Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-06T09:46:59.746Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

University of Wisconsin Radiocarbon Dates XIX

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Margaret M Bender ,
David A Baerreis ,
Reid A Bryson  and
Raymond L Steventon
Margaret M Bender
Affiliation:
Center for Climatic Research, Institute for Environmental Studies, 1225 W Dayton Street, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706
David A Baerreis
Affiliation:
Center for Climatic Research, Institute for Environmental Studies, 1225 W Dayton Street, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706
Reid A Bryson
Affiliation:
Center for Climatic Research, Institute for Environmental Studies, 1225 W Dayton Street, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706
Raymond L Steventon
Affiliation:
Center for Climatic Research, Institute for Environmental Studies, 1225 W Dayton Street, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Procedures and equipment have been described in previous date lists. Except as otherwise indicated, wood, charcoal and peat samples are pretreated with dilute NaOH–Na4P2O7 and dilute H3PO4 before conversion to the counting gas methane; marls and lake cores are treated with acid only. Very calcareous materials are treated with HCl instead of H3PO4. Pretreatment of bone varies with the condition of the bone sample, solid bone with little deterioration is first cleaned manually and ultrasonically. The bone is treated with 8% HCl for 15 minutes, then dilute NaOH–Na4P2O7 for 3 hours at room temperature, washed until neutral, and the collagen extracted by Longin's method (Longin, 1971). Charred bone is treated with dilute HCl, NaOH–Na4PO7, and then dilute HCl again.

Type
Date Lists
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , 1982 , pp. 83 - 100
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Bender, M M, Baerreis, D A, and Bryson, R A, 1980, University of Wisconsin radiocarbon dates XVII: Radiocarbon, v 22, p 115–129.Google Scholar
Bender, M M, Baerreis, D A, Bryson, R A, and Steventon, R L, 1981, University of Wisconsin Radiocarbon Dates XVIII: Radiocarbon, v 23, p 145–161.Google Scholar
Davis, M B, 1958, Three pollen diagrams from central Massachusetts: Am Jour Sci, v 256, p 540–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Futato, E M, 1977, Selected radiocarbon dates from Alabama: Alabama Archaeol Jour, v 23, p 37–52.Google Scholar
Gradwohl, D M and Osborn, N M, 1976, Continued site seeking in Saylorville: an intensive archaeological survey of reconnaissance units 12 through 19, Saylorville Reservoir, Iowa: Iowa State Univ Archaeol Lab, Research Rept, p 165.Google Scholar
Henning, D R, ed, 1968, Climatic change and the Mill Creek culture of Iowa: Iowa Archaeol Soc Jour, v 15, Pts 1 and 2, 358 P.Google Scholar
Johnson, W C, 1978, Intensified fluvial activity in response to Holocene climatic variations: Am Quaternary Assoc Abs, Edmonton, Alberta, p 216.Google Scholar
Johnson, W C, 1979, Holocene climatic activity on the Central Great Plains: Assoc Am Geographers (abs), Grand Forks, North Dakota.Google Scholar
Knox, J C, McDowell, P F, and Johnson, W C, 1981, Holocene fluvial stratigraphy and climatic change in the Dritfless area, Wisconsin, in Holocene fluvial stratigraphy and climatic change in the Dritfless area, Wisconsin,.Google Scholar
Longin, R, 1971, New method of collagen extraction for radiocarbon dating: Nature, v 230, p 241–242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDowell, P F, ms, 1980, Holocene fluvial activity in Brush Creek watershed, Wisconsin: PhD thesis, Univ Wisconsin-Madison, 256 P.Google Scholar
Myers, T P, 1981, Current research: Am Antiquity, v 46, no. 2, p 439.Google Scholar
Neumann, A C, 1972, Quaternary sea-level history of Bermuda and Bahamas: AMQUA abs, Miami, p 41–44.Google Scholar
Oakley, C B and Futato, E M, 1975, Archaeological investigations in the Little Bear Creek Reservoir: Office Archaeol Res, Univ Alabama, Research ser 1, p 247–255.Google Scholar
Penman, J T, 1981, Archaeology of the Bluff Siding site (47-Bf-45) Buffalo County, Wisconsin: Wisconsin Archaeologist, v 62, p 51–52.Google Scholar
Swain, P C, ms, 1979, The development of some bogs in eastern Minnesota: PhD thesis, Univ Minnesota, 100 P.Google Scholar
Van Zant, Kent, 1979, Late Glacial and Postglacial pollen and plant macrofossils from Lake West Okoboji, Northwestern Iowa: Quaternary Research, v 12, no. 3, p 358–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, W A and Bright, R C, 1968, Pollen, seed, and mollusk analysis of a sediment core from Pickerel Lake, northeastern South Dakota: Geol Soc America Bull, v 79, no. 7, p 855–876.Google Scholar
Webb, W S and DeJarnette, D L, 1942, An archeological survey of Pickwick Basin in the adjacent portions of the states of Alabama, Mississippi and Tennessee: Bureau Am Ethnol Bull, v 129, p 9–25.Google Scholar