Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-scsgl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-04T13:51:23.991Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Exploring the use of social virtual reality for virtual exchange

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 May 2023

Alice Gruber Open the ORCID record for Alice Gruber [Opens in a new window] ,
Silvia Canto Open the ORCID record for Silvia Canto [Opens in a new window]  and
Kristi Jauregi-Ondarra Open the ORCID record for Kristi Jauregi-Ondarra [Opens in a new window]
Alice Gruber
Affiliation:
Augsburg University of Applied Sciences, Germany (alice.gruber@hs-augsburg.de)
Silvia Canto
Affiliation:
Utrecht University, the Netherlands (s.canto@uu.nl)
Kristi Jauregi-Ondarra
Affiliation:
Utrecht University, the Netherlands (k.jauregi@uu.nl)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mentored online intercultural interaction offers foreign language learners the opportunity to develop different competences, including intercultural, linguistic, and digital competence (O’Dowd, 2021). Such virtual exchange (VE) projects typically involve computer-mediated communication via, for example, Zoom. However, the use of high-immersion virtual reality (VR) for synchronous online collaboration in VE projects has received little attention. This study investigated the effect of VR on students’ levels of presence and engagement, on students’ communication and on students’ views on using VR for intercultural encounters compared to traditional videoconferencing tools. Twenty-seven university students from the Netherlands and Germany utilised VR to carry out intercultural learning tasks using English as a lingua franca during a four-week implementation period. Participants responded to pre- and post-intervention questionnaires, completed reflection journals, audio- or video-recorded their VR meetings and participated in interviews. Results showed that the levels of presence and engagement and preferences of social VR compared to videoconferencing for intercultural encounters depended on students individually. A VR immersion experience and comfortability scale was created based on the data which showed mixed experiences. VR influenced participants’ interactions, topics of conversation and communication strategies when they explored their spaces together. The results showed that students’ attitudes towards VR and their subjective experience of VR seem to play an important role in the VE-VR setting. VR provided a safe space for many participants. Positive attitudes towards communicating in the VR environment are highly correlated with positive attitudes towards meeting students from other countries in VR. Implications for language education are provided.

Keywords

virtual exchangevirtual realityEnglish as a lingua francaintercultural learningoral interactionsituated learning

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
ReCALL , Volume 35 , Issue 3 , September 2023 , pp. 258 - 273
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of EUROCALL, the European Association for Computer-Assisted Language Learning

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ahlers, T., Lazović, M., Schweiger, K. & Senkbeil, K. (2020) Tandemlernen in Social-Virtual-Reality: Immersiv-spielebasierter DaF-Erwerb von mündlichen Sprachkompetenzen. Zeitschrift für Interkulturellen Fremdsprachenunterricht, 25(2): 237–269. http://tujournals.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/index.php/zif Google Scholar
Barreda-Ángeles, M. & Hartmann, T. (2022) Psychological benefits of using social virtual reality platforms during the covid-19 pandemic: The role of social and spatial presence. Computers in Human Behavior, 127: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107047 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Canto, S. & Jauregi Ondarra, K. (2017) Language learning effects through the integration of synchronous online communication: The case of video communication and Second Life. Language Learning in Higher Education, 7(1): 21–53. https://doi.org/10.1515/cercles-2017-0004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhimolea, T. K., Kaplan-Rakowski, R. & Lin, L. (2022) A systematic review of research on high-immersion virtual reality for language learning. TechTrends, 66(5): 810–824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00717-w CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diemer, J., Alpers, G. W., Peperkorn, H. M., Shiban, Y. & Mühlberger, A. (2015) The impact of perception and presence on emotional reactions: A review of research in virtual reality. Frontiers in Psychology, 6: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00026 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gass, S. M. (2018) Input, interaction, and the second language learner. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315173252 Google Scholar
Gijsen, L. A. J. (2021) Task engagement in virtual pedagogical lingua franca communication. Utrecht University, doctoral dissertation. https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/406850 Google Scholar
Gruber, A. & Kaplan-Rakowski, R. (2020) User experience of public speaking practice in virtual reality. In Zheng, R. Z. (ed.), Cognitive and affective perspectives on immersive technology in education. Hershey: IGI Global, 235–249. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-3250-8.ch012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruber, A. & Kaplan-Rakowski, R. (2022) Verbal and nonverbal communication in high-immersion virtual reality for language learners. In Arnbjörnsdóttir, B., Bédi, B., Bradley, L., Friðriksdóttir, K., Garðarsdóttir, H., Thouësny, S. & Whelpton, M. J. (eds.), Intelligent CALL, granular systems, and learner data: Short papers from EUROCALL 2022. Research-publishing.net, 129–134. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2022.61.1447 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guest, G., Namey, E., Taylor, J., Eley, N. & McKenna, K. (2017) Comparing focus groups and individual interviews: Findings from a randomized study. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(6): 693–708. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2017.1281601 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harbord, C. & Dempster, E. (2019) Avatars: The other side of Proteus’s mirror: A study into avatar choice regarding perception. In van der Spek, E., Göbel, S., Do, E. Y.-L., Clua, E. & Hauge, J. B. (eds.), Entertainment computing and serious games. Cham: Springer, 412–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34644-7_37 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R. & Friedman, J. H. (2009) The elements of statistical learning: Data mining, inference, and prediction (2nd ed.). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jauregi, K. & Melchor-Couto, S. (2018) Successful telecollaboration exchanges in primary and secondary education: What are the challenges? In Taalas, P., Jalkanen, J., Bradley, L. & Thouësny, S. (eds.), Future-proof CALL: Language learning as exploration and encounters: Short papers from EUROCALL 2018. Research-publishing.net, 112–117. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2018.26.822 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jauregi-Ondarra, K., Canto, S. & Melchor-Couto, S. (2022) Virtual worlds and second language acquisition. In Ziegler, N. & Gonzalez-Lloret, M. (eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and technology. New York: Routledge, 311–325. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351117586-27 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jauregi-Ondarra, K., Gruber, A. & Canto, S. (2020) When international avatars meet – Intercultural language learning in virtual reality exchange. In Frederiksen, K.-M., Larsen, S., Bradley, L. & Thouësny, S. (eds.), CALL for widening participation: Short papers from EUROCALL 2020. Research-publishing.net, 138–142. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2020.48.1178 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jauregi-Ondarra, K., Gruber, A. & Canto, S. (2021) Pedagogical experiences in a virtual exchange project using high-immersion virtual reality for intercultural language learning. In Zoghlami, N., Brudermann, C., Sarré, C., Grosbois, M., Bradley, L. & Thouësny, S. (eds.), CALL and professionalisation: Short papers from EUROCALL 2021. Research-publishing.net, 155–160. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2021.54.1325 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan-Rakowski, R. & Gruber, A. (2019) Low-immersion versus high-immersion virtual reality: Definitions, classification, and examples with a foreign language focus. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference Innovation in Language Learning. Bologna: Filodiritto Proceedings, 552–555. https://doi.org/10.26352/DY14_2384-9509 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan-Rakowski, R. & Gruber, A. (2021) One-on-one foreign language speaking practice in high-immersion virtual reality. In Lan, Y.-J. & Grant, S. (eds.), Contextual language learning: Real language learning on the continuum from virtuality to reality. Singapore: Springer, 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3416-1_9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kilteni, K., Groten, R. & Slater, M. (2012) The sense of embodiment in virtual reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 21(4): 373–387. https://doi.org/10.1162/PRES_a_00124 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lan, Y.-J. (2020) Immersion, interaction, and experience-oriented learning: Bringing virtual reality into FL learning. Language Learning & Technology, 24(1): 1–15. https://doi.org/10125/44704 Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. P. & Thorne, S. L. (2006) Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991) Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, M. A. & Lawson, H. A. (2013) New conceptual frameworks for student engagement research, policy, and practice. Review of Educational Research, 83(3): 432–479. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313480891 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, K. M. (2004) Presence, explicated. Communication Theory, 14(1): 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00302.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legault, J., Zhao, J., Chi, Y.-A., Chen, W., Klippel, A. & Li, P. (2019) Immersive virtual reality as an effective tool for second language vocabulary learning. Languages, 4(1): 1–32. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages4010013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liaw, M.-L. (2019) EFL learners’ intercultural communication in an open social virtual environment. Educational Technology & Society, 22(2): 38–55. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26819616 Google Scholar
Marks, S., Windsor, J. & Wünsche, B. (2012) Head tracking based avatar control for virtual environment teamwork training. Journal of Virtual Reality and Broadcasting, 9(9): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.20385/1860-2037/9.2012.9 Google Scholar
Mercer, S. (2019) Language learner engagement: Setting the scene. In Gao, X. (ed.), Second handbook of English language teaching. Cham: Springer, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02899-2_40 Google Scholar
O’Dowd, R. (2021) What do students learn in virtual exchange? A qualitative content analysis of learning outcomes across multiple exchanges. International Journal of Educational Research, 109: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2021.101804 Google Scholar
O’Dowd, R. & Dooly, M. (2022) Exploring teachers’ professional development through participation in virtual exchange. ReCALL, 34(1): 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344021000215 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Dowd, R. & O’Rourke, B. (2019) New developments in virtual exchange in foreign language education. Language Learning & Technology, 23(3): 1–7. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/44690 Google Scholar
O’Dowd, R., Sauro, S. & Spector-Cohen, E. (2020) The role of pedagogical mentoring in virtual exchange. TESOL Quarterly, 54(1): 146–172. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.543 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oh, C. S., Bailenson, J. N. & Welch, G. F. (2018) A systematic review of social presence: Definition, antecedents, and implications. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 5: 1–35. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00114 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pakanen, M., Alavesa, P., van Berkel, N., Koskela, T. & Ojala, T. (2022) “Nice to see you virtually”: Thoughtful design and evaluation of virtual avatar of the other user in AR and VR based telexistence systems. Entertainment Computing, 40: Article 100457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2021.100457 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philp, J. & Duchesne, S. (2016) Exploring engagement in tasks in the language classroom. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36: 50–72. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190515000094 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saldaña, J. (2013) The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.Google Scholar
Senkbeil, K. (2021) Developing methodology and applications for virtual reality in the humanities. Stiftung Universität Hildesheim. https://doi.org/10.25528/063 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Servotte, J.-C., Goosse, M., Campbell, S. H., Dardenne, N., Pilote, B., Simoneau, I. L., Guillaume, M., Bragard, I. & Ghuysen, A. (2020) Virtual reality experience: Immersion, sense of presence, and cybersickness. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 38: 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2019.09.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, M. (2009) Place illusion and plausibility can lead to realistic behaviour in immersive virtual environments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 364(1535): 3549–3557. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0138 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slater, M. (2018) Immersion and the illusion of presence in virtual reality. British Journal of Psychology, 109(3): 431–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12305 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thrasher, T. (2022) The impact of virtual reality on L2 French learners’ language anxiety and oral comprehensibility: An exploratory study. CALICO Journal, 39(2): 219–238. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.42198 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Zwaard, R. & Bannink, A. (2014) Video call or chat? Negotiation of meaning and issues of face in telecollaboration. System, 44: 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.03.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vázquez, C., Xia, L., Aikawa, T. & Maes, P. (2018, July) Words in motion: Kinesthetic language learning in virtual reality. In Chang, M., Chen, N.-S., Huang, R., Kinshuk, Moudgalya, K., Murthy, S. & Sampson, D. G. (eds.), Proceedings of IEEE 18th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies. Los Alamitos: IEEE Computer Society, Conference Publishing Services, 272–276. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2018.00069 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weech, S., Kenny, S. & Barnett-Cowan, M. (2019) Presence and cybersickness in virtual reality are negatively related: A review. Frontiers in Psychology, 10: Article 158. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00158 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weibel, D., Wissmath, B. & Mast, F. W. (2010) Immersion in mediated environments: The role of personality traits. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13(3): 251–256. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2009.0171 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Gruber et al. supplementary material

Gruber et al. supplementary material

Download Gruber et al. supplementary material(File)
File 22.4 KB