Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Luther's necessitarian argument in De servo arbitrio

  • ANDERS KRAAL (a1)

Abstract

In De servo arbitrio (1525) Luther famously argues that the divine attributes of will, power, foreknowledge, and immutability are incompatible with (human) free will, and hence that free will is a ‘name with no reality’. I survey some earlier explications of Luther's argument in the literature, and reject them as exegetically unsound. I then go on to propose a new explication. On the proposed explication, Luther's argument turns out to be theologically cogent, provided that we follow Luther in understanding the relevant divine attributes in accordance with Augustinian theology.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Aristotle, (1962) Prior Analytics, Tredennick, H. (tr. & ed.) (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press).
Augustine, (1963) The City of God against the Pagans, II, Green, W. (tr. & ed.) (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press).
Augustine, (1968a) The City of God against the Pagans, III, Wiesen, D. (tr. & ed.) (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press).
Augustine, (1968b) De trinitate, Mountain, W. J. (ed.) (Turnhout: Brepols).
Ayres, L. (2000) ‘The fundamental grammar of Augustine's trinitarian theology’, in Dodaro, R. & Lawless, G. (eds) Augustine and his Critics (London and New York: Routledge), 5176.
Bergmann, M., Moor, J., & Nelson, J. (2004) The Logic Book, 4th edn (New York: McGraw-Hill).
Boehner, P. (1950) Medieval Logic (Manchester: Manchester University Press).
Denzinger, H. (ed.) (1965) Enchiridion symbolorum definitionum et declarationum de rebus fidei et morum, 33rd edn (Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder).
Dinneen, F. (ed.) (1990) Peter of Spain: Language in Dispute: An English Translation of Peter of Spain's ‘Tractatus’ called afterwards SUMMULAE LOGICALES, based on the Critical Edition by de Rijk, L. M. (Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company).
Erasmus, (1969) De libero arbitrio diatribe sive collatio, Lesowsky, W. (ed.) (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft).
Frankfurt, H. (1969) ‘Alternate possibilities and moral responsibility’, The Journal of Philosophy, 66, 829839.
Kolb, R. (2005) Bound Choice, Election, and the Wittenberg Theological Method (Grand Rapids MI: Eerdmans).
Kraal, A. (2011) ‘Logic and divine simplicity’, Philosophy Compass, 6, 282294.
Kraal, A. (2013) ‘Free choice, determinism, and the re-evaluation of Luther in twentieth-century Swedish theology’, Studia Theologica, 67, 2842.
Kraal, A. (forthcoming) ‘Valla-style determinism and the intellectual background of Luther's De servo arbitrio’, Harvard Theological Review.
Lohse, B. (1999) Martin Luther's Theology: Its Historical and Systematic Development, Harrisville, R. A. (ed. & tr.) (Edinburgh: T&T Clark).
Luther, M. (1883–2009) D. Martin Luthers Werke: Kritische Gesammtausgabe, 121 vols (Weimar: Böhlau).
Luther, M. (2006) The Bondage of the Will, Packer, J. I. & Johnston, O. R. (trs & eds) (Grand Rapids MI: Revell).
McSorley, H. J. (1967) Luthers Lehre vom unfreien Willen nach seiner Hauptschrift ‘De servo arbitrio’ im Lichte der biblischen und kirchlichen Tradition (Munich: Hueber).
Oberman, H. (1981) Masters of the Reformation: The Emergence of a New Intellectual Climate in Europe, Martin, D. (tr.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Oberman, H. (1986) The Dawn of the Reformation: Essays in Late Medieval and Early Reformation Thought (Edinburgh: T&T Clark).
O'Daly, G. (1999) Augustine's City of God: A Reader's Guide (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
Portalié, E. (1960) A Guide to the Thought of Saint Augustine (London: Barnes & Oats).
Stayer, J. M. (2000) Martin Luther, German Saviour (Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press).
Tarski, A. (2002) ‘On the concept of following logically’, History and Philosophy of Logic, 23, 155196.
Trinkaus, C. (ed.) (1999) Collected Works of Erasmus, LXXVI (Toronto: University of Toronto Press).
Urban, L. (1971) ‘Was Luther a thoroughgoing determinist?’, Journal of Theological Studies, 22, 113139.
White, G. (1994) Luther as Nominalist: A Study of the Logical Methods used in Martin Luther's Disputations in the Light of their Medieval Background (Helsinki: Luther-Agricola-Society).
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Religious Studies
  • ISSN: 0034-4125
  • EISSN: 1469-901X
  • URL: /core/journals/religious-studies
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed