Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-h8lrw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-15T07:18:11.071Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

School snacks decrease morbidity in Kenyan schoolchildren: a cluster randomized, controlled feeding intervention trial

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2013

Charlotte G Neumann*
Affiliation:
Departments of Community Health Sciences and Pediatrics, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Fielding School of Public Health and Geffen School of Medicine, PO Box 951772, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1772, USA
Nimrod O Bwibo
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya
Luohua Jiang
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Rural Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA Department of Biostatistics, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Robert E Weiss
Affiliation:
Department of Biostatistics, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA
*
*Corresponding author: Email cneumann@ucla.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

To examine the effects of three different school snacks on morbidity outcomes.

Design

Twelve schools were randomized to either one of three feeding groups or a Control group. There were three schools per group in this cluster randomized trial. Children in feeding group schools received school snacks of a local plant-based dish, githeri, with meat, milk or extra oil added. The oil used was later found to be fortified with retinol. Physical status, food intake and morbidity outcomes were assessed longitudinally over two years.

Setting

Rural Embu District, Kenya, an area with high prevalence of vitamin A deficiency.

Subjects

Standard 1 schoolchildren (n 902; analytic sample) enrolled in two cohorts from the same schools one year apart.

Results

The Meat and Plain Githeri (i.e. githeri + oil) groups showed the greatest declines in the probability of a morbidity outcome (PMO) for total and severe illnesses, malaria, poor appetite, reduced activity, fever and chills. The Meat group showed significantly greater declines in PMO for gastroenteritis (mainly diarrhoea) and typhoid compared with the Control group, for jaundice compared with the Plain Githeri group, and for skin infection compared with the Milk group. The Milk group showed the greatest decline in PMO for upper respiratory infection. For nearly all morbidity outcomes the Control group had the highest PMO and the least decline over time.

Conclusions

The intervention study showed beneficial effects of both animal-source foods and of vitamin A-fortified oil on morbidity status.

Information

Type
HOT TOPIC – Nutrition in low and middle income countries
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2013 
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Trial profile

Figure 1

Table 1 Nutrient content of school snacks†

Figure 2

Table 2 Morbidity outcome variables

Figure 3

Table 3 Baseline characteristics by study group (Cohorts I and II combined)

Figure 4

Table 4 Baseline daily nutrient intakes by study group (Cohorts I and II combined)

Figure 5

Table 5 Baseline prevalence of anaemia and selected low micronutrient values by study group (Cohort I)†

Figure 6

Table 6 Baseline frequency of morbidity outcomes for all groups combined and by study group

Figure 7

Table 7 Parameter estimates by age and gender (boy) for baseline morbidity outcomes

Figure 8

Fig. 2 Estimated trends of gastroenteritis (mainly diarrhoea) over time (for boys at median age of 7·22 years old) according to study group (——, Control; – – –, Plain Githeri; — -—, Meat; ---, Milk)

Figure 9

Fig. 3 Estimated trends of malaria over time (for boys at median age of 7·22 years old) according to study group (——, Control; – – –, Plain Githeri; — -—, Meat; ---, Milk)

Figure 10

Fig. 4 Estimated trends of upper respiratory infection over time (for boys at median age of 7·22 years old) according to study group (——, Control; – – –, Plain Githeri; — -—, Meat; ---, Milk)

Figure 11

Table 8 Slope estimates (time in months) on logit scale for morbidities by intervention group

Figure 12

Table 9 Pairwise comparisons of slopes between intervention groups for selected morbidity outcomes

Figure 13

Table 10 Summary of statistically significant changes in slopes for probability of morbidity outcomes