^{page 477 note 1} See Francis, M., The Origins of the Spencerian Philosophy and the New Reformation, Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge, 1973.Google Scholar

^{page 477 note 2} See Spencer, H., First Principles, 5th edn., London and Edinburgh, 1887, p. xiii.Google Scholar

^{page 477 note 3} For a more detailed analysis see Fitzgerald, T., Philosophical Issues in Agnosticism Since Hume and Kant, Ph.D. thesis, London, 1983.Google Scholar

^{page 479 note 1} First Principles, p. 552.Google Scholar

^{page 479 note 2} Ibid. p. 160.

^{page 480 note 1} Ibid. p. 69.

^{page 480 note 2} Ibid. p. 69.

^{page 480 note 3} Ibid. p. 81.

^{page 480 note 4} Ibid. p. 81.

^{page 480 note 5} Ibid. p. 88.

^{page 480 note 6} Ibid. p. 88.

^{page 480 note 7} Ibid. p. 88.

^{page 480 note 8} Ibid. p. 99.

^{page 481 note 1} Ibid. p. 108.

^{page 481 note 2} Ibid. p. 110.

^{page 481 note 3} Ibid. p. 167.

^{page 481 note 4} See Spencer, H. and Harrison, F., The Nature and Reality of Religion: A Controversy, New York, 1885, p. 65.Google Scholar

^{page 481 note 5} First Principles, p. 133.

^{page 481 note 6} Ibid. p. 113.

^{page 482 note 1} Ibid. p. 552.

^{page 482 note 2} Ibid. pp. 111–13.

^{page 482 note 3} Ibid. p. 558.

^{page 482 note 4} Ibid. p. 20.

^{page 482 note 5} Ibid. p. 68, 103.

^{page 482 note 6} Ibid. p. 16/17.

^{page 483 note 1} Ibid. p. 43.

^{page 483 note 2}1 Ibid. p. 13.

^{page 483 note 3} Ibid. p. 13.

^{page 483 note 4} Ibid. pp. 41–5, 108/9.

^{page 484 note 1} See Spencer, H., ‘The Universal Postulate’, Westminster Review, IV (1853), 513–50;Google Scholar also see ‘Hamilton v Mill’, Fortnightly Review, 1, (1865), 531–50.

^{page 484 note 2} First Principles, pp. 47, 50–4, 68.

^{page 484 note 3} Ibid. pp. 50–4.

^{page 484 note 4} Ibid. p. 54.

^{page 484 note 5} Ibid. p. 167.

^{page 485 note 1} Ibid. p. 169.

^{page 485 note 2} See, for instance, p. 171.

^{page 485 note 3} Ibid. p. 171.

^{page 485 note 4} Ibid. p. 84.

^{page 485 note 5} Ibid. p. 179.

^{page 485 note 6} Spencer, H., ‘The Universal Postulate’, Westminster Review, IV (1853), 513–50.Google Scholar

^{page 486 note 1} See Fitzgerald, T., Philosophical Issues in Agnosticism since Hume and Kant, Ph.D. thesis, London, 1983, p. 269 passim.Google Scholar

^{page 486 note 2} First Principles, p. 541

^{page 486 note 3} Quoted in Greene, W. B., The Facts of Consciousness and the Philosophy of H. Spencer (Boston, 1871), p. 7.Google Scholar

^{page 486 note 4} Universal Postulate, p. 521.

^{page 486 note 5} First Principles, pp. 64/5.

^{page 487 note 1} Spencer, H., Principles of Psychology, vol. 1, 2nd edn. (London and Edinburgh, 1878), p. 98 passim.Google Scholar

^{page 487 note 2} Ibid. p. 129.

^{page 487 note 3} Ibid. p. 140.

^{page 487 note 4} Ibid. p. 98.

^{page 487 note 5} Ibid. p. 98.

^{page 488 note 1} This reading of Spencer is born out by his description of the complicated process of inference necessary to establish “the connection between nervous action and feeling”, Ibid. p. 100.

^{page 488 note 2} Ibid. p. 157.

^{page 488 note 3} Ibid. p. 399.

^{page 488 note 4} Ibid. pp. 400/1.

^{page 488 note 5} Ibid. pp. 402/3.

^{page 490 note 1} Ibid. p. 396.

^{page 491 note 1} First Principles, p. 559.