Skip to main content Accesibility Help

Effects of required and optional exchange tasks in online language learning environments

  • Klaus Brandl (a1)

This study investigates the effects of an optional and required (jigsaw) task on learners’ quantity and quality of use of language under synchronous and asynchronous conditions. The question raised is: Does performing either of these task types under synchronous conditions cause a compounding effect that either positively or negatively impacts language production? Eighty-six beginning learners of German participated in this study. The results show that the optional task yielded significantly more learner output, both in terms of target language and c-unit counts. The impact of the condition appears to be mixed, favoring the synchronous mode. Regarding quality, students produced fewer errors when performing the required than the optional task. The results of this study have implications for task design and implementation in online learning environments.

Hide All
Abrams, Z. I. (2003) The effect of synchronous and asynchronous CMC on oral performance in German. Modern Language Journal, 87: 157167.
Anderson, J. R. (2000) Learning and Memory: An integrated approach, revised edition. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Arnold, M. N. (2002) Computer-mediated communication: Writing to speak without foreign language anxiety? Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The University of Texas at Austin.
Beauvois, M. (1992) Computer-assisted classroom discussion in the foreign language classroom: Conversation in slow motion. Foreign Language Annals, 25: 455464.
Beauvois, M. H. (1995) E-talk: Attitudes and motivation in computer-assisted classroom discussion. Computers in the Humanities, 28(2): 177190.
Beauvois, M. H. (1998) Conversations in slow motion: Computer-mediated communication in the foreign language classroom. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 54(2): 198217.
Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A.Wozney, L. (2004) How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74(3): 379439.
Blake, R. (2000) Computer mediated communication: A window on L2 Spanish interlanguage. Language Learning & Technology, 4: 120136.
Chaudron, C. (1988) Second language classrooms: Research on teaching and learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Christophel, D. M. (1990) The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 39: 323340.
Chun, D. M. (2008) Computer-mediated discourse in instructed environments. In: Magnan, S. (ed.), Mediating discourse online. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1545.
Doughty, C.Long, M. (2003) Optimal psycholinguistic environments for distance foreign language learning. Language Learning and Technology, 7(3): 5080.
Duff, P. (1986) Another look at interlanguage talk: talking task to task. In: Day, R. (ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in Second Language Acquisition. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House, 147181.
Ellis, R. (2003) Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Foster, P. (1998) A classroom perspective on the negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics, 19: 123.
Gunawardena, C. N.McIssac, M. S. (2004) Distance education. In: Jonassen, D. H. (ed.), Handbook of research in educational communications and technology (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 355395.
Hampel, R. (2006) Rethinking task design for the digital age: A framework for language teaching and learning in a synchronous online environment. ReCALL, 18(1): 105121.
Hirotani, M. (2009) Synchronous versus asynchronous CMC and transfer to Japanese oral performance. CALICO, 26(2): 413438.
Jepson, K. (2005) Conversations – and negotiated interaction – in text and voice chat rooms. Language Learning and Technology, 9(3): 7998.
Johnson, K. (1988) Mistake correction. ELT Journal, 42: 89101.
Keller-Lally, A. (2006) Effect of task-type and group size on foreign language learner output in synchronous computer-mediated communication. Unpublished PhD Dissertation: University of Texas at Austin.
Kitade, K. (2006) The negotiation model in asynchronous computer-mediated communication (CMC): Negotiation in task-based email exchanges. CALICO Journal, 23: 319348.
Klapper, J. (2003) Taking communication to task? A critical review of recent trends in language teaching. Language Learning Journal, 27: 3342.
Lai, C.Li, G. (2011) Technology and task-based language teaching: A critical review. CALICO, 28(2): 498521.
Lai, C., Zhao, Y.Li, N. (2008) Designing a distance foreign language learning environment. In: Goertler, S. and Winke, P. (eds.), Opening Doors through Distance Language Education: Principles, Perspectives, and Practices. San Marco, TX: CALICO, 86101.
Larson-Hall, J. (2010) A guide to doing statistics in second language research using SPSS. New York: Routledge.
Lee, L. (2001) Online interaction: Negotiation of meaning and strategies used among learners of Spanish. ReCALL, 13(2): 232244.
Lee, L. (2002) Synchronous online exchanges: A study of modification devices on non-native discourse. System, 30: 275288.
Levy, M.Stockwell, G. (2006) CALL Dimensions. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Long, M. (1989) Task, group and task-group interactions. University of Hawaii Working Papers in ESL, 8: 126.
Long, M. H.Robinson, P. (1998) Focus on form: theory, research and practice. In: Doughty, C. and Williams, J. (eds.), Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1541.
Meskill, C. (1999) Computers as Tools for Sociocollaborative Language Learning. In: Cameron, K. (ed.), Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL): Media, design and applications. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger, 141162.
Mishan, F.Strunz, B. (2003) An application of XML to the creation of an interactive resource for authentic language learning tasks. ReCALL, 15(2): 237250.
Newton, J. (1991) Negotiation: negotiating what? Paper given at SEAMEO Conference on Language Acquisition and the Second/Foreign Language Classroom, RELC, Singapore.
Ortega, L. (2009) Interaction and attention to form in L2 text-based computer-mediated communication. In: Mackey, A. and Polio, C. (eds.), Multiple perspectives on interaction. New York: Routledge, 226253.
Peterson, M. (1997) Language teaching and networking. System, 25(1): 2937.
Pica, T., Kanagy, R.Falodun, J. (1993) Choosing and using communication tasks for second language instruction and research. In: Crookes, G. and Gass, S. M. (eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice. Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters, 933.
Skehan, P. (1998) A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Smith, B. (2003) Computer-mediated negotiated interaction: An expanded model. Modern Language Journal, 87: 3857.
Sotillo, S. M. (2000) Discourse functions and syntactic complexity in synchronous and asynchronous communication. Language Learning & Technology, 4: 82119.
Swain, M. (1995) Three functions of output in second language learning. In: Cook, G. and Seidelhofer, B. (eds.), Principle and Practice in Applied Linguistics: Studies in Honor of H.G. Widdowson. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 125144.
Zhao, Y., Lei, J., Yan, B., Tan, H. S.Lai, C. (2005) What makes the difference? A practical analysis of research on the effectiveness of distance education. Teachers College Record, 107(8): 18361884.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

  • ISSN: 0958-3440
  • EISSN: 1474-0109
  • URL: /core/journals/recall
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed