Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-79b67bcb76-ncjtf Total loading time: 0.26 Render date: 2021-05-13T20:26:16.222Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true }

A new logical problem for the doctrine of the Trinity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 December 2016

JUSTIN MOONEY
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Wisconsin – Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI 53201, USA
Corresponding
E-mail address:

Abstract

In this article I develop a new problem for the doctrine of the Trinity that I call the Problem of Triunity. Rather than proceeding from the fact that God is one and the persons are many, as the traditional problem of the Trinity does, the problem of triunity proceeds from the fact that, in one sense or another, God is many, and yet each divine person on his own is just one.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Baber, H. E. (2015) ‘The Trinity: relative identity redux’, Faith and Philosophy, 32, 161171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brower, Jeffrey E. & Rea, Michael C. (2005) ‘Material constitution and the Trinity’, Faith and Philosophy, 22, 5776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cain, James (1989) ‘The doctrine of the Trinity and the logic of relative identity’, Religious Studies 25, 141152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, William Lane (2009a) ‘Another glance at Trinity monotheism’, in McCall, T. & Rea, M. (eds) Philosophical and Theological Essays on the Trinity (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 126130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, William Lane (2009b). ‘Toward a tenable social trinitarianism’, in McCall, T. & Rea, M. (eds) Philosophical and Theological Essays on the Trinity (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 8999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, William Lane & Moreland, J. P. (2003) Philosophical Foundations for a Christian Worldview (Downers Grove IL: InterVarsity Press).Google Scholar
Effingham, Nikk (2015) ‘Multiple location and Christian philosophical theology’, Faith and Philosophy, 32, 2544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasker, William (2013) Metaphysics and the Tri-Personal God (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard-Snyder, Daniel (2009) ‘Trinity monotheism’, in McCall, T. & Rea, M. (eds) Philosophical and Theological Essays on the Trinity (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 100125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jedwab, Joseph (2015) ‘Against the Geachian theory of the Trinity and Incarnation’, Faith and Philosophy, 32, 125145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leftow, Brian (2004). ‘A Latin Trinity’, Faith and Philosophy, 21, 304333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leftow, Brian (2007) ‘Modes without modalism’, in van Inwagen, P. & Zimmerman, D. (eds) Persons: Human and Divine (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 357375.Google Scholar
Leftow, Brian (2012) God and Necessity (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leftow, Brian (2015) ‘Perfection and possibility’, Faith and Philosophy, 32, 423431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merricks, Trenton (2006) ‘Split brains and the godhead’, in Crisp, T. M., Davidson, M., & Vanderlaan, D. (eds) Knowledge and Reality (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers), 299326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, Thomas V. (1991) Our Idea of God: An Introduction to Philosophical Theology (Downers Grove IL: Intervarsity Press), 180184.Google Scholar
Plantinga, Cornelius (1989) ‘Social trinity and tritheism’, in Feenstra, R. J. & Plantinga, C. (eds) Trinity, Incarnation, and Atonement, (Notre Dame IN: University of Notre Dame Press), 2147.Google Scholar
Pruss, Alexander (2009). ‘The Leibnizian cosmological argument’, in Moreland, J. P. & Craig, W. L. (eds) The Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology (Malden MA: Blackwell Publishing), 24100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rea, Michael C. (2009a) ‘Relative identity and the doctrine of the Trinity’, in McCall, T. & Rea, M. (eds) Philosophical and Theological Essays on the Trinity (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 249262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rea, Michael C. (2009b) ‘The Trinity’, in Flint, T. & Rea, M. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Theology (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 403429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speaks, Jeff (2014). ‘The method of perfect being theology’, Faith and Philosophy, 31, 256266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speaks, Jeff (forthcoming). ‘Perfect being theology and modal truth’.Google Scholar
Sullivan, James. (1907). ‘The Athanasian Creed’, In The Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company. Retrieved September 5, 2016 from New Advent: <http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/02033b.htm>.Google Scholar
Swinburne, Richard (1994) The Christian God (New York: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuggy, Dale (2014) ‘Trinity’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, (Winter 2014 Edition), Zalta, E. N. (ed.), URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2014/entries/trinity/>..>Google Scholar
Van Inwagen, Peter (2009). ‘And yet they are not three gods but one God’, in McCall, T. & Rea, M. (eds) Philosophical and Theological Essays on the Trinity (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 217248.Google Scholar
Wierenga, Edward (2004) ‘Trinity and polytheism’, Faith and Philosophy, 21, 281294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Scott M. (2013). ‘Indexicals and the Trinity: two non-social models’, Journal of Analytic Theology, 1, 7494.Google Scholar
Yandell, Keith (2009). ‘How many times does three go into one?’, in McCall, T. & Rea, M. (eds) Philosophical and Theological Essays on the Trinity (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 151168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

A new logical problem for the doctrine of the Trinity
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

A new logical problem for the doctrine of the Trinity
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

A new logical problem for the doctrine of the Trinity
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *