Skip to main content Accesibility Help
×
×
Home

Relative validity of the pre-coded food diary used in the Danish National Survey of Diet and Physical Activity

  • Vibeke K Knudsen (a1), Maj-Britt Gille (a1), Trine H Nielsen (a1), Tue Christensen (a1), Sisse Fagt (a1) and Anja Biltoft-Jensen (a1)...
Abstract
Objective

To determine the relative validity of the pre-coded food diary applied in the Danish National Survey of Dietary Habits and Physical Activity.

Design

A cross-over study among seventy-two adults (aged 20 to 69 years) recording diet by means of a pre-coded food diary over 4 d and a 4 d weighed food record. Intakes of foods and drinks were estimated, and nutrient intakes were calculated. Means and medians of intake were compared, and cross-classification of individuals according to intake was performed. To assess agreement between the two methods, Pearson and Spearman's correlation coefficients and weighted kappa coefficients were calculated.

Setting

Validation study of the pre-coded food diary against a 4 d weighed food record.

Subjects

Seventy-two volunteer, healthy free-living adults (thirty-five males, thirty-seven females).

Results

Intakes of cereals and vegetables were higher, and intakes of fruit, coffee and tea were lower, in the weighed food record compared with the food diary. Intakes of nutrients were grossly the same in the two methods, except for protein, where a higher intake was recorded in the weighed record. In general, moderate agreement between the two methods was found.

Conclusions

Participants were classified moderately correct according to food and nutrient intakes assessed in the pre-coded food diary; however values of absolute food intakes should be used and interpreted with caution. Improvement of the methods to estimate portion size may increase the accuracy of the dietary intake estimates.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Relative validity of the pre-coded food diary used in the Danish National Survey of Diet and Physical Activity
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Relative validity of the pre-coded food diary used in the Danish National Survey of Diet and Physical Activity
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Relative validity of the pre-coded food diary used in the Danish National Survey of Diet and Physical Activity
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: Email vkkn@food.dtu.dk
References
Hide All
1.Groth, MV & Fagt, S (1997) Danskernes kostvaner 1995. Teknisk rapport 1. Undersøgelsens tilrettelæggelse, gennemførelse og datakvalitet (Dietary Habits in Denmark 1995. Technical Report 1). Søborg, Denmark: Levnedsmiddelstyrelsen.
2.Fagt, S, Matthiessen, J, Biltoft-Jensen, A et al. (2004) Udviklingen i danskernes kost 1985–2001. Med fokus på sukker og alkohol samt motivation og barrierer for sund livsstil (Trends in Danish Dietary Habits 1985–2001). Søborg, Denmark: Danmarks Fødevare- og Veterinærforskning.
3.Lyhne, N, Groth, MV, Christensen, T et al. (2005) Danskernes kostvaner 2000–2002. Hovedresultater (Dietary Habits in Denmark 2000–2002. Main Results). Søborg, Denmark: Danmarks Fødevareforskning.
4.Rasmussen, LB, Matthiessen, J, Biltoft-Jensen, A et al. (2007) Characteristics of misreporters of dietary intake and physical activity. Public Health Nutr 10, 230237.
5.Biltoft-Jensen, A, Groth, MV, Matthiessen, J et al. (2009) Diet quality: associations with health messages included in the Danish Dietary Guidelines 2005, personal attitudes and social factors. Public Health Nutr 12, 11651173.
6.Biltoft-Jensen, A, Matthiessen, J, Rasmussen, LB et al. (2009) Validation of the Danish 7-day pre-coded food diary among adults: energy intake v. energy expenditure and recording length. Br J Nutr 102, 18381846.
7.Masson, LF, McNeill, G, Tomany, JO et al. (2003) Statistical approaches for assessing the relative validity of a food-frequency questionnaire: use of correlation coefficients and the kappa statistic. Public Health Nutr 6, 313321.
8.Landis, JR & Koch, GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33, 159174.
9.SAS Institute Inc. (2006) SAS Enterprise Guide version 4·1. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
10.Palaniappan, U, Cue, RI, Payette, H et al. (2003) Implications of day-to-day variability on measurements of usual food and nutrient intakes. J Nutr 133, 232235.
11.Watson, JF, Collins, CE, Sibbritt, DW et al. (2009) Reproducibility and comparative validity of a food frequency questionnaire for Australian children and adolescents. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 6, 62.
12.Hong, TK, Dibley, MJ & Sibbritt, D (2010) Validity and reliability of an FFQ for use with adolescents in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Public Health Nutr 13, 368375.
13.Vereecken, CA, Covents, M, Matthys, C et al. (2005) Young adolescents’ nutrition assessment on computer (YANA-C). Eur J Clin Nutr 59, 658667.
14.Koebnick, C, Wagner, K, Thielecke, F et al. (2005) An easy-to-use semiquantitative food record validated for energy intake by using doubly labelled water technique. Eur J Clin Nutr 59, 989995.
15.Nydahl, M, Gustafsson, IB, Mohsen, R et al. (2009) Comparison between optical readable and open-ended weighed food records. Food Nutr Res 53, 10.3402/fnr.v53i0.1889.
16.Brunner, E, Stallone, D, Juneja, M et al. (2001) Dietary assessment in Whitehall II: comparison of 7 d diet diary and food-frequency questionnaire and validity against biomarkers. Br J Nutr 86, 405414.
17.Andersen, LF, Pollestad, ML, Jacobs, DR Jr et al. (2005) Validation of a pre-coded food diary used among 13-year-olds: comparison of energy intake with energy expenditure. Public Health Nutr 8, 13151321.
18.Lillegaard, IT, Loken, EB & Andersen, LF (2007) Relative validation of a pre-coded food diary among children, under-reporting varies with reporting day and time of the day. Eur J Clin Nutr 61, 6168.
19.Luhrmann, PM, Herbert, BM, Gaster, C et al. (1999) Validation of a self-administered 3-day estimated dietary record for use in the elderly. Eur J Nutr 38, 235240.
20.Braddon, FE, Wadsworth, ME, Davies, JM et al. (1988) Social and regional differences in food and alcohol consumption and their measurement in a national birth cohort. J Epidemiol Community Health 42, 341349.
21.Bingham, SA, Gill, C, Welch, A et al. (1997) Validation of dietary assessment methods in the UK arm of EPIC using weighed records, and 24-hour urinary nitrogen and potassium and serum vitamin C and carotenoids as biomarkers. Int J Epidemiol 26, Suppl. 1, S137S151.
22.Gariballa, SE & Forster, SJ (2008) Dietary intake of older patients in hospital and at home: the validity of patient kept food diaries. J Nutr Health Aging 12, 102106.
23.Carlsen, MH, Lillegaard, IT, Karlsen, A et al. (2010) Evaluation of energy and dietary intake estimates from a food frequency questionnaire using independent energy expenditure measurement and weighed food records. Nutr J 9, 37.
24.Willett, WC & Hu, FB (2007) The food frequency questionnaire. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 16, 182183.
25.Biro, G, Hulshof, KF, Ovesen, L et al. (2002) Selection of methodology to assess food intake. Eur J Clin Nutr 56, Suppl. 2, S25S32.
26.Heitmann, BL & Lissner, L (1995) Dietary underreporting by obese individuals – is it specific or non-specific? BMJ 311, 986989.
27.Lafay, L, Mennen, L, Basdevant, A et al. (2000) Does energy intake underreporting involve all kinds of food or only specific food items? Results from the Fleurbaix Laventie Ville Sante (FLVS) study. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 24, 15001506.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Public Health Nutrition
  • ISSN: 1368-9800
  • EISSN: 1475-2727
  • URL: /core/journals/public-health-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed