Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 3
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Hao, Changchi 2011. Lao-Zhuang and Augustine on the issue of suspension in the philosophy of religion. Frontiers of Philosophy in China, Vol. 6, Issue. 1, p. 75.

    Smith, Suzanne 2011. Partial Transcendence, Religious Pluralism, and the Question of Love. Harvard Theological Review, Vol. 104, Issue. 01, p. 1.

    King, Nathan L. 2008. Religious Diversity and its Challenges to Religious Belief. Philosophy Compass, Vol. 3, Issue. 4, p. 830.


Exclusivism versus pluralism in religion: a response to Kevin Meeker

  • JOHN HICK (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 07 April 2006

I argue that Meeker is mistaken in two crucial respects. First, contrary to both myself and Plantinga, he treats exclusivism as a theory about the relation between the religions, and then claims that it is superior to the pluralist theory. But he does not say what his exclusivist theory is. Second, he bases his claim of a fundamental self-contradiction in my pluralist position on a view which I disavow, namely that altruism is the core of religion. He omits the central idea of a profound reorientation in response to the Real, of which altruism is a manifestation.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Religious Studies
  • ISSN: 0034-4125
  • EISSN: 1469-901X
  • URL: /core/journals/religious-studies
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *