Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-qc88w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-02T20:21:35.392Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Decoding the “CoDe”: a framework for conceptualizing and designing help options in computer-based second language listening

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2013

Monica Stella Cardenas-Claros  and
Paul A. Gruba
Monica Stella Cardenas-Claros
Affiliation:
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaiso, Valparaiso, Chile (email: monica.cardenas@ucv.cl)
Paul A. Gruba
Affiliation:
School of Languages and Linguistics, The University of Melbourne, 3010 VIC Australia (email: paulag@unimelb.edu)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper proposes a theoretical framework for the conceptualization and design of help options in computer-based second language (L2) listening. Based on four empirical studies, it aims at clarifying both conceptualization and design (CoDe) components. The elements of conceptualization consist of a novel four-part classification of help options: operational, regulatory, compensatory and explanatory. The design section establishes ways that make help options easy to use, encourage learner control, frame guidance and stimulate learning. Each component is contextualized, discussed and presented with limitations and suggestions for further research.

Keywords

Help optionscomputer-based L2 listeningL2 listeningparticipatory designdesignframework.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
ReCALL , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , May 2013 , pp. 250 - 271
Copyright
Copyright © European Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aleven, V., McLaren, B., Roll, I., Koedinger, K. Lester, P. (2004) Toward tutoring help seeking applying cognitive modeling to meta-cognitive skills. Paper presented at the Intelligent Tutoring Systems: 7th International Conference, ITS 2004, Maceió, Alagoas, Brazil.Google Scholar
Aleven, V., Stahl, E., Schworm, S., Fischer, F. Wallace, R. (2003) Help seeking and help design in interactive learning environments. Review of Educational Research, 73(3): 277–320.Google Scholar
Bartholomé, T., Stahl, E. Bromme, R. (2004) Help-seeking in interactive learning environments: effectiveness of help and learner-related factors in a dyadic setting. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Learning sciences: Embracing diversity in the learning sciences, Mahwah, NJ.Google Scholar
Bødker, S. Iversen, O. S. (2002) Staging a professional participatory design practice: moving PD beyond the initial fascination of user involvement. Proceedings of the second Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction, 11–18.Google Scholar
Brett, P. (1995) Multimedia for listening comprehension: The design of a multimedia-based resource for developing listening skills. System, 23(1): 77–85.Google Scholar
Brett, P. (1996) Using multimedia: an investigation of learners’ attitudes. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 9(2): 191–212.Google Scholar
Brett, P. (1997) A comparative study of the effects of the use of multimedia on listening comprehension. System, 25(1): 39–53.Google Scholar
Brett, P. (2000) Integrating multimedia into the Business English curriculum: a case study. English for Specific Purposes, 19(3): 269–290.Google Scholar
Bromberg, J. L. Henderson, A. (1990) Reflections on participatory design: lessons from the trillium experience. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Empowering people, 353–360.Google Scholar
Cárdenas-Claros, M. S. (2005) Field Dependence/Field Independence: How do students perform in CALL-based listening activities? Unpublished M.A. thesis, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.Google Scholar
Cárdenas-Claros, M. (2011) A preliminary framework of help options in computer-based second language listening. Unpublished PhD thesis. School of Language and Linguistics, Faculty of Arts, The University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
Cárdenas-Claros, M. Gruba, P. (2009) Help options in CALL: A systematic review. CALICO Journal, 27(1): 69–90.Google Scholar
Chapelle, C. (2003) English language learning and technology: Lectures on applied linguistics in the age of information and communication technology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Chapelle, C. (2005) CALICO at center stage: Our emerging rights and responsibilities. CALICO Journal, 23(1): 5–15.Google Scholar
Chapelle, C. (2005) Interactionist SLA theory in CALL research. In: Egbert, J. and Pettrie, G. M. (eds.), CALL research perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Elrbaum Associates, 53–64.Google Scholar
Chapelle, C. A. (2009) The Relationship Between Second Language Acquisition Theory and Computer-Assisted Language Learning. The Modern Language Journal, 93: 741–753.Google Scholar
Chun, D. Payne, J. S. (2004) What makes students click: Working memory and look-up behavior. System, 32(4): 481–503.Google Scholar
Chun, D. M. Plass, J. L. (1996) Effects of multimedia annotations on vocabulary acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 80(2): 183–198.Google Scholar
Clarebout, G. Elen, J. (2006) Tool use in computer-based learning environments: Towards a research framework. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(3): 389–411.Google Scholar
Clarebout, G. Elen, J. (2009) Benefits of inserting support devices in electronic learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(4): 804–810.Google Scholar
Colpaert, J. (2004) Design of online interactive language courseware: Conceptualization, specifications and prototyping. Research into the impact of linguistic-didactic functionality on software architecture. Antwerp: University of Antwerp.Google Scholar
Cushion, S. Hémard, D. (2003) Designing a CALL package for Arabic while learning the language ab initio. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16(2): 259–266.Google Scholar
Dworman, G. Rosenbaum, S. (2004) Helping users to use help: improving interaction with help systems. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM Press, 1717–1718.Google Scholar
Ellison, M. (2007) Embedded user assistance: The future for software help? Interactions, 14(1): 30–31.Google Scholar
Farmer, R. (2008) A conceptual framework for situated task analysis within the context of Computer Assisted Language Learning System Design. Unpublished PhD thesis, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Farmer, R. Gruba, P. (2006) Towards model-driven end-user development in CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19(2): 149–191.Google Scholar
Flowerdew, J. Miller, L. (2005) Second Language Listening: Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fotos, S. Browne, S. (2004) New perspectives on CALL for second language classrooms. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Garrett, N. (2009) Computer Assisted Language Learning Trends and Issues Revisited: Integrating Innovation. The Modern Language Journal, 93: 719–740.Google Scholar
Grgurović, M. Hegelheimer, V. (2007) Help options and multimedia listening: Student's use of subtitles and transcripts. Language Learning & Technology, 11(1): 45–66.Google Scholar
Hegelheimer, V. (2003) Help options in CALL. Paper presented at the Conference on Technology for SLL, Ames, IA.Google Scholar
Hegelheimer, V. Tower, D. (2004) Using CALL in the classroom: Analyzing student interactions in an authentic classroom. System, 32(2): 185–205.Google Scholar
Heift, T. (2006) Context-sensitive Help in CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19(2): 243–259.Google Scholar
Hémard, D. Cushion, S. (2001) Evaluation of a Web-based language learning environment: the importance of a user-centred design approach for CALL. ReCALL, 13(1): 15–31.Google Scholar
Hernández, S. S. (2004) The Effects of Video and Captioned Text and the Influence of Verbal and Spatial Abilities on Second Language Listening Comprehension in a Multimedia Learning Environment. Unpublished PhD thesis, New York University, New York.Google Scholar
Horz, H., Winters, C. Fries, S. (2009) Differential benefits of situated instructional prompts. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(4): 818–828.Google Scholar
Hoven, D. (1999) A model for listening and viewing comprehension in multimedia environments. Language Learning & Technology, 3(1): 88–103.Google Scholar
Hoven, D. (2003) Strategic uses of CALL: What learners use and how they react. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 17: 125–148.Google Scholar
Hsu, J. (1994) Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL): The effect of ESL students’ use of interactional modifications on listening comprehension. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation. Ames, IA: Iowa State University.Google Scholar
Hubbard, P. (2001) The use and abuse of meaning technologies. Contact, 27: 8–86.Google Scholar
Hubbard, P. (2006) Evaluating CALL software. In: Ducate, L. and Arnold, N. (eds.), Calling on CALL: from theory and research to new direction in foreign language teaching (Vol. 5). San Marcos, Texas: CALICO Monograph series, 313–338.Google Scholar
Hubbard, P. (2004) Learner training for effective use of CALL. In: Fotos, S. and Browne, C. (eds.), New perspectives on CALL for second language classrooms. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 45–68.Google Scholar
Hughes, M. (2007) A pattern language for user assistance. Interactions, 14(1): 27–29.Google Scholar
Jones, L. C. (2003) Supporting listening comprehension and vocabulary acquisition with multimedia annotations: the students’ voice. CALICO Journal, 21(1): 41–65.Google Scholar
Jones, L. C. (2006) Effects of collaboration and multimedia annotations on vocabulary learning and listening comprehension. CALICO Journal, 24(1): 33–58.Google Scholar
Jones, L. C. (2009) Supporting Student Differences in Listening Comprehension and Vocabulary Learning with Multimedia Annotations. CALICO Journal, 26(2): 23.Google Scholar
Jones, L. Plass, J. (2002) Supporting listening comprehension and vocabulary acquisition in French with multimedia annotations. The Modern Language Journal, 86(4): 546–561.Google Scholar
Kelleher, C. Pausch, R. (2005) Stencil-based tutorials: Design and evaluation. Portland, OR: ICH.Google Scholar
Könings, K. D., Brand-Gruwelb, S. van Merrienboerb, J. (2010) An approach to participatory instructional design in secondary education: an exploratory study. Educational Research, 52(1): 45–59.Google Scholar
Levy, M. Stockwell, G. (2006) Call Dimensions: Options and issues in computer assisted language learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawerence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Lin, M. Chen, T. (2009) The impact of an online explicit lexical program on EFL vocabulary gains and listening comprehension. JALTCALL, 5(2): 3–14.Google Scholar
Liou, H. C. (1997) Research of on-line help as learner strategies for multimedia CALL evaluation. CALICO Journal, 14(2–4): 81–96.Google Scholar
Liou, H. (2000) Assessing learner strategies using computers: new insights and limitations. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13(1): 65–78.Google Scholar
Lynch, P. J. Horton, S. (2009) Web style guide: Basic design principles for creating web sites. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lynch, T. (2009) Teaching Second Language Listening. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Manlove, S., Lazonder, A. W. De Jong, T. (2009) Trends and issues of regulative support use during inquiry learning: Patterns from three studies. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(4): 795–803.Google Scholar
Müller, M. (2003) Participatory design: The third space in human-computer interaction. In: Jacko, J. and Sears, A. (eds.), The Human-Computer Interaction handbook. New Jersey: Lawrence Elbaum Associates, 1051–1068.Google Scholar
Murray, R. C. VanLehn, K. (2005) Effects of dissuading unnecessary help requests while providing proactive help. Paper presented at the Artificial Intelligence in Education conference, Berlin.Google Scholar
Nvivo, Version 8.0 (2008) [Computer program]: QSR international.Google Scholar
Pujolà, J. (2002) CALLing for help: researching language learning strategies using help facilities in a web-based multimedia program. ReCALL, 14(2): 235–262.Google Scholar
Ramirez, D. Alonso, I. (2007) Using digital stories to improve listening comprehension with Spanish young learners of English. Language Learning & Technology, 11(1): 87–101.Google Scholar
Rivens Mompean, A. Guichon, N. (2009) Assessing the use of aids for computer-mediated tasks: taking notes while listening. JaltCALL, 5(2): 45–60.Google Scholar
Robin, R. (2007) Commentary: Learner-based listening and technology authenticity. Language Learning & Technology, 11(1): 109–115.Google Scholar
Rost, M. (2002) Teaching and researching listening. England: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Rost, M. (2006) Areas of research that influence L2 listening instruction. In: Uso-Juan, E. and Martinez Flor, A. (eds.), Current trends in the development and teaching of the four language skills (Vol. 47–73). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rost, M. (2007) I am only trying to help: A role for interventions in teaching listening. Language Learning & Technology, 11(1): 102–108.Google Scholar
Salman, Y. B., Ince, I. F., Kim, J. Y., Cheng, H. I. Yildirim, M. E. (2009) Participatory design and evaluation of e-learning system for Korean language training. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Interaction Sciences: Information Technology, Culture and Human Factors. Seoul, Korea: ACM Press.Google Scholar
Sampson, F. (2007) Who you gonna call? Interactions , 14(1): 22–23.Google Scholar
Sun, F. (2010) Research on the effect on listening comprehension using Computer Assisted Language Learning. Paper presented at the Computer Engineering and Technology conference, Chengdu.Google Scholar
Vandergrift, L. (2007) Recent developments in second and foreign language listening comprehension research. Language Teaching, 40(3): 191–210.Google Scholar
Vanderplank, R. (2009) Déjà vu? A decade of research on language laboratories, television and video in language learning. Language Teaching, 43(1): 1–37.Google Scholar
Weinberg, A. (2002) Virtual misadventures: technical problems and student satisfaction when implementing multimedia in an advanced French listening comprehension course. CALICO Journal, 19(2): 331–357.Google Scholar
Winke, P., Gass, S. Sydorenko, T. (2010) The effects of captioning videos used for foreign language listening activities. Language Learning & Technology, 14(1): 65–86.Google Scholar
Zaphiris, P. Zacharia, G. (2001) Design methodology of an online greek language course. Paper presented at the CHI′01 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Seattle, WA., 103–114.Google Scholar