Skip to main content Accesibility Help
×
×
Home

The impact of mode of instructional delivery on second language teacher self-efficacy

  • Scott Kissau (a1) and Bob Algozzine (a2)
Abstract

Research has called into question the suitability of fully-online instruction for certain teacher preparation courses. Methodology coursework, in particular, has been singled out in research as ill-suited to online instruction. Recent research, for example, involving second language (L2) teacher candidates has demonstrated that aspiring teachers who completed online methodology instruction were less confident in their abilities to teach L2 learners than their counterparts who completed the same instruction in a face-to-face (F2F) setting. To address the limitations of online instruction, while still incorporating its associated strengths, the development and implementation of hybridized methodology coursework have been proposed. Following this recommendation, the researchers developed and implemented hybridized L2 methodology courses that mirrored their pre-existing online and F2F equivalents. Using a mixed methodology, the researchers then conducted a three-way comparison of instructional delivery modes (online, F2F, hybrid) to investigate their impact on L2 teacher candidate self-efficacy. Although the results demonstrated that all three modes of instruction can be equally effective at increasing candidate confidence, they also highlighted the potential of hybridized instruction to address the limitations of online and F2F instruction, while still including their strengths. The findings also emphasized that simply viewing or participating in live demonstrations of teaching strategies in post-secondary methodology courses is not sufficient. To feel confident in their teaching abilities, teacher candidates need opportunities in their coursework to apply what they have learned in K-12 classrooms. Offering numerous research-based suggestions to improve the design of hybridized methodology courses, the study also serves to inform the development of future hybridized methodology coursework.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Alexander, M., Lignugaris-Kraft, B. and Forbush, D. (2007) Online mathematics methods course evaluation: Student outcomes, generalization, and pupil performance. Teacher Education and Special Education, 30: 199216.
Allen, E. and Seaman, J. (2009) Learning on demand: Online education in the United States, 2009. Needham, MA: The Sloan Consortium.
Aragon, S., Johnson, S. and Shaik, N. (2002) The influence of learning style preferences on student success in online versus face-to-face environments. American Journal of Distance Education, 16: 227244.
Bandura, A. (1986) Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation. (2013) CAEP Accreditation Standards. http://caepnet.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/final_board_approved1.pdf
Dede, C., Ketelhut, D. J., Whitehouse, P., Breit, L. and McCloskey, E. M. (2009) A research agenda for online teacher professional development. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1): 89.
Delfino, M. and Persico, D. (2007) Online or face-to-face? Experimenting with different techniques in teacher training. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(5): 351365.
Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I. and Shaw, L. L. (1995) Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Garrison, D. R. and Kanuka, H. (2004) Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 7: 95105.
Gedik, N., Kiraz, E. and Özden, M. Y. (2012) The optimum blend: Affordances and challenges of blended learning for students. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 3: 102117.
Hall, D. and Knox, J. (2009) Issues in the education of TESOL teachers by distance education. Distance Education, 30(1): 6385.
Harter, S. (1978) Pleasure derived from optimal challenge and the effects of extrinsic rewards on children’s difficulty level choices. Child Development, XLIX: 788799.
Hoven, D. L. (2007) The affordances of technology for student teachers to shape their teacher education experience. In: Kassen, M. A., Lavine, R., Murphy-Judy, K. A. and Peters, M. (eds.), Preparing and developing technology-proficient L2 teachers. San Marcos: Computer Assisted Language Instruction Consortium (CALICO), Texas State University.
James, M. (1996) The role of orientation and perceived personal causation in the motivation of adult ESL learners. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Windsor, Ontario, Canada.
Jang, S. (2008) The effects of integrating technology, observation and writing into teacher education method course. Computers & Education, 50: 853865.
Kirtman, L. (2009) Online versus in-class courses: An examination of differences in learning outcomes. Issues in Teacher Education, 18: 103116.
Kissau, S. (2011) Perceptions of self efficacy for two types of second language methods instruction. Computer Assisted Language Learning: an International Journal. Available at http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09588221.2011.587436
Kissau, S. (2014) Instructional delivery and second language teacher candidate performance: Online vs face-to-face. Computer Assisted Language Learning. DOI:10.1080/09588221.2014.881389.
Kocoglu, Z., Ozek, Y. and Kesli, Y. (2011) Blended learning: Investigating its potential in an English language teacher training program. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27: 11241134.
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M. and Jones, K. (2009) Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Washington, DC: US Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development.
Modern Language Association of America. (2007) Foreign languages and higher education: New structures for a changed world. New York: Modern Language Association.
Moore, M. (1994) Administrative barriers to adoption of distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education 8(3): 14.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2009) Distance education at degree-granting postsecondary institutions, 2006–2007. http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2009044
Tschannen-Moran, M. and Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2001) Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17: 783805.
Young, A. and Lewis, C. W. (2008) Teacher education programmes delivered at a distance: An examination of distance student perceptions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24: 601609.
Youngs, G. and Youngs, C. (1999) Mainstream teachers’ perceptions of the advantages and disadvantages of teaching ESL students. MinneTESOL/WITESOL Journal, 16(1): 1529.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

ReCALL
  • ISSN: 0958-3440
  • EISSN: 1474-0109
  • URL: /core/journals/recall
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed