Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Enhancement of automatization through vocabulary learning using CALL: Can prompt language processing lead to better comprehension in L2 reading?

  • Takeshi Sato (a1), Mitsuyasu Matsunuma (a2) and Akio Suzuki (a3)

Abstract

Our study aims to optimize a multimedia application for vocabulary learning for English as a Foreign Language (EFL). Our study is based on the concept that difficulty in reading a text in a second language is due to the need for more working memory for word decoding skills, although the working memory must also be used for text comprehension skills. This implies that the automatization of word decoding to free the working memory is indispensable. Therefore, developing a multimedia application for vocabulary learning with a time-control function, our study hypothesizes that vocabulary learning with this function brings about the automatization of word decoding or faster recall of the meanings, and, as a result of freeing more working memory, better comprehension of text. According to our research, multimedia application users not only retained more words and recalled their meanings more quickly but also obtained higher scores on reading comprehension tests that contained the words learned through the application. From this result, we conclude that multimedia vocabulary learning with a time-control function can automatize word decoding skills and therefore free more working memory, thereby leading to better comprehension of the text.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Adachi, H.Suzuki, A. (2008) Learning English Vocabulary: Quick and Fun! Tokyo: Chukei Shuppan.
Adams, M. J.Collins, A. (1979) A schema-theoretic view of reading. In: Freedle, R.O. (ed.), New directions in discourse processing, 122. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Al-Seghayer, K. (2001) The effect of multimedia annotation modes on L2 vocabulary acquisition: a comparative study. Language Learning and Technology, 5(1): 202232.
Al-Shehri, S.Gitsaki, C. (2010) Online reading: a preliminary study of the impact of integrated and split-attention formats on L2 students’ cognitive load. ReCALL, 22(3): 356375.
Baddeley, A. D. (1986) Working Memory. Oxford: Clarendon.
Balass, M., Nelson, J. R.Perfetti, C. A. (2010) Word learning: an ERP investigation of word experience effects on recognition and word processing. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35: 126140.
Berquist, B. (1997) Individual differences in working memory span and L2 proficiency: Capacity or processing efficiency? In: Sorace, A., Heycock, C. and Shillcock, R. (eds.), Proceedings of the GALA ‘97 Conference on Language Acquisition. Edinburgh, UK: Human Communication Research Center, University of Edinburgh, 468–473.
Brett, P. (1998) Using Multimedia: A Descriptive Investigation of Incidental Language Learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 11(2): 179200.
Cain, K.Oakhill, J. (2007) Reading comprehension difficulties: Correlates, causes and consequences. In: Cain, K. and Oakhill, J. (eds.), Children's comprehension problems in oral and written language: A cognitive perspective. New York: The Guilford Press, 4175.
Carpenter, P. A.Just, M. A. (1989) The role of working memory in language comprehension. In: Klahr, D. and Ktovsky, K. (eds.), Complex Information Processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 3168.
Chanier, T.Selva, T. (1998) The ALEXIA system: the use of visual representations to enhance vocabulary learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 11(5): 489521.
Chun, D. L.Plass, J. L. (1996) Effects of multimedia annotations on vocabulary acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 80(2): 183198.
Coxhead, A. (2000) A new academic word list. TESOL quarterly, 34(2): 213238.
Coxhead, A.Hirsh, D. (2007) A pilot science word list for EAP. Revue Française de linguistique appliqueé, xii(2): 6578.
Gough, P. B.Tummer, W. E. (1986) Decoding, reading and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7: 610.
Harrington, M.Sawyer, M. (1992) L2 working memory capacity and L2 reading skill. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14: 2538.
Juffs, A.Harrington, M. (2011) Aspects of Working Memory in L2 learning. Language Teaching, 44(2): 137166.
LaBerge, D.Samuels, S. J. (1974) Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6: 293323.
Lomicka, L. L. (1998) “To Gloss or Not To Gloss”: An Investigation of Reading Comprehension Online. Language Learning & Technology, 1: 4150.
Mayer, R. E.Anderson, R. B. (1991) Animations need narrations: An experimental test of a dual-code hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83: 484490.
Moreno, R.Park, B. (2010) Cognitive Load Theory: Historical Development and Relation to Other Theories. In: Plass, J., Moreno, R. and Brünken, R. (eds.), Cognitive Load Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press, 928.
Nation, K.Angell, P. (2006) Learning to read and learning to comprehend. London Review of Education, 4(1): 7787.
Oakhill, J. V., Cain, K.Yuill, N. M. (1998) Individual differences in children's comprehension skill: Towards an integrated model. In: Hulme, C. and Joshi, R. M. (eds.), Reading and spelling: Development and disorder. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 343367.
Pachler, N. (2001) Electronic reference tools for foreign language learners, Teachers and users: Offline vocabulary look-up programs. Language Learning Journal, 24: 2429.
Perfetti, C. A. (1985) Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
Perfetti, C. A.Lesgold, A. M. (1977) Discourse comprehension and source of individual differences. In: Just, M. A. and Carpenter, P. A. (eds.), Cognitive Processes in Comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 141183.
Samuels, S. J. (2004) Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading, revisited. In: Ruddell, R. B. and Unrau, N. J. (eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading. Newark, DE: International Reading Association, 11271148.
Sato, T.Suzuki, A. (2010) Verifying multimedia gloss: Image schemata and polysemous vocabulary in English. Proceeding of EUROCALL 2009 Conference, Valencia, Spain: McMillan ELT, 285–294.
Segalowitz, N.Hebert, M. (1990) Phonological coding in the first and second language reading of skilled bilinguals. Language Learning, 40: 503538.
Stuart, M. (2006) Learning to read: developing processes for recognizing, understanding and pronouncing written words. London Review of Education, 4(1): 1929.
Sweller, J. (1988) Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12: 257285.
Sweller, J. (1994) Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4: 295312.
Tan, A.Nicholson, T. (1997) Flashcards revisited: Training poor readers to read words faster improves their comprehension of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 59: 276288.
Yoshii, M.Fraitz, J. (2002) Second Language Incidental Vocabulary Retention: The Effect of Text and Picture Annotation Types. CALICO Journal, 20(1): 3358.

Keywords

Enhancement of automatization through vocabulary learning using CALL: Can prompt language processing lead to better comprehension in L2 reading?

  • Takeshi Sato (a1), Mitsuyasu Matsunuma (a2) and Akio Suzuki (a3)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed