Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 21
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Djoub, Zineb 2016. Human-Computer Interaction: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications.

    Lin, Chih-Cheng and Yu, Ya-Chuan 2016. Effects of presentation modes on mobile-assisted vocabulary learning and cognitive load. Interactive Learning Environments, p. 1.

    Chiou, Moh 2015. Students acceptance of using smartphone in a mobile learning context. Educational Research and Reviews, Vol. 10, Issue. 14, p. 1937.

    Djoub, Zineb 2015. Promoting Active Learning through the Integration of Mobile and Ubiquitous Technologies.

    Gromik, Nicolas A. 2015. Encyclopedia of Mobile Phone Behavior.

    Mashhadi, Amir and Khazaie, Saeed 2015. Handbook of Research on Individual Differences in Computer-Assisted Language Learning.

    Pascual-Ferrá, Paola 2015. Encyclopedia of Mobile Phone Behavior.

    Fatahipour, Majid and Ghaseminajm, Mahnaz 2014. CALL Design: Principles and Practice - Proceedings of the 2014 EUROCALL Conference, Groningen, The Netherlands. p. 83.

    Nikoopour, Jahanbakhsh and Kazemi, Azin 2014. Vocabulary Learning through Digitized & Non-digitized Flashcards Delivery. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 98, p. 1366.

    MacLean, George R. and Elwood, James A. 2013. Cases on E-Learning Management.

    Sundararajan, Binod Sheehan, Lorn and Gilbert, Sarah 2013. Increasing Student Engagement and Retention Using Classroom Technologies: Classroom Response Systems and Mediated Discourse Technologies.

    Viberg, Olga and Grönlund, Åke 2013. Cross-cultural analysis of users' attitudes toward the use of mobile devices in second and foreign language learning in higher education: A case from Sweden and China. Computers & Education, Vol. 69, p. 169.

    Ting, Yu-Liang 2012. The Pitfalls of Mobile Devices in Learning: A Different View and Implications for Pedagogical Design. Journal of Educational Computing Research, Vol. 46, Issue. 2, p. 119.

    Brett, Paul 2011. Students’ experiences and engagement with SMS for learning in Higher Education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, Vol. 48, Issue. 2, p. 137.

    Derakhshan, Ali and Khodabakhshzadeh, Hossein 2011. Why CALL Why Not MALL: An In-depth Review of Text-message Vocabulary Learning. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, Vol. 1, Issue. 9,

    Keogh, Katrina A. 2011. Mobile Technologies and Handheld Devices for Ubiquitous Learning.

    Sandberg, Jacobijn Maris, Marinus and de Geus, Kaspar 2011. Mobile English learning: An evidence-based study with fifth graders. Computers & Education, Vol. 57, Issue. 1, p. 1334.

    Taki, Saeed and Khazaei, Saeed 2011. Learning Vocabulary via Mobile Phone: Persian EFL Learners in Focus. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, Vol. 2, Issue. 6,

    Li, Mengmeng Ogata, Hiroaki Hou, Bin Hashimoto, Satoshi Uosaki, Noriko Liu, Yuqin and Yano, Yoneo 2010. 2010 6th IEEE International Conference on Wireless, Mobile, and Ubiquitous Technologies in Education. p. 34.

    Macaro, Ernesto 2010. Review of recent research (2000–2008) on applied linguistics and language teaching with specific reference to L2 Italian. Language Teaching, Vol. 43, Issue. 02, p. 127.


L'italiano al telefonino: Using SMS to support beginners' language learning1

  • Claire Kennedy (a1) and Mike Levy (a2)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 August 2008

This article discusses an experiment in sending regular Short Message Service (SMS) messages to support language learning, and vocabulary learning in particular, at beginners' level in Italian at an Australian university. The approach we took built on the initiatives of Thornton and Houser (2005) and Dias (2002b), and was informed by the results of an earlier trial we had conducted with students at high-intermediate level (Levy & Kennedy, 2005). In testing the possibilities for using mobile phones for language learning purposes, we were especially interested in investigating the acceptability of a ‘push’ mode of operation, in which the scheduling of messages is determined by the teachers. While the students appreciated the experience overall, and found the message content often useful or enjoyable, there was a wide range of views on the frequency of messages acceptable. We are therefore planning the further integration of messaging into the course around a flexible arrangement involving options for high or low frequency of pushed messages, as well as messages available on request – in ‘pull’ mode.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

  • ISSN: 0958-3440
  • EISSN: 1474-0109
  • URL: /core/journals/recall
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *