Skip to main content
×
×
Home

CALL from an ecological perspective: How a teacher perceives affordance and fosters learner agency in a technology-mediated language classroom

  • Qian Liu (a1) and Chin-Chi Chao (a2)
Abstract
Abstract

The possibility of exploiting technology for more robust and meaningful learning and teaching has invoked messianic responses from the language education community. Yet to be explored are teachers’ pedagogical choices based on the perceived technological affordances as well as interactions between teacher and student agency mediated by these affordances in the ecology of a classroom. This qualitative case study adopts an ecological approach, aiming to address rather than factor out the broader social context in a physical classroom. With data collected from 30 hours of classroom observation and 10 post-observation interviews with the participant teacher, the study makes an attempt to show how the ecological model of language learning can provide a theoretical lens through which to explore teachers’ practices of CALL that aim to encourage learner agency. The analysis centers on three focused extracts that illustrate interaction between and among the affordance of technology, the teacher participant’s pedagogical considerations, and her goal of encouraging learner agency. The result of the study emphasizes the teacher’s role from an ecological perspective and classroom learner agency mediated by technology, which provides useful insight that can contribute to language teaching practice with technology in the classroom.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Agbatogun A. O. (2014) Developing learners’ second language communicative competence through active learning: Clickers or communicative approach? Educational Technology & Society, 17(2): 257269.
Allwright D. and Hanks J. (2009) The developing language learner: An introduction to exploratory practice. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230233690
Bakhtin M. M. (1981) The dialogical imagination: Four essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Beach R. and Myers J. (2001) Inquiry-based English instruction: Engaging students in life and literature. New York: Teachers College Press.
Beatty B. and Ulasewicz C. (2006) Faculty perspectives on moving from Blackboard to the Moodle Learning Management System. TechTrends, 50(4): 3645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-006-0036-y
Benson P. (2001) Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. Harlow: Longman/Pearson Education.
Bielefeldt T. (2012) Guidance for technology decisions from classroom observation. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 44(3): 205223. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2012.10782587
Blin F. and Munro M. (2008) Why hasn’t technology disrupted academics’ teaching practices? Understanding resistance to change through the lens of activity theory. Computers & Education, 50(2): 475490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.017
Chao C.-c. (2006) How WebQuests send technology to the background: Scaffolding EFL professional development in CALL. In Hubbard, P. and Levy, M. (eds.), Teacher education in CALL. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 221234. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.14.19cha
Chao C.-c. (2015) Rethinking transfer: Learning from CALL teacher education as consequential transition. Language Learning & Technology, 19(1): 102118.
Cortazzi M. and Jin L. (1996) Cultures of learning: Language classrooms in China. In Coleman, H. (ed.), Society and the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 169206.
Fies C. and Marshall J. (2006) Classroom response systems: A review of the literature. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(1): 101109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-006-0360-1
Flowerdew J. and Miller L. (2008) Social structure and individual agency in second language learning: Evidence from three life histories. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 5(4): 201224. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427580802286173
Gao X. (2010) Strategic language learning: The roles of agency and context. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Garrett N. (1991) Technology in the service of language learning: Trends and issues. Modern Language Journal, 75(1): 74101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1991.tb01085.x
Gibson E. J. and Pick A. D. (2000) An ecological approach to perceptual learning and development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gibson J. J. (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Haines K. J. (2015) Learning to identify and actualize affordances in a new tool. Language Learning & Technology, 19(1): 165180.
Hall R. (2008) The impact of the read/write web on learner agency. E-learning, 5(3): 284296. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2008.5.3.284
Hampel R. (2006) Rethinking task design for the digital age: A framework for language teaching and learning in a synchronous online environment. ReCALL, 18(1): 105121. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344006000711
Hirschel R. (2012) Moodle: Students’ perspectives on forums, glossaries and quizzes. JALT CALL Journal, 8(2): 95112.
Holec H. (1981) Autonomy and foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.
Honigsfeld A., Giouroukakis V., Cohan A. and Walsh M. (2009) Ten ways to incorporate technology into a TESOL teacher preparation program. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(2): 208221.
Hood M. (2009) Case study. In Heigham, J. and Croker, R. A. (eds.), Qualitative research in applied linguistics: A practical introduction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 6690. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230239517_4
John P. and Sutherland R. (2005) Affordance, opportunity and the pedagogical implications of ICT. Educational Review, 57(4): 405413. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131910500278256
Kennewell S. (2001) Using affordances and constraints to evaluate the use of information and communications technology in teaching and learning. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 10(1–2): 101116. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759390100200105
Koehler M. J. and Mishra P. (2008) Introducing TPCK. In AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology (ed.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators. New York: Routledge, 3–30.
Koehler M. J. and Mishra P. (2009) What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1): 6070.
Kramsch C. and Steffensen S. V. (2008) Ecological perspectives on second language acquisition and socialization. In Duff, P. A. and Hornberger, N. H. (eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education, Vol 8: Language socialization . New York: Springer, 1728. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30424-3_194
Langdon S. and Taylor J. (2005) “Making our lives easier”: Using free learning management systems in the ESL environment. Teaching English with Technology, 5(3). http://tewtjournal.org/issues/past-issue-2005/past-issue-2005-issue-3
Lantolf J. P. and Thorne S. L. (2006) Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Levy M. (1999) Responding to the context of CALL: Directions for research. Prospect, 14(3): 2431.
Liou H.-C. (2012) The role of Second Life in a college computer-assisted language learning (CALL) course in Taiwan, ROC. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(4): 365382. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2011.597766
Little D. (1995) Learning as dialogue: The dependence of learner autonomy on teacher autonomy. System, 23(2): 175181.
Little D. (2015) University language centres, self-access learning and learner autonomy. Recherche et Pratiques Pédagogiques en Langues de Spécialité, 34(1): 1326. https://apliut.revues.org/5008
Lund A. (2013) Collaboration unpacked: Tasks, tools and activities. In Meskill, C. (ed.), Online teaching and learning: Sociocultural perspectives. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 7798.
Lys F. (2013) The development of advanced learner oral proficiency using iPads. Language Learning & Technology, 17(3): 94116.
Menezes V. (2011) Affordances for language learning beyond the classroom. In Benson, P. and Reinders, H. (eds.), Beyond the classroom: The theory and practice of informal language learning and teaching. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 5971.
Mercer S. (2011) Understanding learner agency as a complex dynamic system. System, 39(4): 427436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.08.001
Mishra P. and Koehler M. J. (2006) Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6): 10171054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Morgan B. and Martin I. (2014) Toward a research agenda for classroom-as-ecosystem. The Modern Language Journal, 98(2): 667670. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12098
Motteram G. (1997) Learner autonomy and the web. In Darleguy, V., Ding, A. and Svensson, M. (eds.), Educational technology in language learning: Theoretical considerations and practical applications. Lyons: National Institute of Applied Sciences, 1724.
Murphy-Judy K. and Youngs B. L. (2006) Technology standards for teacher education, credentialing, and certification. In Hubbard, P. and Levy, M. (eds.), Teacher education in CALL. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 4560. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.14.06mur
Nunan D. (1992) Research methods in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pierson M. E. (2001) Technology integration practice as a function of pedagogical expertise. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(4): 413430. https://doi.org/10.1080/08886504.2001.10782325
Rama P. S., Black R. W., van Es E. and Warschauer M. (2012) Affordances for second language learning in World of Warcraft . ReCALL, 24(3): 322338. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344012000171
Rodriguez L. A. and Shepard M. (2013) Adult English language learners’ perceptions of audience response systems (Clickers) as communication aides: A Q-methodology study. TESOL Journal, 4(1): 182193. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.69
Roush C. and Song L. (2013) The impact of using Clickers technology on classroom instruction: Students’ and teachers’ perspectives. Canadian Journal of Action Research, 14(1): 2137.
Tapscott D. (1998) Growing up digital: The rise of the net generation. New York: McGraw-Hill.
TESOL International Association (2004) TESOL research agenda. http://www.tesol.org/s_tesol/seccss.asp?CID=236&DID=1708
Thoms J. J. (2014) An ecological view of whole-class discussions in a second language literature classroom: Teacher reformulations as affordances for learning. The Modern Language Journal, 98(3): 724741. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12119
Tudor I. (2003) Learning to live with complexity: Towards an ecological perspective on language teaching. System, 31(1): 112. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0346-251x(02)00070-2
van Lier L. (2000) From input to affordance: Social-interactive learning from an ecological perspective. In Lantolf, J. P. (ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 245259.
van Lier L. (2004) The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective. Boston: Kluwer Academic. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7912-5
van Lier L. (2008a) Agency in the classroom. In Lantolf, J. P. and Poehner, M. E. (eds.), Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages. London: Equinox, 163186.
van Lier L. (2008b) Ecological-semiotic perspectives on educational linguistics. In Spolsky, B. and Hult, F. M. (eds.), The handbook of educational linguistics. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 596605. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470694138.ch42
van Lier L. (2010) The ecology of language learning: Practice to theory, theory to practice. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 3: 26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.005
Vygotsky L. S. (1978) Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. (Cole, M., John-Steiner, V., Scribner, S. and Souberman, E., eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Warschauer M. (1998) Researching technology in TESOL: Determinist, instrumental, and critical approaches. TESOL Quarterly, 32(4): 757761. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588010
Warschauer M. (1999) Electronic literacies: Language, culture and power in online education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Warschauer M. and Cook J. (1999) Service learning and technology in TESOL. Prospect, 14(3): 3239.
Warschauer M. and Healey D. (1998) Computers and language learning: An overview. Language Teaching, 31(2): 5771. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444800012970
Yang C. and Xie Y. (2013) Learning Chinese idioms through iPads. Language Learning & Technology, 17(2): 1223.
Ziglari L. (2008) Affordance and second language acquisition. European Journal of Scientific Research, 23(3): 373379.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

ReCALL
  • ISSN: 0958-3440
  • EISSN: 1474-0109
  • URL: /core/journals/recall
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 14
Total number of PDF views: 138 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 478 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 8th September 2017 - 25th February 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.