Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 3
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    DURSTON, KIRK 2015. The incompatibility of God and gratuitous evil: implications for the termination of civilizations. Religious Studies, Vol. 51, Issue. 03, p. 411.

    McBrayer, Justin P. 2010. Skeptical Theism. Philosophy Compass, Vol. 5, Issue. 7, p. 611.

    Trakakis, Nick 2008. Theodicy: The Solution to the Problem of Evil, or Part of the Problem?. Sophia, Vol. 47, Issue. 2, p. 161.


Evil and the complexity of history: a response to Durston

  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 December 2003

Kirk Durston recently presented an argument aimed against evidential arguments from evil predicated on instances of suffering that appear to be gratuitous; ‘The consequential complexity of history and gratuitous evil’, Religious Studies, 36 (2000), 65–80. He begins with the notion that history consists of an intricate web of causal chains, so that a single event in one such chain may have countless unforeseen consequences. According to Durston, this consequential complexity exhibited by history negatively impacts on our grasp of the data necessary to determine whether or not an evil is gratuitous. He therefore concludes that our epistemic condition poses an insurmountable barrier towards the inference from inscrutability to pointlessness. By way of reply, I contend that Durston's argument is flawed in two significant respects, and thus the evidential argument emerges unscathed from his critique.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Religious Studies
  • ISSN: 0034-4125
  • EISSN: 1469-901X
  • URL: /core/journals/religious-studies
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *