Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-7mfl8 Total loading time: 0.256 Render date: 2021-12-02T07:18:21.063Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Validity and repeatability of a simple index derived from the short physical activity questionnaire used in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2007

Nicholas J Wareham*
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 2SR, UK
Rupert W Jakes
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 2SR, UK
Kirsten L Rennie
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 2SR, UK
Jantine Schuit
Affiliation:
Department of Chronic Disease and Environmental Epidemiology, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
Jo Mitchell
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 2SR, UK
Susie Hennings
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 2SR, UK
Nicholas E Day
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 2SR, UK
*
*Corresponding author: Email njw1004@medschl.cam.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

HTML view is not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

To assess the validity and repeatability of a simple index designed to rank participants according to their energy expenditure estimated by self-report, by comparison with objectively measured energy expenditure assessed by heart-rate monitoring with individual calibration.

Design:

Energy expenditure was assessed over one year by four separate episodes of 4-day heart-rate monitoring, a method previously validated against whole-body calorimetry and doubly labelled water. Cardio-respiratory fitness was assessed by four repeated measures of sub-maximum oxygen uptake. At the end of the 12-month period, participants completed a physical activity questionnaire that assessed past-year activity. A simple four-level physical activity index was derived by combining occupational physical activity together with time participating in cycling and other physical exercise (such as keep fit, aerobics, swimming and jogging).

Subjects:

One hundred and seventy-three randomly selected men and women aged 40 to 65 years.

Results:

The repeatability of the physical activity index was high (weighted kappa = 0.6, P < 0.0001). There were positive associations between the physical activity index from the questionnaire and the objective measures of the ratio of daytime energy expenditure to resting metabolic rate (P = 0.003) and cardio-respiratory fitness (P = 0.001). As an indirect test of validity, there was a positive association between the physical activity index and the ratio of energy intake, assessed by 7-day food diaries, to predicted basal metabolic rate.

Conclusions:

The summary index of physical activity derived from the questions used in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study suggest it is useful for ranking participants in terms of their physical activity in large epidemiological studies. The index is simple and easy to comprehend, which may make it suitable for situations that require a concise, global index of activity.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © CABI Publishing 2003

References

1Riboli, E. Nutrition and cancer: background and rationale of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). Ann. Oncol. 1993; 3(10): 783–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Day, N, Oakes, S, Luben, R, Khaw, K-T, Bingham, S, Welch, A, et al. EPIC in Norfolk: study design and characteristics of the cohort. Br. J. Cancer 1999; 80(Suppl. 1): 95103.Google ScholarPubMed
3US Department of Health and Human Services. Physical Activity and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, 1996.Google Scholar
4Pols, MA, Peeters, PHM, Ocke, MC, Slimani, N, Bueno-De-Mesquita, HB, Collette, HJA. Estimation of reproducibility and relative validity of the questions included in the EPIC physical activity questionnaire. Int. J. Epidemiol. 1997; 26(Suppl. 1): S181–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Wong, MY, Day, NE, Wareham, NJ. Measurement error in epidemiology: the design of validation studies II: bivariate situation. Stat. Med. 1999; 18: 2831–45.3.0.CO;2-3>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Ainsworth, BE, Haskell, WL, Whitt, MC, Irwin, ML, Swartz, AM, Strath, SJ, et al. Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2000; 32(Suppl. 9): S498–516.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Jacobs, DR, Ainsworth, BE, Hartman, TJ, Leon, AS. A simultaneous evaluation of 10 commonly used physical activity questionnaires. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 1993; 25: 8191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Wareham, NJ, Byrne, CD, Williams, R, Day, NE, Hales, CN. Fasting proinsulin concentrations predict the development of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 1999; 22: 262–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Wareham, NJ, Wong, M-Y, Day, NE. Glucose intolerance and physical inactivity: the relative importance of low habitual energy expenditure and cardiorespiratory fitness. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2000; 152: 132–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Williams, DRR, Wareham, NJ, Brown, DC, Clark, PMS, Cox, BD, Cox, LJ, et al. Glucose intolerance in the community: the Isle of Ely Diabetes Project. Diabetic Med. 1995; 12: 30–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Wareham, NJ, Hennings, SJ, Prentice, AM, Day, NE. Feasibility of heart-rate monitoring to estimate total level and pattern of energy expenditure in a population-based epidemiological study: the Ely young cohort feasibility study 1994–5. Br. J. Nutr. 1997; 78: 889900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Elia, M, Livesey, G. Energy expenditure and fuel selection in biological systems: theory and practice of calculations based on indirect calorimetry and tracer methods. In: Simopoulus, AP, ed. Metabolic Control of Eating, Energy Expenditure and The Bioenergetics of Obesity. Basel: Karger 1992; 68131.Google Scholar
13James, WPT, Schofield, EC. Human Energy Requirements. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
14Stata Corporation. Stata Statistical Software, Release 7.0 version [program]. College Station, TX: Stata Corporation, 2001.Google Scholar
15Ainsworth, BE, Jacobs, DR Jr, Leon, AS, Richardson, MT, Montoye, HJ. Assessment of the accuracy of physical activity questionnaire occupational data. J. Occup. Med. 1993; 35(10): 1017–27.Google ScholarPubMed
You have Access
572
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Validity and repeatability of a simple index derived from the short physical activity questionnaire used in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Validity and repeatability of a simple index derived from the short physical activity questionnaire used in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Validity and repeatability of a simple index derived from the short physical activity questionnaire used in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *