Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 1
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    MARMODORO, ANNA and HILL, JONATHAN 2010. Composition models of the incarnation: unity and unifying relations. Religious Studies, Vol. 46, Issue. 04, p. 469.


    ×

Inclusion and Incarnation: a reply to Sturch

  • TIM BAYNE (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0034412502006388
  • Published online: 01 March 2003
Abstract

I make three points in response to Richard Sturch's comments on my paper: I defend my interpretation of the Morris–Swinburne (M–S) account of the Incarnation; I argue that the M–S model appears to undercut the view that the unity of consciousness can be explained in terms of the self; and third, I argue that M–S model seems to entail that God has false beliefs.

Copyright
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Religious Studies
  • ISSN: 0034-4125
  • EISSN: 1469-901X
  • URL: /core/journals/religious-studies
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×