Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Blending technology and face-to-face: Advanced students’ choices

  • Ruth Trinder (a1)

Abstract

It has been suggested that current research in computer-assisted language learning (CALL) should seek to understand the conditions and circumstances that govern students’ use of technology (Steel & Levy, 2013). This paper attempts to identify critical factors accounting for student choices, first, by investigating advanced learners’ reported use as well as their views on the potential of specific technological resources for language learning, and, second, by widening the perspective and surveying students’ ideal learning environments. Learners’ reasons for preferring teacher-fronted classes, blended learning, immersion or technology-mediated settings yield useful information on how students perceive the strengths and weaknesses of interaction/engagement with material (i.e. technological) as well as social (i.e. human) resources, and how the roles of teachers/classes can be conceptualised today.

Data was collected via a survey of 175 Austrian university students which included Likert-type ratings and free text responses to open questions. Findings indicate that though the cohort routinely use a wide range of technology tools in their everyday lives and show awareness of the potential of ICT for language learning, a number of barriers exist based on learner beliefs/conceptions and learning aims. Thus the notion that enhancement of communicative competence is intrinsically tied to personal interaction with native speakers means that the potential of communication technologies such as Skype is not fully appreciated. It was further established that though many students are well versed in blending different technological resources in line with the criteria identified, thus displaying the hallmarks of autonomous learners, there was a clear preference for real-life compared to virtual environments.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Bax, S. (2003) CALL – Past, present and future. System, 31: 1328.
Bax, S. (2011) “Normalisation Revisited: The effective use of technology in language education”. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning and Teaching, 1(2): 115.
Breen, M. ed. (2001) Learner contributions to language learning. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
Carver, D. (1983) Some propositions about ESP. The ESP Journal, 2(2): 131137.
Cohen, A. (2003) The learner’s side of foreign language learning: Where do styles, strategies, and tasks meet? International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 41(4): 279291.
Conole, G. (2008) Listening to the learner voice: The ever-changing landscape of technology use for language students. ReCALL, 20(2): 124140.
Conole, G. and Azelou, P. (2010) A literature review of the use of Web 2.0 tools in higher education. York, UK: HEA Academy https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resource/literature-review-use-web-20-tools-higher-education.
Diaz, V. and Brown, M. (2010) Blended learning: A report on the ELI focus session. Educause Learning Initiative. https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELI3023.pdf.
EACEA. (2009) Study on the Impact of Information and Communications Technology (ICT) and New Media on Language Learning: Final Report. Brussels: European Commission http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/llp/studies/study_impact_ict_new_media_language_learning_en.php.
Egbert, J., Akasha, O., Huff, L. and Lee, H. (2011) Moving forward: Anecdotes and evidence guiding the next generation of CALL. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1): 115.
Groman, D. and Schnitzer, H. (Forthcoming) Empirical study on dictionary use in foreign-language learning: Where do business students turn for help?
Hampel, R. (2014) Enhancing interaction and communication in distance language learning by using new technologies. Distance Education in China (In Press).
Horwitz, E. (1988) The beliefs about language learning of beginning university foreign language students, Modern Language Journal, 72(3): 283294.
Kramsch, C. (2014) Teaching foreign languages in an era of globalization: Introduction. The Modern Language Journal, 98: 296311.
Kern, R. (2014) Technology as Pharmakon: The promise and perils of the internet for foreign language education. The Modern Language Journal, 98: 340357.
Kern, R., Ware, P. and Warschauer, M. (2004) Crossing frontiers: New directions in online pedagogy and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24: 243260.
Leduning, D. and Wah, L. K. (2013) Focus on students: A blended business English writing class in Sabah. Jurnal Teknologi, 65(2): 2531.
Levy, M. (2009) Technologies in use for second language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 93: 769782.
Levy, M. (2012) Technology in the classroom. In: Burns, A. and Richards, J. C. (eds.), The Cambridge guide to pedagogy and practice in second language teaching. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press, 279286.
Lew, R. (2012) How can we make electronic dictionaries more effective? In: Granger, S. and Paquot, M. (eds.), Electronic lexicography. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 343361.
Macaro, E. (2008) The shifting dimensions of language learner autonomy. In: Lamb, T. and Reinders, H. (eds.) Learner and teacher autonomy: Concepts, realities, and response. 4762.
Owston, R., York, D. and Murtha, S. (2013) Student perceptions and achievement in a university blended learning strategic initiative. Internet and Higher Education, 18: 3846.
Palfreyman, D. (2006) Social context and resources for language learning. System, 34(3): 352370.
Perez, M. M., Peters, E. and Desmet, P. (2014) Is less more? Effectiveness and perceived usefulness of keyword and full captioned video for L2 listening comprehension. ReCALL, 26(1): 2143.
Peters, M., Weinberg, A. and Sarma, N. (2008) To like or not to like! Student perceptions of technological activities for learning French as a second language at five Canadian universities. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 65(5): 869896.
Peters, M., Weinberg, A., Sarma, N. and Frankoff, M. (2011) From the mouths of Canadian university students: Web-based information-seeking activities for language learning. CALICO Journal, 28(3): 621638.
Prenksy, M. (2001) Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5): 16.
Riley, P. (1997) The guru and the conjurer: Aspects of counselling for self-access. In: Benson, P.and Voller, P. (eds.), Autonomy and Independence in Language Learning. London: Longman, 114131.
Stanley, G. (2013) Language Learning with Technology: Ideas for Integrating Technology in the Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Steel, C. H. and Levy, M. (2013) Language students and their technologies: Charting the evolution 2006–2011. ReCALL, 25(3): 306320.
Trinder, R. (2013) Business students’ beliefs about language learning in a university context. English for Specific Purposes, 32(1): 111.
Trinder, R. and Herles, M. (2013) Students’ and teachers’ ideals of effective business English teaching. ELT Journal, 67(2): 220229.
Taylor, D. (1994) Inauthentic authenticity or authentic inauthenticity? TESL-EJ, 1(2): http://www.tesl-ej.org/wordpress/issues/volume1/ej02/ej02a1/.
Warschauer, M. (2011) Learning in the Cloud. How (and why) to transform schools with digital media. New York, NY: Teachers’ College Press.
Wenden, A. (1999) An introduction to metacognitive knowledge and beliefs in language learning: Beyond the basics. System, 27(4): 435441.
White, C. (2006) Distance learning of foreign languages. Language Teaching, 39(4): 247264.
Yang, N. D. (1999) The relationship between EFL learners’ beliefs and learning strategy use. System, 27(4): 515535.
Yang, J. C. and Chang, P. (2014) Captions and reduced forms instruction: The impact on EFL students’ listening comprehension. ReCALL, 26(1): 4461.
Zourou, K. (2012) On the attractiveness of social media for language learning: A look at the state of the art. Alsic, 15(1): http://alsic.revues.org/2436.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

ReCALL
  • ISSN: 0958-3440
  • EISSN: 1474-0109
  • URL: /core/journals/recall
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed