Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T22:18:38.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Love in dark times: Iris Murdoch on openness and the void

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2013

TONY MILLIGAN
TONY MILLIGAN*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB24 3UB, UK e-mail: t.milligan@abdn.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

After situating Iris Murdoch's promotion of openness to love within a broadly Platonic ethic, I outline a familiar suspicion about such openness in the context of grief, where the finding of a new and intimate love may seem inappropriate. By drawing upon her treatment of spiritual crisis and grief as parallel instances of the void, I respond to this suspicion by arguing that love in the context of spiritual crisis offers a way to resist the dangers of the void and that similar considerations apply in the parallel case (grief). If we accept Murdoch's overall position we will then lack justification for rejecting love as a morally defensible pathway out of grief.

Type
Articles
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 50 , Issue 1 , March 2014 , pp. 87 - 100
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Antonaccio, M. (2000) Picturing the Human: The Moral Thought of Iris Murdoch (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Altorf, M. (2007) Iris Murdoch and the Art of Imagining (London & New York: Continuum).Google Scholar
Benedict, (2006) Deus Caritas Est (San Francisco: St Ignatius Press).Google Scholar
Frankfurt, H. (2004) Reasons of Love (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Helm, B. (2010) Love, Friendship and the Self (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Jollimore, T. (2011) Love's Vision (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Kolodny, N. (2003) ‘Love as valuing a relationship’, The Philosophical Review, 112, 135–189.Google Scholar
Maio, E. A. (1973) St. John of the Cross: The Imagery of Eros (Madrid: Playor).Google Scholar
Milligan, T. (2010) ‘Suffering and contentment’, in Roberts, S. & Scott-Bowmann, A. (eds) Iris Murdoch's Moral Imaginations (Jefferson NC: McFarland), 168–189.Google Scholar
Milligan, T. (2011) Love (Durham: Acumen).Google Scholar
Milligan, T. (2013) ‘Valuing love and valuing the self’, Convivium, Revista de Filosofia [forthcoming].Google Scholar
Mulhall, S. (2006) ‘ “All the world must be religious”: Iris Murdoch's ontological arguments’, in Rowe, A. (ed.) Iris Murdoch: A Reassessment (London: Palgrave Macmillan), 23–34.Google Scholar
Murdoch, I. (1966) The Time of the Angels (London: Chatto & Windus).Google Scholar
Murdoch, I. (1980) Nuns and Soldiers (London: Chatto & Windus).Google Scholar
Murdoch, I. (1992) Metaphysics as a Guide to Morals (London: Chatto & Windus).Google Scholar
Murdoch, I. (1999) Existentialists and Mystics, Conradi, Peter (ed.) (London: Penguin).Google Scholar
Murdoch, I. (2001) The Sovereignty of Good (London & New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
Parfit, D. (1992) Reasons and Persons (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Slote, M. (1984) ‘Morality and self–other asymmetry’, The Journal of Philosophy, 81, 179–192.Google Scholar
Soskice, J. (1992) ‘Love and attention’, Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 32, 59–72.Google Scholar
Velleman, D. (1999) ‘Love as a moral emotion’, Ethics, 109, 338–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weil, S. (1951) Waiting on God (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Weil, S. (1963) Gravity and Grace (London: Routledge).Google Scholar