Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-qc88w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-24T21:36:00.833Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Intelligent grammar checking for CALL

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2021

Cornelia Tschichold
Cornelia Tschichold*
Affiliation:
Department of English, University of Basel, Switzerland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Grammar checkers are not reliable enough yet to be used in CALL programs. Their rate of overflagging is still much too high for learners of a foreign language. CALL programs, however, could profit greatly from the incorporation of a grammar checker if this could provide the option of responding more intelligently to students’ input. Several strategies are proposed to make grammar checkers more acceptable for CALL developers, among them adapting the lexicon and the parser in the grammar checker.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
ReCALL , Volume 11 , Issue S1: Natural Language Processing In Computer-Assisted Language Learning , May 1999 , pp. 5 - 11
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bolt, P. & Yazdani, M. (1998) ‘The evolution of a grammar-checking program: LINGER to ISCA”, Computer Assisted Language Learning 11(1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brill, E. (1995) ‘Transformation-based error-driven learning and natural language parsing: A case study in part-of-speech tagging”, Computational Linguistics 21(4), 543-565.Google Scholar
Brock, M. N. (1990) ‘Customizing a computerized text analyzer for ESL writers: Cost versus gain”, CALICO Journal 8(2), 51-60.Google Scholar
Brock, M. N. (1994) “Three disk-based text analyzers and the ESL writer”. Journal of Second Language Writing 2(1), 19-40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Church, K. & Mercer, R. (1993) Introduction to the Special Issue, Computational Linguistics 19(1), 1-24.Google Scholar
Cornu, E., Kübler, N., Bodmer R, Grosjean R, Grosjean, L., Léwy, N., Tschichold, C. & Tschumi, C. (1996) ‘Prototype of a second language writing tool for French speakers writing in English”, Journal of Natural Language Engineering 2(3), 211-228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, G. & Yu Hung, Wie (1997) “Do grammar checkers work? A report on research into the effectiveness of Grammatik V based on samples of authentic essays by EFL students”, in Kohn J, Riischoff B & Wolff D (eds.), Proceedings of EUROCALL 96, Szombathely, Hungary: Berszenyi Dániel College, 169-188.Google Scholar
Holland, V. M., Maisano, R. & Alders, C. (1993) ‘Parsers in tutors: What are they good for?”, CALICO Journal 11(1), 28-46.Google Scholar
Imlah, W.G. & du Boulay, J.B.H. (1985) ‘Robust natural language parsing in computer-assisted language instruction”, System 13(2), 137-147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leech, G. (1986) “Automatic grammatical analysis and its educational applications”. In Leech, G. and Candlin, C. (eds.) Computers in English language teaching and research, London: Longman.Google Scholar
Levin, L. & Evans, D. (1995) “ALICE-chan: A case study in ICALL theory and practice”. In Holland, V.M., Kaplan, J.D. & Sams, M.R. (eds.), Intelligent language tutors: Theory shaping technology, Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Nagata, N. (1995) ‘An effective application of natural language processing in second language instruction”, CALICO Journal 13(1), 47-67.Google Scholar
Pawley, A. & Syder, F.H. (1983) “Two puzzles for linguistic theory: nativelike selection and nativelike fluency”. In Richards & Schmidt (eds.), Language and Communication, London: Longman.Google Scholar
Pusak, J.P. (1983) “Answer-processing and error correction in foreign language CAP, System, 11(1), 53-64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sciarone, A.G. (1996) “Feedback: The need for a flexible tool”. In Gimeno, A. (ed.), Proceedings of EUROCALL 95, Spain: Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, 395-402.Google Scholar
Tschichold, C. (in print) English multi-word units in a lexicon for natural language processing, Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Tschichold, C. & ten Hacken, P. (1998) “English Phraseology in Word Manager”, Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Phraseology, Stuttgart IMS, 219-225.Google Scholar