No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 November 2015
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Information
- Type
- Bibliography
- Information
- Ramus , Volume 44 , Issue 1-2: New Essays on Homer: Language, Violence, and Agency , December 2015 , pp. 222 - 237
- Copyright
- Copyright © Aureal Publications 2015
References
Adkins, A.W.H. (1970), From the Many to the One: A Study of Personality and View of Human Nature in the Context of Ancient Greek Society, Values and Belief (London).Google Scholar
Ahmed, S. (2010), ‘Orientations Matter’, in Coole, D. and Frost, S. (eds.), New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics (Durham), 234-57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, C. (2009), The War That Killed Akhilleus: The True Story of Homer's Iliad and the Trojan War (New York).Google Scholar
Allan, W. (2008), ‘Performing the Will of Zeus: The Διὸς βουλή and the Scope of Early Greek Epic’, in Revermann, M. and Wilson, P. (eds.), Performance, Iconography, Reception: Studies in Honour of Oliver Taplin (Oxford), 204-16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allan, W. and Cairns, D. (2011), ‘Conflict and Community in the Iliad
’, in Fisher, N. and van Wees, H. (eds.), Competition in the Ancient World (Swansea), 113-46.Google Scholar
Amory, A. (1963), ‘The Reunion of Odysseus and Penelope’, in Taylor, C. (ed.), Essays on the Odyssey (Bloomington), 100-21.Google Scholar
Amthor, A., (1880), ‘Das Problema bovinum des Archimedes’, Zeitschrift für Mathematik und Physik
25, 153-71.Google Scholar
Andersen, Ø., and Haug, D.T.T. (eds.) (2012), Relative Chronology in Early Greek Epic Poetry (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Auerbach, E. (1953), Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature, tr. Trask, W.R. (Princeton).Google Scholar
Auerbach, E. (2003), Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature, tr. Trask, W.R., with a new introduction by Said, E.W. (Princeton).Google Scholar
Austin, N. (1975), Archery at the Dark of the Moon: Poetic Problems in Homer's Odyssey (Berkeley).Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. (1981), The Dialogic Imagination, tr. Emerson, C. and Holquist, M. (Austin).Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. (1984), Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics, tr. Emerson, C. (Minneapolis).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, E. (1999), ‘Introduction: Homer and Oral Poetry Research’, in de Jong, I. (ed.), Homer: Critical Assessments (London/New York), 163-83.Google Scholar
Bakker, E. (2013), The Meaning of Meat and the Structure of the Odyssey (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, E. and Fabbricotti, F. (1991), ‘Peripheral and Nuclear Semantics in Homeric Diction: The Case of Dative Expressions for “Spear”’, Mnemosyne
44, 63-84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, E. and Kahane, A. (eds.) (1997), Written Voices, Spoken Signs (Cambridge MA).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, E.J.W. (1975), ‘Voice—Beyond the Passive’, Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 116-24.Google Scholar
Barker, E.T.E. (2009), Entering the Agon: Dissent and Authority in Homer, Historiography and Tragedy (Oxford).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, E.T.E. and Christensen, J.P. (2008), ‘Oedipus of Many Pains: Strategies of Contest in Homeric Poetry’, LICS 7.2, 1-30.Google Scholar
Battezzato, L. (ed.) (2003), Tradizione testuale e ricezione letteraria antica della tragedia greca (Amsterdam).Google Scholar
Baumbach, M., Petrovic, A. and Petrovic, I. (eds.) (2010), Archaic and Classical Greek Epigram (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Beidelman, T.O. (1989), ‘Agonistic Exchange: Homeric Reciprocity and the Heritage of Simmel and Mauss’, Cultural Anthopology
4, 227-59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, J. (2010b), ‘A Vitalist Stopover on the Way to New Materialism’, in Coole, D. and Frost, S. (eds.), New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics (Durham NC).Google Scholar
Benson, G.C. (2014), ‘Archimedes the Poet: Generic Innovation and Mathematical Fantasy in the Cattle Problem
’, Arethusa
47, 169-96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergren, A. (1983), ‘Odyssean Temporality: Many (Re)turns’, in Rubino and Shelmerdine (below), 38-73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bershadsky, N. (2010), ‘The Unbreakable Shield: Thematics of Sakos and Aspis
’, CP
105, 1-24.Google Scholar
Bing, P. (1986), ‘The Alder and the Poet: Philetas 10 (p.92 Powell)’, RhM
129, 222-26.Google Scholar
Bing, P. (1998), ‘Between Literature and Monuments’, in Harder, Regtuit and Wakker (below), 21-43.Google Scholar
Bing, P. (2005), ‘The Politics and Poetics of Geography in the Milan Posidippus, Section One: On Stones (AB 1-20)’, in Gutzwiller, K. (ed.), The New Posidippus: A Hellenistic Poetry Book (Oxford), 120-40.Google Scholar
Bing, P. (2009), The Scroll and the Marble: Studies in Reading and Reception in Hellenistic Literature (Ann Arbor).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, G.D. (2010), Multitextuality in the Homeric Iliad: The Witness of Ptolemaic Papyri (Cambridge MA).Google Scholar
Boehm, I. (1998), ‘Paysage et personnage dans la tragédie grecque’, in Mauduit and Luccioni (below), 39-61.Google Scholar
Bolens, G. (2000), La logique du corps articulaire: les articulations du corps humain dans la littérature occidentale (Rennes).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonifazi, A. (2012), Homer's Versicolored Fabric: The Evocative Power of Ancient Greek Epic Word-Making (Washington DC/Cambridge MA).Google Scholar
Bonifazi, A. and Elmer, D.F. (2012), ‘The Meaning of Melody: Remarks on the Performance-Based Analysis of Bosniac Epic Song’, in Harris, J. and Hillers, B. (eds.), Child's Children: Ballad Study and Its Legacies (Trier), 233-47.Google Scholar
Bonnafé, A. (1998), ‘Paysages d'Homère: techniques descriptives dans l’Iliade et dans l’Odyssée’, in Mauduit and Luccioni (below), 9-18.Google Scholar
Borthwick, E. (1963), ‘The Oxyrhynchus Musical Monody and Some Ancient Fertility Superstitions’, AJP
84, 225-43.Google Scholar
Bouvier, D. (1986), ‘La tempête de la guerre: remarques sur l'heure et le lieu du combat dans l’Iliade
,’ Métis
1, 237-57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, A.C., and Todd, R.B. (2004), Cleomedes’ Lectures on Astronomy: A Translation of The Heavens (Berkeley).Google Scholar
Bremer, J.M. (1987), ‘The So-Called “Götterapparat”’, in Bremer, J.M., de Jong, I.J.F. and Kalff, J. (eds.), Homer: Beyond Oral Poetry
(Amsterdam), 31-46.Google Scholar
Brown, B. (2003), A Sense of Things: The Object Matter of American Literature (Chicago).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchan, M. (2004a), The Limits of Heroism: Homer and the Ethics of Reading (Ann Arbor).Google Scholar
Buchan, M. (2004b), ‘Looking to the Feet: The Riddles of the Scylla’, Helios
31, 21-49.Google Scholar
Buchan, M. (2008), ‘“Too Difficult for a Single Man to Understand”: Medea's Out-Jutting Foot’, Helios
35, 3-28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, J. (2014), ‘Framing Odysseus: The Death of the Suitors’, in Christopoulos, M. and Païzi-Apostolopoulou, M. (eds.), Crime and Punishment in Homeric and Archaic Epic: Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on the Odyssey, Ithaca, September 3-7, 2013 (Ithaca), 337-54.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. (1960), ‘Das Lied von Ares und Aphrodite: Zum Verhältnis von Odyssee und Ilias
’, RhM
103, 130-44.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. (1972), Homo Necans: Interpretationen altgriechischer Opferriten und Mythen (Berlin).Google Scholar
Butler, J. (1990), Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity (New York).Google Scholar
Butler, S., and Purves, A. (eds.) (2013), Synaesthesia and the Ancient Senses (Durham).Google Scholar
Cairns, D.L. (2011), ‘Ransom and Revenge in the Iliad
’, in Lambert, S.D. (ed.), Sociable Man: Essays on Ancient Greek Social Behaviour in Honour of N.R.E. Fisher (Swansea), 87-116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cairns, D.L. (2012), ‘
Atē in the Homeric Poems’, Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar
15, 1-52.Google Scholar
Cassio, A.C. (2002), ‘Early Editions of the Greek Epics and Homeric Textual Criticism’, in Montanari (below), 105-36.Google Scholar
Cerri, G. (2005), ‘L'ontano di Filita: soluzione di un enigma e ricostruzione di un percorso critico’, QUCC
80, 133-39.Google Scholar
Chafe, W. (1994), Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speech and Writing (Chicago).Google Scholar
Chantraine, P. (1999), Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue grecque: histoire des mots
2
(Paris) [orig. pub. 1968-80].Google Scholar
Chantraine, P. (2009), Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue grecque: histoire des mots (Nouvelle ed. achevée par Taillardat, J.
et al. : Paris).Google Scholar
Clarke, M. (1995) ‘The Wisdom of Thales and the Problem of the Word ΙΕΡΟΣ’, CQ
45, 296-317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, M. (1997), ‘Gods and Mountains in Greek Myth and Poetry’, in Lloyd, A.B. (ed.), What is a God?: Studies in the Nature of Greek Divinity (Swansea/London), 65-80.Google Scholar
Clarke, M. (1999), Flesh and Spirit in the Songs of Homer: A Study of Words and Myths (Oxford).Google Scholar
Clarke, M. (2001), ‘“Heart-Cutting Talk”: Homeric κερτομέω and Related Words’, CQ
51, 329-38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, M. (2004a), ‘An Ox-Fronted River-God: Sophocles, Trachiniae 12-13’, HSCP
102, 97-112.Google Scholar
Clarke, M. (2004b), ‘Manhood and Heroism’, in Fowler, R. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Homer (Cambridge), 74-90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clay, J.S. (1999), ‘
Iliad 24.469 and the Semantics of κερτομέω’, CQ
49, 618-21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, S.G. (2004), Landscapes, Gender, and Ritual Space: The Ancient Greek Experience (Berkeley).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, E. (2003), ‘Agamemnon's Test of the Army in Iliad Book 2 and the Function of Homeric Akhos
’, AJP
124, 165-98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, E. (2012), ‘Introduction’, in McCrorie, E. (tr.), Homer: The Iliad (Baltimore), xvii-lxiii.Google Scholar
Coole, D., and Frost, S. (eds.), New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics (Durham NC).Google Scholar
Cribiore, R. (1994), ‘A Homeric Writing Exercise and Reading Homer in School’, Tyche
9, 1-8.Google Scholar
Cribiore, R. (2001), Gymnastics of the Mind: Greek Education in Hellenistic and Roman Egypt (Princeton).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crotty, K.M. (1994), The Poetics of Supplication: Homer's Iliad and Odyssey (Ithaca NY/London).Google Scholar
Currie, B. (2002), ‘Euthymos of Locri: A Case Study in Heroization in the Classical Period’, JHS
122, 24-44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Alessio, G.B. (2004), ‘Textual Fluctuations and Cosmic Streams: Ocean and Acheloios’, JHS
124, 16-37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danek, G. (2002), ‘Odysseus between Scylla and Charybdis’, in Hurst, A. and Létoublon, F. (eds.), La Mythologie et l'Odyssée (Geneva), 15-25.Google Scholar
Day, J.W. (2007), ‘Poems on Stone: The Inscribed Antecedents of Hellenistic Epigram’, in Bing, P. and Bruss, J.S. (eds.), Brill's Companion to Hellenistic Epigram (Leiden), 29-47.Google Scholar
Day, J.W. (2010), Archaic Greek Epigram and Dedication: Representation and Reperformance (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Deacey, S. (2000), ‘Athena and Ares: War, Violence, and Warlike Deities’, in Van Wees, H. (ed.), War and Violence in Ancient Greece (London), 285-98.Google Scholar
de Jong, I.J.F. (1994), ‘Between Word and Deed: Hidden Thoughts in the Odyssey
’, in de Jong, I.J.F. and Sullivan, J.P. (eds.), Modern Critical Theory and Classical Literature (Leiden), 27-50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jong, I.J.F. (2004 [1987]), Narrators and Focalizers: The Presentation of the Story in the Iliad (Amsterdam; 2nd ed.
Bristol).Google Scholar
de Jong, I.J.F. (2001), A Narratological Commentary on the Odyssey (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deleuze, G., and Guattari, F. (1987), A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, tr. Massumi, B. (Minneapolis).Google Scholar
Desersiwicz, W. (2014), Excellent Sheep: The Miseducation of the American Elite and the Way to a Meaningful Life (New York).Google Scholar
DeSmidt, D. Ben. (2006), ‘Horn and Ivory, Bow and Scar: Odyssey 19.559-81’, CQ
56, 284-89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Detienne, M., and Vernant, J.-P. (1991), Cunning Intelligence in Greek Culture and Society, tr. Lloyd, J. (Chicago) [prev. publ. 1978].Google Scholar
Dihle, A. (1970), ‘Leumanns Homerische Wörter und die Sprache der mündlichen Dichtung’, Glotta
48, 1-8.Google Scholar
Dimock, W.C. (2008), ‘After Troy: Homer, Euripides, Total War’, in Felski, R. (ed.), Rethinking Tragedy (Baltimore), 66-81.Google Scholar
Dobbin, R. (tr.) (2008), Epictetus: Discourses and Selected Writings (London/New York).Google Scholar
Doherty, L. (1995), Siren Songs: Gender, Audiences, and Narrators in the Odyssey (Ann Arbor).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donlan, W. (1993), ‘Duelling with Gifts in the Iliad: As the Audience Saw It’, Colby Quarterly
29.3, 155-72.Google Scholar
Dougherty, C. (1991), ‘Phemius’ Last Stand: The Impact of Occasion on Tradition in the Odyssey
’, Oral Tradition
6, 93-103.Google Scholar
Dougherty, C. (2001), The Raft of Odysseus: The Ethnographic Imagination of Homer's Odyssey (New York).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dué, C. (2001), ‘Achilles’ Golden Amphora in Aeschines’ Against Timarchus and the Afterlife of Oral Tradition’, CP
96, 33-47.Google Scholar
Dué, C. and Ebbott, M. (2004), ‘As Many Homers As You Please: An Online Multitext of Homer’, Classics@ 2, http://chs.harvard.edu/CHS/article/display/1314
Google Scholar
Dué, C. and Ebbott, M. (2009), ‘Digital Criticism: Editorial Standards for the Homer Multitext’, Digital Humanities Quarterly 3.1, http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/3/1/000029/000029.html
Google Scholar
Dué, C. and Ebbott, M. (2010), Iliad 10 and the Poetics of Ambush: A Multitext Edition with Essays and Commentary (Washington DC).Google Scholar
Dué, C. and Ebbott, M. (2012), ‘Homeric Scholia and the Multitextuality of the Iliad
’, in Bers, V., Elmer, D. and Muellner, L. (eds.), Donum natalicium digitaliter confectum Gregorio Nagy septuagenario a discipulis collegis familiaribus oblatum: A Virtual Birthday Gift Presented to Gregory Nagy on Turning Seventy by his Students, Colleagues, and Friends (Cambridge MA).Google Scholar
Düntzer, H. (1872), ‘Zur Beurtheilung der stehenden homerischen Beiwoerter’, in Homerische Abhandlungen (Leipzig), 507-16.Google Scholar
Edwards, M.W. (1991), The Iliad: A Commentary, Volume 5: Books 17-20 (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elmer, D.F. (2012), ‘Building Community across the Battle-Lines: The Truce in Iliad 3 and 4’, in Wilker, J. (ed.), Maintaining Peace and Interstate Stability in Archaic and Classical Greece (Berlin), 24-58.Google Scholar
Elmer, D.F. (2013), The Poetics of Consent: Collective Decision Making and the Iliad (Baltimore).Google Scholar
Fantuzzi, M. (2001), ‘“Homeric” Formularity in the Argonautica of Apollonius of Rhodes’, in Papanghelis, T. D. and Rengakos, A. (eds.), A Companion to Apollonius Rhodius (Leiden), 171-92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fantuzzi, M. and Hunter, R. (2004), Tradition and Innovation in Hellenistic Poetry (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Fenno, J. (2005), ‘“A Great Wave against the Stream”: Water Imagery in Iliadic Battle Scenes’, AJP
126, 475-504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández-Galiano, M. (1992), ‘Books XXI-XXII’, in Fernández-Galiano, M., Heubeck, A. and Russo, J., A Commentary on Homer's Odyssey: Volume III (Oxford), 131-310.Google Scholar
Finkelberg, M. (2000), ‘The Cypria, the Iliad, and the Problem of Multiformity in Oral and Written Tradition’, CP
95, 1-11.Google Scholar
Finkelberg, M. (2012), ‘Late Features in the Speeches of the Iliad’, in Andersen and Haug (above), 80-95.Google Scholar
Foley, H. (1984), ‘ “Reverse Similes” and Sex Roles in the Odyssey
’, in Peradotto, J. and Sullivan, J.P. (eds.), Women and the Ancient World (Albany), 59-78.Google Scholar
Foley, J.M. (1991), Immanent Art: From Structure to Meaning in Traditional Oral Epic (Bloomington).Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1990), The Care of the Self: The History of Sexuality, Volume 3, tr. Hurley, R. (London).Google Scholar
Fränkel, H. (1975), Early Greek Poetry and Philosophy, tr. Hadas, M. and Willis, J. (New York/London) [orig. publ. 1951].Google Scholar
Fränkel, H. (1997), ‘Essence and Nature of the Homeric Simile’, in Wright, G.M. and Jones, P.V. (eds.), Homer: German Scholarship in Translation (Oxford), 103-23 = Fränkel (1921), 98-114.Google Scholar
Fredricksmeyer, H.C. (1997), ‘Penelope Polutropos: The Crux at Odyssey 23.218-24’, AJP
118, 487-97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedrich, R. (1987), ‘Thrinakia and Zeus’ Ways to Men in the Odyssey
’, GRBS
28, 375-400.Google Scholar
Friedrich, R. (2007), Formular Economy in Homer: The Poetics of the Breaches (Stuttgart).Google Scholar
Gasparov, B. (2010), Speech, Memory, and Meaning: Intertextuality in Everyday Language (Berlin).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaster, A. (1961), Thespis: Ritual, Myth, and Drama in the Ancient Near East, rev. ed. (Garden City).Google Scholar
Gavrylenko, V. (2012), ‘The Body without Skin in the Homeric Poems’, in Horstmanshoff, M., King, H. and Zittel, C. (eds.), Blood, Sweat, and Tears: The Changing Concepts of Physiology from Antiquity into Early Modern Europe (Leiden), 479-502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, A. (2003), The Babylonian Gilgamesh Epic: Introduction, Critical Edition, and Cuneiform Texts (Oxford).Google Scholar
Giangrande, G. (1967), ‘Sympotic Literature and Epigram’, in Raubitschek, A.E. (ed.), L’Épigramme grecque (Geneva), 93-177.Google Scholar
Giangrande, G. (1970), ‘Der stilistische Gebrauch der Dorismen im Epos’, Hermes
98, 257-77.Google Scholar
Gill, C. (1996), Personality in Greek Epic, Tragedy, and Philosophy: The Self in Dialogue (Oxford).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gittings, J. (2012), The Glorious Art of Peace: From the Iliad to Iraq (Oxford).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gladstone, W.E. (1889), ‘Phœnician Affinities of Ithaca’, The Nineteenth Century
26, 280-93.Google Scholar
Goff, B. (1991), ‘The Sign and the Fall: The Scars of Orestes and Odysseus’, ClAnt
10, 259-67.Google ScholarPubMed
Goldhill, S. (1988), ‘Reading Differences: The Odyssey and Recognition’, Ramus
17, 1-31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldhill, S. (1990), ‘Supplication and Authorial Comment in the Iliad: Iliad Z 61-2’, Hermes
118, 373-76.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (1991), The Poet's Voice: Essays on Poetics and Greek Literature (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Gomme, A.W., Andrewes, A. and Dover, K.J. (1970), A Historical Commentary on Thucydides (Oxford/Toronto).Google Scholar
Gottschall, J. (2008), The Rape of Troy: Evolution, Violence, and the World of Homer (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Goulet, R. (ed.) (1980), Cléomède: Théorie élémentaire (De motu circulari corporum caelestium) (Paris).Google Scholar
Graziosi, B. (2013a), ‘The Poet in the Iliad
’, in Marmodoro, A. and Hill, J. (eds.), The Author's Voice in Classical and Late Antiquity (Oxford), 9-38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graziosi, B. (2013b), ‘Homer: From Reception to Composition’, Letras Clássicas
14, 21-33.Google Scholar
Graziosi, B. and Haubold, J. (2003), ‘Homeric Masculinity: ἠνορέη and ἀγηνορίη’, JHS
123, 60-76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenblatt, S. (1980), Renaissace Self-Fashioning: From More to Shakespeare (Chicago/London).Google Scholar
Grethlein, J. (2008), ‘Memory and Material Objects in the Iliad and the Odyssey
’, JHS
128, 27-51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith, M. (2006), ‘Horsepower and Donkeywork: Equids and the Ancient Greek Imagination’, CP
101, 185-246 and 307-58.Google Scholar
Gutzwiller, K., (2002), ‘Posidippus on Statuary’, in Bastianini, G. and Casanova, A. (eds.), Il papiro di Posidippo un anno dopo (Florence), 41-60.Google Scholar
Hackstein, O. (2002), Die Sprachform der homerischen Epen. Faktoren morphologischer Variabilität in literarischen Frühformen: Tradition, Sprachwandel, sprachliche Anachronismen (Wiesbaden).Google Scholar
Hackstein, O. (2007), ‘La paréchèse et les jeux sur les mots chez Homère’, in Blanc, A. and Dupraz, E. (eds.), Procédés synchroniques de la langue poétique en grec et en Latin (Brussels), 103-13.Google Scholar
Haft, A.J. (1984), ‘Odysseus, Idomeneus and Meriones: The Cretan Lies of Odyssey 13-19’, CJ
79, 289-306.Google Scholar
Hainsworth, B. (1993), The Iliad: A Commentary, Volume 3: Books 9-12 (Cambridge/New York).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, S. (1996), ‘Introduction: Who Needs Identity?’, in Hall, S. and du Gay, P. (eds.), Questions of Cultural Identity (London), 1-17.Google Scholar
Hansen, W.F. (2002), Ariadne's Thread: A Guide to International Tales Found in Classical Literature (Ithaca NY).Google Scholar
Haraway, D. (1991), Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature (New York).Google Scholar
Harder, M.A., Regtuit, R.F. and Wakker, G.C. (eds.) (2002), Genre in Hellenistic Poetry (Groningen).Google Scholar
Haslam, M. (1997), ‘Homeric Papyri and Transmission of the Text’, in Morris and Powell (below), 55-100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haubold, J. (2000), Homer's People: Epic Poetry and Social Formation (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Havelock, C.M. (1995), ‘The Intimate Act of Footwashing: Odyssey 19’, in Cohen, B. (ed.), The Distaff Side: Representing the Female in Homer's Odyssey (Oxford), 185-201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, J. (2001), ‘Telemachus ΠΕΠΝYΜΕΝΟΣ: Growing into an Epithet’, Mnemosyne
54, 129-57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heiden, B. (2009), ‘Hidden Thoughts, Open Speech: Some Reflections on Discourse Analysis in Recent Homeric Studies’, in Montanari (below), 431-44.Google Scholar
Henderson, John (1986), ‘Becoming a Heroine (1st): Penelope's Ovid…’, LCM
11, 7-10, 25-28, 37-40, 67-70, 82-85, 114-21.Google Scholar
Henderson, John (1997), ‘The Name of the Tree: Recounting Odyssey XXIV 340-2’, JHS
117, 87-116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heubeck, A.
et al. (eds.) (1988-92), A Commentary on Homer's Odyssey (3 vols.: Oxford).Google Scholar
Hodder, I. (2012), Entangled: An Archaeology of the Relationship between Humans and Things (Chichester).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, M. (1914), Die ethische Terminologie bei Homer, Hesiod und den alten Elegikern und Jambographen (Tübingen).Google Scholar
Holmes, B. (2010), The Symptom and the Subject: The Emergence of the Physical Body in Ancient Greece (Princeton).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holoka, J.P. (2002), ‘Homer and Simone Weil: The Iliad Sub Specie Violentiae’, in Reichel, M. and Rengakos, A. (eds.), Epea Pteroenta: Beiträge zur Homerforschung. Festschrift für Wolfgang Kullmann zum 75. Geburtstag (Stuttgart), 63-75.Google Scholar
Hopman, M. (2012), ‘Narrative and Rhetoric in Odysseus’ Tales to the Phaeacians’, AJP
133, 1-30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höschele, R. (2007), ‘The Traveling Reader: Journeys through Ancient Epigram Books’, TAPA
137, 333-69.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (2009), Critical Moments in Classical Literature: Studies in the Ancient View of Literature and its Uses (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingold, T. (2011), Being Alive: Essays on Movement, Knowledge and Description (London).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Innes, D.C. (ed. and tr.) (1995),
Demetrius: On Style
, in Halliwell, S. (ed.), Aristotle: Poetics (Cambridge MA/London), 309-525.Google Scholar
Jaeger, W. (1933), Paideia: Die Formung des griechischen Menschen, Vol. 1 (Berlin/Leipzig).Google Scholar
Katz, J.T. (2006), ‘The Riddle of the sp(h)ij-: The Greek Sphinx and her Indic and Indo-European Background’, in Pinault, G.-J. and Petit, D. (eds.), La langue poétique indo-européenne: actes du Colloque de Travail de la Société des Études Indo-Européennes (Indogermanische Gesellschaft/Society for Indo-European Studies), Paris, 22-24 octobre 2003 (Louvain), 157-94.Google Scholar
Katz, M.A. (1991), Penelope's Renown: Meaning and Indeterminacy in the Odyssey (Princeton).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, L. (2010), Homer Between History and Fiction in Imperial Greek Literature (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitts, M. (2005), Sanctified Violence in Homeric Society: Oath-Making Rituals and Narratives in the Iliad (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehmer, W. (1976), ‘Volk ohne “Schuld”? Einige Bemerkungen zur Volksversammlung des β’, ZAnt
26, 11-22.Google Scholar
Kretschmer, P. (1912), Review of P. Cauer, Grundfragen der Homerkritik
2 (Leipzig 1909), Glotta 3, 307-09.Google Scholar
Kristeva, J. (1980), Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art, ed. Roudiez, L.S. (New York).Google Scholar
Krumbeigel, B. (1880), ‘Das Problema bovinum des Archimedes’, Zeitschrift für Mathematik und Physik
25, 121-36.Google Scholar
Kühn, J.H. (1941), ὕψος: Εine Untersuchung zur Entwicklungsgeschichte des Aufschwungsgedankens von Platon bis Poseidonios (Stuttgart).Google Scholar
Kwapisz, J. (2013), ‘Were There Hellenistic Riddle Books?’, in Kwapisz, J., Petrain, D. and Szymański, M. (eds.), The Muse at Play: Riddles and Wordplay in Greek and Latin Poetry (Berlin), 148-67.Google Scholar
Langacker, R.W. (1987), Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 1: Theoretical Prerequisites (Stanford).Google Scholar
Lee, M.M. (2006), ‘Acheloös Peplophoros: A Lost Statuette of a River God in Feminine Dress’, Hesperia
75, 317-25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenz, A. (1980), Das Proöm des frühen griechischen Epos: ein Beitrag zum poetischen Selbstverständnis (Bonn).Google Scholar
LeVen, P.A. (2013), ‘The Colors of Sound: Poikilia and its Aesthetic Contexts’, Greek and Roman Musical Studies 1, 229-42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, G. (2009), ‘The Condition of Improvisation’, International Society for Improvised Music Key Note Address, Santa Cruz, CA.Google Scholar
Lewis, G. and Davidson, A. (2012), ‘Improvisation as a Way of Life’, lecture delivered 9 Feb. as part of a series on Improvisation. Newhouse Center for Humanities, Wellesley College.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, J.L. (2009), Hellenistic Collection: Philetas, Alexander of Aetolia, Hermesianax, Euphorion, Parthenius (Cambridge MA/London).Google Scholar
Lissarrague, F. (2007), ‘Ajax, Corps et Armes’, in Colpo, I., Faveretto, I. and Ghedini, F. (eds.), Iconografia 2006: gli eroi di Omero. Atti del convegno internazionale, Taormina, Giuseppe Sinopoli Festival, 20-22 ottobre 2006 (Rome), 21-32.Google Scholar
Lissarrague, F. (2010), ‘Transmission and Memory: The Arms of the Heroes’, in Walter-Karydi, E. (ed.), Myths, Texts, Images: Homeric Epics and Ancient Greek Art. Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on the Odyssey, Ithaca, Sept 15-19, 2009 (Ithaca NY), 191-207.Google Scholar
Lloyd, M. (2004), ‘The Politeness of Achilles: Off-Record Conversation Strategies in Homer and the Meaning of KERTOMIA’, JHS
124, 5-89.Google Scholar
Lloyd-Jones, H., and Parsons, P. (eds.) (1983), Supplementum Hellenisticum (Berlin/New York).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lohse, G. (1964/1965/1967), ‘Untersuchungen über Homerzitate bei Platon’, Helikon
4, 3-18; 5, 248-325; 7, 223-31.Google Scholar
Louden, B. (1999), The Odyssey: Structure, Narration, and Meaning (Baltimore).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowenstam, S. (1981), ‘Irus’ “Queenly” Mother and the Problem of the Irrational Use of Homeric Epithets’, Pacific Coast Philology
16.1, 39-47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynn-George, M. (1993), ‘Aspects of the Epic Vocabulary of Vulnerability’, Colby Quarterly
29, 197-21.Google Scholar
Lynn-George, M. (1996), ‘Structures of Care in the Iliad
’, CQ
46, 1-26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Machacek, G. (1994), ‘The Occasional Contextual Appropriateness of Formulaic Diction in the Homeric Poems’, AJP
115, 321-35.Google Scholar
Mackie, C.J. (1999), ‘Scamander and the Rivers of Hades in Homer’, AJP
120, 485-501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLachlan, B. (1993), The Age of Grace: Charis in Early Greek Poetry (Princeton).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, J. (2002), ‘The Junction between the Kypria and the Iliad
’, Phoenix
56, 1-24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, R.P. (1989), The Language of Heroes: Speech and Performance in the Iliad (Ithaca NY).Google Scholar
Matthaios, S. (1999), Untersuchungen zur Grammatik Aristarchs: Texte und Interpretation zur Wortartenlehre (Göttingen).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauduit, C., and Luccioni, P. (eds.) (1998), Paysages et milieux naturels dans la littérature antique: actes de la table ronde organisé au Centre d’études et de recherches sur l'Occident romain de l'Université Jean Moulin-Lyon 3 (25 septembre 1997) (Lyon).Google Scholar
Maurizio, L. (1997), ‘Delpic Oracles as Oral Performances: Authenticity and Historical Evidence’, ClAnt
16, 308-34.Google Scholar
Meier-Brügger, M. (1986), ‘Homerisch μευ oder μοι?’, in Etter, A. (ed.), o-o-pe-ro-si: Festschrift für Ernst Risch zum 75. Geburtstag (Berlin/New York), 346-54.Google Scholar
Mills, S. (1990), ‘Achilles, Patroclus and Parental Care in some Homeric Similes’, G&R
47, 3-18.Google Scholar
Minchin, E. (1992), ‘Homer Springs a Surprise: Eumaios’ Tale at Od. 14.403-84’, Hermes
120, 259-66.Google Scholar
Mojsik, T. (2011), Between Tradition and Innovation: Genealogy, Names and the Number of the Muses (Warsaw).Google Scholar
Morgan, T. (1998), Literate Education in the Hellenistic and Roman Worlds (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Most, G.W. (2003), ‘Anger and Pity in Homer's Iliad’, in Braund, S. and Most, G.W. (eds.), Ancient Anger: Perspectives from Homer to Galen, YCS 23, 50-75.Google Scholar
Mueller, M. (2007), ‘Penelope and the Poetics of Remembering’, Arethusa
40, 337-62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, M. (forthcoming), Objects as Actors: Props and Poetics of Performance in Greek Tragedy (Chicago).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murnaghan, S. (1997), ‘Equal Honor and Future Glory: The Plan of Zeus in the Iliad
’, in Roberts, D. (ed.), Classical Closure: Reading the End of Greek and Latin Literature (Princeton), 23-42.Google Scholar
Nagler, M. (1974), Spontaneity and Tradition: A Study in the Oral Art of Homer (Berkeley).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagy, G. (1979), The Best of the Achaeans: Concepts of the Hero in Archaic Greek Poetry (Baltimore/London).Google Scholar
Nagy, G. (1992), ‘Mythological Exemplum in Homer’, in Hexter, R. and Selden, D. (eds.), Innovations of Antiquity (New York), 311-31; repr. in Nagy (1996b), 113-46.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. (1999), The Best of the Achaeans: Concepts of the Hero in Archaic Greek Poetry (rev. ed.: Baltimore) [orig. publ. 1979].Google Scholar
Nelson, H. (1981), ‘A Solution to Archimedes’ Cattle Problem
’, Journal of Recreational Mathematics
13, 162-76.Google Scholar
Nesselmann, G.H.F. (1842), Versuch einer kritischen Geschichte der Algebra, Teil 1: die Algebra der Griechen (Berlin).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Netz, R. (2009), Ludic Proof: Greek Mathematics and the Alexandrian Aesthetic (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nooter, S. (2012), When Heroes Sing: Sophocles and the Shifting Soundscape of Tragedy (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nünlist, R. (1998), Poetologische Bildersprache in der frühgriechischen Dichtung (Stuttgart).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nünlist, R. (2009) The Ancient Critic at Work: Terms and Concepts of Literary Criticism in Greek Scholia (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M.C. (2001), The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy (rev. ed.: Cambridge) [orig. publ. 1986].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oikonomides, A.N. (1988), ‘Three Archaic Greek Inscriptions from the Island of Syros’, AncW
17, 31-34.Google Scholar
Olson, S.D. and Sens, A. (1999), Matro of Pitane and the Tradition of Epic Parody in the Fourth Century BCE: Text, Translation, and Commentary (Atlanta GA).Google Scholar
Onians, R.W. (1988), The Origins of European Thought about the Body, the Mind, the Soul, the World, Time and Fate
2
(Cambridge).Google Scholar
Padel, R. (1992), In and Out of the Mind: Greek Images of the Tragic Self (Princeton).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panoussi, V. (2002), ‘Vergil's Ajax: Allusion, Tragedy, and Heroic Identity in the Aeneid
’, ClAnt
21, 95-134.Google Scholar
Parry, Adam (1957), ‘Landscape in Greek Poetry’, YCS 15, 3-29; repr. in The Language of Achilles and Other Essays (Oxford 1989), 8-35.Google Scholar
Parry, Anne Amory (1973), Blameless Aegisthus: A Study of Amumōn and other Homeric Epithets (Leiden).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parry, H. (1994), ‘The Apologos of Odysseus: Lies, All Lies?’, Phoenix
48, 1-20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parry, M. (1932), ‘Studies in the Epic Technique of Oral Verse-Making, II: The Homeric Language as the Language of an Oral Poetry’, HSPh
43, 1-50.Google Scholar
Parry, M. (1971), The Making of Homeric Verse: The Collected Papers of Milman Parry, ed. Parry, A. (Oxford).Google Scholar
Passa, E. (2001), ‘L'antichità della grafia ευ per εο, εου nell'epica: a proposito di una recente edizione dell’ Iliade’
, RFIC
129, 385-417.Google Scholar
Paxton, S. (2001), ‘Improvisation is a Word for Something that Can't Keep a Name’, in Dils, A. and Cooper Albright, A. (eds.), Moving History/Dancing Cultures: A Dance History Reader (Middletown CT), 421-26.Google Scholar
Payne, M. (2014), ‘The Natural World in Greek Literature and Philosophy’, Oxford Handbooks Online, DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935390.013.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peradotto, J. (1990), Man in the Middle Voice: Name and Narration in the Odyssey (Princeton).Google Scholar
Petegorsky, D. (1982), Context and Evocation: Studies in Early Greek and Sanskrit Poetry (Diss. UCal Berkeley).Google Scholar
Petrain, D. (2014), Homer in Stone: The Tabulae Iliacae in their Roman Context (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, J.I. (1992), ‘Hermeneutic Lines and Circles: Aristarchus and Crates on Homeric Exegesis’, in Lamberton, R. and Keaney, J.J. (eds.), Homer's Ancient Readers: The Hermeneutics of Greek Epic's Earliest Exegetes (Princeton), 67-114.Google Scholar
Porter, J.I. (2008), ‘Erich Auerbach and the Judaizing of Philology’, Critical Inquiry
35, 115-47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, J.I. (2011), ‘Making and Unmaking: The Achaean Wall and the Limits of Fictionality in Homeric Criticism’, TAPA
141, 1-36.Google Scholar
Porter, J.I. (2014), ‘Introduction’, in Porter, J.I (ed.), Time, History, and Literature: Selected Essays of Erich Auerbach, tr. Newman, J.O. (Princeton), ix-xlv.Google Scholar
Porter, J.I. and Buchan, M. (eds.) (2004), Before Subjectivity? Lacan and the Classics (= Helios 31).Google Scholar
Pratt, L. (2007), ‘The Parental Ethos of the Iliad
’, in Cohen, A. and Rutter, J.B. (eds.), Constructions of Childhood in Ancient Greece and Italy (Princeton), 25-40.Google Scholar
Purves, A.C. (2013), ‘Thick Description: From Auerbach to the Boar's Lair (Od. 19.388-475)’, in Skempis, M. and Ziogas, I. (eds.), Geography, Topography, Landscape: Configurations of Space in Greek and Roman Epic (Berlin), 37-61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purves, A.C. (forthcoming), ‘Feeling on the Surface’, in Butler, S. (ed.), A Deep Classics Reader (London).Google Scholar
Ready, J.L. (2012), ‘Zeus, Ancient Near Eastern Notions of Divine Incomparability, and Similes in the Homeric Epics’, ClAnt
31, 56-91.Google Scholar
Redfield, J.M. (1975), Nature and Culture in the Iliad: The Tragedy of Hector (Chicago).Google Scholar
Redfield, J.M. (1983), ‘Economic Man’, in Rubino and Shelmerdine (below), 218-47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redfield, J.M. (1994), Nature and Culture in the Iliad: The Tragedy of Hector, expanded edition (Durham NC/London).Google Scholar
Reece, S. (1993), The Stranger's Welcome: Oral Theory and the Aesthetics of the Homeric Hospitality Scene (Ann Arbor).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riggsby, A.M. (1992), ‘Homeric Speech Introductions and the Theory of Homeric Composition’, TAPA
122, 99-114.Google Scholar
Roisman, H. (1990), ‘Eumaeus and Odysseus—Covert Recognition or Self-Revelation?’, ICS
15, 215-38.Google Scholar
Rosenmeyer, P.A., (2002), ‘Epistolary Epigrams in the Greek Anthology’, in Harder, Regtuit and Wakker (above), 137-49.Google Scholar
Rubincam, C. (2003), ‘Numbers in Greek Poetry and Historiography: Quantifying Fehling’, CQ
53, 448-63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruskin, J. (1963), ‘Of Classical Landscape’, in Rosenberg, J.D. (ed.), The Genius of John Ruskin: Selections from his Writings (New York), 72-83.Google Scholar
Russo, J. (1997), ‘A Jungian Analysis of Homer's Odysseus’, in Young-Eisendrath, P. and Dawson, T. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Jung (Cambridge), 253-68.Google Scholar
Russo, J., Fernández-Galiano, M. and Heubeck, A. (eds.) (1992), A Commentary on Homer's Odyssey, Volume 3: Books XVII-XXIV (Oxford).Google Scholar
Sacks, R. (1987), The Traditional Phrase in Homer: Two Studies in Form, Meaning and Interpretation (Leiden/New York).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sale, M. (1996), ‘In Defense of Milman Parry: Renewing the Oral Theory’, Oral Tradition
11, 374-417.Google Scholar
Scanzo, R. (2002), ‘Un inno per Hermes: rilettura e postille eratosteniche al βίος pseudo-omerico’, Maia
54, 33-49.Google Scholar
Schadewaldt, W. (1960), ‘Der Helios-Zorn in der Odyssee’, in Studi in onore di Luigi Castiglioni (Florence), 859-76.Google Scholar
Schein, S.L. (1984), The Mortal Hero: An Introdution to Homer's Iliad (Berkeley).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schein, S.L. (forthcoming), ‘“War, What is it Good For?” in Homer's Iliad and Four Receptions’, in Homeric Epic and its Reception: Interpretive Essays (Oxford).Google Scholar
Schutz, A. (1964), ‘Making Music Together: A Study in Social Relationship’, in Brodersen, A. (ed.), Collected Papers Vol. 2: Studies in Social Theory (The Hague), 159-78.Google Scholar
Scodel, R. (2002), Listening to Homer: Tradition, Narrative, and Audience (Ann Arbor).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, C. (1963), ‘Nature and the World of Man in Greek Literature’, Arion 1 ser. 2.1, 19-53.Google Scholar
Segal, C. (1971), The Theme of the Mutilation of the Corpse in the Iliad (Leiden).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shay, J. (1994), Akhilleus in Vietnam: Combat Trauma and the Undoing of Character (New York).Google Scholar
Shifferd, K.D. (2011), From War to Peace: A Guide to the Next Hundred Years (Jefferson NC).Google Scholar
Sistakou, E. (2008), Reconstructing the Epic: Cross-Readings of the Trojan Myth in Hellenistic Poetry (Groningen).Google Scholar
Slatkin, L.M. (1991), The Power of Thetis: Allusion and Interpretation in the Iliad (Berkeley/Los Angeles).Google Scholar
Smith, J.A. (tr.) (1984), ‘On the Soul’, in Barnes, J. (ed.), The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, Vol. 1 (Princeton), 641-92.Google Scholar
Snell, B. (1953), The Discovery of the Mind: The Greek Origins of European Thought, tr. Rosenmeyer, T.G. (New York) [orig. publ. 1946].Google Scholar
Sourvinou-Inwood, C. (1995), ‘Reading’ Greek Death to the End of the Classical Period (Oxford).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, M. (2011), The Iliad in a Nutshell: Visualizing Epic on the Tabulae Iliacae (Oxford).Google Scholar
Stewart, D.J. (1976), The Disguised Guest: Rank, Role, and Identity in the Odyssey (London).Google Scholar
Stocking, C. (forthcoming), Sacrifice and the Politics of the Belly in Early Greek Poetry (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Stoevesandt, M. (2004), Feinde – Gegner – Opfer: zur Darstellung der Trojaner in den Kampfszenen der Ilias (Basel).Google Scholar
Struve, J. and , K.L. (1821), Altes griechisches Epigramm mathematischen Inhalts, von Lessing erst einmal zum Drucke befördert, jetzt neu abgedruckt, und mathematisch und kritisch behandelt (Altona).Google Scholar
Thalmann, W.G. (1998), The Swineherd and the Bow: Representations of Class in the Odyssey (Ithaca NY/London).Google Scholar
Thalmann, W.G. (2004), ‘“The Most Divinely Approved and Political Discord”: Thinking about Conflict in the Developing Polis’, ClAnt
23, 359-99.Google Scholar
Thomas, I. (1941), Greek Mathematical Works Vol. 2: Aristarchus to Pappus (Cambridge MA).Google Scholar
Thompson, D.J. (1994), ‘Literacy and Power in Ptolemaic Egypt’, in Bowman, A.K. and Woolf, G. (eds.), Literacy and Power in the Ancient World (Cambridge), 67-83.Google Scholar
Thornton, A. (1984), Homer's Iliad: Its Composition and the Motif of Supplication (Göttingen).Google Scholar
Toutain, J. (1926), ‘La culte des fleuves, sa forme primitive et ses principaux rites chez les peuples de l'antiquité classique’, L'Ethnographie 13/14 (1926), 1-7.Google Scholar
Trahman, C.R. (1952), ‘Odysseus’ Lies (Odyssey, Books 13-19)’, Phoenix
6, 31-43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsagalis, C. (2008a), The Oral Palimpsest: Exploring Intertextuality in the Homeric Epics (Washington DC/Cambridge MA).Google Scholar
Tsagalis, C. (2008b), Inscribing Sorrow: Fourth-Century Attic Funerary Epigrams (Berlin).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsitsibakou-Vasalos, E. (2000), ‘Πηλεγών - Σκάμανδρος (Il. 21.139-383): Etymological Patterns in Homer’, BICS
44, 1-18.Google Scholar
Tueller, M. (2008), Look Who's Talking: Innovations in Voice and Identity in Hellenistic Epigrams (Groningen).Google Scholar
Tueller, M. (2010), ‘The Passer-by in Archaic and Classical Epigram’, in Baumbach, Petrovic and Petrovic (above), 42-60.Google Scholar
Ulf, C. (1990), ‘Die Abwehr von internem Streit als Teil des “politischen” Programms der Homerischen Epen’, GB
17, 1-25.Google Scholar
Valance, J.T. (1999), ‘Galen, Proclus, and the Non-Submissive Commentary’, in Most, G.W. (ed.), Commentaries/Kommentare (Göttingen).Google Scholar
van der Valk, M. (1963-64), Researches on the Text and Scholia of the Iliad (2 vols.: Leiden).Google Scholar
van Nortwick, T. (2009), The Unknown Odysseus: Alternate Worlds in Homer's Odyssey (Ann Arbor).Google Scholar
van Wees, H. (1996), ‘Heroes, Knights and Nutters: Warrior Mentality in Homer’, in Lloyd, A.B. (ed.), Battle in Antiquity (Swansea), 1-86.Google Scholar
Vardi, I. (1998), ‘Archimedes’ Cattle Problem
’, The American Mathematical Monthly
105, 305-19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verity, A. (tr.) (2011), Homer: The Iliad, with introduction and notes by Graziosi, B. (Oxford).Google Scholar
Vernant, J.-P. (1991a), ‘The Individual within the City-State’, in Zeitlin, F.I. (ed.), Mortals and Immortals: Collected Essays (Princeton), 318-33.Google Scholar
Vernant, J.-P. (1991b), ‘A “Beautiful Death” and the Disfigured Corpse in Homeric Epic’, ibid., 50-74.Google Scholar
Vestrheim, G. (2010), ‘Voices in Sepulchral Epigrams: Some Remarks on the Use of the First and Second Person in Sepulchral Epigrams, and a Comparison with Lyric Poetry’, in Baumbach, Petrovic and Petrovic (above), 61-78.Google Scholar
Visser, E. (1988), ‘Formulae or Single Words? Towards a New Theory on Homeric Verse-Making’, WJA
14, 21-37.Google Scholar
Vlahos, J. (2007), ‘Homer's Odyssey, Books 19 and 23: Early Recognition. A Solution to the Enigmas of Ivory and Horn, and the Test of the Bed’, College Literature 34.2, 107-31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Soden, W. (1995), Grundriss der Akkadischen Grammatik (3. ergänzte Auflage: Rome).Google Scholar
Wachter, R. (2012), ‘The Other View: Focus on Linguistic Innovations in the Homeric Epics’, in Andersen and Haug (above), 65-79.Google Scholar
Walsh, T.R. (2005), Fighting Words and Feuding Words: Anger and the Homeric Poems (Lanham).Google Scholar
Weil, S. (2005), ‘The Iliad, or the Poem of Force’, in Weil, S. and Bespaloff, R., War and the Iliad, tr. McCarthy, M. (New York), 3-37.Google Scholar
West, M.L. (1973), Textual Criticism and Editorial Technique Applicable to Greek and Latin Texts (Stuttgart).Google Scholar
West, M.L. (1995), ‘“Longinus” and the Grandeur of God’, in Innes, D., Hine, H. and Pelling, C. (eds.), Ethics and Rhetoric: Classical Essays for Donald Russell on His Seventy-Fifth Birthday (Oxford), 335-42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, M.L. (2001a), Studies in the Text and Transmission of the Iliad (Munich/Leipzig).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, M.L. (2004), ‘West on Rengakos (BMCR 2002.11.15) and Nagy (Gnomon 75, 2003, 481-501) on West’, BMCR 2004.04.17.Google Scholar
Whitley, J. (2013), ‘Homer's Entangled Objects: Narrative, Agency and Personhood In and Out of Iron Age Texts’, CArchJ
23, 395-416.Google Scholar
Williams, H.C., German, R.A. and Zarnke, C.R. (1965), ‘Solution of the Cattle Problem of Archimedes’, Mathematics of Computation
19, 671-74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. (2002), Ransom, Revenge, and Heroic Identity in the Iliad (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winkler, J. (1990), ‘Penelope's Cunning and Homer's, in The Constraints of Desire: The Anthropology of Sex and Gender in Ancient Greece (New York).Google Scholar
Worman, N. (2001), ‘The Herkos Achaion Transformed: Character Type and Spatial Meaning in the Ajax
’, CP
96, 228-52.Google Scholar
Wurm, J.F. (1830), ‘De Archimedis Problemate Bovino’, Jährbucher für Philologie und Pedagogik
10, 194-202.Google Scholar
Yatsuhashi, A. (2010), In the Bird Cage of the Muses: Archiving, Erudition, and Empire in Ptolemaic Egypt (Diss. Duke University).Google Scholar
Zeitlin, F.I. (1996), Playing the Other: Gender and Society in Classical Greek Literature (Chicago).Google Scholar
Zerba, M. (2009), ‘Odyssean Charisma and the Uses of Persuasion’, AJP
130, 313-39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
You have
Access