Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-jtdwj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T09:17:20.880Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Being of one substance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2018

JOHN HEIL
JOHN HEIL*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, CB 1073, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO 63130-4899, USA
*
e-mail: jh@wustl.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An attempt is made to provide a consistent, independently motivated metaphysics of the Trinity by invoking an ontology of substances, attributes, and modes in the spirit of Descartes and Spinoza. The Trinity comprises one substance, triply attributed, where distinctions among attributes are ‘of reasoned reason’ only, but ‘founded’ in the nature of the substance.

Information

Type
Original Article
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 54 , Special Issue 3: Metaphysics of the Trinity: New Directions , September 2018 , pp. 313 - 324
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Armstrong, D. M. (1997) A World of States of Affairs (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Campbell, K. (1990) Abstract Particulars (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).Google Scholar
Descartes, R. (1644/1985) Principles of Philosophy, in Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R., & Murdoch, D. (eds) The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, I (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 277–291.Google Scholar
Descartes, R. (1645/1991) ‘Letter to an anonymous addressee’, in Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R., Murdoch, D., & Kenny, A. (eds) The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, II (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 279–281.Google Scholar
Des Chene, D. (1996) Physiologia: Natural Philosophy in Late Aristotelian and Cartesian Thought (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Garber, D. (1992) Descartes’ Metaphysical Physics (Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Heil, J. (2012) The Universe as We Find It (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Heil, J. (2014) ‘Accidents, modes, tropes, and universals’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 51, 49–60.Google Scholar
Heil, J. (2015) ‘Cartesian transubstantiation’, in Kvanvig, J. (ed.) Oxford Studies in the Philosophy of Religion 6 (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 139–157.Google Scholar
Locke, J. (1690/1978) An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, Niddich, P. H. (ed.) (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Lowe, E. J. (2006) The Four-Category Ontology: A Metaphysical Foundation for Natural Science (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Melamed, Y. Y. (2013) Spinoza's Metaphysics: Substance and Thought (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Melamed, Y. Y. (forthcoming) ‘The building blocks of Spinoza's metaphysics: substance, attributes, and modes’, in Della Rocca, M. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Spinoza (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Rea, M. C. (2009) ‘The Trinity’, in Flint, T. P. & Rea, M. C. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Theology (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 403–429.Google Scholar
Suárez, F. (1597/1947) Metaphysical Disputations, VII: On the Various Kinds of Distinction. Vollert, C. (tr.) (Milwaukee: Marquette University Press).Google Scholar