Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-8p85h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-13T03:15:02.936Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The rise and fall of dietetics and of nutrition science, 4000 BCE–2000 CE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2007

Geoffrey Cannon
Geoffrey Cannon*
Affiliation:
World Health Policy, Forum, Juiz de Fora, Brazil
*
*Corresponding author: Email geoffreycannon@aol.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.
Objective

To outline the history of dietetics since its beginnings in recorded history, and of nutrition science in its first phase beginning in the mid-nineteenth century and then its second phase in the second half of the twentieth century.

Method

Three narrative overviews: of dietetics from its beginnings until after the end of the mediaeval and then Renaissance periods in Europe; of nutrition science in its first phase from its beginnings in the mid-nineteenth century until the middle of the twentieth century, with reasons for its rise; and of nutrition science in its second phase in the second half of the twentieth century, with reasons for its decline.

Conclusions

In its third phase in the twenty-first century, the new nutrition science should regain much of the vision and scope of its preceding disciplines.

Keywords

History of dieteticsHistory of nutrition science

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Public Health Nutrition , Volume 8 , Issue 6a , September 2005 , pp. 701 - 705
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2005

References

1Darby, W, Ghaliongi, P, Grivettill, P. Food, the Gift of Osiris. London: Academic Press, 1977.Google Scholar
2Estes, J. Food as medicine. In: Kiple, K, Ornelas, K, eds. The Cambridge World History of Food. Cambridge: University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
3Hutchison, R. The history of dietetics. In: Mottram, V, Graham, G, eds. Hutchison's Food and the Principles of Dietetics, 9th ed. London: Edward Arnold, 1944 [originally published in The Practitioner, 01 1934].Google Scholar
4Drummond, J, Wilbraham, A. The Englishman's Food. Five Centuries of English Diet. London: Pimlico, 1991 [first published in London: Jonathan Cape, 1939].Google Scholar
5Lovejoy, A. The Great Chain of Being. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001 [originally published 1936].Google Scholar
6Schmid, R. Traditional Foods Are Your Best Medicine. New York: Ballantine, 1987.Google Scholar
7Robbins, R. The Food Revolution. How Your Diet Can Help Save Your Life and the World. Boston, MA: Conari, 2001.Google Scholar
8Brock, W. Justus von Liebig. The Chemical Gatekeeper. Cambridge: University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
9Beaudry, M. Think globally, act locally. Do dietitians have a role to play in alleviating hunger in the world?. Journal of Canadian Dietetic Association 1985; 46(1): 19–27.Google Scholar
10Kirschke, M. Liebig, his university professor Karl Wilhelm Gottlob Kastner (1783–1857) and his problematic relation with romantic natural philosophy. Ambix 2003; 50(1): 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Latour, B. War and peace of microbes [Part One]. In: The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press,1988 [first published in Paris: Editions Métailié, 1984].Google Scholar
12Cannon, G. The Fate of Nations. London: Caroline Walker Trust, 2003. Obtainable from the author at Google Scholar
13Engels, F. The Condition of the Working Class in England. London: Penguin, 1987 [originally published in German, 1845].Google Scholar
14Hobsbawm, E. Revolutionary prelude [Part 1]. In: The Age of Capital: 1848–1875. London: Abacus, 2003 [originally published in London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1975].Google Scholar
15Wynter, A. Our Social Bees. London: 1861.Google Scholar
16Fogel, R. Economic growth, population theory and physiology: the bearing of long-term processes on the making of economic policy. American Economic Review 1994; 84: 369–95.Google Scholar
17Orr, J. Foreword to second edition. In: Food Health and Income. London: Macmillan, 1937.Google Scholar
18Medawar, P. An essay on scians. In: The Limits of Science. Oxford: University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
19Cannon, G. Food and Health: The Experts Agree. London: Consumers' Association, 1993.Google Scholar
20World Health Organization (WHO). Diet, Nutrition and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases. Report of a Joint WHO/Food and Agriculture Organization Expert Consultation. Technical Report Series No. 916. Geneva: WHO, 2003.Google Scholar
21Acheson, D. Food policy, nutrition and government [10th Boyd Orr lecture]. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 1986; 45: 131–8.Google ScholarPubMed
22Cannon, G. Unconquered epidemics [Chapter 3]. In: Superbug. London: Virgin, 1995.Google Scholar
23Smith, D. A case of Parturiunt Montes, Nascitur Ridiculus Mus? The BMA nutrition committee 1947–1950 and the political disengagement of nutrition science. Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 2004; 59(2): 240–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24Walker, C, Cannon, G. The story of the food scandal. In: The Food Scandal enlarged paperback ed. London: Century, 1985.Google Scholar
25Cannon, G. Science, government and industry. The system [Chapter 6]. In: The Politics of Food. London: Century, 1987.Google Scholar
26Lacey, R. Mad Cow Disease. The History of BSE in Britain. Jersey: Cypsela, 1994.Google Scholar
27Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)/World Health Organization. International Conference on Nutrition. World Declaration and Plan of Action. Rome: FAO, 1992.Google Scholar
28Stiglitz, J. Broken promises [Chapter 2]. In: Globalization and Its Discontents. London: Allen, 2002.Google Scholar
29British Medical Association (BMA). Report of the Committee on Nutrition. London: BMA, 1950.Google Scholar
30Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. Manual of Nutrition, 6th ed. London: HMSO, 1961 [reprinted 1966].Google Scholar
31World Health Organization (WHO). Diet, Nutrition and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases. Report of a WHO Study Group. Technical Report Series No. 797. Geneva: WHO, 1990.Google Scholar
32McLaren, D. The great protein fiasco. Lancet 1974; ii: 93–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33Lang, T. Food industrialization and food power: implications for food governance. Development Policy Review 2003; 21(5): 555–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34Cannon, G. Why the Bush administration and the global sugar industry are determined to demolish the 2004 WHO global strategy on diet, physical activity and health. Public Health Nutrition 2004; 7(3): 369–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35National Institutes of Health (NIH). Clinical Guidelines for the Identification, Evaluation and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults: The Evidence Report. NIH Publication, 98–4083. Washington, DC: NIH, 1998.Google Scholar
36 US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Global Health Affairs. Letter to the Directors-General of WHO and FAO, received 5 01 2005 [unpublished].Google Scholar
37Fuller, S. The pilgrimage from Plato to Nato [Chapter 1]. In: Thomas Kuhn. A Philosophical History for Our Times. Chicago, IL: University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
38Bok, D. Scientific research [Chapter 5]. In: Universities in the Marketplace. The Commercialization of Higher Education. Princeton, NJ: University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
39Proctor, S. Cancer Wars. How Politics Shapes What We Know and Don't Know about Cancer. New York: Basic Books, 1995.Google Scholar
40Nestle, M. Working the system [Part 2]. In: Food Politics. How the Food Industry Influences Nutrition and Health. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2002.Google Scholar
41Shrimpton, R. Evidence v. rights-based decision making for nutrition. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 2003; 62: 553–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42George, S. How the Other Half Dies. The Real Reasons for World Hunger. London: Penguin, 1975.Google Scholar
43Oxfam, . Rigged Rules and Double Standards. Trade, Globalization and the Fight against Poverty. Oxford: Oxfam, 2002.Google Scholar