Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-c75p9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-25T04:57:27.325Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Designing, implementing and evaluating a project in tandem language learning via e-mail

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2008

David Little  and
Ema Ushioda
David Little
Affiliation:
Centre for Language and Communication Studies, Trinity College Dublin
Ema Ushioda
Affiliation:
Centre for Language and Communication Studies, Trinity College Dublin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Tandem language learning is based on a partnership between two people, each of whom is learning the other's language. Successful tandem partnerships observe the principle of reciprocity (“tandem learners support one another equally’) and the principle of learner autonomy (“tandem partners are responsible for their own learning”) (Little and Brammerts 1996: 1 Off.). This paper begins by exploring some of the theoretical implications of tandem language learning in general and tandem language learning via e-mail in particular. It then reports on the pilot phase of an e-mail tandem project involving Irish university students learning German and German university students learning English.

Information

Type
Selected Papers
Information
ReCALL , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , May 1998 , pp. 95 - 101
Copyright
Copyright © European Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Brammerts, H. (1993) ‘Sprachenlemen im Tandem’. In Fachverband Moderne Fremdsprachen (eds.), Fremdsprachen für die Zukunft – Nachbarsprachen und Mehrsprachigkeit. Beiträge zum Bundeskongreβ in Freiburg (1992) des Fachverbandes Moderne Fremdsprachen, Saarbrücken: Universität des Saarlandes (SALUS – Saarbrücker Schriften zur Angewandten Linguistik und Sprachlehrforschung 12), 121–32.Google Scholar
Calvert, M. (1992) ‘Working in tandem: peddling an old idea’, Language Learning Journal 6, 17–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eck, A., Legenhausen, L. and Wolff, D. (1995) Telekommunikation und Fremdsprachenunterricht: Informationen, Projekte, Ergebnisse, Bochum: AKS-Verlag (Fremdsprachen in Lehre und Forschung 18)Google Scholar
Lewis, T., Woodin, J. and St John, E. (1996) ‘Tandem learning: independence through partnership’. In Broady, E. and Kenning, M.-M. (eds.), Promoting Learner Autonomy in University Language Teaching, London: Association for French Language Studies in association with CILT, 105– 20Google Scholar
Little, D. (1991) Learner Autonomy 1: Definitions, Issues and Problems. Dublin: AuthentikGoogle Scholar
Little, D. and Brammerts, H. (1996) ‘A guide to language learning in tandem via the Internet’,CLCS Occasional Paper No. 46, Dublin: Trinity College, Centre for Language and Communication StudiesGoogle Scholar
Schwienhorst, K. (1998) ‘The “third place” – virtual reality applications for second language learning’. In Blin, F. and Thompson, J. (eds.). Where Research and Practice Meet, Proceedings of EUROCALL '97, Dublin, 11–13 September 1997, ReCALL, 10(1), 118–126Google Scholar