Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-s6l46 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-29T10:10:36.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Language practice with multimedia supported web-based grammar revision material

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2010

Meltem Huri Baturay ,
Aysegul Daloglu  and
Soner Yildirim
Meltem Huri Baturay*
Affiliation:
Institute of Informatics, Gazi University, Milas Sok. Teknikokullar, Beşevler, Ankara, Turkey. Phone: +90 (312) 202 38 05; Fax: +90 (312) 202 37 91 (email: baturay@gazi.edu.tr)
Aysegul Daloglu*
Affiliation:
Department of Foreign Language Education, Middle East Technical University, Faculty of Education, 06531 Ankara, Turkey. Phone: +90 (312) 210 4007; Fax: +90 (312) 210 4146 (email: daloglu@metu.edu.tr)
Soner Yildirim*
Affiliation:
Department of Computer Education & Instructional Technology, Middle East Technical University, Faculty of Education, 06531 Ankara, Turkey. Phone: +90 (312) 210 4007; Fax: +90 (312) 210 4146 (email: soner@metu.edu.tr)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the perceptions of elementary-level English language learners towards web-based, multimedia-annotated grammar learning. WEBGRAM, a system designed to provide supplementary web-based grammar revision material, uses audio-visual aids to enrich the contextual presentation of grammar and allows learners to revise target grammatical structures using interactive exercises such as gap-filling, combo-box and drag-and-drop exercises. This study gathered quantitative data on learner satisfaction, attention and participation and qualitative data with regard to the material’s content, visual and instructional design, usability, practicality and effectiveness. The findings indicate that learners enjoyed using the material and developed a positive attitude towards the system.

Keywords

web-basedinteractive learningmultimedialanguage learninge-learning

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
ReCALL , Volume 22 , Issue 3 , September 2010 , pp. 313 - 331
Copyright
Copyright © European Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Adler, R. W., Milne, M. J.Stablein, R. (2001) Situated motivation: An empirical test in an accounting class. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 18(2): 101–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Jarf, R. (2004) The effects of Web-based learning on struggling EFL college writers. Foreign Language Annals, 37(1): 49–57.Google Scholar
Al-Jarf, R. (2005) The effects of on-line grammar instruction on low proficiency EFL college students’ achievement. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly, 7(4): 166–190.Google Scholar
Ardito, C., Costabile, M. F., De Marsico, M., Lanzilotti, R., Levialdi, S., Roselli, T.Rossano, V. (2006) An approach to usability evaluation of e-learning applications. Universal Access in the Information Society International Journal, 4(3): 270–283.Google Scholar
Banados, E. (2006) A blended-learning pedagogical model for teaching and learning EFL successfully through on online interactive multimedia environment. CALICO Journal, 23(3): 533–550.Google Scholar
Baturay, M., Yıldırım, S.Daloğlu, A. (2009) Effects of web-based spaced repetition on vocabulary retention of foreign language learners. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 34: 17–36.Google Scholar
Berzosa, M. J.Rokowski, P. E. (2000) CALL for Beginners: Motivation or Rejection. Proceedings of ESP conference 2000 ESP and IT 2000. http://www.it.uom.gr/elu/director/Google Scholar
Burrows, C. P. (2001) Faculty attitudes and perceptions concerning web-based instruction. A Ph.D. Dissertation. The Faculty of the Curry School of Education. University of Virginia, US.Google Scholar
Campbell, A., Brown, I.Weatherford, Y . (2008) A CALL Project with Low-Level EFL Students. 3rd World CALL International Conference, Fukuoka, Japan.Google Scholar
Chang, M. (2005) Applying self-regulated learning strategies in a web-based instruction–an investigation of motivation perception. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(3): 217–230.Google Scholar
Chang, M. M.Lehman, J. D. (2002) Learning foreign language through an interactive multimedia program: An experimental study on the effects of the relevance component of the ARCS model. The Computer Assisted Language Instruction Consortium Journal, 20(1): 81–98.Google Scholar
Chenoweth, N. A.Murday, K. (2003) Measuring student learning in an online French course. CALICO Journal, 20(2): 285–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, R. C.Mayer, R. E. (2003) E-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.Google Scholar
Felix, U. (2001) A multivariate analysis of students’ experience of web-based learning. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 17(1): 21–36.Google Scholar
Gagne, R. M. (1965) The conditions of learning. New York: Holt, Reinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Gonzalez-Bueno, M.Perez, L. C. (2000) Electronic mail in foreign language writing: A study of grammatical and lexical accuracy, and quantity of language. Foreign Language Annals, 33(2): 189–198.Google Scholar
Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J. D.Smaldino, S. E. (2002) Instructional media and technologies for learning (7th edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Inc.Google Scholar
Johnson, A.Heffernan, N. (2006) The short readings project: A CALL reading activity utilizing vocabulary recycling. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19(1): 63–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonassen, D. H. (1994) Thinking Technology: Towards a construvtivist design model. Educational Technology, 34(4): 34–37.Google Scholar
Keller, J. M. (1987) Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(3): 2–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, J. M. (1993) Manual for the Instructional Materials Motivational Survey (IMMS). Unpublished manuscript, Tallahassee, FL.Google Scholar
Kim, K. S.Moore, J. L. (2005) Web-based learning: Factors affecting students’ satisfaction and learning experience. First Monday, 10(11), http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/1294/1214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1994) Evaluating training programs: the four levels. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. D. (1985) The input hypothesis: Issue and implications. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Liou, H. C. (2000) Conceptualization and implementation of an English learning Web site which bridges TEFL theories and practices. Paper presented at the 4th International Conference on Multimedia Language Education, Chung-Li, Yuan Ze University.Google Scholar
Liou, H.-C., Wang, S. H.Hung-Yeh, Y. (1992) Can grammatical CALL help EFL writing instruction? CALICO Journal, 10(1): 23–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, Q.Kelly, P. (2006) Computer assisted vocabulary learning: design and evaluation. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19(1): 15–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, R. E. (2001) Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meskill, C.Anthony, N. (2005) Foreign language learning with CMC: forms of on-line instructional discourse in a hybrid Russian class. System, 33(1): 89–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murday, K., Ushida, E.Chenoweth, N. A. (2008) Learners’ and teachers’ perspectives on language online. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(2): 125–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagata, N. (1996) Computer vs. workbook instruction in second language acquisition. CALICO Journal, 14(1): 53–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagata, N. (1997) The effectiveness of computer-assisted metalinguistic instruction: A case study in Japanese. Foreign Language Annals, 30(2): 187–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, J.Ortega, L. (2000) Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50: 417–528.Google Scholar
Nutta, J. (1998) Is computer-based grammar instruction as effective as teacher-directed grammar instruction for teaching L2 structures? The Computer Assisted Language Instruction Consortium Journal, 16(1): 49–62.Google Scholar
Paivio, A. (1990) Mental representation: A dual coding approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plass, J. L., Chun, D. M., Mayer, R. E.Leutner, D. (1998) Supporting visual and verbal learning preferences in a second-language multimedia learning environment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1): 25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quitadamo, I. J.Brown, A. (2001) Effective teaching styles and instructional design for on-line learning environments. Washington, DC: Department of Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED462 942).Google Scholar
Redston, C.Cunningham, G. (2007) Face2Face Elementary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Reeves, T. C. (1997) Established and emerging evaluation paradigms for instructional design. In: Dills, C. R. and Romiszowski, A. J. (eds.), Instructional Development Paradigms. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications, 163–178.Google Scholar
Reeves, T. C.Reeves, P. M. (1997) The effective dimensions of interactive learning on the WWW. In: Khan, B. H. (ed.), Web-based instruction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications, 59–66.Google Scholar
Schoenberg, I. E.Maurer, J. (2006) Focus on grammar 1 (3rd ed.). New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Scida, E. E.Saury, R. E. (2006) Hybrid courses and their impact on student and classroom performance: A case study at the University of Virginia. CALICO Journal, 23(3): 517–531.Google Scholar
Schwienhorst, K. (2004) Native-speaker/non native-speaker discourse in the MOO: topic negotiation and initiation in a synchronous text-based environment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 17(1): 35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smart, K. L.Cappel, J. J. (2006) Students’ perceptions of on-line learning: A comparative study. Journal of Information Technology Education, 5: 201–219.Google Scholar
Waring, R. (2004) How to successfully use flashcards: In defense of learning words in word pairs. The Internet TESL Journal. http://iteslj.org/links/TESL/Articles/Vocabulary/Google Scholar
Warschauer, M. (2000) On-line learning in second language classrooms: An ethnographic study. In: Warschauer, M. and Kern, R. (eds.), Network-Based Language Teaching: Concepts and Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press, 41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wegner, S. B., Holloway, K. C.Garton, E. M. (1999) The effects of Internet-based instruction on student learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 3(2): 98–106.Google Scholar
Wu, S., Witten, I. H., Edwards, A., Nichols, D.Aquino, R. (2007) A digital library of language learning exercises. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 2: 1.Google Scholar
Yang, S. C. (2001) Integrating computer-mediated tools into the language curriculum. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17(1): 85–93.Google Scholar
Yang, S. C.Chen, Y. J. (2007) Technology-enhanced language learning: A case study. Computers in Human Behavior, 23: 860–879.Google Scholar