Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Hume on prophecy

  • PADDY JANE MCSHANE (a1)

Abstract

Hume claims that his argument against miracles applies ‘without any variation’ to prophecies. While Hume's argument against miracles has been thoroughly examined in the philosophical literature, his claim that this argument works against prophecies has been left relatively unexplored. In this article I examine Hume's conception of ‘prophecy’ and I argue that it is flawed. I also argue, however, that Hume's argument against miracles does indeed apply to prophecies, but only if we amend Hume's conception of ‘prophecy’. I articulate and defend such an amendment.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Beauchamp, Tom (1999) ‘Introduction’ to Hume, David, An Enquiry Human Understanding (New York: Oxford University Press).
Davison, Scott (2010) ‘Prophecy’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Summer 2010, Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2010/entries/prophecy/>.
Harrison, Peter (1999) ‘Early modern apologetics, and Hume's argument against miracles’, Journal of History of Ideas, 60, 241256.
Hume, David (1999) An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Beauchamp, Tom L. (ed.) (New York: Oxford University Press).
Spinoza, Baruch (1862) Tractatus Theologico-Politicus, Willis, Robert (tr.) (London: Trubner & Co.).
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Religious Studies
  • ISSN: 0034-4125
  • EISSN: 1469-901X
  • URL: /core/journals/religious-studies
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed