Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

On the Estimation of Confidence Intervals for Binomial Population Proportions in Astronomy: The Simplicity and Superiority of the Bayesian Approach

  • Ewan Cameron (a1)
Abstract

I present a critical review of techniques for estimating confidence intervals on binomial population proportions inferred from success counts in small to intermediate samples. Population proportions arise frequently as quantities of interest in astronomical research; for instance, in studies aiming to constrain the bar fraction, active galactic nucleus fraction, supermassive black hole fraction, merger fraction, or red sequence fraction from counts of galaxies exhibiting distinct morphological features or stellar populations. However, two of the most widely-used techniques for estimating binomial confidence intervals — the ‘normal approximation’ and the Clopper & Pearson approach — are liable to misrepresent the degree of statistical uncertainty present under sampling conditions routinely encountered in astronomical surveys, leading to an ineffective use of the experimental data (and, worse, an inefficient use of the resources expended in obtaining that data). Hence, I provide here an overview of the fundamentals of binomial statistics with two principal aims: (I) to reveal the ease with which (Bayesian) binomial confidence intervals with more satisfactory behaviour may be estimated from the quantiles of the beta distribution using modern mathematical software packages (e.g. r, matlab, mathematica, idl, python); and (ii) to demonstrate convincingly the major flaws of both the ‘normal approximation’ and the Clopper & Pearson approach for error estimation.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      On the Estimation of Confidence Intervals for Binomial Population Proportions in Astronomy: The Simplicity and Superiority of the Bayesian Approach
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      On the Estimation of Confidence Intervals for Binomial Population Proportions in Astronomy: The Simplicity and Superiority of the Bayesian Approach
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      On the Estimation of Confidence Intervals for Binomial Population Proportions in Astronomy: The Simplicity and Superiority of the Bayesian Approach
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
References
Hide All
Agresti, A. & Coull, B. A., 1998, The American Statistician, 52, 2, 119
Baldry, I. K., Balogh, M. L., Bower, R. G., Glazebrook, K., Nicol, R. C., Bamford, S. P. & Budavari, T., 2006, MNRAS, 373, 469
Burgasser, A. J., Kirkpatrick, J. D., Reid, N. I., Brown, M. E., Miskey, C. L. & Gizis, J. E., 2003, ApJ, 586, 512
Brown, L. D., Cai, T. T. & DasGupta, A., 2001, Statistical Science, 16, 2101
Brown, L. D., Cai, T. T. & DasGupta, A., 2002, The Annals of Statistics, 30, 1, 160
Cameron, E. et al. , 2010, MNRAS, 409, 1, 346
Clopper, C. J. & Pearson, E. S., 1934, Biometrika, 26, 404
Conselice, C. J., Rajgor, S. & Myers, R., 2008, 386, 909
Cousins, R. D., Hymes, K. E. & Tucker, T., 2009, NIM, 612, 2, 388
De Propris, R., Liske, J., Driver, S. P., Allen, P. D. & Cross, N. J. G., 2005, ApJ, 130, 1516
Elmegreen, D. M., Elmegreen, B. G. & Bellin, A. D., 1990, ApJ, 364, 415
Gehrels, N., 1986, ApJ, 303, 336
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S. & Rubin, D. B., 2003, Bayesian Data Analysis, (New York: Chapman & Hall)
Hester, J. A., 2010, ApJ, 720, 191
Ilbert, O. et al. , 2010, ApJ, 709, 644
Kraft, R. P., Burrows, D. N. & Nousek, J. A., 1991, ApJ, 374, 344
Quirin, W. L., 1978, Probability and Statistics (New York: Harper & Row Publishers)
López-Sanjuan, C., Balcells, M., Pérez-González, P. G., Barro, G., Gallego, J. & Zamorano, J., 2010, A&A, 518, 20
Nair, P. B. & Abraham, R. G., 2010, ApJL, 714, 2, L260
Neyman, J., 1935, The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 6, 111
Rao, M. M. & Swift, R. J., 2006, Mathematics and Its Applications, 582
Ross, T. D., 2003, Computers in Biology and Medicine, 33, 509
Santner, T. J., 1998, Teaching Statistics, 20, 2023
van den Bergh, S., 2002, AJ, 124, 782
Vollset, S. E., 1993, Statistics in Medicine, 12, 809
Wald, A. & Wolfowitz, J., 1939, The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 10, 105
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia
  • ISSN: 1323-3580
  • EISSN: 1448-6083
  • URL: /core/journals/publications-of-the-astronomical-society-of-australia
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed