Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

The effects of using corpora on revision tasks in L2 writing with coded error feedback

  • Yukio Tono (a1), Yoshiho Satake (a2) and Aika Miura (a3)
Abstract

This study reports on the results of classroom research investigating the effects of corpus use in the process of revising compositions in English as a foreign language. Our primary aim was to investigate the relationship between the information extracted from corpus data and how that information actually helped in revising different types of errors in the essays. In ‘data-driven learning’, previous research has often failed to provide rigorous criteria for choosing the words or phrases suitable for correction with corpus data. By investigating the above relationship, this study aims to clarify what should be corrected by looking at corpus data. 93 undergraduate students from two universities in Tokyo wrote a short essay in 20 minutes without a dictionary, and the instructors gave coded error feedback for two lexical or grammatical errors. They deliberately selected one error which should be appropriate for checking against corpus data and one that was more likely to be corrected without using any reference resource. Three weeks later, a short hands-on instruction of the corpus query tool was given, followed by revision activities in which the participants were instructed to revise their first drafts, with or without the tool depending on the codes given to each error. 188 errors were automatically classified into three different categories (omission, addition and misformation) using natural language processing techniques. All words and phrases tagged for errors were further annotated for part-of-speech (POS) information. The results show that there was a significant difference in the accuracy rate among the three error types when the students consulted the corpus: omission and addition errors were easily identified and corrected, whereas misformation errors were low in correction accuracy. This reveals that certain errors are more suitable for checking against corpus data than others.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Bernardini, S. (2000) Systematising serendipity: Proposals for concordancing large corpora with language learners. In: Burnard, L. and McEnery, T. (eds.), Rethinking language pedagogy from a corpus perspective. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 225234.
Bernardini, S. (2004) Corpora in the classroom: An overview and some reflections on future developments. In: Sinclair, J. (ed.), How to use corpora in language teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1536.
Boulton, A. (2008) Looking for empirical evidence of data-driven learning at lower Levels. In: Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, B. (ed.), Corpus linguistics, computer tools, and applications: State of the art. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 581598.
Boulton, A. (2009a) Data-driven learning: Reasonable fears and rational reassurance. Indian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 35(1): 81106.
Boulton, A. (2009b) Testing the limits of data-driven learning: Language proficiency and training. ReCALL, 21(1): 3754.
Boulton, A. (2012) Corpus consultation for ESP: A review of empirical research. In: Boulton, A., Carter-Thomas, S. and Rowley-Jolivet, E. (eds.), Corpus-informed research and learning in ESP: Issues and applications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 261291.
Brown, D. (2007) Language learner motivation and the role of choice in ESP listening engagement. ASp, 51–52: 159177.
Chambers, A. and O’Sullivan, Í. (2004) Corpus consultation and advanced learners’ writing skills in French. ReCALL, 16(1): 158172.
Chujo, K., Utiyama, M. and Nishigaki, C. (2007) Towards building a usable corpus collection for the ELT classroom. In: Hidalgo, E., Quereda, L. and Santana, J. (eds.), Corpora in the foreign language classroom. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 4769.
Ferris, D. R. (2002) Treatment of error in second language student writing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Flowerdew, L. (2010) Using corpora for writing instruction. In: O’Keeffe, A. and McCarthy, M. (eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics. London: Routledge, 444457.
Gaskell, D. and Cobb, T. (2004) Can learners use concordance feedback for writing errors? System, 32(3): 301319.
Granger, S. and Meunier, F. (2008) Phraseology in language learning and teaching: Where to from here? In: Meunier, F. and Granger, S. (eds.), Phraseology in foreign language learning and teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 247252.
Hahne, A. (2001) What’s different in second-language processing? Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30(3): 251266.
Johns, T. (1984) From printout to handout: Grammar and vocabulary teaching in the context of data-driven learning. In: Odlin, T. (ed.) Perspectives on pedagogical grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 293313.
Johns, T. (1986) Micro-concord: A language learner’s research tool. System, 14(2): 151162.
Johns, T. (1991) Should you be persuaded: Two examples of data-driven learning. In: Johns, T. and King, P. (eds.), Classroom concordancing. English Language Research Journal, 4: 116.
Kennedy, C. and Miceli, T. (2001) An evaluation of intermediate students’ approaches to corpus investigation. Language Learning & Technology, 5(3): 7790.
Kosem, I. (2008) User-friendly corpus tools for language teaching and learning. In: Frankenberg-Garcia (ed.), Proceedings of the 8 thTeaching and Language Corpora conference. Lisbon: ISLA, 183192.
Lee, D. and Swales, J. (2006) A corpus-based EAP course for NNS doctoral students: Moving from available specialized corpora to self-compiled corpora. English for Specific Purposes, 25: 5675.
Mukherjee, J. (2004) Bridging the gap between applied corpus linguistics and the reality of English language teaching in Germany. In: Connor, U. and Upton, T. (eds.), Applied corpus linguistics: A multi-dimensional perspective. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 239250.
O’Keeffe, A. and Farr, F. (2003) Using language corpora in initial teacher training: Pedagogic issues and practical application. TESOL Quarterly, 37(3): 389418.
Osborne, J. (2004) Top-down and bottom-up approaches to corpora in language teaching. In: Connor, U. and Upton, T. (eds.), Applied corpus linguistics: A multi-dimensional perspective. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 251265.
Perani, D., Paulesu, E., Galles, N. S., Dupoux, E., Dehaene, S., Bettinardi, V., Cappa, S. F., Fazio, F. and Mehler, J. (1998) The bilingual brain: Proficiency and age of acquisition of the second language. Brain, 121(10): 18411852.
Pérez-Paredes, P. (2010) Corpus linguistics and language education in perspective: appropriation and the possibilities scenario. In: Harris, T. and Moreno Jaén, M. (eds.), Corpus linguistics in language teaching. Bern: Peter Lang.
Pérez-Paredes, P., Sánchez-Tornel, M. and Alcarez Calero, J. M. (2012) Learners’ search patterns during corpus-based focus-on-form activities. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 17(4): 482515.
Pérez-Paredes, P., Sánchez-Tornel, M., Alcarez Calero, J. M. and Aguado Jiménez, P. (2011) Tracking learners’ actual uses of corpora: Guided vs non-guided corpus consultation. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(3): 233253.
Rossi, S., Gugler, M. F., Friederici, A. D. and Hahne, A. (2006) The impact of proficiency on syntactic second-language processing of German and Italian: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(12): 20302048.
Todd, R. W. (2001) Induction from self-selected concordances and self-correction. System, 29(1): 91102.
Tono, Y. and Mochizuki, H. (2009) Toward automatic error identification in learner corpora: A DP matching approach. Paper presented at Corpus Linguistics 2009, Liverpool, UK.
Wilson, J., Hartley, A., Sharoff, S. and Stephenson, P. (2010) Advanced corpus solutions for humanities researchers. Proceedings of PACLIC 24. Sendai: Tohoku University, 769–778.
Yoon, H. (2008) More than a linguistic reference: The influence of corpus technology on L2 academic writing. Language Learning & Technology, 12(2): 3148.
Yoon, H. and Hirvela, A. (2004) ESL student attitude toward corpus use in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13: 257283.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

ReCALL
  • ISSN: 0958-3440
  • EISSN: 1474-0109
  • URL: /core/journals/recall
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed