Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Effects of required and optional exchange tasks in online language learning environments

  • Klaus Brandl (a1)

This study investigates the effects of an optional and required (jigsaw) task on learners’ quantity and quality of use of language under synchronous and asynchronous conditions. The question raised is: Does performing either of these task types under synchronous conditions cause a compounding effect that either positively or negatively impacts language production? Eighty-six beginning learners of German participated in this study. The results show that the optional task yielded significantly more learner output, both in terms of target language and c-unit counts. The impact of the condition appears to be mixed, favoring the synchronous mode. Regarding quality, students produced fewer errors when performing the required than the optional task. The results of this study have implications for task design and implementation in online learning environments.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Z. I. Abrams (2003) The effect of synchronous and asynchronous CMC on oral performance in German. Modern Language Journal, 87: 157167.

J. R. Anderson (2000) Learning and Memory: An integrated approach, revised edition. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

M. Beauvois (1992) Computer-assisted classroom discussion in the foreign language classroom: Conversation in slow motion. Foreign Language Annals, 25: 455464.

M. H. Beauvois (1995) E-talk: Attitudes and motivation in computer-assisted classroom discussion. Computers in the Humanities, 28(2): 177190.

M. H. Beauvois (1998) Conversations in slow motion: Computer-mediated communication in the foreign language classroom. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 54(2): 198217.

R. M. Bernard , P. C. Abrami , Y. Lou , E. Borokhovski , A. Wade L. Wozney (2004) How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74(3): 379439.

D. M. Christophel (1990) The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 39: 323340.

D. M. Chun (2008) Computer-mediated discourse in instructed environments. In: Magnan, S. (ed.), Mediating discourse online. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1545.

P. Foster (1998) A classroom perspective on the negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics, 19: 123.

K. Johnson (1988) Mistake correction. ELT Journal, 42: 89101.

J. Klapper (2003) Taking communication to task? A critical review of recent trends in language teaching. Language Learning Journal, 27: 3342.

C. Lai G. Li (2011) Technology and task-based language teaching: A critical review. CALICO, 28(2): 498521.

L. Lee (2002) Synchronous online exchanges: A study of modification devices on non-native discourse. System, 30: 275288.

M. Peterson (1997) Language teaching and networking. System, 25(1): 2937.

B. Smith (2003) Computer-mediated negotiated interaction: An expanded model. Modern Language Journal, 87: 3857.

Y. Zhao , J. Lei , B. Yan , H. S. Tan C. Lai (2005) What makes the difference? A practical analysis of research on the effectiveness of distance education. Teachers College Record, 107(8): 18361884.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

  • ISSN: 0958-3440
  • EISSN: 1474-0109
  • URL: /core/journals/recall
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 5
Total number of PDF views: 69 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 213 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.