Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

An analysis of student engagement patterns in language learning facilitated by Web 2.0 technologies

  • Chen-Chung Liu (a1), Pin-Ching Wang (a2) and Shu-Ju Diana Tai (a3)

Recent research indicates that Web 2.0 applications contribute to supporting a social constructivist approach for language learning. However, students encounter different types of barrier associated with technologies and learning tasks, which can cause disengagement during different phases of learning. Thus, based on flow theory and the strategic motivation framework, this study aims to investigate students’ motivation and their engagement patterns while participating in Web 2.0 digital storytelling activities. The participants are 24 elementary school students of a suburban school in northern Taiwan. Over 19 weeks of observations on students aged 9–10 years in a third-grade classroom, data were collected through three sources: surveys, students’ digital stories, and English tests. The analysis of the data showed that motivation was a dynamic process, initially low but increasing in later phases. A dynamic pattern was also identified in the students’ flow perceptions, which included two cycles of disengagement and reengagement. Students encountered different challenges that led to disengagement phases, which highlighted the need for specific types of learning support in elementary school contexts. In addition, the participants’ vocabulary and oral fluency were found to have been enhanced by the end of the study. The implications for educational practice are discussed and the direction for future studies addressed.

Corresponding author
*Corresponding author.
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

S. S. Arslan and A. Sahin-Kizil (2010) How can the use of blog software facilitate the writing process of English language learners? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(3): 183197.

M. Asoodar , M. R. Atai , S. Vaezi and S. S. Marandi (2014) Examining effectiveness of communities of practice in online English for academic purposes (EAP) assessment in virtual classes. Computers & Education, 70: 291300.

P. C. Blumenfeld , R. W. Marx , E. Soloway and J. Krajcik (1996) Learning with peers: From small pair cooperation to collaborative communities. Educational Researcher, 25(8): 3742.

D. P. S. Chen , D. A. Lambert and R. K. Guidry (2010) Engaging online learners: The impact of web-based learning technology on college student engagement. Computers & Education, 54(4): 12221232.

G. Cheng and J. Chau (2012) Exploring the relationship between students’ self-regulated learning ability and their ePortfolio achievement. The Internet and Higher Education, 17: 915.

C. W. Chung , C. C. Lee and C. C. Liu (2013) Investigating face-to-face peer interaction patterns in a collaborative web discovery task: The benefits of a shared display. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29: 188206.

R. E. Clark (1983) Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53(4): 445459.

L. C. Ducate , L. L. Anderson and N. Moreno (2011) Wading through the world of wikis: An analysis of three wiki projects. Foreign Language Annals, 44(3): 495524.

L. C. Ducate and L. L. Lomicka (2008) Adventures in the blogosphere: From blog readers to blog writers. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(1): 928.

P. A. Ertmer , T. J. Newby , W. Liu , A. Tomory , J. H. Yu and Y. M. Lee (2011) Students’ confidence and perceived value for participating in cross-cultural wiki-based collaborations. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(2): 213228.

R. Hampel and C. Pleines (2013) Fostering student interaction and engagement in a virtual learning environment: An investigation into activity design and implementation. Calico Journal, 30(3): 342370.

L. Hedman and P. Sharafi (2004) Early use of Internet-based educational resources: Effects on students’ engagement modes and flow experience. Behaviour & Information Technology, 23(2): 137146.

D. Hoffman and T. P. Novak (1996) Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: Conceptual foundations. Journal of Marketing, 60: 5068.

B. Hoffman and D. Ritchie (1997) Using multimedia to overcome the problems with problem based learning. Instructional Science, 25(2): 97115.

H.-Y. Hsu , S.-K. Wang and L. Comac (2008) Using audioblogs to assist English-language learning: An investigation into student perception. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(2): 181198.

J. Hur and J. Oh (2012) Learning, engagement, and technology: Middle school students’ three-year experience in pervasive technology environments in South Korea. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 46(3): 295312.

K. Kiili (2005) Digital game-based learning: Towards an experiential gaming model. The Internet and Higher Education, 8(1): 1324.

G. D. Kuh (2009) What student affairs professionals need to know about student engagement. Journal of College Student Development, 50: 683706.

L. Lee (2010) Exploring Wiki-mediated collaborative writing: A case study in an elementary Spanish course. Calico Journal, 27(2): 260272.

C. C. Liu , Y. B. Cheng and C. W. Huang (2011) The effect of simulation games on the learning of computational problem solving. Computers & Education, 57(3): 19071918.

C. C. Liu , L. Y. Wu , Z. M. Chen , C. C. Tsai and H. M. Lin (2014) The effect of story grammars on creative self-efficacy and digital storytelling. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30: 450464.

H. L. O’Brien and E. G. Toms (2008) What is user engagement? A conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology. Journal of The Association for Information Science and Technology, 59(6): 938955.

J. M. Pearce , M. Ainley and S. Howard (2005) The ebb and flow of online learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(5): 745771.

M. J. Salvo (2002) Critical engagement with technology in the computer classroom. Technical Communication Quarterly, 11(3): 317337.

R. C. Shih (2011) Can Web 2.0 technology assist college students in learning English writing? Integrating Facebook and peer assessment with blended learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(5): 829845.

Y. C. Sun (2010) Extensive writing in foreign‐language classrooms: A blogging approach. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(3): 327339.

M. Taplin (2000) Problem-based learning in distance education: Practitioners’ beliefs about an action learning project. Distance Education, 21(2): 284307.

L. K. Trevino and J. Webster (1992) Flow in computer-mediated communication: Electronic mail and voice mail evaluation and impacts. Communication Research, 19(5): 539573.

J. Webster and H. Ho (1997) Audience engagement in multimedia presentations. The Data Base for Advances in Information Systems, 28(2): 6377.

V. Zorko (2009) Factors affecting the way students collaborate in a wiki for English language learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(5): 645665.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

  • ISSN: 0958-3440
  • EISSN: 1474-0109
  • URL: /core/journals/recall
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 37
Total number of PDF views: 322 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 583 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.