Hostname: page-component-76c49bb84f-vcmr7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-06T18:24:27.980Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Enhancement of automatization through vocabulary learning using CALL: Can prompt language processing lead to better comprehension in L2 reading?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 February 2013

Takeshi Sato ,
Mitsuyasu Matsunuma  and
Akio Suzuki
Takeshi Sato
Affiliation:
Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Japan (email: tsato@cc.tuat.ac.jp)
Mitsuyasu Matsunuma
Affiliation:
Shizuoka University, Japan (email: ommatun@ipc.shizuoka.ac.jp)
Akio Suzuki
Affiliation:
Toyo University, Japan (email: suzukiakio@toyo.jp)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Our study aims to optimize a multimedia application for vocabulary learning for English as a Foreign Language (EFL). Our study is based on the concept that difficulty in reading a text in a second language is due to the need for more working memory for word decoding skills, although the working memory must also be used for text comprehension skills. This implies that the automatization of word decoding to free the working memory is indispensable. Therefore, developing a multimedia application for vocabulary learning with a time-control function, our study hypothesizes that vocabulary learning with this function brings about the automatization of word decoding or faster recall of the meanings, and, as a result of freeing more working memory, better comprehension of text. According to our research, multimedia application users not only retained more words and recalled their meanings more quickly but also obtained higher scores on reading comprehension tests that contained the words learned through the application. From this result, we conclude that multimedia vocabulary learning with a time-control function can automatize word decoding skills and therefore free more working memory, thereby leading to better comprehension of the text.

Keywords

L2 readingworking memoryautomatizationvocabulary learningtime-control functiontext comprehension.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
ReCALL , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , January 2013 , pp. 143 - 158
Copyright
Copyright © European Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Adachi, H.Suzuki, A. (2008) Learning English Vocabulary: Quick and Fun! Tokyo: Chukei Shuppan.Google Scholar
Adams, M. J.Collins, A. (1979) A schema-theoretic view of reading. In: Freedle, R.O. (ed.), New directions in discourse processing, 1–22. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
Al-Seghayer, K. (2001) The effect of multimedia annotation modes on L2 vocabulary acquisition: a comparative study. Language Learning and Technology, 5(1): 202–232.Google Scholar
Al-Shehri, S.Gitsaki, C. (2010) Online reading: a preliminary study of the impact of integrated and split-attention formats on L2 students’ cognitive load. ReCALL, 22(3): 356–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, A. D. (1986) Working Memory. Oxford: Clarendon.Google ScholarPubMed
Balass, M., Nelson, J. R.Perfetti, C. A. (2010) Word learning: an ERP investigation of word experience effects on recognition and word processing. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35: 126–140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berquist, B. (1997) Individual differences in working memory span and L2 proficiency: Capacity or processing efficiency? In: Sorace, A., Heycock, C. and Shillcock, R. (eds.), Proceedings of the GALA ‘97 Conference on Language Acquisition. Edinburgh, UK: Human Communication Research Center, University of Edinburgh, 468–473.Google Scholar
Brett, P. (1998) Using Multimedia: A Descriptive Investigation of Incidental Language Learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 11(2): 179–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cain, K.Oakhill, J. (2007) Reading comprehension difficulties: Correlates, causes and consequences. In: Cain, K. and Oakhill, J. (eds.), Children's comprehension problems in oral and written language: A cognitive perspective. New York: The Guilford Press, 41–75.Google Scholar
Carpenter, P. A.Just, M. A. (1989) The role of working memory in language comprehension. In: Klahr, D. and Ktovsky, K. (eds.), Complex Information Processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 31–68.Google Scholar
Chanier, T.Selva, T. (1998) The ALEXIA system: the use of visual representations to enhance vocabulary learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 11(5): 489–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chun, D. L.Plass, J. L. (1996) Effects of multimedia annotations on vocabulary acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 80(2): 183–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coxhead, A. (2000) A new academic word list. TESOL quarterly, 34(2): 213–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coxhead, A.Hirsh, D. (2007) A pilot science word list for EAP. Revue Française de linguistique appliqueé, xii(2): 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gough, P. B.Tummer, W. E. (1986) Decoding, reading and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7: 6–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, M.Sawyer, M. (1992) L2 working memory capacity and L2 reading skill. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14: 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juffs, A.Harrington, M. (2011) Aspects of Working Memory in L2 learning. Language Teaching, 44(2): 137–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaBerge, D.Samuels, S. J. (1974) Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6: 293–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lomicka, L. L. (1998) “To Gloss or Not To Gloss”: An Investigation of Reading Comprehension Online. Language Learning & Technology, 1: 41–50.Google Scholar
Mayer, R. E.Anderson, R. B. (1991) Animations need narrations: An experimental test of a dual-code hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83: 484–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreno, R.Park, B. (2010) Cognitive Load Theory: Historical Development and Relation to Other Theories. In: Plass, J., Moreno, R. and Brünken, R. (eds.), Cognitive Load Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press, 9–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nation, K.Angell, P. (2006) Learning to read and learning to comprehend. London Review of Education, 4(1): 77–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakhill, J. V., Cain, K.Yuill, N. M. (1998) Individual differences in children's comprehension skill: Towards an integrated model. In: Hulme, C. and Joshi, R. M. (eds.), Reading and spelling: Development and disorder. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 343–367.Google Scholar
Pachler, N. (2001) Electronic reference tools for foreign language learners, Teachers and users: Offline vocabulary look-up programs. Language Learning Journal, 24: 24–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perfetti, C. A. (1985) Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A.Lesgold, A. M. (1977) Discourse comprehension and source of individual differences. In: Just, M. A. and Carpenter, P. A. (eds.), Cognitive Processes in Comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 141–183.Google Scholar
Samuels, S. J. (2004) Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading, revisited. In: Ruddell, R. B. and Unrau, N. J. (eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading. Newark, DE: International Reading Association, 1127–1148.Google Scholar
Sato, T.Suzuki, A. (2010) Verifying multimedia gloss: Image schemata and polysemous vocabulary in English. Proceeding of EUROCALL 2009 Conference, Valencia, Spain: McMillan ELT, 285–294.Google Scholar
Segalowitz, N.Hebert, M. (1990) Phonological coding in the first and second language reading of skilled bilinguals. Language Learning, 40: 503–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuart, M. (2006) Learning to read: developing processes for recognizing, understanding and pronouncing written words. London Review of Education, 4(1): 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweller, J. (1988) Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12: 257–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweller, J. (1994) Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4: 295–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, A.Nicholson, T. (1997) Flashcards revisited: Training poor readers to read words faster improves their comprehension of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 59: 276–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoshii, M.Fraitz, J. (2002) Second Language Incidental Vocabulary Retention: The Effect of Text and Picture Annotation Types. CALICO Journal, 20(1): 33–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar