Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Ultra-processing. An odd ‘appraisal’

  • Carlos A Monteiro (a1) (a2), Geoffrey Cannon (a2), Jean-Claude Moubarac (a2) (a3), Renata B Levy (a2) (a4), Maria Laura C Louzada (a2) (a5) and Patrícia C Jaime (a1) (a2)...
Abstract

It is now generally agreed that the impact of the current nature, purpose and extent of food processing on human well-being, health and disease needs to be better understood and explained, in order to improve public health. The special issue of Public Health Nutrition devoted to the concept of ultra-processing of food, and the NOVA classification of which ultra-processed foods are one category, is a great step forward in this work. Coincidentally, a polemical ‘critical appraisal’ of ultra-processing was recently published in another journal. Debate and discussion are an essential part of the scientific endeavour. In this commentary, we correct inaccurate statements made about NOVA in the ‘appraisal,’ rebut points raised, and discuss the larger issue of scientific responsibility for publishing opposing views on controversial topics.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Ultra-processing. An odd ‘appraisal’
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Ultra-processing. An odd ‘appraisal’
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Ultra-processing. An odd ‘appraisal’
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
* Corresponding author: Email carlosam@usp.br
References
Hide All
1. Monteiro, CA, Cannon, G, Moubarac, J-C et al. (2017) The UN Decade of Nutrition, the NOVA food classification and the trouble with ultra-processing. Public Health Nutr. Published online: 21 March 2017. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017000234.
2. Jacobs, A & Richtel, M (2017) How big business got Brazil hooked on junk food. New York Times, 16 September. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/09/16/health/brazil-obesity-nestle.html?mcubz=0 (accessed September 2017).
3. Gibney, MJ, Forde, CG, Mullally, D et al. (2017) Ultra-processed foods in human health: a critical appraisal. Am J Clin Nutr 106, 717724.
4. Louzada, ML, Martins, AP, Canella, DS et al. (2015) Ultra-processed foods and the nutritional dietary profile in Brazil. Rev Saude Publica 49, 38.
5. Louzada, ML, Martins, AP, Canella, DS et al. (2015) Impact of ultra-processed foods on micronutrient content in the Brazilian diet. Rev Saude Publica 49, 45.
6. Martinez Steele, E, Baraldi, LG, Louzada, ML et al. (2016) Ultra-processed foods and added sugars in the US diet: evidence from a nationally representative cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 6, e009892.
7. Martinez Steele, E, Popkin, B, Swinburn, B et al. (2017) The share of ultra-processed foods and the overall nutritional quality of diets in the US: evidence from a nationally representative cross-sectional study. Popul Health Metr 15, 6.
8. Moubarac, J-C, Batal, M, Louzada, ML et al. (2017) Consumption of ultra-processed foods predicts diet quality in Canada. Appetite 108, 512520.
9. Monteiro, CA (2009) Nutrition and health. The issue is not food, nor nutrients, so much as processing. Public Health Nutr 12, 729731.
10. Moodie, R, Stuckler, D, Monteiro, CA et al. (2013) Profits and pandemics: prevention of harmful effects of tobacco, alcohol, and ultra-processed food and drink industries. Non-communicable Diseases Series 4. Lancet 381, 670679.
11. Mendonça, RD, Pimenta, AM, Gea, A et al. (2016) Ultra-processed foods consumption and risk of overweight/obesity: the SUN cohort study. Am J Clin Nutr 104, 14331440.
12. Mendonça, RD, Lopes, AC, Pimenta, AM et al. (2017) Ultraprocessed food consumption and the incidence of hypertension in a Mediterranean cohort: the Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra Project. Am J Hypertens 30, 358366.
13. Brazilian Ministry of Health (2014) Dietary Guidelines for the Brazilian Population. Brasília: Ministry of Health; available at http://189.28.128.100/dab/docs/portaldab/publicacoes/guia_alimentar_populacao_ingles.pdf.
14. Monteiro, CA, Cannon, G, Moubarac, J-C et al. (2015) Dietary guidelines to nourish humanity and the planet in the twenty-first century. A blueprint from Brazil. Public Health Nutr 18, 23112322.
15. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations & Food Climate Research Network (2016) Plates, Pyramids, Planet. Developments in National Healthy and Sustainable Dietary Guidelines: A State of Play Assessment . Rome/Oxford: FAO/University of Oxford; available at http://www.fao.org/3/a-i5640e.pdf
16. Ministerio de Salud (2016) Guía Alimentaria Para la Población Uruguaya. http://www.msp.gub.uy/sites/default/files/archivos_adjuntos/MS_guia_web.pdf (accessed September 2017).
17. International Tobacco Control Project (2012) ITC Uruguay National Report. Findings from the Wave 1 to 3 Surveys (2006–2011). University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada; Centro de Investigación para la Epidemia del Tabaquismo (CIET Uruguay); Universidad de la Republica, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales. http://www.itcproject.org/files/ITC_Uruguay_NR-Aug8-web-v2.pdf (accessed September 2017).
18. Pan American Health Organization of the World Health Organization (2015) Ultra-Processed Food and Drink Products in Latin America: Trends, Impact on Obesity, Policy Implications. Washington, DC: PAHO; available at http://iris.paho.org/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/7699/9789275118641_eng.pdf?sequence=5&isAllowed=y&ua=1
19. Moubarac, J-C, Claro, RM, Baraldi, LG et al. (2013) International differences in cost and consumption of ready-to-consume food and drink products: United Kingdom and Brazil, 2008–2009. Glob Public Health 8, 845856.
20. Pan American Health Organization of the World Health Organization (2016) Nutrient Profile Model. Washington, DC: PAHO.
21. Martínez Steele, E & Monteiro, CA (2017) Association between dietary share of ultra-processed foods and urinary concentrations of phytoestrogens in the US. Nutrients 9, 209.
22. Julia, C, Martinez, L, Allès, B et al. (2017) Contribution of ultra-processed foods in the diet of adults from the French NutriNet-Santé study. Public Health Nutr. Published online: 13 July 2017. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017001367.
23. Mozaffarian, D & Ludwig, D (2010) Dietary guidelines in the 21st century – a time for food. JAMA 304, 681682.
24. Katz, DL & Meller, S (2014) Can we say what diet is best for health? Annu Rev Public Health 35, 83103.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Public Health Nutrition
  • ISSN: 1368-9800
  • EISSN: 1475-2727
  • URL: /core/journals/public-health-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed