Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-5c569c448b-s84wp Total loading time: 0.767 Render date: 2022-07-05T16:04:15.088Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Sociodemographic determinants of diet quality of the EU elderly: a comparative analysis in four countries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 May 2013

Xavier Irz*
Economic Research Unit, MTT Agrifood Research Finland, Latokartanonkaari 9, 00790 Helsinki, Finland
Laura Fratiglioni
Karolinska Institutet and Aging Research Center, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
Nataliya Kuosmanen
Economic Research Unit, MTT Agrifood Research Finland, Latokartanonkaari 9, 00790 Helsinki, Finland
Mario Mazzocchi
Department of Statistics, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
Lucia Modugno
Department of Statistics, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
Giuseppe Nocella
Department of Food Economics and Marketing, University of Reading, Reading, UK
Behnaz Shakersain
Karolinska Institutet and Aging Research Center, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
W Bruce Traill
Department of Food Economics and Marketing, University of Reading, Reading, UK
Weili Xu
Karolinska Institutet and Aging Research Center, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
Giacomo Zanello
Department of Food Economics and Marketing, University of Reading, Reading, UK
*Corresponding author: Email
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]



To investigate the sociodemographic determinants of diet quality of the elderly in four EU countries.


Cross-sectional study. For each country, a regression was performed of a multidimensional index of dietary quality v. sociodemographic variables.


In Finland, Finnish Household Budget Survey (1998 and 2006); in Sweden, SNAC-K (2001–2004); in the UK, Expenditure & Food Survey (2006–07); in Italy, Multi-purpose Survey of Daily Life (2009).


One- and two-person households of over-50s (Finland, n 2994; UK, n 4749); over-50 s living alone or in two-person households (Italy, n 7564); over-60 s (Sweden, n 2023).


Diet quality among the EU elderly is both low on average and heterogeneous across individuals. The regression models explained a small but significant part of the observed heterogeneity in diet quality. Resource availability was associated with diet quality either negatively (Finland and UK) or in a non-linear or non-statistically significant manner (Italy and Sweden), as was the preference for food parameter. Education, not living alone and female gender were characteristics positively associated with diet quality with consistency across the four countries, unlike socio-professional status, age and seasonality. Regional differences within countries persisted even after controlling for the other sociodemographic variables.


Poor dietary choices among the EU elderly were not caused by insufficient resources and informational measures could be successful in promoting healthy eating for healthy ageing. On the other hand, food habits appeared largely set in the latter part of life, with age and retirement having little influence on the healthiness of dietary choices.

Special groups
Copyright © The Authors 2013 

It is now well established that the EU population is ageing, which creates important challenges for the functioning of public services and raises fundamental questions about the evolution of human welfare. A few figures help appreciate the magnitude and speed of the changes ahead. Eurostat forecasts that the proportion of the EU population over the age of 65 years (80 years) will increase steadily from 16·0 % (4·1 %) in 2010 to 27·8 % (10·1 %) in 2050Reference Lanzieri (1) . Meanwhile, the demographic projections of the ANCIEN project of the EU Seventh Framework Programme suggest that life expectancy at age 65 years will increase by about 3 years from 2008 to 2040Reference Bonneux, Van der Gaag and Bijwaard (2) .Footnote The problems that this evolution entails for the funding of pensions, organisation of social care and funding of health services are well known, but there also concerns that longer lives can have grim consequences for the elderly themselves, with prolonged periods of disability, functional limitations, ailments and/or vegetative existence before death. As a result, healthy ageing, defined as the prevention of diseases as well as the delaying of the deterioration of health status, has become a key objective of European public health policy.

Although the question of whether people in the industrial world are living not only longer but also better remains open,Footnote science has now clearly established that ageing processes are fortunately modifiable (4) . In particular, evidence is accumulating that nutrition interacts with the ageing process in numerous ways and it is therefore believed that healthy eating can be used to slow functional declines and the onset of age-related chronic diseasesReference Christensen, Doblhammer and Rau (5) . However, in addition to robust scientific assessment of the nutrition–ageing relationship, effective nutritional policy for healthy ageing requires a clear understanding of what is driving the elderly to adopt particular diets and what can be done at population or individual level to increase the healthiness of those diets.

Although these questions have been the subject of some research, a literature review indicates some important gaps in knowledge: only a small number of studies have investigated the EU elderly specifically and, while research so far has identified a large number of potential drivers of diet quality and food choices among the elderly, the influence of each factor is rarely quantified and identified ceteris paribus. This makes interpretation of the observed associations difficult because of possible confounding and, as a result, the fundamental barriers to the adoption of healthy diets remain unclear. For instance, an unconditional positive association between income and diet quality cannot establish whether poor diets are driven by a lack of resources or limited education, as the latter is strongly correlated with the former. While recognising the merits of unconditional analysis for targeting policiesReference Shankar, Srinivasan and Irz (7) , we believe that the conditional approach that we follow brings more insights for the design of policies to promote healthy eating (e.g. choice of income transfer v. informational campaign).

Against this background, the present paper analyses the economic, social and demographic determinants of diet quality among elderly individuals in four EU countries, namely the UK, Italy, Sweden and Finland.

Materials and methods

Index of dietary quality

Although many studies have investigated the determinants of diet quality by focusing on a single dietary component (e.g. saturated fat, fruit and vegetable intake), a more holistic approach considering the entire diet seems preferable in order to guide policyReference Thiele, Mensik and Beitz (8) . Multidimensional indices of diet quality have therefore been developed, with a large number of variants reflecting somewhat arbitrary choices regarding the foods and nutrients included and the aggregation procedure (e.g. cut-off values, scoring methods) as described in the detailed reviews of KantReference Kant (9) and Waijers et al.Reference Waijers, Feskens and Ocké (10) . The choice of index is difficult as none has been shown to be more strongly associated with health outcomesReference Waijers, Feskens and Ocké (10) , but four original indices (Healthy Eating Index, Diet Quality Index (DQI), Mediterranean Diet Score, Healthy Eating Indicator) have been validated and used most extensively. Ultimately, based on these reviews, data availability and the objective of ensuring consistency across the country data sets, the DQI of Patterson et al.Reference Patterson, Haines and Popkin (11) was selected. As our investigation was part of the large EU-funded NU-AGE project on healthy ageing, this choice was also discussed and agreed within the project with experts in nutrition of the elderly. The following important modifications were then made to the original DQI.

  1. 1. For each of its components, the original DQI takes only integer values of 0, 1 and 2. This creates arbitrary discontinuities and we therefore preferred to build each component as a continuous piece-wise linear function between the minimum value, set at 0, and the maximum value, set at 10.

  2. 2. The original DQI was based on the US nutritional recommendations, which do not suit the European context. It was therefore adjusted in view of the Finnish Nutritional Recommendations.Footnote *

Table 1 describes the specific criteria used to define the bounds of the eight components of the DQI, which covers intakes of macronutrients (total fat, saturated fat, protein and carbohydrate), cholesterol, minerals (sodium and calcium) and fruits and vegetables. The score takes a value between 0 and 80.

Table 1 Diet quality indices

E%, percentage of energy; DRI, Dietary Reference Intake.

The Italian data set only provides a dietary record at a high level of product aggregation. This information is not detailed enough to allow calculation of some of the components of the DQI focusing on micronutrients (e.g. calcium). Hence, the alternative Recommendation Compliance Index (RCI) of Mazzocchi et al.Reference Mazzocchi, Brasili and Sandri (12) was used to measure diet quality on the Italian data, as this index is based on relative dietary composition (e.g. shares of energy intake from various nutrients) and its distance from the recommended WHO diet. While this complicates the comparison of results across countries, a check on the UK data that allows computation of both indices indicated a significant and high degree of correlation between RCI and DQI scores.Footnote


A data mapping exercise covering the four countries as well as the EU was carried out in order to identify secondary data sets suitable for the analysis. The key selection criteria included the number of observations specifically on older individuals, year of collection, comprehensiveness of the food and nutrient intake data, and extensiveness of the socio-economic information collected. On that basis, we selected the four data sets described succinctly in Table 2. With one exception in the case of Sweden, the data were not derived from surveys targeting the elderly specifically and it was therefore necessary to define a minimum age of eligible individuals. Although the traditional definition of the elderly sets an age limit of 65 years, we decided to lower that limit to 50 years to provide a basis for comparison of elderly and non-elderly households/individuals. Another reason for this age limit was that we also wanted to understand the potential impact of retirement on food choices and diet quality, which requires data on both retired and active individuals.Footnote * A broader age bracket also allowed us to better appreciate the impact of ageing on diet quality, while giving us larger samples.Footnote For Finland and the UK, the data recorded information at the level of the household rather than the individual and, in those cases, only one- and two-person households formed of individuals over the age limit were selected.Footnote In order to improve consistency, individual data taken from the Italian data set only included those aged above 50 years who lived alone or in two-person households. Finally, in order to limit the influence of outliers on the results, observations with extreme values for the eight nutrient (or food) intakes entering the DQI were excluded by removing the 1 % tail of the distribution on each side.

Table 2 Characteristics of the four data sets

Multivariate regression analysis

Given the high level of correlation among sociodemographic variables (e.g. education and income), multivariate regression models were used to quantify the association of each variable to diet quality ceteris paribus. Further, a common model was defined for the four samples in order to maximise comparability of results and ease of interpretation. The exact selection of explanatory variables was guided by existing literature as well as availability of particular data in the four samples, resulting in the model defined in the left column of Table 3. Some important remarks are in order.

  1. 1. Although resource availability is often mentioned as a key driver of the food choices of the elderly, constructing a related variable for empirical analysis raises several difficulties. Income is not particularly appropriate to measure the resources available for consumption because pensioners often fund their expenses from savings. Meanwhile, the food budget is itself endogenous in the sense that it results from a choice, so that regression models including that variable may be spurious. Ultimately, resource availability was measured by total consumption expenditure where possible (UK and Finnish samples) with two adjustments. First, in multi-individual households, economies of scale in consumption were accounted for by dividing total household expenditure by the number of consumption units (rather than individuals) as defined by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Footnote § Second, the expenditure variable entered the model in logarithmic terms to accommodate the broad range of the data.

  2. 2. The Italian and Swedish data sets measure financial resources only through answers to qualitative questions, which were included through appropriate dummy variables.Footnote

  3. 3. In the two data sets that measure expenses quantitatively, it was possible to build a preference for food variable defined as the share of total expenditure allocated to food.

  4. 4. The educational levels, referred to as primary, secondary and tertiary in the text, were defined in each country and introduced into the model through two dummy variables (the reference category in Table 3 corresponding to those having achieved at most a primary level of education).

  5. 5. The definition of socio-professional categories varies across countries but the reference group used to build the dummy variables corresponds to pensioners. The Swedish data set differs from the others in that it only covers individuals over the age of 60 years who are almost all pensioners and, in that case, socio-professional category refers to the pre-retirement status.

  6. 6. Household structure is described by a dummy variable distinguishing those living alone from others (the reference category in Table 3 being couples).

  7. 7. The gender dummy in Table 3 takes males as the reference group.

  8. 8. To allow for potentially non-linear relationships, age enters the model through dummies for 5-year age brackets, the reference corresponding to the youngest age group.

  9. 9. Regional and quarterly dummies are also introduced. For the latter, the fourth quarter is taken as reference for comparison.

  10. 10. In the two data sets with repeated cross-sections, a year dummy is also introduced.


On the basis of the calculated index, diet quality of the elderly in the four countries is both relatively poor and heterogeneous. From a maximum achievable score of 80, the mean score in the sample is 50 in Sweden, 36 in Finland and 60 in the UK, with few individuals achieving the maximum score. The distributions of the index in the four samples are in each case wide, indicating that diet quality varies greatly within each population. However, a closer look at the sub-components of the DQI reveals that the nutritional problems underlying the relatively low DQI scores are not necessarily the same across countries. In Finland, excess consumption of salt and saturated fat appears particularly problematic, while underconsumption of fruits and vegetables represents a larger problem in Sweden.

Next, the regression analysis seeks to explain variation in diet quality within each sample by sociodemographic variables. The full regression results are presented in Tables 36 separately for each country. In all four countries, several sociodemographic variables explain diet quality of the elderly in a statistically significant manner, but the overall explanatory power of the models remains modest: the R 2 statistic varies from 4 % for the UK and Italy to 10 % for Sweden and Finland. The low explanatory power of the models, which is not unusual given the cross-sectional nature of the data, could be caused by measurement errors, the omission of important variables or inherent and unobserved heterogeneity (for instance related to tastes). However, we also note that, for all four countries, total energy consumption is much better explained than diet quality. One potential reason is that diet quality affects well-being (i.e. what economists call ‘utility’) only indirectly, while the choice of energy intake, which determines satiation of hunger, has a more direct impact on utility. Previous authors have used a similar argument to explain why models of demand for macronutrients usually perform much better than corresponding models for micronutrientsReference Behrman (13,14) .

Table 3 Determinants of diet quality in the UK

E%, percentage of energy; CHO, carbohydrate; F&V, fruits and vegetables; DQI, Diet Quality Index; CU, consumption unit; ref., reference category.

***Statistically significant at 1% level; **statistically significant at 5% level; *statistically significant at 10% level; coefficients of regional dummy variables not reported.

Table 4 Determinants of diet quality in Italy

E%, percentage of energy; CHO, carbohydrate; F&V, fruits and vegetables; RCI, Recommendation Compliance Index; ref., reference category.

***Statistically significant at 1% level; **statistically significant at 5% level; *statistically significant at 10% level.

Table 5 Determinants of diet quality in Finland

E%, percentage of energy; CHO, carbohydrate; F&V, fruits and vegetables; DQI, Diet Quality Index; CU, consumption unit; ref., reference category.

***Statistically significant at 1% level; **statistically significant at 5% level; *statistically significant at 10% level.

Table 6 Determinants of diet quality in Sweden

E%, percentage of energy; CHO, carbohydrate; F&V, fruits and vegetables; DQI, Diet Quality Index; CU, consumption unit; ref., reference category.

***Statistically significant at 1% level; **statistically significant at 5% level; *statistically significant at 10% level; coefficients of regional dummy variables not reported.

However, we also note similarities across the four countries in the way that each sociodemographic variable associates with diet quality. In the UK and Finland, the coefficient of the variable ‘resource availability’ is significant at the 1 % level but the direction of the effect is unexpected: relatively better-off households adopt, ceteris paribus, diets of relatively poorer quality. The result is explained mainly by a greater share of energy derived from fat and saturated fat and the larger consumption of cholesterol and sodium as total expenditure increases. Those changes influence diet quality negatively and dominate the positive effect of an increase in the consumption of fruits, vegetables and calcium as expenditure rises. For the other two countries, the resource constraint is not found to be significant (Sweden) or monotonically associated with diet quality (Italy) but we note that in both cases, the variable is self-assessed and measured imperfectly.

The variable ‘preference for food’ defined in the previous section is also very significantly and negatively associated with diet quality in the two samples that allow its measurement (corresponding to the UK and Finland). Hence, elderly households that allocate relatively more of their resources to food consumption, holding total expenditure constant, achieve a relatively lower DQI. The explanation lies mainly with a larger share of energy derived from fat and an increase in the consumption of cholesterol as the share of expenditure allocated to food expands. The qualitative variables used to measure resource availability in Italy and Sweden do not permit the construction of a comparable variable measuring the elderly's preference for food.

Next, the association between education and diet quality is investigated. Taking individuals having at most completed primary school as a reference, it is found in all four countries that achieving a tertiary level of education is associated with higher diet quality. In the case of Italy, the result extends to secondary education. Hence, there is evidence that the better-educated elderly make healthier food choices and that the effect is not due to the correlates of education, such as higher income, which are controlled for. Although the exact underlying mechanisms seem different in the four samples, the relatively higher consumption of fruits and vegetables of the more-educated elderly emerges in all four countries and, in the two Nordic countries, the analysis also reveals that education is associated with lower consumption of saturated fat.

The statistical results also establish that, once income and education are controlled for, the socio-professional status of the elderly does not correlate with diet quality in a clear manner. In the UK, active managers adopt relatively healthier diets than pensioners, but there is no statistically significant difference in diet quality between pensioners and the other socio-professional categories (employees, self-employed). Besides, a different relationship is observed in the Italian sample, where managers are found to choose diets of relatively poorer quality than pensioners. For Finland, none of the coefficients of the four dummy variables describing the socio-professional status of the household is significant. The results of the regression models for the Swedish sample are interpreted slightly differently as the socio-professional status describes the situation of the elderly person prior to retirement, with blue collar workers used as the reference group. It is found there that the elderly belonging to the white collar and entrepreneur categories make healthier food choices than those in the blue collar category.

The regression models indicate that in three of the four countries studied, household structure correlates significantly with diet quality: the elderly living alone make relatively less healthy food choices than elderly couples. The result is explained by different aspects of the diets in the three samples, with only the larger consumption of protein by those living alone showing consistency across the three countries. In Sweden, diet quality of those living alone is also found to be relatively poorer, but the effect is small and not statistically significant.

The impact of gender is most easily assessed in the Swedish sample because of the individual (rather than household) nature of the data and it is found that women make healthier food choices than men, the difference in diet quality score between the two groups being both large and statistically significant. This is explained by better nutrition in almost all dimensions of the DQI for women than for men: better macronutrient mix of the energy ingested (relatively more carbohydrate and less fat and saturated fat for women), lower intakes of cholesterol and sodium, as well as greater intakes of fruits and vegetables. The effect of gender is not systematically measurable in the data sets for the UK, Finland, and Italy, but valuable insights can nevertheless be derived by comparing the coefficients of the dummy variables for men living alone and women living alone. In all three cases, and in line with the Swedish results, this comparison leads to the conclusion that men make less healthy food choices than women. The reasons vary but, overall, there is evidence that, relative to men, elderly females tend to consume less protein, cholesterol and sodium while deriving a larger share of their energy from carbohydrate and consuming more fruits and vegetables.

Age is not statistically significant in explaining diet quality in the British, Italian and Swedish samples. In the Finnish case, the relationship with age is not very robust either, as only the coefficient corresponding to the 75–80 years age range is significant, and we can conclude overall a limited influence of age on the healthiness of the food choices made by the elderly.

Tables 36 also provide information about the effect of some general control variables on diet quality. First, in all three countries where the nature of the data permits the analysis of potential regional effects, these are found to be significant. Hence, diets in the northern and eastern regions of Finland are found to be significantly healthier than in the south of the country; in Italy, the analysis indicates relatively better diets in the North-East and Central regions, and relatively more unhealthy food choices among the elderly in the South. In the UK, the diets of the elderly in London, the South-East, West Midlands, Scotland and Northern Ireland are relatively healthier than the diets adopted by the elderly in the North East. Next, the influence of seasonality is not found to be significant in the UK, but in Finland the elderly appear to make food choices of relatively poorer nutritional quality during the fourth quarter of the year. Finally, in an attempt to detect potential structural changes in food preferences among the elderly, the influence of the year of data collection is analysed. In Finland, once accounting for the other sociodemographic variables, no such fundamental difference in diet quality is found between the two rounds of the survey (1998 and 2006). In the UK, the elderly adopt relatively less healthy diets in 2007 than in 2006, but the short time span separating the two rounds of the survey does not allow us to conclude that the difference reflects a fundamental, continuous and worrying evolution.

The robustness of the results has been assessed by estimating different specifications of the model, as reported in the Appendix in the case of the Finnish model. Given the rather unexpected result of a negative relationship between resource availability and diet quality, we used several proxies to measure the former: total consumption expenditure per consumption unit and share of expenditure allocated to food (baseline model); total income per consumption unit (income model); and total expenditure alone (expenditure only model). In addition, the sample was also restricted by raising the age limit of eligible individuals to 65 years (65+ model) and a model controlling for total energy intake per capita was also estimated (energy model). Although the explanatory power of the model varies a great deal across specifications, most results appear robust and, in particular, resource availability is found to affect diet quality negatively for all the variants of the Finnish model. The sensitivity analysis for other countries was less thorough because of data limitations – for instance, there is no income variable in any of the other data sets – but confirmed overall the robustness of the results.

Discussion and conclusion

The finding that the variables resource availability and preference for food either influence diet quality negatively (in the case of the UK and Finland) or in a non-significant or non-linear way (in the case of Italy and Sweden) stands in sharp contrast with the predominant view in the public health literature that many individuals have few options but to make unhealthy food choices because of limited resources. Although not specifically for the elderly, this idea is for instance articulated by Drewnowski and DarmonReference Drewnowski and Darmon (15) , who consider that obesity in the USA is largely an economic issue explained by growing disparities in income, the declining value of the minimum wage and the relatively low price of energy-dense but nutrient-poor foods compared with healthier alternatives. According to that logic, and given that the elderly in industrialised countries tend to have lower incomes and face a greater risk of relative poverty than the rest of the population, one would expect financial resources to influence diet quality positively among the elderly, but our analysis does not support that proposition. Instead, the empirical findings related to the resource availability, preference for food and even education variables appear more consistent with the view that poor diet quality among the elderly represents a ‘challenge of affluence’, as proposed by OfferReference Offer (16) to describe the disorders of self-control and lack of rationality of the choices that accompany growing prosperity.Footnote *

Albeit unexpected, this conclusion is rather encouraging regarding the potential of specific public health policies, as opposed to general economic ones, to improve the nutritional health of the elderly population. In particular, if poor diet quality results from the elderly's inability to appreciate the future benefits of healthy food choices, informational measures explaining those benefits more clearly may be successful in improving diet healthiness. This remains a hypothesis requiring further examination, however, because the data do not provide any measure of nutritional knowledge of the surveyed individuals.

We also note that other empirical results reported in the literature are consistent with a non-positive relationship between nutritional health and economic resources. For example, Cawley et al.Reference Cawley, Moran and Simon (18) used a natural experiment to conclude that income had no effect on the weight of elderly Americans. For the general US population, Variyam and BlaylockReference Variyam and Blaylock (19) found that income was negatively associated with diet quality after controlling for other sociodemographic variables because of a link between income and preferences for convenience foods, dining out and more expensive, fat-rich foods. For the same US population, Popkin et al.Reference Popkin, Zizza and Siega-Riz (20) compared dietary surveys from 1965 and 1996 to conclude the absence of any consistent and significant effect of income on diet quality. Less surprising because of the lower development level of the country, Du et al.Reference Du, Mroz and Zhai (21) found that rapid economic growth in China adversely affected diet quality. While these findings do not relate specifically to elderly Europeans, they point to the plausibility of our conclusion regarding the non-positive effect of resource availability on diet quality.

The estimations also support the view that food choices are largely set in those over the age of 50 years, perhaps as the result of habits contracted throughout life. In particular, retirement does not come out in the data as a major life event which, perhaps because of its impact on social networks or the opportunity cost of time, brings about a structural change in the elderly's food choices. Further, the fact that the age variable does not explain diet quality much suggests that the physiological and functional changes normally associated with ageing (e.g. changes in gustatory and olfactory functions, masticatory efficiency and mobility) cannot be regarded as the main drivers of diet quality among the elderly, at least at the population level.

If food choices and diet quality appear to be fairly stable in the over-50 s age group, the analysis also reveals great inter-individual heterogeneity which is only partially explained by socio-economic variables. The finding that educational level, being a female and not living alone are positively associated with diet quality is largely in line with previous studies. For instance, in a European context, the Swedish case study of Gustavsson and SidenvallReference Gustavsson and Sidenvall (22) found that women living alone were more likely to simplify meals and, as a result, adopt diets of relatively poor quality. Meanwhile, the UK study of Donkin et al.Reference Donkin, Johnson and Lilley (23) concluded that the salient question to explain intakes of fruits and vegetables was ‘is there a woman in the household?’ Although few studies have investigated the influence of education on the food choices of the elderly, our findings are also consistent with the robust ‘education gradient’, which describes the positive relationship between education and health for the general populationReference Cutler and Llera-Muney (24) .

Finally, it is important to point to some limitations of the study. The secondary data sets did not provide information on some potentially important determinants of food choices and diet quality, which were consequently omitted from the analysis. For instance, it is difficult to conclude whether availability and access to healthy foods are important drivers of diet quality among the EU elderly, although the evidence related to the seasonality and age variables suggests, indirectly, otherwise. More serious is the omission of health status, which influences food choices and diet quality, as with diabetics urged by their physician to make specific dietary adjustments in order to manage their disease. Although some of the data included information on health status, the variable was nevertheless omitted because it is itself influenced by diet quality and therefore cannot be treated as an ordinary variable in multivariate regression analysis.Footnote While possible, statistical modelling of the bidirectional causal relationship between diet quality and health is difficult and left to further research.


Sources of funding: The research leading to these results has received funding from the Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement no. 266486 (NU-AGE project entitled ‘New dietary strategies addressing the specific needs of elderly population for a healthy ageing in Europe’). Conflicts of interest: None. Ethics: Ethical approval was not required. Authors’ contributions: The study was originally conceived by X.I., M.M. and W.B.T. X.I., N.K., M.M., L.M., G.N., W.B.T., W.X. and G.Z. contributed to the data mapping exercise. Data analysis was carried out by: N.K. and X.I. jointly for Finland; L.M. and M.M. for Italy; W.X., L.F. and B.S. for Sweden; G.Z., W.B.T. and G.N. for the UK. The common model was defined during a workshop involving X.I., M.M., G.N., W.B.T. and G.Z. X.I. wrote the first draft of the paper and modified it after receiving comments from all authors. X.I., M.M. and W.B.T. handled the first revision of the paper. Acknowledgements: The authors would like to thank other NU-AGE partners for the comments that they received on a preliminary version of the paper presented at the 2012 project annual meeting. Comments from two anonymous referees are gratefully acknowledged.

Appendix Sensitivity analysis, Finnish results


Even more starkly, the number of centenarians in the UK is projected to increase from 14 500 in 2012 to 110 000 in 2035Reference Horwath (3) .

For instance, in the UK the Office of National Statistics has found that the proportions of life spent disability-free increased for women but mostly fell for men at age 65 years between 2004–06 and 2007–09 (6) .

* We did not adjust the definition of the DQI to reflect the recommendations in each of the four countries because this would have made comparison of the country-level results difficult. Given that our focus is on heterogeneity of diets, the choice of the benchmark recommendations has a negligible impact on the results.

The correlation coefficient was 0·70.

* We recognise that the term ‘elderly’ does not describe very well the demographic group over the age of 50 years, but we keep it for convenience and conciseness.

A more minor reason relates to the fact that the socio-professional status of individuals over the age of 65 years is often not described in detail, as they are usually lumped together into a ‘pensioner’ category.

Hence, in the case of the UK, Italy and Finland, we ignored the elderly individuals living with non-elderly individuals. For Finland, the available data allowed us to calculate that a large majority of those aged 65 years and over in the sample belonged to the types of households selected in the analysis.

§ In practice, this means dividing total expenditure of two-person households by 1·5.

In the Swedish data set, the resource constraint is measured by a yes/no answer to the question ‘Do you face difficulties in taking care of your daily expenses?’; in the case of Italy, the respondents were simply asked to characterize their financial resources as being insufficient, poor, adequate or very good.

* This view is summarised and extended in the book review of Oswald and PowdthaveeReference Oswald and Powdthavee (17) .

Otherwise the results are subject to the ‘ecological fallacy’Reference Piantadosi, Byar and Green (25) .

CU, consumption unit; ref., reference category.

***Statistically significant at 1% level; **statistically significant at 5% level; *statistically significant at 10% level.


1. Lanzieri, G (2011) The greying of the baby boomers. A century-long view of ageing in European populations. Population and social conditions. Stat Focus 23, 111.Google Scholar
2. Bonneux, L, Van der Gaag, N, Bijwaard, G et al. (2012) Demographic epidemiologic projections of long-term care needs in selected European countries: Germany, Spain, the Netherland and Poland. European Network of Economic Policy Research Institutes, ENEPRI Policy Brief no. 8, February 2012; available at Google Scholar
3. Horwath, CC (2002) Nutrition and ageing. In Essentials of Human Nutrition, 2nd ed., pp. 551565 [J Mann and AS Truswell editors]. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
4. Office of National Statistics (2012) What are the Chances of Surviving to Age 100? Statistical Bulletin, 26 March 2012. Newport: Office of National Statistics.Google Scholar
5. Christensen, K, Doblhammer, G, Rau, R et al. (2009) Ageing populations: the challenges ahead. Lancet 374, 11961208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Office of National Statistics (2011) Health Expectancies at Birth and at Age 65 in the United Kingdom, 2007–2009, Statistical Bulletin, 31 August 2011. Newport: Office of National Statistics.Google Scholar
7. Shankar, B, Srinivasan, CS & Irz, X (2008) World Health Organization dietary norms: a quantitative evaluation of potential consumption impacts in the United States, United Kingdom and France. Rev Agric Econ 30, 151175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Thiele, S, Mensik, GBM & Beitz, R (2004) Determinants of diet quality. Public Health Nutr 7, 2937.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Kant, AK (1996) Indexes of overall diet quality: a review. J Am Diet Assoc 96, 785791.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Waijers, PM, Feskens, EJ & Ocké, MC (2007) A critical review of predefined diet quality scores. Br J Nutr 97, 219231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Patterson, RE, Haines, PS & Popkin, BM (1994) Diet quality index: capturing a multidimensional behavior. J Am Diet Assoc 94, 5764.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Mazzocchi, M, Brasili, C & Sandri, E (2008) Trends in dietary patterns and compliance with World Health Organization recommendations: a cross-country analysis. Public Health Nutr 11, 535540.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Behrman, JR (1995) Household Behaviour and Micronutrients: What We Know and What We Don't Know. Working Papers on Agricultural Strategies for Micronutrients no. 2. Washington, DC: IFPRI.Google Scholar
14. Liu, Y & Shankar, B (2007) Will rising household incomes solve China's micronutrient deficiency problems? Econ Bull 15, 114.Google Scholar
15. Drewnowski, A & Darmon, N (2005) The economics of obesity: dietary energy density and energy cost. Am J Clin Nutr 82, Suppl. 1, S265S273.Google ScholarPubMed
16. Offer, A (2006) The Challenge of Affluence: Self-Control and Well-Being in the United States and Britain Since 1950. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
17. Oswald, AJ & Powdthavee, N (2007) Obesity, unhappiness, and the challenge of affluence: theory and evidence. Book review of Offer, A. (2006). Econ J 117, F441F459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Cawley, J, Moran, J & Simon, K (2009) The impact of income on the weight of elderly Americans. Health Econ 19, 979993.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Variyam, J & Blaylock, J (1998) Unlocking the mystery between nutrition knowledge and diet quality. Food Rev 21, 2128.Google Scholar
20. Popkin, BM, Zizza, C & Siega-Riz, AM (2003) Who is leading the change? US dietary quality comparison between 1965 and 1996. Am J Prev Med 25, 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Du, S, Mroz, TA, Zhai, F et al. (2004) Rapid income growth adversely affects diet quality in China – particularly for the poor! Soc Sci Med 59, 15051515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Gustavsson, K & Sidenvall, B (2002) Food-related health perceptions and food habits among older women. J Adv Nurs 39, 164173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Donkin, AJM, Johnson, AE & Lilley, JM (1998) Gender and living alone as determinants of fruit and vegetable consumption among the elderly living at home in urban Nottingham. Appetite 30, 3951.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24. Cutler, DM & Llera-Muney, A (2010) Understanding differences in health behaviors by education. J Health Econ 29, 128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25. Piantadosi, S, Byar, DP & Green, SB (1988) The ecological fallacy. Am J Epidemiol 127, 893904.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1 Diet quality indices

Figure 1

Table 2 Characteristics of the four data sets

Figure 2

Table 3 Determinants of diet quality in the UK

Figure 3

Table 4 Determinants of diet quality in Italy

Figure 4

Table 5 Determinants of diet quality in Finland

Figure 5

Table 6 Determinants of diet quality in Sweden

You have Access
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Sociodemographic determinants of diet quality of the EU elderly: a comparative analysis in four countries
Available formats

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Sociodemographic determinants of diet quality of the EU elderly: a comparative analysis in four countries
Available formats

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Sociodemographic determinants of diet quality of the EU elderly: a comparative analysis in four countries
Available formats

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *