Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Orientations to negotiated language and task rules in online L2 interaction

  • Olcay Sert (a1) and Ufuk Balaman (a2)
Abstract
Abstract

Recent research shows that negotiation of meaning in online task-oriented interactions can be a catalyst for L2 (second/foreign/additional language) development. However, how learners undertake such negotiation work and what kind of an impact it has on interactional development in an L2 are still largely unknown mainly due to a lack of focus on task engagement processes. A conversation analytic investigation into negotiation of meaning (NoM) in task-oriented interactions can bring evidence to such development, as conversation analysis (CA), given its analytic tools, allows us to see how participant orientations in interaction evolve over time. Based on an examination of screen-recorded multiparty online task-oriented interactions, this study aimed to describe how users (n=8) of an L2 (1) negotiate and co-construct language and task rules and (2) later show orientations to these rules both in the short term (50 minutes) and in the long term (8 weeks). The findings showed that in addition to negotiating existing rules, the learners co-constructed new rules around an action called policing, which occurred when the learners attended to the breach of language and task rules. Furthermore, even after the negotiation work was completed, they oriented to negotiated rules through policing their own utterances (i.e. self-policing). Overall, this interactional continuum (from other-repairs to self-repairs) brought longitudinal evidence to bear on the role of NoM in the development of L2 interactional competence. These findings bring new insights into NoM, technology-mediated task-based language teaching (TBLT), and CA for second language acquisition (SLA).

Copyright
References
Hide All
Amir A. (2013) Self-policing in the English as a foreign language classroom. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 7(2): 84105.
Amir A. and Musk N. (2013) Language policing: Micro-level language policy-in-process in the foreign language classroom. Classroom Discourse, 4(2): 151167. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2013.783500
Auer P. (1984) Bilingual conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pb.v.8
Balaman U. (2015) A conversation analytic investigation into the impact of task design on the emergence of information gaps. In Colpaert, J., Aerts, A., Oberhofer, M. & Plana, M. G. C. (eds.), Proceedings of 17th International CALL Conference: Task Design & CALL. Tarragona, Spain: Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 95–104.
Balaman U. (2016) A conversation analytic study on the development of interactional competence in English in an online task-oriented environment. Hacettepe University, Turkey, unpublished PhD.
Balaman U. and Sert O. (2017a) The coordination of online L2 interaction and orientations to task interface for epistemic progression. Journal of Pragmatics, 115: 115129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.01.015
Balaman U. and Sert O. (2017b) Development of L2 interactional resources for online collaborative task accomplishment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(7): 601630. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1334667
Belz J. A. & Thorne S. L. (eds.) (2006) Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education. Boston: Thomson, Heinle.
Bonacina-Pugh F. (2012) Researching ‘practiced language policies’: Insights from conversation analysis. Language Policy, 11(3): 213234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-012-9243-x
Bower J. and Kawaguchi S. (2011) Negotiation of meaning and corrective feedback in Japanese/English eTandem. Language Learning & Technology, 15(1): 4171.
Doughty C. J. and Long M. (2003) Optimal psycholinguistic environments for distance foreign language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 7(3): 5080.
Doughty C. J. and Pica T. (1986) “Information gap” tasks: Do they facilitate second language acquisition? TESOL Quarterly, 20(2): 305325. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586546
Fernández-García M. and Martínez-Arbelaiz A. (2002) Negotiation of meaning in nonnative speaker-nonnative speaker synchronous discussions. CALICO Journal, 19(2): 279294.
Firth A. and Wagner J. (1997) On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. The Modern Language Journal, 81(3): 285300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1997.tb05480.x
Foster P. and Ohta A. S. (2005) Negotiation for meaning and peer assistance in second language classrooms. Applied Linguistics, 26(3): 402430. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami014
Gafaranga J. (2000) Medium repair vs. other-language repair: Telling the medium of a bilingual conversation. International Journal of Bilingualism, 4(3): 327350. https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069000040030301
Gafaranga J. (2010) Medium request: Talking language shift into being. Language in Society, 39(2): 241270. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404510000047
González-Lloret M. (2015) Conversation analysis in computer-assisted language learning. CALICO Journal, 32(3): 569594. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v32i3.27568
González-Lloret M. and Ortega L. (2014) Towards technology-mediated TBLT: An introduction. In González-Lloret, M. & Ortega, L. (eds.), Technology-mediated TBLT: Researching technology and tasks. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 121.
Goodwin C. (2013) The co-operative, transformative organization of human action and knowledge. Journal of Pragmatics, 46(1): 823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.003
Hall J. K. and Pekarek Doehler S. (2011) L2 interactional competence and development. In Hall, J. K., Hellermann, J. & Pekarek Doehler, S. (eds.), L2 interactional competence and development. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters, 115.
Hauser E. (2005) Coding ‘corrective recasts’: The maintenance of meaning and more fundamental problems. Applied Linguistics, 26(3): 293316. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami010
Hazel S. (2015) Identities at odds: Embedded and implicit language policing in the internationalized workplace. Language and Intercultural Communication, 15(1): 141160. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2014.985311
Hellermann J. (2008) Social actions for classroom language learning. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Hellermann J. and Pekarek Doehler S. (2010) On the contingent nature of language-learning tasks. Classroom Discourse, 1(1): 2545. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463011003750657
Heritage J. (1984) A change-of state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In Maxwell Atkinson, J. & Heritage, J. (eds.), Structure of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 299345.
Jakonen T. and Morton T. (2015) Epistemic search sequences in peer interaction in a content-based language classroom. Applied Linguistics, 36(1): 7394. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt031
Jefferson G. (2004) Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In Lerner, G. H. (ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1334. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
Jenks C. J. (2014) Social interaction in second language chat rooms. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Jepson K. (2005) Conversations – and negotiated interaction – in text and voice chat rooms. Language Learning & Technology, 9(3): 7998.
Kasper G. and Wagner J. (2011) A conversation-analytic approach to second language acquisition. In Atkinson, D. (ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 117142.
Kern R. G. (1995) Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: Effects on quantity and characteristics of language production. The Modern Language Journal, 79(4): 457476. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1995.tb05445.x
Kitade K. (2000) L2 learners’ discourse and SLA theories in CMC: Collaborative interaction in internet chat. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13(2): 143166. https://doi.org/10.1076/0958-8221(200004)13:2;1-D;FT143
Kitzinger C. (2013) Repair. In Sidnell, J. & Stivers, T. (eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis. Chichester, UK: Blackwell, 229256.
Lee L. (2001) Online interaction: Negotiation of meaning and strategies used among learners of Spanish. ReCALL, 13(2): 232244. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344001000829a
Lee Y.-A. (2013) Descriptions of second language interaction: Toward descriptive adequacy. The Modern Language Journal, 97(4): 853868. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12041.x
Lindström A. (1994) Identification and recognition in Swedish telephone conversation openings. Language in Society, 23(2): 231252. https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450001784X
Long M. H. (1996) The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In Ritchie, W. & Bhatia, T. (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 413468. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012589042-7/50015-3
Markee N. and Kasper G. (2004) Classroom talks: An introduction. The Modern Language Journal, 88(4): 491500. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-14-.x
Markee N. and Kunitz S. (2013) Doing planning and task performance in second language acquisition: An ethnomethodological respecification. Language Learning, 63(4): 629664. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12019
Martin C. (2004) From other to self: Learning as interactional change. Uppsala, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Uppsaliensis.
Martin C. (2009) Relevance of situational context in studying learning as changing participation. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 53(2): 133149. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830902757568
Martin C. and Sahlström F. (2010) Learning as longitudinal interactional change: From other-repair to self-repair in physiotherapy treatment. Discourse Processes, 47(8): 668697. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638531003628965
Meunier L. (1998) Personality and motivational factors in electronic networking. In Muyskens, J. A. (ed.), New ways of learning and teaching: Focus on technology and foreign language education. Boston: Heinle, 63126.
Mondada L. and Pekarek Doehler S. (2004) Second language acquisition as situated practice: Task accomplishment in the French second language classroom. Modern Language Journal, 88(4): 501518. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-15-.x
Mori J. (2004) Pursuit of understanding: Rethinking ‘negotiation of meaning’ in view of projected action. In Gardner, R. & Wagner, J. (eds.), Second language conversations. London: Continuum, 157177.
Musk N. (2016) Correcting spellings in second language learners’ computer-assisted collaborative writing. Classroom Discourse, 7(1): 3657. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2015.1095106
Nakahama Y., Tyler A. and Van Lier L. (2001) Negotiation of meaning in conversational and information gap activities: A comparative discourse analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 35(3): 377405. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588028
Pekarek Doehler S. and Berger E. (2016) L2 interactional competence as increased ability for context-sensitive conduct: A longitudinal study of story-openings. Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amw021
Pekarek Doehler S. and Pochon-Berger E. (2015) The development of L2 interactional competence: Evidence from turn-taking organization, sequence organization, repair organization and preference organization. In Cadierno, T. & Eskildsen, S. W. (eds.), Usage-based perspectives on second language learning . Berlin: De Gruyter, 233268. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110378528-012
Pellettieri J. (2000) Negotiation in cyberspace: The role of chatting in the development of grammatical competence. In Warschauer, M. & Kern, R. (eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 5986. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524735.006.
Piirainen-Marsh A. and Tainio L. (2014) Asymmetries of knowledge and epistemic change in social gaming interaction. The Modern Language Journal, 98(4): 10221038. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12153
Salaberry M. R. (2000) L2 morphosyntactic development in text-based computer-mediated communication. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13(1): 527. https://doi.org/10.1076/0958-8221(200002)13:1;1-K;FT005
Sacks H., Schegloff E. A. and Jefferson G. (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4): 696735. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010
Schegloff E. A., Jefferson G. and Sacks H. (1977) The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2): 361382. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1977.0041
Seedhouse P. (2005) “Task” as research construct. Language Learning, 55(3): 533570. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00314.x
Sert O. (2015) Social interaction and L2 classroom discourse. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Shekary M. and Tahririan M. H. (2006) Negotiation of meaning and noticing in text-based online chat. The Modern Language Journal, 90(4): 557573. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00504.x
Sidnell J. (2010) Conversation analysis: An introduction. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
Sidnell J. & Stivers T. (eds.) (2013) The handbook of conversation analysis. Chichester, UK: Blackwell.
Smith B. (2003) Computer-mediated negotiated interaction: An expanded model. The Modern Language Journal, 87(1): 3857. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00177
Smith B. (2004) Computer-mediated negotiated interaction and lexical acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(3): 365398. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226310426301X
Smith B. (2005) The relationship between negotiated interaction, learner uptake, and lexical acquisition in task-based computer-mediated communication. TESOL Quarterly, 39(1): 3358. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588451
Smith B. (2009) Task-based learning in the computer-mediated communicative ESL/EFL classroom. CALL-EJ Online, 11(1). http://callej.org/journal/11-1/smith.html
Sotillo S. M. (2000) Discourse functions and syntactic complexity in synchronous and asynchronous communication. Language Learning & Technology, 4(1): 77110.
ten Have P. (2007) Doing conversation analysis: A practical guide (2nd ed.). London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208895
Tudini V. (2010) Online second language acquisition: Conversation analysis of online chat. London: Continuum.
Tudini V. and Liddicoat A. J. (2017) Computer-mediated communication and conversation analysis. In Thorne, S. L. & May, S. (eds.), Language, education and technology (3rd ed.). Springer International, 112. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02237-6_32
van der Zwaard R. and Bannink A. (2014) Video call or chat? Negotiation of meaning and issues of face in telecollaboration. System, 44: 137148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.03.007
van der Zwaard R. and Bannink A. (2016) Nonoccurrence of negotiation of meaning in task-based synchronous computer-mediated communication. The Modern Language Journal, 100(3): 625640. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12341
Varonis E. M. and Gass S. (1985) Non-native/non-native conversations: A model for negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics, 6(1): 7190. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/6.1.71
Wang Y. (2006) Negotiation of meaning in desktop videoconferencing-supported distance language learning. ReCALL, 18(1): 122145. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344006000814
Watanabe A. (2017) Developing L2 interactional competence: Increasing participation through self-selection in post-expansion sequences. Classroom Discourse, 8(3): 271293. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2017.1354310
Yanguas Í. (2010) Oral computer-mediated interaction between L2 learners: It’s about time! Language Learning & Technology, 14(3): 7293.
Yanguas Í. (2012) Task-based oral computer-mediated communication and L2 vocabulary acquisition. CALICO Journal, 29(3): 507531. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.29.3.507-531
Yüksel D. and İnan B. (2014) The effects of communication mode on negotiation of meaning and its noticing. ReCALL, 26(3): 333354. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344014000147
Zheng D., Young M. F., Wagner M. M. and Brewer R. A. (2009) Negotiation for action: English language learning in game-based virtual worlds. The Modern Language Journal, 93(4): 489511. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00927.x
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

ReCALL
  • ISSN: 0958-3440
  • EISSN: 1474-0109
  • URL: /core/journals/recall
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 28 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 299 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 2nd February 2018 - 21st February 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.