Skip to main content

The use of questions in a synchronous intercultural online exchange project

  • Rong Yang (a1)

In this digital era, online intercultural exchange has gained increased popularity in language and culture education. However, concerns arise over its productiveness and efficacy in engaging participants cognitively. In addition, there is a paucity of research on out-of-classroom synchronous online exchange projects, let alone those involving Chinese English learners and English-speaking Chinese learners. Guided by the social constructivist theory, this study examined the productiveness of a small-scale intercultural online exchange project from its quality dimension measured by the participants’ use of questions. The purpose was to gain a better understanding of the dynamics and educational value of online synchronous text communication in language and culture learning. Participants were six English learners from China and six English-speaking Chinese learners from the U.S. Unlike many previous intercultural exchanges, this project was entirely independent from the curricula on both sides. Within a certain time frame, participants chose when and where exactly the synchronous text chat took place. Data analyses focused on the self-generated questions found in chat logs. Although participants seemed to self-generate more lower-order than higher-order thinking questions, the latter were frequently used in the process of online discussion to engage learners from both sides in critical thinking and self-reflection. Differences in the use of questions were found across dyads, languages, and groups of participants. Implications for future research and project design were discussed.

Hide All
Abrams, Z. I. (2003) The effect of synchronous and asynchronous CMC on oral performance in German. The Modern Language Journal, 87(2): 157167.
AbuSeileek, A. and Qatawneh, K. (2013) Effects of synchronous and asynchronous computer-mediated communication (CMC) oral conversations on English language learners’ discourse functions. Computers & Education, 62: 181190.
Anderson, T. (1996) The virtual conference: Extending professional education in Cyberspace. International . Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 2: 121135.
Anderson, L. and Krathwohl, D. A. (2001) Taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
Applegate, M. D., Quinn, K. B. and Applegate, A. J. (2002) Levels of thinking required by comprehension questions in informal reading inventories. The Reading Teacher, 56(2): 174180.
Bradley, M. E., Thom, L. R., Hayes, J. and Hay, C. (2008) Ask and you will receive: how question type influences quantity and quality of online discussions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5): 888900.
Bloom, B., Englehart, M., Furst, E., Hill, W. and Krathwohl, D. (1956) Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain . New York, Toronto: Longmans, Green.
Chin, C. and Langsford, A. (2004) Questioning students in ways that encourage thinking. Teaching Science, 50: 1621.
Choi, I., Land, S. M. and Turgeon, A. J. (2005) Scaffolding peer-questioning strategies to facilitate metacognition during online small group discussion. Instructional Science, 33: 483511.
Collison, G., Elbaum, B., Haavind, S. and Tinker, R. (2000) Facilitating online learning: Effective strategies for moderators. Madison: Atwood Publishing.
Cox, G., Carr, T. and Hall, M. (2004) Evaluating the use of synchronous communication in two blended courses. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(3): 183193.
Elder, L. and Paul, R. (1998) The role of Socratic questioning in thinking, teaching, and learning. The Clearing House, 71(5): 297301.
Gao, F., Wang, C. and Sun, Y. (2009) A new model of productive online discussion and its implications for research and instruction. Journal of Educational Technology Development & Exchange, 2(1): 6578.
Gao, F., Zhang, T. and Franklin, T. (2013) Designing asynchronous online discussion environments: Recent progress and possible future directions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(3): 469483.
García, J. S. and Crapotta, J. (2007) Models of telecollaboration (2): Cultura. Languages for Intercultural Communication and Education, 15: 6284.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T. and Archer, W. (2000) Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3): 87105.
Garrison, D., Anderson, T. and Archer, W. (2001) Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1): 723.
Garrison, R. D. and Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005) Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3): 133148.
Ge, X., Chen, C. and Davis, K. A. (2005) Scaffolding novice instructional designers’ problem-solving processes using question prompts in a web-based learning environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 33(2): 219248.
Graesser, A. C, Rus, V. and Cai, Z. (2008) Question classification schemes. Proceedings of the Workshop on Question Generation.
Green, L. (1998) Online conferencing: Llessons learned. Office of Learning Technologies, Government of Canada.
Groenke, S. (2010) Missed opportunities, misunderstandings, and misgivings: A case study analysis of three beginning English teachers’ attempts at authentic discussion with adolescents in a synchronous CMC environment. Journal of Technology & Teacher Education, 18(3): 387414.
Guth, S. and Helm, F. (eds.) (2010) Telecollaboration 2.0: language, literacies and intercultural learning in the 21st Century. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.
Guth, S. and Helm, F. (2012) Developing multiliteracies in ELT through telecollaboration. ELT Journal: English Language Teachers Journal, 66(1): 4251.
Im, Y. and Lee, O. (2004) Pedagogical implications of online discussion for preservice teacher training. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36: 155170.
Ingram, A. L., Hathorn, L. G. and Evans, A. (2000) Beyond chat on the internet. Computers & Education, 35(1): 2135.
Kanuka, H. and Anderson, T. (1998) Online social interchange, discord and knowledge construction. Journal of Distance Education, 13(1): 5774.
King, A. (1990) Enhancing peer interaction and learning in classroom through reciprocal questioning. American Educational Research Journal, 27(4): 664687.
Kramsch, C. (1993) Context and culture in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002) A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4): 212218.
Lamy, M. N. and Hampel, R. (2007) Online communication in language teaching and learning. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lai, T. (2006) The effect of using peer discussion, learning journals and question prompts to support reflection in a distance learning environment. The Pennsylvania State University, unpublished PhD.
Lipman, M. (1991) Thinking in education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McLoughlin, C. and Luca, J. (2000, February) Cognitive engagement and higher order thinking through computer conferencing: We know why but do we know how. In: Flexible futures in tertiary teaching. Proceedings of the 9th Annual Teaching Learning Forum: 2–4. Perth, Australia: Curtin University of Technology.
McLoughlin, D. and Mynard, J. (2009) An analysis of higher order thinking in online discussions. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46(2): 147160.
Newman, D. R., Webb, B. and Cochrane, C. (1997) Evaluating the quality of learning in computer supported cooperative learning. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(6): 484495. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199706)48:6<484::AID-ASI2>3.0.CO;2-Q
Notar, C. E., Wilson, J. D. and Montgomery, M. K. (2005) A distance learning model for teaching higher order thinking. College Student Journal, 39: 1725.
O’Dowd, R. (2007) Introduction. In: R. O’Dowd (Ed.), Online intercultural exchange: an introduction for foreign language teachers. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters: 316.
O’Dowd, R. and Ritter, M. (2006) Understanding and working with “failed communication” in telecollaborative exchanges. CALICO Journal, 23(3): 623642.
Pilkington, R. (2004) Developing discussion for learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20: 61164.
Qatipi, S. (2011) Questioning and its true values in the process of learning and teaching to promote critical thinking. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 38: 7181.
Salmon, G. (2000) E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online. Kogan Page, London.
Savage, L. B. (1998) Eliciting critical thinking skills through questioning. The Clearing House, 71(5): 291293.
Schwier, R. A. and Dykes, M. E. (2004, June) The struggle for community and content in virtual learning communities. Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications: 2976–2982. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Schrire, S. (2006) Knowledge building in asynchronous discussion groups: Going beyond quantitative analysis. Computers and Education, 46: 4970.
Taba, H. (1966) Teaching strategies and cognitive functioning in elementary school children. San Francisco: San Francisco State College.
Thomas, M. J. W. (2002) Learning within incoherent structures: The space of online discussion forums. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18: 351366.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978) Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wang, C. (2005) Questioning skills facilitate online synchronous discussions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(4): 303313.
Ware, P. (2005) “Missed” communication in online communication: Tensions in a German-American telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 9(2): 6489.
Yang, Y. C., Newby, T. J. and Bill, R. L. (2005) Using socratic questioning to promote critical thinking skills through asynchronous discussion forums in distance learning environments. American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3): 163181.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

  • ISSN: 0958-3440
  • EISSN: 1474-0109
  • URL: /core/journals/recall
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 4
Total number of PDF views: 84 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 322 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 16th August 2017 - 19th March 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.