Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-768ffcd9cc-x2fkq Total loading time: 0.375 Render date: 2022-12-05T11:09:55.290Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

The problem of religious evil

Co-winner of the 2014 Religious Studies Postgraduate Essay Prize

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2014

DANIEL KODAJ*
Affiliation:
Central European University, Department of Philosophy, 1051 Budapest, Nador u 9, Hungary e-mail: kodaj_daniel@student.ceu.hu

Abstract

The article argues that evils perpetrated in the name of God (‘religious evils') generate a special version of the problem of evil, and a concomitant evidential argument, that cannot be solved by any of the current defences and theodicies. The article draws on historical examples to clarify the concept of religious evil, it shows that religious evil is a candidate defeater of theism, and it claims that the resulting evidential argument cannot be defused by defences and theodicies currently on offer. The last section outlines a solution.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, Robert (1977) ‘Middle knowledge and the problem of evil’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 14, 109117.Google Scholar
Allen, Diogenes (1980) ‘Natural evil and the love of God’, Religious Studies, 16, 439456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, S. J. & Amt, Emilie (eds) (2003) The Crusades: A Reader (Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press).Google Scholar
Alston, William P. (1991) ‘The inductive argument from evil and the human cognitive condition’, Philosophical Perspectives, 5, 2967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergmann, Michael (2001) ‘Skeptical theism and Rowe's new evidential argument from evil’, Noûs, 35, 278296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hick, John (1966) Evil and the God of Love (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar
Howard-Snyder, Daniel & Howard-Snyder, Frances (1999) ‘Is theism compatible with gratuitous evil?’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 36, 115130.Google Scholar
Kors, Alan C. & Peters, Edward (eds) (1972) Witchcraft in Europe, 1100–1700: A Documentary History (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press).Google Scholar
Levack, Brian P. (2006) The Witch-Hunt in Early Modern Europe, 3rd edn (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Levack, Brian P. (ed.) (2013) The Oxford Handbook of Witchcraft in Early Modern Europe and Colonial America (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, J. L. (1955) ‘Evil and omnipotence’, Mind, 64, 200212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCord Adams, Marilyn (1990) ‘Horrendous evils and the goodness of God’, in Adams, Robert & McCord Adams, Marilyn (eds) The Problem of Evil (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 209221.Google Scholar
McCord Adams, Marilyn (1999) Horrendous Evils and the Goodness of God (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Peterson, Michael (2003) ‘The problem of evil: the case against God's existence’, in Peterson, Michael, Hasker, William, Reichenbach, Bruce, & Basinger, David (eds) Reason and Religious Belief, 3rd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 128153.Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin (1974) The Nature of Necessity (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Rowe, William L. (1979) ‘The problem of evil and some varieties of atheism’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 16, 335341.Google Scholar
Stump, Eleonore (1985) ‘The problem of evil’, Faith and Philosophy, 2, 392423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stump, Eleonore (1997) ‘Saadia Gaon on the problem of evil’, Faith and Philosophy, 14, 523549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stump, Eleonore (2001) ‘Second-person accounts and the problem of evil’, Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia, 57, 745771.Google Scholar
Swinburne, Richard (1998) Providence and the Problem of Evil (Oxford: Clarendon Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Inwagen, Peter (1988) ‘The magnitude, duration, and distribution of evil: a theodicy’, Philosophical Topics, 14, 161187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Inwagen, Peter (2006) The Problem of Evil (Oxford: Clarendon Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wykstra, Stephen J. (1984) ‘The Humean obstacle to evidential arguments from suffering’, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 16, 7393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The problem of religious evil
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

The problem of religious evil
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

The problem of religious evil
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *