Skip to main content
×
Home

Validating a nutrient profile model

  • Carukshi Arambepola (a1), Peter Scarborough (a1) and Mike Rayner (a1)
Abstract
AbstractObjective

To assess the validity of nutrient profiling Model WXYfm – developed for the purpose of regulating the promotion of ‘less healthy’ foods to children. The model ranks foods according to their healthiness and categorises foods into ‘healthier’ and ‘less healthy’ foods.

Design

Convergent and discriminant validity was tested by comparing the way Model WXYfm categorises foods with the way the UK’s national food guide – the Balance of Good Health (BGH) – categorises foods. Construct validity was assessed by testing a hypothesis relating the constructs of ‘healthiness’ of foods (as measured by Model WXYfm) and the ‘healthiness’ of diets (measured using the Diet Quality Index) and assessing whether this hypothesis was confirmed or refuted by using data on the dietary patterns of subjects (n = 1117) of the National Diet and Nutrition Survey of adults carried out in Great Britain in 2000–01.

Results

Model WXYfm showed good convergent and discriminant validity: the level of agreement between the way the model categorises foods and the way the BGH categorises foods was good (κ = 0.69). Model WXYfm also showed good construct validity: the energy intake from ‘less healthy’ foods amongst subjects with the least healthy diets was nearly twice the energy intake from ‘less healthy’ foods amongst the subjects with the healthiest diets.

Conclusions

Model WXYfm demonstrated good validity in categorising foods in a way that is related to the healthiness of diets both recommended and achieved. The methods for assessing the validity of a nutrient profile model used in this paper have not, to our knowledge, been used before.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Validating a nutrient profile model
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Validating a nutrient profile model
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Validating a nutrient profile model
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
Corresponding author: Email Peter.Scarborough@dphpc.ox.ac.uk
References
Hide All
1World Health Organization (WHO). Diet, Nutrition and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases. Report of a Joint WHO/FAO Expert Consultation. Geneva: WHO, 2003.
2Freeland-Graves J, Nitzke S. Position of the American Dietetic Association: total diet approach to communicating food and nutrition information. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 2002; 102: 100108.
3Rayner M, Scarborough P, Stockley L. Nutrient Profiles: Options for Definitions for Use in Relation to Food Promotion and Children’s Diets [online]. London: FSA, 2004. Available at http://www.food.gov.uk/multimedia/pdfs/nutrientprofilingfullreport.pdf. Accessed 23 February 2007.
4 Scarborough P, Rayner M, Stockley L. Developing nutrient profiles: a systematic approach. Public Health Nutrition 2007; 10: 330360.
5Rayner M, Scarborough P, Stockley L, Boxer A. Nutrient Profiles: Development of Final Model [online]. London: FSA, 2005. Available at http://www.food.gov.uk/multimedia/pdfs/nutprofr.pdf. Accessed 23 February 2007.
6Rayner M, Scarborough P, Stockley L. Nutrient Profiles: Applicability of Currently Proposed Model for Uses in Relation to Promotion of Foods to Children Aged 5–10 and Adults [online]. London: FSA, 2005. Available at http://www.food.gov.uk/multimedia/pdfs/nutprofmodelforadults.pdf. Accessed 23 February 2007.
7Steiner D, Norman G. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to their Development and Use, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
8Henderson L, Gregory J, Swan G. The National Diet and Nutrition Survey: Adults Aged 19 to 64 Years. London: HMSO, 2002.
9Health Education Authority (HEA). The Balance of Good Health. London: HEA, 1994.
10 British Nutrition Foundation. Balance of Good Health [online]. Available at http://www.nutrition.org.uk/home.asp?siteId=43&sectionId=874&parentSection=320&which=1. Accessed 23 February 2007.
11Cronbach LJ, Meehl PE. Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin 1955; 52: 281302.
12Clark LA, Watson D. Constructing validity: basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment 1995; 7: 209219.
13Waijers PMCM, Feskens EJM. Indexes of Overall Diet Quality. A Review of the Literature. The Netherlands: National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, 2005.
14Seymour JD, Calle LL, Flagg EW, Coates RJ, Ford ES, Thun MJ. Diet Quality Index as a predictor of short-term mortality in the American Cancer Society Cancer Prevention Study II Nutrition Cohort. American Journal of Epidemiology 2003; 157: 980988.
15Davey GK, Spencer EA, Appleby PN, Allen NE, Knox KH, Key TJ. EPIC-Oxford: lifestyle characteristics and nutrient intakes in a cohort of 33 883 meat-eaters and 31 546 non meat-eaters in the UK. Public Health Nutrition 2002; 6: 259268.
16Key T, Appleby P, Rosell M. Health effects of vegetarian and vegan diets. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 2006; 65: 3541.
17Altman DG. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London: Chapman and Hall, 1991.
18 Scarborough P, Boxer A, Rayner M, Stockley L. Testing nutrient profile models using data from a survey of nutrition professionals. Public Health Nutrition 2007; 10: 337345.
19ILSI Europe. Nutritional Characterisation of Foods. Science-based Approach to Nutrient Profiling. Brussels: ILSI Europe, 2006.
20Gatenby SJ, Hunt P, Rayner M. The National Food Guide: development of dietetic criteria and nutritional characteristics. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics 1995; 8: 323334.
21Coward WA, Wright A, Bluck LJC. Comparisons Between Energy Intake and Energy Expenditure in the NDNS Survey, Adults Aged 19–64 Years. Cambridge: MRC Resource Centre for Human Nutrition Research, 2000.
22Kent AK. Consumption of energy-dense, nutrient-poor foods by adult Americans: nutritional and health implications. The Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1988–1994. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2000; 72: 929936.
23Drewnowski A. Concept of a nutritious food: toward a nutrient density score. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2005; 82: 721732.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Public Health Nutrition
  • ISSN: 1368-9800
  • EISSN: 1475-2727
  • URL: /core/journals/public-health-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 19
Total number of PDF views: 279 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 284 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.