Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Access
  • Cited by 58
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Brondel, Laurent Brindisi, Marie-Claude Jacquin-Piques, Agnès Mouillot, Thomas and Pénicaud, Luc 2016. Flavor.

    Chamoun, Elie Mutch, David M. Allen-Vercoe, Emma Buchholz, Andrea C. Duncan, Alison M. Spriet, Lawrence L. Haines, Jess and Ma, David W.L. 2016. A review of the associations between single nucleotide polymorphisms in taste receptors, eating behaviours, and health. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, p. 00.

    Frank, Guido K.W. Shott, Megan E. Keffler, Carrie and Cornier, Marc-Andre 2016. Extremes of eating are associated with reduced neural taste discrimination. International Journal of Eating Disorders, Vol. 49, Issue. 6, p. 603.

    Low, Julia Lacy, Kathleen McBride, Robert and Keast, Russell 2016. The Association between Sweet Taste Function, Anthropometry, and Dietary Intake in Adults. Nutrients, Vol. 8, Issue. 5, p. 241.

    Parkinson, Lisa Kestin, Mark and Keast, Russell 2016. The perceptual properties of the virgin olive oil phenolic oleocanthal are not associated with PROP taster status or dietary intake. Food Quality and Preference, Vol. 48, p. 17.

    Shen, Yuchi Kennedy, Orla B. and Methven, Lisa 2016. Exploring the effects of genotypical and phenotypical variations in bitter taste sensitivity on perception, liking and intake of brassica vegetables in the UK. Food Quality and Preference, Vol. 50, p. 71.

    Ulla, Hoppu Antti, Knaapila Oskar, Laaksonen and Mari, Sandell 2016. Flavor.

    Williams, Johnny A. Bartoshuk, Linda M. Fillingim, Roger B. and Dotson, Cedrick D. 2016. Exploring Ethnic Differences in Taste Perception. Chemical Senses, Vol. 41, Issue. 5, p. 449.

    Woodward, Halley E. Cameron, C. Daryl and Treat, Teresa A. 2016. Enhancing the Conceptualization and Measurement of Implicit and Explicit Affective Evaluations: A Case Study in Disordered Eating. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, Vol. 10, Issue. 4, p. 252.

    Ciullo, Dana L. and Dotson, Cedrick D. 2015. Using Animal Models to Determine the Role of Gustatory Neural Input in the Control of Ingestive Behavior and the Maintenance of Body Weight. Chemosensory Perception, Vol. 8, Issue. 2, p. 61.

    Masi, Camilla Dinnella, Caterina Monteleone, Erminio and Prescott, John 2015. The impact of individual variations in taste sensitivity on coffee perceptions and preferences. Physiology & Behavior, Vol. 138, p. 219.

    Mihindukulasuriya, Suramya D. F. and Jayasuriya, Hemantha P. W. 2015. Drying of chilli in a combined infrared and hot air rotary dryer. Journal of Food Science and Technology, Vol. 52, Issue. 8, p. 4895.

    Nesil, Tanseli Kanit, Lutfiye and Pogun, Sakire 2015. Bitter taste and nicotine preference: evidence for sex differences in rats. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, Vol. 41, Issue. 1, p. 57.

    Sandell, Mari Hoppu, Ulla Mikkilä, Vera Mononen, Nina Kähönen, Mika Männistö, Satu Rönnemaa, Tapani Viikari, Jorma Lehtimäki, Terho and Raitakari, Olli T. 2014. Genetic variation in the hTAS2R38 taste receptor and food consumption among Finnish adults. Genes & Nutrition, Vol. 9, Issue. 6,

    Wasalathanthri, Sudharshani Hettiarachchi, Priyadarshika and Prathapan, Shamini 2014. Sweet taste sensitivity in pre-diabetics, diabetics and normoglycemic controls: a comparative cross sectional study. BMC Endocrine Disorders, Vol. 14, Issue. 1,

    Catanzaro, Diane Chesbro, Emily C. and Velkey, Andrew J. 2013. Relationship between food preferences and PROP taster status of college students. Appetite, Vol. 68, p. 124.

    Demura, Shinichi Aoki, Hiroki Mizusawa, Toshihide Soukura, Kei Noda, Masahiro and Sato, Toshiro 2013. Gender Differences in Coffee Consumption and Its Effects in Young People. Food and Nutrition Sciences, Vol. 04, Issue. 07, p. 748.

    Gaudette, Nicole J. and Pickering, Gary J. 2013. Modifying Bitterness in Functional Food Systems. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, Vol. 53, Issue. 5, p. 464.

    Lim, J. and Padmanabhan, A. 2013. Retronasal Olfaction in Vegetable Liking and Disliking. Chemical Senses, Vol. 38, Issue. 1, p. 45.

    O'Brien, Sinead A. Feeney, Emma L. Scannell, Amalia G.M. Markey, Anne and Gibney, Eileen R. 2013. Bitter Taste Perception and Dietary Intake Patterns in Irish Children. Journal of Nutrigenetics and Nutrigenomics, Vol. 6, Issue. 1, p. 43.


Taste and food preferences as predictors of dietary practices in young women

  • Adam Drewnowski (a1), Susan Ahlstrom Henderson (a2), Alisa Levine (a2) and Clayton Hann (a2)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 January 2007

To investigate links between taste responses, self-reported food preferences and selected dietary outcomes in young women.


Subjects were 159 women, with a mean age of 27.0 years. Taste responses were measured using aqueous solutions of 6−n-propylthiouracil (PROP) and sucrose. All subjects completed a 171-item food preference checklist, using nine-point category scales. Food preference data were reduced using principal components factor analyses, with the internal consistency of factor-based subscales established using Cronbach's alpha. Dietary intakes, available for a subset of 87 women, were based on 3 days of food records. Estimated intakes of carbohydrate, fibre and β-carotene were the key dietary outcome variables.


Genetically-mediated sensitivity to the bitter taste of PROP was associated with reduced preferences for Brussels sprouts, cabbage, spinach and coffee beverages. Higher preferences for sucrose in water were associated with increased preferences for sweet desserts. Food preferences, in turn, were associated with measures of current diet. Reduced acceptability of vegetables and fruits was associated with lower estimated intakes of carbohydrate, fibre and β-carotene.


Taste responses to sucrose and PROP were predictive of some food preferences. Food preferences, in turn, were associated with food consumption patterns. Given that taste responsiveness to PROP is an inherited trait, there may be further links between genetic taste markers, eating habits and the selection of healthful diets.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Taste and food preferences as predictors of dietary practices in young women
      Available formats
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Taste and food preferences as predictors of dietary practices in young women
      Available formats
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Taste and food preferences as predictors of dietary practices in young women
      Available formats
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: Email
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

2E Kennedy , L Meyers , W Layden . The 1995 dietary guidelines for Americans: an overview. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1996; 96: 234–7.

6S Havas , J Heimendinger , K Reynolds , Five a day for better health: a new research initiative. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1994; 94: 32–6.

9A Drewnowski . Taste preferences and food intake. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 1997; 17: 237–53.

10A Drewnowski , SA Henderson , AB Shore . Genetic sensitivity to 6−n-propylthiouracil (PROP) and hedonic responses to bitter and sweet tastes. Chem. Senses 1997; 22: 2737.

11P Rozin , TA Vollmecke . Food likes and dislikes. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 1986; 6: 433–56.

13EV Glanville , AR Kaplan . Food preferences and sensitivity of taste for bitter compounds. Nature 1965; 205: 851–3.

15ML Pelchat , S Danowski . A possible genetic association between PROP-tasting and alcoholism. Physiol. Behav. 1992; 51: 1261–6.

16AF Fox . The relationship between chemical constitution and taste. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1932; 18: 115–20.

17H Kalmus . Genetics of taste. In: LM Beidler , ed. Handbook of Sensory Physiology. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1971; 165–79.

18LM Bartoshuk . The biological basis of food perception and acceptance. Food Qual. Prefer. 1993; 4: 2132.

19JF Gent , LM Bartoshuk . Sweetness of sucrose, neohesperidin dihydrochalcone, and saccharin is related to the genetic ability to taste the bitter substance 6−n-propylthiouracil. Chem. Senses 1983; 7: 265–72.

21A Drewnowski , SA Henderson , AB Shore , A Barratt-Fornell . Nontasters, tasters, and supertasters of 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) and hedonic response to sweet. Physiol. Behav. 1997; 62: 649–55.

23LM Bartoshuk , VB Duffy , IJ Miller . PTC/PROP tasting: anatomy, psychophysics, and sex effects. Physiol. Behav. 1994; 56: 1165–71

24WC Boyd . Taste reactions to antithyroid substances. Science 1950; 112: 153.

27GD Akella , SA Henderson , A Drewnowski . Sensory acceptance of Japanese green tea and soy products is linked to genetic sensitivity to 6−n-propylthiouracil. Nutr. Cancer 1997; 29: 146–51.

28WJ Craig . Phytochemicals: guardians of our health. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1997; 97: S199204.

30RA Frank , NJ van der Klaauw . The contribution of chemosensory factors to individual differences in reported food preferences. Appetite 1994; 22: 101–23.

32A Niewind , M Krondl , M Shrott . Genetic influences on the selection of Brassica vegetables by elderly individuals. Nutr. Res. 1988; 8: 1320.

37AW Logue , ME Smith . Predictors of food preferences in adult humans. Appetite 1986; 7: 109–25.

38KA Steinmetz , JD Potter . Vegetables, fruit, and cancer prevention: a review. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1966; 96: 1027–39.

41F Lucas , F Bellisle . The measurement of food preferences in humans; do taste and spit tests predict consumption? Physiol. Behav. 1987; 39: 739–43.

42A Drewnowski . Taste and food preferences in human obesity. In: ED Capaldi , TL Powley , eds. Taste, Experience and Feeding. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1990; 227–40.

43J Rodin , HR Moskowitz , GA Bray . Relationship between obesity, weight loss and taste responsiveness. Physiol. Behav. 1976; 17: 391–7.

45GR Fenwick , RK Heaney , WJ Mulling . Glucosinolates and their breakdown products in food and food plants. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 1983; 18: 123201.

46M Jerzsa-Latta , M Krondl , P Coleman . Use and perceived attributes of cruciferous vegetables in terms of genetically-mediated taste sensitivity. Appetite 1990; 15: 127–34.

47A Drewnowski . From asparagus to zucchini: mapping cognitive space for vegetable names. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 1996; 15: 1147–53.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Public Health Nutrition
  • ISSN: 1368-9800
  • EISSN: 1475-2727
  • URL: /core/journals/public-health-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *