Skip to main content
×
×
Home

A framework for learner agency in online spoken interaction tasks

  • Janine Knight (a1) (a2), Elena Barbera (a3) and Christine Appel (a4)
Abstract

Learner agency, the capability of individual human beings to make choices and act on these choices in a way that makes a difference in their lives (Martin, 2004), is instrumental in second language learning because attainment is only arrived at by learner choice (Pavlenko & Lantolf, 2000). If attainment is understood as learner engagement in synchronous, collaborative, spoken interaction which is thought to lead to gains in second language acquisition (SLA), then design considerations that harness learners’ agency towards that end is important. This study explores the relationship between learner agency and two different task types, namely an information-gap task and an opinion-sharing task in two peer-to-peer synchronous computer-mediated communication (SCMC) spoken interaction events. Students’ choices and how students act on these choices during tasks are analysed using a discourse analysis approach. Audio recordings of four dyads as cases were examined using three analytical dimensions: language functions of verbal interaction, cognitive processing and social processing. The results show that most learners used their agency to reconfigure the tasks from spontaneous to planned interaction, with some choices and actions relating to technology impacting detrimentally on interaction time in the target language. The different tasks were found to filter and channel different types of agency that learners could exercise, namely representational, organisational, and strategic agency as speech acts, and directional agency as a physical act. These types consisted of different natures and purposes and are presented as a framework. The information-gap task supported strategic agency and an opinion-sharing task supported personalisation and identity construction or representational agency.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Ahearn, L. M. (2001) Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30: 109137.
Anderson, B. (1983) Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. New York: Verso.
Appel, C., Nic Giolla Mhichíl, M., Jager, S. and Prizel-Kania, A. (2014) SpeakApps 2: Speaking practice in a foreign language through ICT tools. In: Jager, S., Bradley, L., Meima, E. J. and Thouësny, S. (eds.), CALL Design: Principles and Practice. Dublin: Research-publishing.net, 1217. doi:10.14705/rpnet.2014.000187
Appel, C., Robbins, J., Moré, J. and Mullen, T. (2012) Task and tool interface design for L2 speaking interaction online. In: Bradley, L. and Thouësny, S. (eds.), CALL: Using, Learning, Knowing. Dublin: Research-publishing.net, 15. doi:10.14705/rpnet.2012.9781908416032
Blin, F. and Jalkanen, J. (2014) Designing for language learning: Agency and languaging in hybrid environments. Apples – Journal of Applied Language Studies, 8: 147170.
Breen, M. (1987) Learner contributions to task design. Language Learning Tasks, 7: 2346.
Coughlan, P. and Duff, P. A. (1994) Same task, different activities: Analysis of a SLA task from an activity theory perspective. In: Lantolf, J. and Appel, G. (eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 157172.
Council of Europe (2001) Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Strasbourg: Language Policy Unit.
de la Colina, A. A. and García Mayo, M. P. (2007) Attention to form across collaborative tasks by low-proficiency learners in an EFL setting. In: García Mayo, M. P. (ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 91116.
Deters, P., Gao, X., Miller, E. and Vitanova, G. (eds.) (2015) Theorizing and analyzing agency in second language learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Dewaele, J. (2009) Individual differences in second language acquisition. In: Ritchie, W. C. and Bhatia, T. K. (eds.), The new handbook of second language acquisition. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing, 623646.
Dooley, M. (2011) Divergent perceptions of telecollaborative language learning tasks: Task-as-workplan vs. task-as-process. Language Learning & Technology, 15(2): 6991.
Dörnyei, Z. and Ushioda, E. (2009) Motivation, language identities and the L2 self: Future research directions. In: Dörnyei, Z. and Ushioda, E. (eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 350356.
Doughty, C. J. and Long, M. H. (2003) Optimal psycholinguistic environments for distance foreign language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 7(3): 5080.
Ellis, R. (2000) Task-based research and language pedagogy. Language Teaching Research, 4(3): 193220.
Foster, P. and Ohta, A. S. (2005) Negotiation for meaning and peer assistance in second language classrooms. Applied linguistics, 26(3): 402430.
García, O. (2009) Education, multilingualism and translanguaging in the 21st century. In Mohanty, A. K., Panday, M., Phillipson, R. and Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (eds.), Multilingual education for social justice: Globalising the local. New Delhi: Orient BlackSwan, 140158.
Gass, S. M. and Mackey, A. (2006) Input, interaction and output: An overview. AILA Review, 19: 317.
Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R. (1989) Language, context, and text. London: Oxford University Press.
Kumpulainen, K. and Mutanen, M. (1999) The situated dynamics of peer group interaction: An introduction to an analytic framework. Learning and Instruction, 9(5): 449473.
Lafford, P. A. and Lafford, B. A. (2005) CMC technologies for teaching foreign languages: What’s on the horizon? CALICO Journal, 22(3): 679709.
Lai, C. and Li, G. (2011) Technology and task-based language teaching: A critical review. CALICO Journal, 28(2): 498521.
Lamy, M.-N. (2006) Interactive task design: Metachat and the whole learner. In: García Mayo, P. (ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 242264.
Lantolf, J. (ed.) (2000) Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Luckin, R. (2010) Re-designing learning contexts: Technology-rich, learner-centred ecologies. Abingdon: Routledge.
Martin, J. (2004) Self-regulated learning, social cognitive theory, and agency. Educational Psychologist, 39(2): 135145.
Mercer, N. (2010) The analysis of classroom talk: Methods and methodologies. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(1): 114.
Mercer, S. (2011) Understanding learner agency as a complex dynamic system. System, 39(4): 427436.
Miller, E. (2012, Sep 2) Chapter proposals: Agency and SLA. http://linguistlist.org/issues/23/23-3666.html
Novick, D. G. and Sutton, S. (1997) What is mixed-initiative interaction? In Haller, S. and McRoy, S. (eds.), Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Computational Models for Mixed Initiative Interaction. AAAI/MIT Press, 114–116.
Ortega, L. (1997) Processes and outcomes in networked classroom interaction: Defining the research agenda for L2 computer-assisted classroom discussion. Language Learning & Technology, 1(1): 8293.
Pavlenko, A. and Lantolf, J. (2000) Second language learning as participation and the (re)construction of selves. In: Lantolf, J. (ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 155177.
Reeve, J. and Tseng, C. (2011) Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4): 257267.
Roebuck, R. (2000) Subjects speak out: How learners position themselves in a psycholinguistic task. In Lantolf, J. P. (ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 7995.
Samuda, V. and Bygate, M. (2008) Tasks in second language learning. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Schwartz, D. and Okita, S. (2009) The productive agency in learning by teaching. Unpublished manuscript. http://aaalab.stanford.edu/papers/Productive_Agency_in_Learning_by_Teaching.pdf
Skehan, P. (1996) Second language acquisition research and task-based instruction. In: Willis, J. and Willis, D. (eds.), Challenge and change in language teaching. Oxford: Heinemann, 1730.
Swain, M. (2006) Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced second language proficiency. In: Byrnes, H. (ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky. London: Continuum, 95108.
Swain, M. and Deters, P. (2007) ‘New’ mainstream SLA theory: Expanded and enriched. The Modern Language Journal, 91(s1): 820836.
van Lier, L. (2008) Agency in the classroom. In: Lantolf, J. and Poehner, M. (eds.), Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages. London: Equinox, 163186.
Wang, J. (1996) Same task: different activities. Unpublished research report. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh.
Xiao, J. (2014) Learner agency in language learning: The story of a distance learner of EFL in China. Distance Education, 35(1): 417.
Yim, Y. K. K. (2011) Second language students’ discourse socialization in academic online communities. Canadian Modern Language Review, 67(1): 127.
Zhang, J. (2010) Learner agency, motive and self-regulated learning in an online ESL writing Class. IALLT Journal, 43(2): 5781.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

ReCALL
  • ISSN: 0958-3440
  • EISSN: 1474-0109
  • URL: /core/journals/recall
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed