Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-x2lbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-08T00:59:14.902Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Computer-based language assessment: a formative approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2008

Rosario Kane-lturrioz
Rosario Kane-lturrioz
Affiliation:
University of Luton
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper analyses new research into learner-assisted testing. The results of this research, in addition to advances in computer technology and programming, have opened up the possibility of helping students to learn more effectively by providing immediate feedback or further information in the form of clues or hints. The implications of these developments regarding a formative approach to assessment and autonomous learning are reviewed. Finally, innovative approaches within computer-based assessment of language learning, such as modules entirely taught through the use of computer courseware and CAL methods, and applications of Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS) to foreign language learning, are discussed.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
ReCALL , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , May 1997 , pp. 15 - 21
Copyright
Copyright © European Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Notes

1. Alderson, J. C. and Windeatt, S. ‘Computers and Innovation in Language Testing’ in Alderson, C. and North, B. (eds) Language Testing in the 1990s, Prentice Hall International, Hertfordshire, 1995, P. 235.Google Scholar

2. Alderson, J. C. ‘Learner-Centred Testing through Computers: Institutional Issues in Individual Assessment’, in de Jong, J. H. A. L. and Stevenson, D. K. (eds), Individualizing the Assessment of Language Abilities, Multilingual Matters Ltd, Clevedon-Philadeiphia, 1990, p. 27.Google Scholar

3. Alderson, J. C., op. cit., p. 27.Google Scholar

4. Oscarson, M. ‘Self-assessment of language proficiency: rationale and applications’, in Language Testing, 6 (1), 1989, pp. 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5. Alderson, J.C., op.cit.Google Scholar

6. Thompson, J. ‘Embedding Technology into Language Examinations: a Case Study’, in Active Learning 4, 1996, Pp. 24–29Google Scholar

7. Thompson, J., op.cit.Google Scholar

8. Canale, M. ‘The Promise and Threat of Computerized Adaptive Assessment of Reading Comprehension’, in Stansfield, C. W. (ed), Technology and Language Testing, Teachers English to Speakers of other Languages, Washington DC, 1986, p. 37.Google Scholar

9. McKendree, J. and Hammond, N. ‘Implicit Assessment in Task-based Computer Course- ware’ in Bull, J. (ed), TLTP Workshop Papers on Assessment of Learning in Higher Education, The UK Universities' Staff Development Unit and the Universities of Kent and Leeds, 1993, pp. 13–17.Google Scholar

10. Pengelly, M. ‘Computer-based Assesment to Support the Learner not the Assesseor’ in Bull, J. (ed), op. cit. pp. 29–35.Google Scholar

11. Hayet, M. ‘Take up your Computer and Learn’ in Bull, J. (ed), op. cit. pp. 19–24.Google Scholar

12. Adman, P. and Warren, L. ‘Frames of Mind’ in Bull, J. (ed), op. cit. pp. 13–17.Google Scholar

13. Swartz, M. L. ‘Introduction’ in Swartz, M. L. and Yazdani, M. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems for Foreign Language Learning, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1992 pp. 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14. Swartz, M.L., op.cit.Google Scholar

15. Bull, S. ‘Learning languages: Implications for student modelling in ICALL’, in ReCALL 6 (1), 1994, pp. 34–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

16. Criswell, E. et al. ‘Intelligent Automated Strategies of Teaching Foreign Language in Context’ in Swartz, M. L. and Yazdani, M. (eds), Intelligent Tutoring Systems for Foreign Language Learning, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1992, pp. 307–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

17. Matthews, C. ‘Intelligent Computer Assisted Language Learning As Cognitive Science: The Choice of Syntactic Frameworks for Language Tutoring’, Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 5 (4), AACE, Charlottesville, 1994, pp. 533–556.Google Scholar