Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T04:26:24.123Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Classic Marine Isotope Substage 5e

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Nicholas J. Shackleton ,
Mark Chapman ,
Maria Fernanda Sánchez-Goñi ,
Delphine Pailler  and
Yves Lancelot
Nicholas J. Shackleton
Affiliation:
Godwin Institute for Quaternary Research, Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Pembroke Street, Cambridge, CB2 3SA, United Kingdom
Mark Chapman
Affiliation:
School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, United Kingdom
Maria Fernanda Sánchez-Goñi
Affiliation:
Department de Geologie et Oceanographie, Universite Bordeaux I, Avenue des Facultés, 33405 Talence Cedex, France
Delphine Pailler
Affiliation:
CEREGE, Universite d'Aix-Marseille III, CNRS UMR-6635, Europole de l'Arbios, BP80, 13545 Aix-en-Provence Cedex 4, France
Yves Lancelot
Affiliation:
Centre d'Oceanologie de Marseille, CNRS/Université de la Mediterranée, Case 901—Luminy, 13288 Marseille Cedex 09, France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Since its identification nearly fifty years ago, Marine Isotope Stage 5 (MIS 5) has been placed onto absolute time scales on the basis of three independent approaches. Cesare Emiliani, who set up the isotope stages (Emiliani, 1955), depended on uranium-series dating of the sediments, a method that today is regarded as not generally capable of yielding useful precision or accuracy. Broecker and van Donk (1970) pioneered the approach of correlating to radiometrically dated marine coral terraces; this has been much aided in recent years by improvements in the precision and accuracy of these age determinations that have flowed from the development of thermal ionization mass spectrometry (TIMS) for uranium-series dating (Edwards et al., 1986). The third approach is to use the astronomical record as a guide to the time scale. Martinson et al. (1987) generated a detailed time scale for MIS 5 using this approach. These authors suggested that the overall average error was of the order ±5000 yr, although the error would be smaller during interglacial periods with high precession-related variability, such as MIS5. At that time, the suggested confidence limits were smaller than typical values quoted for the radiometric dating of corals (typically ±6000 yr). Today the accuracy of the time scale of Martinson et al. (1987) is challenged by high-precision TIMS dates with quoted uncertainties of the order ±1000 yr or better. From the point of view of achieving a better understanding of the last interglacial period, the more serious disadvantage of the Martinson et al. (1987) time scale is the underlying hypothesis that all the proxy palaeoclimate records represent smoothly varying responses to changes in insolation; hence, there is no basis for estimating the duration of an extended interval with northern ice sheet volumes static at a size no greater than at present. From this point of view, the model of Gallée et al. (1993) is more promising, but that model is not at present sufficiently realistic to provide a reliable independent time scale. We have therefore chosen to depict the oxygen isotope record of core MD95-2042 (37°48′N, 10°10′W, water depth of 3146 m) on a time scale (Shackleton et al., 2001) that is based only on making use of selected radiometric dates obtained from fossil corals to calibrate the isotope record.

Type
Research Article
Information
Quaternary Research , Volume 58 , Issue 1 , July 2002 , pp. 14 - 16
Copyright
University of Washington

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adkins, J.F., Boyle, E.A., Keigwin, L., and Cortijo, E. Variability of the North Atlantic thermohaline circulation during the last interglacial period. Nature 390, (1997). 154 156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, A., and Loutre, M.F. Insolation values for the climate of the last 10 million years. Quaternary Science Reviews 10, (1991). 297 317.Google Scholar
Broecker, W.S., and van Donk, J. Insolation changes, ice-volumes, and the 18O record in deep-sea cores. Reviews of Geophysics and Space Physics 8, (1970). 169 198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, M.R., and Shackleton, N.J. Interactions between sea level, North Atlantic ice rafting events and deep ocean circulation during isotope stage 5. Geology 27, (1999). 795 798.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, R.L., Chen, J.H., and Wasserburg, G.J. 238U-234U-230Th-232Th systematics and the precise measurement of time over the past 500,000 years. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 81, (1986). 175 192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emiliani, C. Pleistocene temperatures. Journal of Geology 63, (1955). 538 578.Google Scholar
Gallée, H., Berger, A., and Shackleton, N.J. Simulation of the climate of the last 200 kyr with the LLN 2D-model. Proceedings of the NATO ARW 112, (1993). 321 341.Google Scholar
Imbrie, J., and Imbrie, J.Z. Modelling the climatic response to orbital variations. Science 207, (1980). 943 953.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martinson, D.G., Pisias, N.G., Hays, J.D., Imbrie, J., Moore, T.C., and Shackleton, N. Age dating and the orbital theory of the ice ages: Development of a high-resolution 0 to 300,000-year chronostratigraphy. Quaternary Research 27, (1987). 1 30.Google Scholar
McManus, J.F., Bond, G.C., Broecker, W.S., Johnsen, S., Labeyrie, L., and Higgins, S. High-resolution climate records from the North Atlantic during the last interglacial. Nature 371, (1994). 326 329.Google Scholar
Sánchez Goñi, M.F., Eynaud, F., Turon, J.L., and Shackleton, N.J. High resolution palynological record off the Iberian margin: Direct land-sea correlation for the last interglacial complex. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 171, (1999). 123 137.Google Scholar
Shackleton, N.J., Hall, M.A., and Vincent, E. Phase relationships between millennial scale events 64,000 to 24,000 years ago. Paleoceanography 15, (1999). 565 569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shackleton, N.J., Sánchez-Goñi, M.F., Pailler, D., and Lancelot, Y. Marine Isotope Substage 5e and the Eemian Interglacial. Global and Planetary Change (2001). Google Scholar
Woillard, G.M. Grande Pile Peat Bog: A continuous pollen record for the last 140,000 years. Quaternary Research 9, (1978). 1 12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar