Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Empathy and divine union in Kierkegaard: solving the faith/history problem in Philosophical Fragments

  • JOSHUA COCKAYNE (a1)

Abstract

Søren Kierkegaard's account of faith in Philosophical Fragments claims that the historical Incarnation is necessary for faith, but that historical evidence for the Incarnation is neither necessary nor sufficient for faith. It has been argued that the defence of these two claims gives rise to a faith/history problem for Kierkegaard and that it is incoherent to defend an account of faith which affirms both the necessity of the historical Incarnation and rejects the necessity and sufficiency of the historical evidence for the Incarnation. I argue that this problem can be solved by applying Eleonore Stump's (2013) account of divine–human union. I argue that the Incarnation is necessary because it allows us to enjoy a kind of mutual empathy with Christ which is the basis of divine–human union and that the historical evidence is neither necessary nor sufficient since faith is grounded in a second-person experience of Christ. I claim that this solves the faith/history problem and offers a way of defending Kierkegaard's account of faith as coherent.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Bogdashina, Olga (2013) Autism and Spirituality: Psyche, Self and Spirit in People on the Autism Spectrum (London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers).
Borg, Emma (2013) ‘More questions for mirror neurons’, Consciousness and Cognition, 22, 11221131.
Buber, Martin (1937) I and Thou, Gregor Smith, Ronald (tr.) (Edinburgh: T&T Clark).
Davies, Martin & Stone, Tony (eds) (1995) Folk Psychology: The Theory of Mind Debate (Oxford: Blackwell).
Descartes, René (1649/1989) Passions of the Soul, Voss, Stephen H. (tr.) (Indiana: Hackett Publishing Co, Inc.).
Doherty, Trent (2014) The Problem of Animal Pain: A Theodicy for All Creatures Great and Small (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
Elian, Naomi, Hoerl, Christoph, Mccormack, Teresa & Roessler, Joahnnes (eds) (2005) Joint Attention: Communication and Other Minds, Issues in Philosophy and Psychology (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
Evans, C. Stephen (1990) ‘The relevance of historical evidence for Christian faith: a critique of a Kierkegaardian view’, Faith and Philosophy, 7, 470485.
Evans, C. Stephen (1996) The Historical Christ and The Jesus of Faith (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
Evans, C. Stephen (2006) Kierkegaard on Faith and the Self: Collected Essays (Waco TX: Baylor University Press).
Ferreira, M. J. (1987) ‘The faith/history problem, and Kierkegaard's a priori “proof” ’, Religious Studies, 23, 337345.
Galese, Vittorio (2001) ‘The “shared manifold” hypothesis: from mirror neurons to empathy’, Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8, 3350.
Galese, Vittorio (2003) ‘The roots of empathy: the shared manifold hypothesis and the neural basis of intersubjectivity’, Psychopathology, 36, 171180.
Galese, Vittorio (2005) ‘“Being like me”: self-other identity, mirror neurons, and empathy’, in Hurley, Susan & Chater, Nick (eds) Perspectives on Imitation, I: From Neuroscience to Social Science – Mechanisms of Imitation and Imitation in Animals (Cambridge MA: MIT Press), 101118.
Goldie, Peter & Coplan, Amy (2011) ‘Introduction’, in Coplan, Amy & Goldie, Peter (eds) Empathy: Philosophical and Psychological Perspectives (Oxford: Oxford University Press), ixxlviii.
Goldman, Alvin (2006) Simulating Minds: The Philosophy, Psychology, and Neuroscience of Mindreading (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Goldman, Alvin (2011) ‘Two routes to empathy: insights from cognitive neuroscience’, in Coplan, Amy & Goldie, Peter (eds) Empathy: Philosophical and Psychological Perspectives (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), 3144.
Hartshorne, Charles (1941) Man's Vision of God and the Logic of Theism (Chicago: Willett, Clark, & Co.).
Hickok, Gregory (2014) The Myth of Mirror Neurons: The Real Neuroscience of Communication and Cognition (New York: W. W. Norton & Company).
Hudson, Hud (2014) The Fall and Hypertime (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
James, William (1884) ‘What is an emotion?’, Mind, 9, 188205.
Kierkegaard, Søren (1844/1985) Philosophical Fragments, Hong, Howard V. & Hong, Edna H. (trs), Kierkegaard's Writings, VII (Princeton: Princeton University Press), 1111.
Kierkegaard, Søren (1850/1991) Practice in Christianity, Hong, Howard V. & Hong, Edna H. (trs), Kierkegaard's Writings, XX (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
Kierkegaard, Søren (1846/1992) Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments, Hong, Howard V. & Hong, Edna H. (trs), Kierkegaard's Writings, XII.1 (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
Levine, Michael P. (1982) ‘Why the Incarnation is a superfluous detail for Kierkegaard’, Religious Studies, 18, 171175.
McNeill, William (2012a) ‘Embodiment and the perceptual hypothesis’, Philosophical Quarterly, 62, 569591.
McNeill, William (2012b) ‘On seeing that someone is angry’, European Journal of Philosophy, 20, 575597.
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice (1945/2002) Phenomenology of Perception, Smith, Colin (tr.) (New York: Routledge).
Moore, G. E. (1944) ‘Russell's theory of description’, in Schilpp, P. A. (ed.) The Philosophy of Bertrand Russell (La Salle IL: Open Court), 175225.
Moser, Paul K. (2008) The Elusive God: Reorientating Religious Epistemology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Moser, Paul K. & McCreary, Mark L. (2010) ‘Kierkegaard's conception of God’, Philosophy Compass, 5, 127135.
Oxley, Julinna (2006) ‘Empathy and contractual theories of ethics’, PhD dissertation, Tulane University.
Patios, Georgios (2014) Kierkegaard on the Philosophy of History (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
Plantinga, Alvin (1981) ‘On taking belief in God as basic’, Noûs, 15, 4151.
Pojman, Louis P. (1982) ‘Kierkegaard on faith and history’, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 13, 5768.
Prinz, Jesse J. (2004) Gut Reactions: A Perceptual Theory of Emotion (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Rizzolatti, Giacomo & Craighero, Laila (2004) ‘The mirror-neuron system’, Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169192.
Stueber, Karsten (2000) ‘Understanding other minds and the problem of rationality’, in Kögler, H. & Stueber, K. (eds) Empathy and Agency: The Problem of Understanding in the Human Sciences (Boulder CO: Westview Press), 144162.
Stueber, Karsten (2006) Rediscovering Empathy: Agency, Folk Psychology, and the Human Sciences (Cambridge MA: MIT Press).
Stump, Eleonore (2003) Aquinas (London & New York: Routledge).
Stump, Eleonore (2010) Wandering in Darkness (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Stump, Eleonore (2013) ‘Omnipresence, indwelling and the second-personal’, European Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 5, 6387.
Swinburne, Richard (1977) The Coherence of Theism (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Taliaferro, Charles (1994) Consciousness and the Mind of God (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Taliaferro, Charles (1997) ‘Incorporeality’, in Quinn, Philip L. & Taliaferro, Charles (ed.) A Companion to the Philosophy of Religion (Oxford: Blackwell), 271278.
Westphal, Merold (2014) Kierkegaard's Concept of Faith, Kierkegaard as a Christian Thinker (Grand Rapids MA & Cambridge UK: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company).
Wierenga, Edward (1988) ‘Anselm on omnipresence’, New Scholasticism, 52, 3041.
Wierenga, Edward (1997) ‘Omnipresence’, in Quinn, Philip L. & Taliaferro, Charles (eds) A Companion to the Philosophy of Religion (Oxford: Blackwell), 286290.
Wierenga, Edward (2002) ‘Timelessness out of Mind: on the alleged incoherence of divine timelessness’, in Ganssle, Gregory E. & Woodruff, David M. (eds) God and Time: Essays on the Divine Nature (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 153164.
Yeo, Ray S. (2014) ‘Towards a model of indwelling: a conversation with Jonathan Edwards and William Alston’, Journal of Analytic Theology, 2, 210237.
Zagzebski, Linda (2008) ‘Omnisubjectivity’, in Kvanvig, Jonathan L. (ed.) Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion, I (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 231249.
Zagzebski, Linda (2013) Omnisubjectivity: A Defence of a Divine Attribute, The Aquinas Lecture, 2013 (Milwaukee: Marquette University Press).
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Religious Studies
  • ISSN: 0034-4125
  • EISSN: 1469-901X
  • URL: /core/journals/religious-studies
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed