Skip to main content
×
Home

The role of foreign direct investment in the nutrition transition

  • Corinna Hawkes (a1)
Abstract
AbstractObjective

To examine the role of foreign direct investment (FDI) in the nutrition transition, focusing on highly processed foods.

Design

Data on FDI were identified from reports/databases and then compiled and analysed. A review of published literature on FDI into the food sector was conducted.

Setting

The nutrition transition is a public health concern owing to its connection with the rising burden of obesity and diet-related chronic diseases in developing countries. Global health leaders are calling for action to address the threat. Highly processed foods often have considerable fat, sugar and salt content, and warrant closer examination.

Results

FDI into food processing, service and retail has risen rapidly since the 1980s, mainly from transnational food companies (TFCs) in developed countries. As FDI has risen, so has the proportion invested in highly processed foods for sale in the host market. FDI has proved more effective than trade in generating sales of highly processed foods, and enables TFCs to cut costs, gain market power and obtain efficiencies in distribution and marketing. The amount of FDI targeted at developing countries is increasing; while a disproportionate share enters the larger developing economies, foreign affiliates of TFCs are among the largest companies in low- and low- to middle-income countries. The effect of FDI is to make more highly processed foods available to more people. FDI has made it possible to lower prices, open up new purchasing channels, optimise the effectiveness of marketing and advertising, and increase sales.

Conclusion

FDI has been a key mechanism in shaping the global market for highly processed foods. Notwithstanding the role of demand-side factors, it has played a role in the nutrition transition by enabling and promoting the consumption of these foods in developing countries. Empirical data on consumption patterns of highly processed foods in developing countries are critically needed, but since FDI is a long-term investment vehicle, it is reasonable to assume that availability and consumption of highly processed foods will continue to increase. FDI can, however, bring considerable benefits as well as risks. Through its position ‘upstream’, FDI would therefore be an appropriate entry-point to implement a range of public health policies to ‘redirect’ the nutrition transition.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      The role of foreign direct investment in the nutrition transition
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      The role of foreign direct investment in the nutrition transition
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      The role of foreign direct investment in the nutrition transition
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: Email c.hawkes@cgiar.org
References
Hide All
1Popkin BM. The nutrition transition and its health implications in lower income countries. Public Health (Nutrition) 1998; 1: 521.
2Popkin BM. An overview of the nutrition transition and its health implications: The Bellagio Meeting. Public Health Nutrition 2002; 5(1A): 93103.
3World Health Organization. Global Strategy on Diet, Physical Activity and Health, 05 2004. Available at http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/strategy/eb11344/en/
4Haddad L. Redirecting the nutrition transition: what can food policy do?. Development Policy Review 2003; 21: 599614.
5Ruel MT, Haddad L, Garrett JL. Some urban facts of life: implications for research and policy. World Development 1999; 27: 1917–38.
6Hawkes C. Marketing activities of global soft drink and fast food companies in emerging markets: a review. In: Globalization, Diets and Noncommunicable Diseases. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2002. Available at http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/9241590416.pdf
7Chopra M, Darnton-Hill I. Tobacco and obesity epidemics: not so different after all?. British Medical Journal 2004; 328: 1558–60.
8United Nations Standing Committee on Nutrition (UN SCN). 5th Report on the World Nutrition Situation: Nutrition for Improved Development Outcomes. Geneva: UN SCN, 2004.
9Gilmore AB, McKee M. Tobacco and transition: an overview of industry investments, impact and influence in the former Soviet Union. Tobacco Control 2004; 13: 136–42.
10Bolling C, Somwaru A. US food companies access foreign markets through direct investment. Food Review 2001; 24: 23–8.
11Mody A. Is FDI integrating the world economy?. The World Economy 2004; 27: 1195–222.
12United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). World Investment Report 2003. FDI Policies for Development: National and International Perspectives. Geneva: UNCTAD, 2003.
13Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Foreign Direct Investment, Development and Corporate Responsibility. Paris: OECD, 2000.
14United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). Largest Transnational Corporations, 2004. Available at http://www.unctad.org/Templates/Page.asp?intItemID=2443&lang=1
15United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America & the Caribbean (UN ECLAC). Foreign Investment in Latin America and the Caribbean. Chile: UN ECLAC, 2003.
16United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). World Investment Directory, 2004. Available at http://www.unctad.org/Templates/Page.asp?intItemID=3204&lang=1
17Mattson J, Koo WW. US Processed Food Exports and Foreign Direct Investment in the Western Hemisphere. Fargo, ND: North Dakota State University, 2002.
18Tullao TS. The impact of economic globalization on NCDs: opportunities and threats. In: Globalization, Diets and Noncommunicable Diseases. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2002; Available at http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/9241590416.pdf
19Whitton C. Processed Agricultural Exports Led Gains in US Agricultural Exports Between 1976 and 2002. Electronic Output Report FAU-85-01. Washington, DC: Economic Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, 2004.
20Bolling C, Neff S, Handy C. US Foreign Direct Investment in the Western Hemisphere Processed Food Industry. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture, 1998.
21Bolling C. Appendix 4: Foreign direct investment in the global processed food industries. In: Burfisher ME, Jones EA, eds. Regional Trade Agreements and US Agriculture Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture, 1998.
22Gow HR, Swinnen JFM. Impact of foreign direct investment on agriculture and agro-industry in transition economies. In: Csaki C, Lerman Z, eds. Structural Change in the Farming Sectors in Central and Eastern Europe. World Bank Technical Paper No. 465. Washington DC: World Bank, 2000.
23Jansik C. Foreign Direct Investment in the Food Processing of the Baltic Countries. Economic Research Report 250. Helsinki: Taloustukimus (MTTL), 2001.
24Walkenhorst P. The geography of foreign direct investment in Poland's food industry. Journal of Agricultural Economics 2001; 52: 7186.
25Wei A, Cacho J. Competition among foreign and Chinese agro-food enterprises in the process of globalization. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 2001; 2: 437–51.
26Yenal NZ. Food TNCs, intellectual property investments and Post-Fordist food consumption: the case of Unilever and Nestlé in Turkey. International Journal of the Sociology of Agriculture and Food 1999; 8: 2134.
27Bolling C, Elizalde JC, Handy C. US firms invest in Mexico's processed food industry. Food Review 1999; 22: 2630.
28Reardon T, Timmer CP, Barrett CB, Berdegué J. The rise of supermarkets in Africa, Asia, and Latin America. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 2003; 85: 1140–6.
29Reardon T, Swinnen JFM. Agrifood sector liberalisation and the rise of supermarkets in former state-controlled economies: a comparative overview. Development Policy Review 2004; 22: 515–23.
30Reardon TBerdegué JA. The rapid rise of supermarkets in Latin America: challenges and opportunities for development. Development Policy Review 2002; 20: 371–88.
31Dries L, Reardon T, Swinnen JFM. The rapid rise of supermarkets in Central and Eastern Europe: implications for the agrifood sector and rural development. Development Policy Review 2004; 22: 525–56.
32Harris JM, Kaufman PR, Martinez SW, Price C. The US Food Marketing System, 2002. Agricultural Economic Report No. 811. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture, 2002.
33US International Trade Commission. Processed Foods and Beverages: A Description of Tariff and Non-Tariff Barriers for Major Products and their Impact on Trade: Vol. 1. Washington, DC: US Trade Commission, 2001.
34Pritchard B, Fagan R. Circuits of capital and transnational corporate spatial behaviour: Nestlé in Southeast Asia. International Journal of Sociology of Food and Agriculture 1999; 8: 320.
35Chavez M. The transformation of Mexican retailing with NAFTA. Development Policy Review 2002; 20: 503–13.
36Bolling C. Globalization of the soft drink industry. Agricultural Outlook 2002; 297: 25–7.
37Jansik C. The path of Baltic food industries towards the EU. Economic Trends (Finland) 2003; 2: 30–3.
38Gehlhar M. Shaping the global market for high-value foods. Agricultural Outlook 2002; 297: 3842.
39Plummer C, Makki S. French fries driving globalization of frozen potato industry. Agricultural Outlook 2002; 295: 811.
40Lanclos DK, Devadoss S, Guenthner J. Impacts of foreign direct investment and advertising on the export demand for US frozen potatoes. Agribusiness 1997; 13: 273–84.
41Farina EMMQ. Challenges for Brazil's food industry in the context of globalization and Mercosur consolidation. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 2001; 2: 315–30.
42Ghezán D, Mateos M, Viteri L. Impact of supermarkets and fast-food chains on horticulture supply chains in Argentina. Development Policy Review 2002; 20: 389408.
43Watson JL, ed. Golden Arches East: McDonald's in East Asia. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1997.
44Drewnowski A, Popkin BM. The nutrition transition: new trends in the global diet. Nutrition Reviews 1997; 55: 3143.
45Popkin BM, Nielsen SJ. The sweetening of the world's diet. Obesity Research 2003; 11: 1325–32.
46Bettcher D, Subramaniam C, Guidon E, Perucic A-M, Soll L, Grabman G. Confronting the Tobacco Epidemic in an Era of Trade Liberalization. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2003.
47Caraher M, Coveney J. Public health nutrition and food policy. Public Health Nutrition 2004; 7: 591–8.
48Hawkes C. The Global Regulatory Environment around Marketing Food to Children. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2004.
49Hawkes C. The Global Regulatory Environment around Nutrition Labels and Health Claims. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2004.
50Hooker NH, Caswell JA. Trends in food quality regulation: implications for processed food trade and foreign direct investment. Agribusiness 1996; 12: 411–9.
51BBC News. Coca-Cola makes Somalia return. Available at http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/3865595.stm
52Lang T, Heasman M. Diet and nutrition policy: a clash of ideas or investment? Development 2004; 47: 6474.
53United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). World Investment Report 1999. Foreign Direct Investment and the Challenge of Developments. Geneva: UNCTAD, 2003.
54South Centre. Foreign Direct Investment, Development and the New Global Economic Order. Geneva: South Centre, 2000.
55Doane D, Greenhill R, Oram J, Pettifor A, Simms A. Chasing Shadows: Re-imagining Finance for Development. London: New Economics Foundations, 2002.
56Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Policies to Enhance Sustainable Development. Paris: OECD, 2001.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Public Health Nutrition
  • ISSN: 1368-9800
  • EISSN: 1475-2727
  • URL: /core/journals/public-health-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 805 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1418 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 12th December 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.