Knoch, U (2010) Raising the linguistic accuracy level of advanced L2 writers with written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing 19, 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2010.10.002
Burstein, J, Chodorow, M
Leacock, C (2003) CriterionSM: Online essay evaluation: An application for automated evaluation of student essays. Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence. Acapulco, Mexico, 3–10.
Chapelle, CA (1998) Multimedia CALL: Lessons to be learned from research on instructed SLA. Language Learning & Technology, 2(1): 21–39.
Chapelle, CA (2003) English language learning and technology: Lectures on applied linguistics in the age of information and communication technology. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.7
Voss, E (2016) 20 years of technology and language assessment in language learning & technology. Language Learning & Technology, 20(2): 116–128. http://www.lltjournal.org/item/2950
Chen, C-F E
Cheng, W-YE (2008) Beyond the design of automated writing evaluation: Pedagogical practices and perceived learning effectiveness in EFL writing classes. Language Learning & Technology, 12(2): 94–112. http://www.lltjournal.org/item/2631
Chodorow, M, Gamon, M
Tetreault, J (2010) The utility of article and preposition error correction systems for English language learners: Feedback and assessment. Language Testing, 27(3): 419–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532210364391
Derewianka, B (2008) School discourse: Learning to write across the years of schooling. New York: Continuum.
Saricaoglu, A (2016) Causal discourse analyzer: Improving automated feedback on academic ESL writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(3): 494–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.991795
Cotos, E (2012) Towards effective integration and positive impact of automated writing evaluation in L2 writing. In: Kessler G, Oskoz A & Elola I (eds.), Technology across writing contexts and tasks (CALICO Monograph Series Vol. 10)
. San Marcos: CALICO, 81–112.
Hedgcock, JS (2005) Teaching ESL composition: Purpose, process, and practice
(2nd ed.). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Gass, SM (1997) Input, interaction, and the second language learner Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Mackey, A (2015) Input, interaction, and output in second language acquisition. In: VanPatten B & Williams J (eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge, 180–206.
Warschauer, M (2010) Utility in a fallible tool: A multi-site case study of automated writing evaluation. Journal of Technology, Language, and Assessment, 8(6): 1–43.
Halliday, MAK (1994) An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London: Hodder Arnold.
Halliday, MAK (2003) On language and linguistics. New York: Continuum.
Martin, JR (1993) Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. London: Falmer Press.
Kroll, B (1997) TOEFL 2000 – writing: Composition, community, and assessment (ETS Research Report No. RM-96-05). Princeton: Educational Testing Service.
Lee, J (2013) The role of technology in teaching and researching writing. In: Thomas M, Reinders H & Warschauer M (eds.), Contemporary computer-assisted language learning. New York: Bloomsbury, 287–302.
Johnson, M (1999) Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.
Lavolette, E, Polio, C
Kahng, J (2015) The accuracy of computer-assisted feedback and students’ responses to it. Language Learning & Technology, 19(2): 50–68. http://www.lltjournal.org/item/2903
Li, J, Link, S
Hegelheimer, V (2015) Rethinking the role of automated writing evaluation (AWE) feedback in ESL writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 27, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.10.004
Kunnan, AJ (2016) Investigating the application of automated writing evaluation to Chinese undergraduate English majors: A case study of WriteToLearn. CALICO Journal, 33(1): 71–91. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v33i1.26380
Long, MH (1983) Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4, 126–141.
Long, MH (1996) The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In: Ritchie W & Bhatia T (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition. San Diego: Academic Press, 413–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012589042-7/50015-3
Slater, T (2016) Connecting Criterion scores and classroom grading contexts: A systemic functional linguistic model for teaching and assessing causal language. CALICO Journal, 33(1): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v33i1.26562
Beckett, GH (2003) A functional approach to research on content-based language learning: Recasts in causal explanations. The Modern Language Journal, 87(3): 421–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00199
Slater, T (2004) The evaluation of causal discourse and language as a resource for meaning. In: Foley JA (ed.), Language, education and discourse: Functional approaches. New York: Continuum, 255–269.
Phakiti, A (2014) Experimental research methods in language learning. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
Pica, T (1994) Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second language learning conditions, processes, and outcomes? Language Learning, 44(3): 493–527.
Robinson, P, Mackey, A, Gass, SM
Schmidt, R (2012) Attention and awareness in second language acquisition. In: Gass SM & Mackey A (eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition. New York: Routledge, 247–267.
Rock, J (2007) The impact of short-term use of Criterion on writing skills in 9th grade (Research Report RR-07-07). Princeton: Educational Testing Service.
Ruiz-Funes, M (2015) Exploring the potential of second/foreign language writing for language learning: The effects of task factors and learner variables. Journal of Second Language Writing, 28, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.02.001
Saricaoglu, A (2015) A systemic functional perspective on automated writing evaluation: Formative feedback on causal discourse. Iowa State University, unpublished PhD.
Mohan, B (2010) Towards systematic and sustained formative assessment of causal explanations in oral interactions. In Paran, A. & Sercu, L. (eds.), Testing the untestable in language education. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 256–269. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847692672-015
Stefanowitsch, A (2001) Constructing causation: A construction grammar approach to analytic causatives. Rice University, unpublished PhD.
Steinhart, D (2001) An intelligent tutoring system for improving student writing through the use of latent semantic analysis. University of Colorado, unpublished PhD.
Osborne, J (2001) Language and literacy in science education. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Yasuda, S (2011) Genre-based tasks in foreign language writing: Developing writers’ genre awareness, linguistic knowledge, and writing competence. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20(2): 111–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2011.03.001