Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-cf9d5c678-ttsf8 Total loading time: 0.488 Render date: 2021-08-04T12:04:13.559Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

What stops us from eating: a qualitative investigation of dietary barriers during pregnancy in Punjab, Pakistan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2021

Muhammad Asim
Affiliation:
Department of Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
Zarak H Ahmed
Affiliation:
Department of Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
Amy R Nichols
Affiliation:
Department of Nutritional Sciences, College of Natural Sciences, University of Texas, Austin, USA
Rachel Rickman
Affiliation:
Department of Nutritional Sciences, College of Natural Sciences, University of Texas, Austin, USA
Elena Neiterman
Affiliation:
School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Canada
Anita Mahmood
Affiliation:
Department of Nutritional Sciences, College of Natural Sciences, University of Texas, Austin, USA
Elizabeth M Widen
Affiliation:
Dell Pediatric Research Institute, University of Texas at Austin, 1400 Barbara Jordan Blvd., Austin, TX 78723, USA
Corresponding
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

Adequate dietary intake during pregnancy is vital for the health and nutritional status of both mother and fetus. The nutritional status of reproductive age women in Pakistan is poor, with 14 % being underweight (BMI < 18·5) and 42 % experiencing Fe deficiency anaemia. This may stem from beliefs, practices and other barriers influencing dietary intake. This qualitative study seeks to determine which factors impact dietary intake during pregnancy in rural Punjab.

Design:

In-depth interviews and focus group discussions were conducted and then analysed using thematic analysis.

Setting:

Three purposively selected rural districts (Sahiwal, Okara and Pakpatan) with the highest prevalence of maternal and child malnutrition in the province of Punjab, Pakistan

Participants:

Mothers with children under age two (n 29) and healthcare providers with at least 5 years of experience working in the district (n 12).

Results:

We identified a combination of physiological, socio-cultural and structural barriers that inhibited healthful dietary intake during pregnancy. The primary physiological barriers to optimal dietary intake and dietary practices included food aversions and food cravings. Food classification, fear of a difficult childbirth, fear of high blood pressure and household food politics were the principal socio-cultural barriers. Additionally, two structural barriers, inadequate antenatal counseling and a lack of affordable food options, were identified.

Conclusions:

Our study demonstrates that complex barriers prevent pregnant women in the Punjab area from consuming adequate dietary intake and that antenatal health education programmes and structural interventions are needed to support healthful dietary practices during this critical period.

Type
Research paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society

Pregnancy is one of the most nutritionally demanding phases in a woman’s life. Optimal dietary intake during pregnancy is critical to support the nutritional status of both mother and fetus(Reference Black, Victora and Walker1Reference Shrimpton4) and to reduce adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes, such as hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, preterm birth and low birth weight(Reference da Silva Lopes, Ota and Shakya5Reference Tunçalp, Pena-Rosas and Lawrie9). To support fetal growth, prevent the depletion of maternal nutrient stores and to ensure adequate nutritional status for breast-feeding, pregnant women require increased energetic intake in the second and third trimesters, as well as increased intake of specific nutrients, including Ca, Fe and folic acid(Reference Kavle and Landry10,Reference Lee and Saha11) . Despite these recommendations, restricting dietary intake during pregnancy is common in Asian low- and middle-income countries (LMIC)(Reference Kavle and Landry10). Pregnant women in Asian LMIC consume less kilocalories, fats, proteins and carbohydrates than their counterparts in Caribbean and Central/South American LMIC(Reference Lee and Saha11). To understand this phenomenon, various studies have highlighted socio-cultural barriers that hinder pregnant women’s food intake in Asian LMIC. These have included food aversions(Reference Christian, Bunjun Srihari and Thorne-Lyman12,Reference Harding, Matias and Mridha13) , beliefs in associations between consumption of certain foods and delivery complications(Reference Kavle and Landry10) and cultural food classifications, such as those practiced in complementary and alternative medicine(Reference Choudhury and Ahmed14Reference Sein16).

This research has explored how socio-cultural norms affect food beliefs and perceptions about certain foods as beneficial or harmful. For example, stemming from Ayurvedic and Unani medical influences, a cultural construct of ‘hot’ and ‘cold’ foods is common in South Asian countries(Reference Erica17,Reference Lefeber18) where every food item has innate properties to either heat or cool the body. Studies from Pakistan, Nepal and India have reported the belief that pregnancy is a state of excess heat in the body that can be offset by increasing consumption of ‘cold’ foods(Reference Christian, Bunjun Srihari and Thorne-Lyman12,Reference Nag19,Reference Zobairi, Freitas and Wasti20) . Violating these socio-cultural rules is believed to be associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. For example in Pakistan, pregnant women classify fish, eggs, beef, eggplant, bitter gourd, greens, okra and dry fruits as ‘hot’ and associate their consumption with adverse pregnancy outcomes(Reference Salam and Sarfraz2128). The effects of these foods are believed to be offset by eating ‘cold’ foods that include buttermilk, yogurt, oranges and cauliflower. Food classifications are not homogeneous across cultures and depict variations across regions.

These food-related beliefs may contribute to the suboptimal nutritional status of pregnant women and their infants observed in Pakistan. Recent estimates in Pakistan show a high proportion of reproductive age women with one or more nutrient deficiencies, including Fe deficiency anaemia (18 %) and vitamin A (27 %), Zn (22 %) and vitamin D (80 %) deficiencies(Reference Jalal32). Moreover, few women (29 %) reported taking Fe supplements for more than 3 months during pregnancy(28). Suboptimal nutritional status among reproductive age women in Pakistan may have lasting effects on child health. Indeed, recent estimates in Pakistan show that over one in five children is low birth weight (22 %), and prevalence of stunting and wasting in children under age of five was 38 % and 7 %, respectively(28).

Despite research from other LMIC reporting associations between socio-cultural influences and dietary intake in pregnant women, the nuances of these relationships have not been fully explored in Pakistan. Studies conducted in Pakistan have primarily adopted a quantitative methodology to evaluate pregnant women’s knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding dietary habits and micronutrient intake(Reference Zobairi, Freitas and Wasti20,Reference Hisam, Rahman and Mashhadi29) . A qualitative approach can build on these insights to provide in-depth contextualised information on factors that impact human behaviour and dietary practices. This information is needed to inform and design health education programmes and structural interventions that facilitate nutritious eating habits. To address this gap, the current study was conducted to explore the factors that shape women’s dietary intake during pregnancy in Punjab, Pakistan.

Methods

Considering the dearth of evidence related to dietary intake barriers in Pakistan, the current study was based on a qualitative descriptive research design that utilised in-depth interviews and focus-group discussions(Reference Colorafi and Evans30). This design allowed us to interview those with differing experiences, including health care providers, which allowed flexibility and to generate a broader view of the complexities that mediate the dietary behaviour of women during pregnancy. Three purposively selected rural districts (Sahiwal, Okara and Pakpatan) in the province of Punjab, Pakistan, were chosen for the current study because they have the highest prevalence of maternal and child malnutrition in Punjab, Pakistan’s most populated province(Reference Cesare, Bhatti and Soofi31).

Study participants

The current study included two categories of participants: mothers and healthcare providers. In total, we conducted three focus group sessions with twenty mothers and a total of twenty-one individual interviews, nine with mothers and twelve with local healthcare providers (Table 1). For a better recall of the pregnancy experience, the eligibility criteria for selecting mothers required them to have been pregnant within the last 2 years. For a broad perspective, we selected three types of healthcare providers: community health workers from Pakistan’s Lady Health Worker (LHW) Programme(Reference Jalal32), midwives and general practitioners. The eligibility criteria for selecting healthcare providers required that they have at least 5 years of experience working within the district.

Table 1 Study participants (n 41)

* Two per district.

One per district.

6–7 Participants in each focus group, one focus group per district.

Since the research topic required participants to talk about intimate aspects of their lives, all participants were recruited through purposive sampling so that we could target information-rich cases. Initial contact was made with the local health counselor working within each district. These individuals served as entry points to the community and identified healthcare providers for the study. In turn, the healthcare providers helped recruit mothers to participate in the study. An equal number of women and healthcare providers were selected from each district (Table 1).

Interview guide development

Semi-structured interview guides were developed for interviews with mothers and healthcare providers (see online supplemental materials). These guides were formulated after an extensive literature review using different keywords related to the socio-cultural determinants of maternal diets in LMIC, i.e. food, dietary or nutritional barriers during pregnancy. The guides were pilot-tested with mothers and healthcare providers before data collection. Moreover, the interview guides were also periodically updated over the course of the study as more details about the community were discovered.

Data collection

Data were collected from January to March 2018. We first conducted twenty-one semi-structured in-depth interviews with nine mothers and twelve healthcare providers followed by three focus-group discussions with twenty mothers (Table 1). Mothers were interviewed at the local ‘health house,’ a designated space within the community where they routinely visit to obtain basic healthcare services, contraceptives and child vaccinations. This neutral location was selected to provide a safe environment for mothers to share their personal experiences. All healthcare providers were interviewed at their workplaces. The interviews were conducted face-to-face in Urdu by the first author (MA, PhD candidate), who is most familiar with the local culture, alongside two female social science research assistants trained on the study protocol and research methodology. The research assistants were recruited due to cultural norms in rural Punjab where unaccompanied interactions between males and females are restricted.

After completing the in-depth interviews(Reference Salam and Sarfraz21), we used the results to further refine our semi-structured interview guide for the focus group discussions. A total of three focus group discussions were held (one in each district) with 20 mothers who were not part of the in-depth interviews. Each session hosted 6–7 participants, and the discussions were moderated by the first author with the help of two research assistants. The sessions focused on discussing common themes that arose during the in-depth interviews, including food meanings and classifications, household politics and behaviour related to seeking healthcare. The sessions enabled exploration of the range of opinions within the group, generated a holistic view and verified any contradictory findings from the interviews.

The in-depth interviews lasted 25–30 min and focus group discussions were 40–50 min. All individual interviews and focus group discussions were audio-recorded, and written field notes were taken by the research assistants to track participants’ nonverbal and verbal communication, including body language and moments of hesitation. Recordings were immediately transcribed verbatim into the English language by the MA and were counter-checked by ZHA to ensure data authenticity. A debriefing session followed each interview and focus group discussion to allow the research team to reflect upon the interview process, examine findings and resolve discrepancies. Data collection was concluded after all authors agreed that the interview discussions and data collected had reached a point of information saturation.

Data analysis

The data analysis process included an intensive review of all transcripts and field notes by two co-authors (MA and ZHA) through manual thematic analysis. To ensure data quality, all transcripts were verified a second time by the research assistants using both written notes and audio recordings. The inductive method was used to formulate study themes; this approach employs a detailed reading of raw data to assemble concepts, themes and interpretations from participants’ responses(Reference Thomas33). Two co-authors generated an exhaustive list of themes through a detailed review of the transcripts. These themes were used to develop a theoretical matrix reviewed by all authors and from which several sub-themes emerged. Then, transcripts were reviewed to extract quotes corresponding to each sub-theme. Discrepancies during this process were resolved with the mutual consent of co-authors through triangulating and validating the narratives of different participants (mothers, healthcare providers and field observations). Similar codes or recurring participant statements were omitted during manuscript preparation.

Results

After analysing the results of in-depth interviews and focus group discussions, three broad categories of food intake barriers emerged: physiological, socio-cultural and structural barriers (Fig. 1). The descriptive characteristics of mothers included in study are presented in Table 2.

Fig. 1 Socio-ecological model highlighting major food intake barriers identified in the current study

Table 2 Descriptive characteristics of mothers included in study (n 29)

* Taken from mother’s recall.

Five grade and above.

Physiological barriers

Physiological barriers to food intake refer to an individuals’ bodily reactions to certain food items. These consisted of food aversions, including those associated with morning sickness, and food cravings.

Food aversions and morning sickness

During our interviews and focus group discussions, several women reported changes in dietary intake due to food aversions caused by morning sickness. A mother of three stated:

‘During pregnancy, I suffered from morning sickness and had to completely change my eating habits. I found it difficult to consume my routine diet, such as milk, bread, and cooked foods.’ (Mother, FGD)

This response was reinforced by another participant who reported antenatal food avoidance due to a fear of vomiting:

‘I did not eat properly for several weeks because I was afraid I would vomit. I only ate light foods, such as biscuits [i.e. plain cookies] and crackers. I lost a lot of weight because of this.’ (Mother, In-depth Interview)

In rural Punjab, the customary diet includes roti (flatbread) accompanied by a curry of either vegetables or lentils. Interview responses highlighted that pregnant women were often averse to this staple meal due to the effects of nausea or morning sickness:

‘I cannot tolerate the smell of salan [curry] or roti [bread]…When I was pregnant, I would not even go near the kitchen because I felt the smell would make me vomit.’ (Mother, FGD)

These responses indicate that commonly consumed foods induced food aversions or nausea for many participants. As a result, traditional meals were avoided in favour of less nutrient-dense foods that may curb nausea, such as biscuits and crackers, and limiting overall dietary diversity and energetic intake.

Food cravings

Interviews revealed that women craved a variety of sour, sweet and salty foods with preferences varying across pregnancy. Other cravings included non-edible or non-nutritive items, such as ice, chalk or dirt, a condition otherwise known as pica. For example, a rural LHW stated from her field experience:

‘Some pregnant women develop a craving to start eating clay and coal.’ (LHW, In-depth Interview)

A mother corroborated this observation:

‘When I was pregnant, I craved eating baked clay, particularly in the last trimester of the pregnancy. My mother-in-law had forbidden me to do so, but I was eating it secretly.’ (Mother, In-depth Interview)

These cravings for non-food items or foods with low nutrient density may displace intake of more nutrient dense foods and also impact overall dietary diversity.

Socio-cultural barriers

The socio-cultural barriers presented here refer to beliefs and values related to food consumption that may limit pregnant mothers from consuming a well-balanced diet that meets macronutrient and micronutrient needs during pregnancy. The current study identified four such barriers: cultural food classifications, fear of a difficult delivery, fear of high blood pressure and household food politics.

Food classifications

Our study revealed that women in rural Punjab were highly concerned about consuming certain foods in these categories, which guided food choices during pregnancy. For example, during the first two trimesters women consumed more items classified as ‘cold’ foods, such as lassi (a drink made from yogurt), raw butter, oranges, cucumber and cauliflower, whereas ‘hot’ food items, such as clarified butter, and dry fruit (dry dates, raisin, and coconut), were more often chosen during the third trimester:

‘I tried to consume Thanda [“cold”] items early in my pregnancy as it helps with morning sickness. The body is already producing heat during this time, so we need to cool it down by eating items like yogurt, lentils, and vegetables. Later on, when we are getting ready to give birth, the body changes. During this time, we can eat more hot items, such as animal proteins and fats. These help with the delivery of the baby.’ (Mother, FGD)

This dietary regulation is reinforced by close relatives and traditional birth attendants. In particular, the participants noted that the role of the mother-in-law can be pivotal in emphasising the importance of ‘hot’ or ‘cold’ foods:

‘I wished to eat more protein-rich foods, but my mother-in-law did not allow me to eat these items because they were “hot” in essence. She [mother-in-law] said that the Dai [traditional birth attendant] had told her not to let me eat any “hot” foods as they may cause a miscarriage.’ (Mother, FGD)

In addition to the concept of ‘hot’ and ‘cold’ foods, participants also discussed ‘hard’ foods that referred to items considered difficult to digest. According to a rural LHW:

‘Most of the mothers avoid consuming “hard” foods, such as chickpeas, red lentils, corn, and guava, during pregnancy because they believe these items may cause bloating, stomach pain, and negatively affect the fetus.’ (LHW, In-depth Interview)

The cultural pressure associated with these perceptions may prevent pregnant women from consuming a balanced diet that supports the nutritional requirements of pregnancy, particularly protein-rich foods.

Fears of complicated deliveries

Our interviews indicated that some women associated the excessive consumption of food with a larger fetus and, consequently, a difficult delivery. Women who adhered to this belief consciously reduced the quantity of food they consumed in order to avoid complications that might occur from delivering a larger baby. This point was voiced by a mother of three:

‘I try and keep myself to having two small meals a day. If I eat more, my baby will become too big. I fear that if my baby is too large, I will not be able to deliver itx at home and will have to spend extra money visiting the hospital and getting a C-section.’ (Mother, In-depth Interview)

Another mother reported that she restrained herself from eating, despite feeling hungry:

‘In my third trimester, I felt hungry … I was afraid that by eating more I would increase the size of the fetus. I seldom ate three proper meals a day.’ (Mother, FGD)

Additionally, some women believed reducing food intake during pregnancy decreased the likelihood of Cesarean delivery. This surgical procedure must be carried out in a hospital and may be prohibitively costly, especially for rural, lower-income households. A rural midwife alluded to this point:

‘Women eat less food during pregnancy because they think that it will lead to normal delivery and they will not have to undergo C-section. Women here don’t have money to run their houses properly, how will they arrange the money for a C-section.’ (Midwife, In-depth Interview)

The belief that consuming an excessive amount of food during pregnancy leads to a larger fetus and difficult delivery may influence mothers to reduce their overall dietary intake, resulting in fewer nutrients available to support pregnancy and lactation.

Fears of high blood pressure

Respondents held certain beliefs about the physiological consequences of consuming certain foods. During interviews, some women revealed perceptions that certain nutrient-dense foods, such as fats, meat, and eggs, may cause high blood pressure and actively restrained themselves from consuming these items. For example, a mother of four children explained:

‘When I was pregnant I only ate dal roti [bread with lentils] due to the fear of high blood pressure. Whenever I ate meat, fats, and fried food, I felt as if my blood pressure was rising.’ (Mother, FGD)

Such views may have originated from medical personnel, as indicated by a mother of two:

‘The doctor forbade me from eating food items that may cause high blood pressure…. that it would increase the risk of a bad pregnancy if I ate a lot of red meat or chicken.’ (Mother, In-depth Interview)

It is probable that this perceived fear, plus directions from care providers, family members, or friends, makes these women feel more vulnerable and presents a psychosocial barrier to eating more nutritionally varied foods, in this case animal proteins and accompanying micronutrients (e.g. Fe).

Household food politics

The influence of household food politics on the diet of pregnant women was also discussed. Specifically, women seeking to supplement their diets with more nutritious foods were often prevented from doing so due to household food-sharing dynamics. Women living within such a system may be pushed toward eating a standardised diet, with little room for special requests:

‘When I was pregnant, I felt a lot of hunger and my mother-in-law used to say, ‘You are not special because you are pregnant. Be thankful to God, and eat whatever is available at home. I had six children and no one ever fed me anything special.’ (Mother, In-depth Interview)

This situation may be further exacerbated by household norms that often limit the social mobility of women, preventing them from making autonomous choices:

‘I was told by my mother-in-law to just eat dal [lentils] and roti [bread] and not to make any special requests. Sometimes I craved something sour or salty but I was not allowed to leave the house to go to the market alone. I was totally dependent on my mother-in-law for food…’ (Mother, In-depth Interview)

The role of the mother-in-law was described as mediating the dietary pattern of the pregnant mother. Aside from enforcing the household norms, mothers-in-law sought to maintain their hierarchical standing within the household by actively blocking preferential treatment for their pregnant daughters-in-law. This was described by a rural LHW:

‘When the new bride in my neighboring household became pregnant, her husband brought her jalebi [a sweet dish] because she had been craving it for days. This caused a fight to break out in the house…. I think she felt threatened because her son was bringing food for his wife and neglecting her [the mother].’ (LHW, In-depth Interview)

These responses indicate that food consumption decisions are not always in the hands of pregnant mothers. Despite an intention to eat more nutritionally dense foods, diverse diets, or to even respond to food cravings, the pressure of household food politics prevented some pregnant women from accessing the foods they wanted or needed.

Structural barriers

Structural barriers to food intake refer to macro-level community factors, such as policies, practices, or procedures, that result in some people receiving unequal access to nutritious food. Two such barriers were identified in the current study: inadequate antenatal counseling and the unaffordability of nutritious food options.

Inadequate antenatal counseling

Discussion with mothers in our study indicated that rural women have limited awareness, food literacy, and may lack motivation regarding the dietary or nutrient requirements for a healthful pregnancy. For instance, one mother reported:

‘I don’t know which foods are beneficial during pregnancy. I have four children and I don’t even care about what food I should consume during pregnancy. I eat whatever food is available at home. I do not take any supplements or tablets during pregnancy.’ (Mother, FGD)

This lack of nutritional awareness was compounded by women missing the opportunity to seek antenatal care because of poor experiences during prenatal care. A mother of two recalled:

‘During my first pregnancy, I was very keen to go to all my antenatal visits…. But when I reached the clinic … There were 50–60 women lined up outside waiting for the doctor. I waited 2 h for my turn. When I finally met the doctor, she spent a total of 2 min with me. She offered me no dietary advice and just gave me a prescription for a few multivitamins.’ (Mother, FGD)

It was not surprising to learn that, often, women in our sample only sought antenatal care when they experienced pregnancy complications. According to one rural GP, this visit was when many received their first antenatal nutritional guidance:

‘Some women come in the third trimester with complications, especially anemia and preeclampsia…. They don’t care about the diet and only demand multivitamin tablets and injections for a quick recovery from anemia. We give some multivitamins and folic acid tablets and instruct them to eat more fruits, vegetables, milk, and meat.’ (GP, In-depth Interview)

Antenatal care typically provides an opportunity to counsel women about the importance of consuming healthy dietary patterns and nutrient rich foods during pregnancy. However, counseling and dietary recommendations were overlooked in our study area. As such, most women we interviewed were unaware of the importance of a diverse diet and increased energy requirements during this time.

Unaffordability of nutritious food options

Our participants reported that certain food items, such as meats, fruits and vegetables, are not affordable for low-income families. According to one mother of four:

‘My husband earns 600 rupees (4USD) per day and I cannot buy fruit, milk, and meat on this limited budget…. We could only afford to eat basic items, such as dal roti [bread with lentils], during pregnancy.’ (Mother, In-depth Interview)

In the absence of adequate nutrition, per one LHW, women may be encouraged to consume an extra meal plus multivitamins each day:

‘Most of the households, especially in rural areas, cannot afford a nutritious diet, i.e. milk, fruits, dry fruits, and meat. In this situation … I instruct them to take an extra meal a day and eat more curry [lentils and vegetables] with bread. I give some multivitamins and folic acid tablets to increase hemoglobin level.’ (LHW, In-depth Interview)

Depending on economic conditions, food availability and affordability and adequate nutritional guidance, adding extra dietary food staples and supplements may not be an attainable solution in rural Pakistan.

Discussion

Adopting a broad-scoped qualitative methodology the current study identified the right barriers preventing women in rural Punjab from consuming nutritionally dense foods and achieving dietary diversity during pregnancy. These included two physiological barriers, food aversions and food cravings, plus four socio-cultural barriers, food classification, fear of difficult delivery, fear of high blood pressure and household food politics. Additionally, two structural barriers were identified, inadequate antenatal care and the lack of affordable nutritious food (Fig. 1).

Physiological barriers

It is well established that nausea and/or vomiting in early pregnancy are common conditions affecting 35–91 % of pregnant women(Reference Lee and Saha11,Reference Crozier, Inskip and Godfrey34Reference Lowensohn, Stadler and Naze47,Reference Einarson, Piwko and Koren48,Reference Flaxman and Sherman49) . This may result in altered dietary intake and food preferences(Reference Crozier, Inskip and Godfrey34). A study by Verberg et al. (2015) indicated that the effects of morning sickness may be more pronounced in Pakistan and India compared with Western countries. These symptoms have been attributed to causes ranging from Zn deficiency to psychosocial stress(Reference Verberg, Gillott and Al-Fardan50). Women affected by morning sickness may find certain foods intolerable and can face unusual food cravings(Reference Orloff and Hormes51). Our interviews indicated that some women found their routine diets of daal and roti intolerable and others craved non-food items, such as clay. This practice, called geophagy, is a form of pica(Reference Khoushabi, Ahmadi and Shadan52). The association between pica and nutrient deficiencies is ambiguous. There is evidence that nutrient deficiencies, such as Zn and Fe, may lead to pica, or cravings for nonnutritive items(Reference Kariuki, Lambert and Purwestri35,Reference Singhi, Ravishanker and Singhi36) . However, consumption of non-nutritive items like clay, a practice known as geophagy, can lead to binding of certain micronutrients, such as Fe or Zn, that may lead to deficiency. Several studies observed strong associations between geophagy and Fe deficiency anaemia(Reference Young, Khalfan and Farag53,Reference Roy, Fuentes-Afflick and Fernald54) .

Socio-cultural barriers

Interviews in the present study revealed that mothers classified food items into three categories, ‘hot,’ ‘cold’ and ‘hard’ foods, and regulated their dietary intake based on the rules of these classifications. This pattern is common in South Asia, where influences from Ayurvedic and Unani humoral medicine prevail, and a balance of ‘hot’ and ‘cold’ is believed to be necessary to maintain health(Reference Poulakou, Karamanou and Androutsos55). Since the first trimester of pregnancy is believed to generate a state of ‘heat,’ it is important to balance the body by consuming ‘cold’ foods, such as yogurt, milk and buttermilk(Reference Nag19,Reference Choudhry56,Reference Quah57) . This pattern is reversed in the third trimester where the pregnant body is thought to be ‘cool.’

While the concepts of ‘hot’ and ‘cold’ foods are widespread throughout South Asia, the underlying criteria for classifying foods are often not clear. Studies indicate that considerable variation exists in this respect not only between different countries but also within regions. Responses from our study reveal that animal protein items, such as poultry, fish, meat and eggs, are considered ‘hot’ foods and are therefore avoided during the early stages of pregnancy. Lack of adequate protein foods, such as meats, may limit availability of essential amino acids, vitamins B6 and B12, Fe and Zn during this critical phase of fetal development(Reference Young, Khalfan and Farag53). Moreover, given the high prevalence of Fe deficiency anaemia among women of reproductive age in Pakistan (18·2 %), intake of protein and Fe-rich foods that are culturally appropriate for the stage of pregnancy (i.e. lentils and beans in early pregnancy) are important to address during nutritional counseling and interventions(27). Foods identified as ‘hard’ during interviews were fibrous, including chickpeas, corn, guava, carrots and lentils. Our interviews indicated that mothers found these foods difficult to digest and felt that they caused stomach pain and bloating. This finding is supported by research from Ethiopia which showed that mothers perceived ‘hard’ foods as difficult to digest and associated with abdominal distension, bloating and difficult deliveries(Reference Hadush, Birhanu and Chaka58).

Our interviews also revealed that mothers believed that consuming more food during pregnancy would increase the size of the fetus and subsequently lead to a complicated delivery. It is possible that this belief was fueled by a rise in cesarean deliveries in Pakistan from 2·7 % in 1991 to 22·3 % in 2017(28). For instance, interviews also indicate that some women view hospital deliveries as a financial burden on their families and strive to eat less food to limit the size of the baby and allow for a home birth. This finding is supported by several studies from other LMIC(Reference Sarker, Rahman and Rahman59Reference Roro, Hassen and Lemma61), including Bangladesh, Ethiopia and Zambia, which highlight the link between poverty and preference for home deliveries. The potentially detrimental consequences of such associations may be countered through the involvement of LHW who can incorporate nutrition counseling as part of their door-to-door visits.

Household food politics refers to the conflict or competition over the control of food and its sources at the household level(Reference Chowbey62) and is another socio-cultural barrier to adequate maternal nutrition. More than half of the families in Pakistan live under an extended family, primarily with the husband’s parents and other siblings, in which members are expected to share food equally(Reference Itrat, Taqui and Qazi41). In rural joint families, tenets of food politics are usually enacted by the mother-in-law. As a newly inducted member in the household, the daughter-in-law is expected to slowly earn her place in the house by apprenticing under her mother-in-law(Reference Varghese and Roy63). As demonstrated in the current study, allowing the daughter-in-law to consume food items of her preference inverts this established power dynamic and may be met with restraint. Other studies from Africa, Asia and Latin America have also reported that mothers-in-law play an instrumental role in determining the diet of pregnant mothers, especially during pregnancy, childbirth and infant feeding(Reference MacDonald, Aubel and Aidam64). Food politics may amplify effects of some of the other barriers identified in the current study. For example, the inability to access certain foods, such as citrus fruits, vegetables and breakfast cereals, may make women more susceptible to nausea and micronutrient deficiencies(Reference Crozier, Inskip and Godfrey34). Greater awareness is needed regarding the implications of household food politics on the dietary practices of pregnant mothers. This can be addressed through awareness-raising campaigns that target mothers-in-law to encourage household decision-making that is sensitive to the dietary needs of pregnant mothers.

Structural barriers

Studies have reported that the quality of antenatal care is poor in Pakistan(Reference Noh, Kim and Lee65,Reference Qureshi, Sheikh and Khowaja66) . Participants in our study reported that women in rural Punjab do not receive adequate maternity care, thus they rarely followed through with antenatal visits. Those who did attend their appointments received limited or no nutrition counseling. Evidence from Majrooh et al. (2014) confirmed this finding: only 56 % of pregnant women enrolled for antenatal care in Punjab and 33 % missed subsequent visits(Reference Majrooh, Hasnain and Akram45). Moreover, Munawar emphasised that more than 52 % of participants reported feeling humiliated by health professionals during maternity care in Pakistan(Reference Munawar, Hassan and Ayub67).

These are notable findings, since a strong, supportive antenatal system could play a critical role in addressing many of the barriers identified in the current study. Antenatal counseling is one avenue for guidance of evidence-based nutrition information, emphasising the importance of consuming a diverse diet to support pregnancy. Counseling can provide mothers with the opportunity to assess the quality of their diets in ways other than culturally mediated food classifications(Reference Lincetto, Mothebesoane-Anoh and Gomez68). This form of nutrition education addresses misconceptions about food and nutrition during pregnancy, such as the association between certain foods and heightened blood pressure or larger babies. Through nutrition consultations, modifications to everyday meals could help mothers avoid nausea-inducing foods while still meeting nutrient requirements. For instance, an emphasis can be placed on the consumption of smaller meals, more frequent meals, alternative sources of protein and hydration(Reference Wegrzyniak, Repke and Ural69).

Pakistan is an LMIC with almost one-fourth of the population living below the poverty threshold(46). Some barriers to accessing nutritious foods are due to changes in Pakistan’s political and economic climate. Our study reported that families living in rural Punjab are unable to afford nutritious food in the form of fruits and vegetables. The inability to consume fresh produce restricted the consumption of vitamins A, C, folate and other B vitamins during critical phases of fetal development(Reference Young, Khalfan and Farag53). Addressing the barriers to fresh fruits and vegetables for marginalised segments of society requires large-scale structural changes, including greater income equality and land reforms. While a discussion of these is beyond the scope of this paper, short-term strategies can be devised to inform mothers on how to optimise their dietary intake amidst scarcity by creating recipes for affordable nutrient-dense foods.

Strengths and limitations

This qualitative study uncovered multifaceted dietary barriers during pregnancy that have not been fully explored in Pakistan. A broad-scoped qualitative methodology enabled us to unearth eight unique physiological, socio-cultural and structural barriers. Since the current study was conducted in three purposefully selected districts of Punjab, our results may not reflect the experiences of women residing in other geographic areas within Pakistan. Likewise, due to the sample size and qualitative design of the current study, it is not possible to fully gauge the depth of these barriers across the selected communities, and other barriers may have been overlooked. Since our study focused on barriers to dietary intake, we did not specifically track micronutrient consumption during pregnancy. We suggest additional investigations across Pakistan designed to identify regional barriers to diverse and nutritionally dense diets among pregnant women and potential interventions.

Conclusions

Adequate dietary intake during pregnancy is essential for both maternal and fetal health. Yet, restricted dietary intake during pregnancy is a common experience among women in Punjab, Pakistan. To explore the complexities of this occurrence, the present study used in-depth interviews and focus group discussions to uncover eight barriers that inhibited pregnant women from consuming nutritionally sound and diverse dietary intakes during pregnancy These were classified as physiological, socio-cultural and structural barriers. Our study reveals that in conjunction with making systemic changes at a structural level, much can be gained through implementing minor changes at the community, interpersonal and individual levels. For instance, the findings of our study could be used to raise greater awareness of the negative impact household food politics has on the health of both mother and child. As the nexus of dietary control within the household, specific campaigns can target mothers-in-law to alleviate dietary restrictions placed on pregnant mothers. Additionally, antenatal care that includes nutritional counseling may address the propagation of certain culturally validated, but potentially misguided, beliefs about diet during pregnancy. The negative impacts of cultural food classifications that prevent the consumption of protein-rich foods and certain fruits could be countered by narratives that link their consumption to essential micronutrients. Care that also addresses strategies to mitigate morning sickness, high blood pressure and unhealthy food cravings may also have a positive impact on maternal diet. Potentially, this process could be mediated through the active involvement of Lady Health Workers as part of outreach services that strengthen the nutritional status of pregnant women in rural areas. Furthermore, improving the accessibility of nutritious food options through low-cost initiatives, such as kitchen gardening, may provide pregnant mothers more opportunities to make healthy choices and consume healthful diets.

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgments: This paper is part of a Ph.D. dissertation entitled ‘Mother-Child Malnutrition: Causes and Consequences in Punjab, Pakistan’ of the first author. The first author would like to acknowledge the financial support of Dr. Hayward Mark, Population Research Center, University of Texas, USA, who provided funds to first author to present this paper in Population Association of America (PAA) 2019 annual meeting at Austin, Texas, USA. The authors would also acknowledge the research assistants who facilitated data collection for this project. Financial support: This research was supported by grant, P2CHD042849, Population Research Center, awarded to the Population Research Center at The University of Texas at Austin by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Widen was supported by R00HD086304. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. Conflict of interest: There are no conflicts of interest. Authorship: M.A. designed the research study, conducted data collection and drafted the paper. M.A. and Z.A. analysed the data. E.W. oversaw framing of the manuscript and provided major intellectual contributions and mentorship to M.A. regarding the evaluation and interpretation of the data and writing of the manuscript. Z.A., A.N., R.R., E.N. and A.M. contributed to interpretation of the data and provided critical feedback and edits to the manuscript. All authors made active contributions to the final version of the paper and approved the submitted copy for publication. Ethics of human subject participation: The Advance Research Board and Ethics Review Committee of the University of Sargodha approved the current study’s protocols [UOS/Acad/17/399]. Written informed consent was obtained from all study participants prior to data collection. Consent included permission to audio record interviews, use anonymised quotes and the option to decline and/or suspend interviews at any point during the study. Participants were encouraged to ask questions and seek clarification.

Supplementary material

For supplementary material accompanying this paper visit https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980021001737

References

Black, RE, Victora, CG, Walker, SP et al. (2013) Maternal and child undernutrition and overweight in low-income and middle-income countries. The Lancet 382, 427451.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haddad, L, Cameron, L & Barnett, I (2014) The double burden of malnutrition in se Asia and the Pacific: priorities, policies and politics. Health Policy Plan 30, 11931206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Özaltin, E, Hill, K & Subramanian, SV (2010) Association of maternal stature with offspring mortality, underweight, and stunting in low-to middle-income countries. JAMA 303, 15071516.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shrimpton, R (2012) Global policy and programme guidance on maternal nutrition: what exists, the mechanisms for providing it, and how to improve them? Paediatr Peri Epidemiol 26, 315325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
da Silva Lopes, K, Ota, E, Shakya, P et al. (2017) Effects of nutrition interventions during pregnancy on low birth weight: an overview of systematic reviews. BMJ Global Health 2, e000389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kibret, KT, Chojenta, C, Gresham, E et al. (2019) Maternal dietary patterns and risk of adverse pregnancy (hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and gestational diabetes mellitus) and birth (preterm birth and low birth weight) outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Public Health Nutr 22, 506520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torlesse, H & Aguayo, VM (2018) Aiming higher for maternal and child nutrition in South Asia. Matern Child Nutr 14, e12739.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
WHO (2016) WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241549912 (accessed July 2020).Google Scholar
Tunçalp, O, Pena-Rosas, JP, Lawrie, T et al. (2017) WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience-going beyond survival. BJOG 124, 860862.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kavle, JA & Landry, M (2018) Addressing barriers to maternal nutrition in low-and middle-income countries: a review of the evidence and programme implications. Matern Child Nutr 14, e12508.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, NM & Saha, S (2011) Nausea and vomiting of pregnancy. Gastroenterol Clinics 40, 309334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christian, P, Bunjun Srihari, S, Thorne-Lyman, A et al. (2006) Eating down in pregnancy: exploring food-related beliefs and practices of pregnancy in rural Nepal. Ecol food Nutr 45, 253278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, KL, Matias, SL, Mridha, MK et al. (2017) Eating down or simply eating less? The diet and health implications of these practices during pregnancy and postpartum in rural Bangladesh. Public Health Nutr 20, 19281940.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Choudhury, N & Ahmed, SM (2011) Maternal care practices among the ultra poor households in rural Bangladesh: a qualitative exploratory study. BMC Preg Childbirth 11, 15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lakshmi, G (2013) Food preferences and taboos during ante-natal period among the tribal women of north coastal Andhra Pradesh. J Com Nutr Health 2, 32.Google Scholar
Sein, KK (2013) Beliefs and practices surrounding postpartum period among Myanmar women. Midwifery 29, 12571263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erica, JP (2010) Food culture in Southeast Asia by Penny Van Esterik. Food Cult Society 13, 455458.Google Scholar
Lefeber, Y (1994) Midwives without training: Practices and beliefs of traditional birth attendants in Africa, Asia and Latin America. https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/portal/resource/pt/pah-26813 (accessed May 2020).Google Scholar
Nag, M (1994) Beliefs and practices about food during pregnancy: implications for maternal nutrition. Eco Poli Weekly 29, 24272438.Google Scholar
Zobairi, SE, Freitas, ML & Wasti, SA (1998) Diet and nutrition: a knowledge, attitude and practice study of pregnant women in Karachi. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 38, 188193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salam, FT & Sarfraz, M (2018) Perceptions and practices among married women of child bearing age regarding obstetric danger signs in rural Islamabad: a qualitative study. J Pak Med Assoc 68, 14961501.Google ScholarPubMed
Ali, NS, Azam, SI & Noor, R (2004) Womens’beliefs and practices regarding food restrictions during pregnancy and lactation: a hospital based study. J Ayub Med Coll Abbo 16, 2931.Google ScholarPubMed
Bhutta, Z, Soofi, S, Zaidi, S et al. (2011) Pakistan National Nutrition Survey. Available at https://ecommons.aku.edu/pakistan_fhs_mc_women_childhealth_paediatr/262 (accessed August 2019).Google Scholar
Qureshi, Z & Khan, R (2015) Dietary intake trends among pregnant women in rural area of rawalpindi, Pakistan. J Ayub Med Col Abbo 27, 684688.Google ScholarPubMed
McNamara, K & Wood, E (2019) Food taboos, health beliefs, and gender: understanding household food choice and nutrition in rural Tajikistan. J Health Pop Nutri 38, 17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chakrabarti, S & Chakrabarti, A (2019) Food taboos in pregnancy and early lactation among women living in a rural area of West Bengal. J Fam Medi Pri Care 8, 86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UNICEF (2019) Pakistan National Nutrition Survey. https://www.unicef.org/pakistan/media/1951/file/Final%20Key%20Findings%20Report%202019.pdf (accessed January 2020).Google Scholar
National Institute of Population Studies (2019) Pakistan Demographic and Health Survey 2017–18. Islamabad, Pakistan, Rockville, Maryland and USA: NIPS and ICF.Google Scholar
Hisam, A, Rahman, MU & Mashhadi, SF (2014) Knowledge, attitude and practice regarding folic acid deficiency; A hidden hunger. Pak J Med Sci 30, 583590.Google ScholarPubMed
Colorafi, KJ & Evans, B (2016) Qualitative descriptive methods in health science research. Health Env Res Des J 9, 1625.Google ScholarPubMed
Cesare, MD, Bhatti, Z, Soofi, SB et al. (2015) Geographical and socioeconomic inequalities in women and children’s nutritional status in Pakistan in 2011: an analysis of data from a nationally representative survey. Lancet Glob Health 3, 229239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jalal, S (2011) The lady health worker program in Pakistan—a commentary. Eur J Public Health 21, 143144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, DR (2006) A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. Am J Eval 27, 237246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crozier, SR, Inskip, HM, Godfrey, KM et al. (2017) Nausea and vomiting in early pregnancy: effects on food intake and diet quality. Matern Child Nutr 13, e12389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kariuki, L, Lambert, C, Purwestri, R et al. (2016) Trends and consequences of consumption of food and non-food items (pica) by pregnant women in Western Kenya. NFS J 5, 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singhi, S, Ravishanker, R, Singhi, P et al. (2003) Low plasma zinc and iron in pica. Ind J Ped 70, 139143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christine, B, Bisogni, CA, Sobal, J et al. (2007) Classifying foods in contexts: how adults categorize foods for different eating settings. Appetite 49, 500510.Google Scholar
Furst, T, Connors, M, Sobal, J et al. (2000) Food classifications: levels and categories. Ecol Food Nutr 39, 331355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mumtaz, S, Bahk, J & Khang, YH (2017) Rising trends and inequalities in cesarean section rates in Pakistan: evidence from Pakistan Demographic and Health Surveys, 1990–2013. PLoS One 12, e0186563.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berhe, AK, Kassa, GM, Fekadu, GA et al. (2018) Prevalence of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in Ethiopia: a systemic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pre Childbirth 18, 111.Google ScholarPubMed
Itrat, A, Taqui, AM, Qazi, F et al. (2007) Family systems: perceptions of elderly patients and their attendents presenting at a university hospital in Karachi, Pakistan. J Pak Med Ass 57, 106.Google Scholar
Samerski, S (2019) Health literacy as a social practice: social and empirical dimensions of knowledge on health and healthcare. Soc Sci Med 226, 18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaleem, R, Adnan, M, Nasir, M et al. (2020) Effects of antenatal nutrition counselling on dietary practices and nutritional status of pregnant women: a quasi-experimental hospital based study. Pak J Med Sci 36, 632639.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iqbal, S, Maqsood, S, Zakar, R et al. (2017) Continuum of care in maternal, newborn and child health in Pakistan: analysis of trends and determinants from 2006 to 2012. BMC Health Serv Res 17, 189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Majrooh, MA, Hasnain, S, Akram, J et al. (2014) Coverage and quality of antenatal care provided at primary health care facilities in the ‘Punjab’province of Pakistan. PLoS One 9, e113390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GOP (2018) Pakistan Economic Survey 2017–18. Islamabad, Pakistan: Finance Division, Economic Advisor’s Wing; available at http://www.finance.gov.pk/survey_1718.html (accessed July 2019).Google Scholar
Lowensohn, RI, Stadler, DD & Naze, C (2016) Current concepts of maternal nutrition. Obstet Gynecol Surv 71, 413.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Einarson, TR, Piwko, C & Koren, G (2013) Quantifying the global rates of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy: a meta-analysis. J Pop Ther Clin Phar 20, e171e183.Google ScholarPubMed
Flaxman, SM & Sherman, PW (2000) Morning sickness: a mechanism for protecting mother and embryo. Q Rev Biol 75, 113148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verberg, MFG, Gillott, DJ, Al-Fardan, N et al. (2005) Hyperemesis gravidarum, a literature review. Hum Reprod Update 11, 527539.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Orloff, NC & Hormes, JM (2014) Pickles and ice cream! Food cravings in pregnancy: hypotheses, preliminary evidence, and directions for future research. Front Psychol 5, 1076.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khoushabi, F, Ahmadi, P, Shadan, MR et al. (2014) Pica practices among pregnant women are associated with lower hemoglobin levels and pregnancy outcome. Open J Obs Gyn 4, 646652.Google Scholar
Young, SL, Khalfan, SS, Farag, TH et al. (2010) Association of pica with anemia and gastrointestinal distress among pregnant women in Zanzibar, Tanzania. Am J Trop Med Hyg 83, 144151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roy, A, Fuentes-Afflick, E, Fernald, LC et al. (2018) Pica is prevalent and strongly associated with iron deficiency among Hispanic pregnant women living in the United States. Appetite 120, 163170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poulakou, RE, Karamanou, M & Androutsos, G (2015) The impact of ancient Greek medicine in India: the birth of Unani medicine. Acta Med Hist Adriat 13, 323328.Google Scholar
Choudhry, UK (1997) Traditional practices of women from India: pregnancy, childbirth, and newborn care. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 26, 533539.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quah, SR (2015) Routledge Handbook of Families in Asia. Routledge, 1st ed. Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781315881706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadush, Z, Birhanu, Z, Chaka, M et al. (2017) Foods tabooed for pregnant women in Abala district of Afar region, Ethiopia: an inductive qualitative study. BMC Nutr 3, 19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sarker, BK, Rahman, M, Rahman, T et al. (2016) Reasons for preference of home delivery with traditional birth attendants (TBAs) in rural Bangladesh: a qualitative exploration. PLoS One 11, e0146161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sialubanje, C, Massar, K, Hamer, DH et al. (2015) Reasons for home delivery and use of traditional birth attendants in rural Zambia: a qualitative study. BMC Preg Childbirth 15, 216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roro, MA, Hassen, EM, Lemma, AM et al. (2014) Why do women not deliver in health facilities: a qualitative study of the community perspectives in south central Ethiopia? BMC Res Notes 7, 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chowbey, P (2017) What is food without love? The micro-politics of food practices among South Asians in Britain, India, and Pakistan. Soc Res Online 22, 165185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varghese, R & Roy, M (2019) Coresidence with mother-in-law and maternal anemia in rural India. Soc Sci Med 226, 3746.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacDonald, CA, Aubel, J, Aidam, BA et al. (2020) Grandmothers as change agents: developing a culturally appropriate program to improve maternal and child nutrition in Sierra Leone. Cur Dev Nutr 4, nzz141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noh, J-W, Kim, Y, Lee, LJ et al. (2019) Factors associated with the use of antenatal care in Sindh province, Pakistan: a population-based study. PLoS One 14, e0213987.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Qureshi, RN, Sheikh, S, Khowaja, AR et al. (2016) Health care seeking behaviours in pregnancy in rural Sindh, Pakistan: a qualitative study. Rep health 13, 34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Munawar, A, Hassan, ZU, Ayub, A et al. (2017) Women’s perceptions about quality of maternity care at tertiary care hospital Karachi, Pakistan. Pak J Pub Health 7, 109112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lincetto, O, Mothebesoane-Anoh, S, Gomez, P et al. (2006) Antenatal care. Opportunities for Africa’s newborns: practical data, policy and programmatic support for newborn care in Africa. Available at http://doh.hpc.go.th/data/mch/ancWHO.pdf (accessed January 2020).Google Scholar
Wegrzyniak, LJ, Repke, JT & Ural, SH (2012) Treatment of hyperemesis gravidarum. Rev Obstet Gynecol 5, 78–74.Google ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1 Study participants (n 41)

Figure 1

Fig. 1 Socio-ecological model highlighting major food intake barriers identified in the current study

Figure 2

Table 2 Descriptive characteristics of mothers included in study (n 29)

Supplementary material: PDF

Asim et al. supplementary material

Asim et al. supplementary material

Download Asim et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 83 KB
You have Access
Open access

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

What stops us from eating: a qualitative investigation of dietary barriers during pregnancy in Punjab, Pakistan
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

What stops us from eating: a qualitative investigation of dietary barriers during pregnancy in Punjab, Pakistan
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

What stops us from eating: a qualitative investigation of dietary barriers during pregnancy in Punjab, Pakistan
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *