Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Radically insensitive theists

  • CAMERON DOMENICO KIRK-GIANNINI (a1)
Abstract

Sceptical theists attempt to meet the challenge to theism posed by evidential arguments from evil by appealing to the limitations of human cognition. Drawing on an exchange between William Rowe and Michael Bergmann, I argue that consistent sceptical theists must be radically insensitive to certain kinds of evidence about prima facie evils – that is, that they must endorse the claim that not even evidence of extreme and pervasive suffering could justify disbelief in theism. I show that Bergmann's attempt to respond to this problem does not succeed and argue that no alternative response is forthcoming, concluding that the threat of radical insensitivity constitutes a serious and underappreciated difficulty for sceptical theism.

Copyright
Corresponding author
e-mail: camerondomenico.kirkgiannini@rutgers.edu
References
Hide All
Almeida, Michael J. & Oppy, Graham (2003) ‘Sceptical theism and evidential arguments from evil’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 81, 496516.
Beaudoin, John (1998) ‘Evil, the human cognitive condition, and natural theology’, Religious Studies, 34, 403418.
Benton, Matthew A., Hawthorne, John, & Isaacs, Yoaav (2016) ‘Evil and evidence’, Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion, 7, 131.
Bergmann, Michael (2001) ‘Skeptical theism and Rowe's new evidential argument from evil’, Noûs, 35, 278296.
Bergmann, Michael (2009) ‘Skeptical theism and the problem of evil’, in Rea, Michael C. & Flint, Thomas P. (eds) Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Theology (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 374402.
Bergmann, Michael (2012) ‘Commonsense skeptical theism’, in Clark, Kelly James & Rea, Michael (eds) Reason, Metaphysics, and Mind: New Essays on the Philosophy of Alvin Plantinga (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 930.
Bostrom, Nick (2013) ‘Existential risk prevention as global priority’, Global Policy, 4, 1531.
Briggs, R. A. (2009) ‘Distorted reflection’, Philosophical Review, 118, 5985.
Gale, Richard M. (1996) ‘Some difficulties in theistic treatments of evil’, in Howard-Snyder, Daniel (ed.) The Evidential Argument from Evil (Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press), 206218.
Maitzen, Stephen (2014) ‘Agnosticism, skeptical theism, and moral obligation’, in Dougherty, Trent & McBrayer, Justin P. (eds) Skeptical Theism: New Essays (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 277292.
McBrayer, Justin P. (2010) ‘Skeptical theism’, Philosophy Compass, 5, 611623.
Rea, Michael C. (2013) ‘Skeptical theism and the “too much skepticism” objection’, in McBrayer, Justin P. & Howard-Snyder, Daniel (eds) The Blackwell Companion to the Problem of Evil (Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell), 482506.
Rowe, William L. (1988) ‘Evil and theodicy’, Philosophical Topics, 16.2, 119132.
Rowe, William L. (1991) ‘Ruminations about evil’, Philosophical Perspectives, 5, 6988.
Rowe, William L. (1996) ‘The evidential argument from evil: a second look’, in Howard-Snyder, Daniel (ed.) The Evidential Argument from Evil (Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press), 262285.
Rowe, William L. (2001) ‘Skeptical theism: a response to Bergmann’, Noûs, 35, 297303.
Russell, Bruce (1996) ‘Defenseless’, in Howard-Snyder, Daniel (ed.) The Evidential Argument from Evil (Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press), 193205.
Swinburne, Richard (1998) Providence and the Problem of Evil (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
van Fraassen, Bas C. (1984) ‘Belief and the will’, Journal of Philosophy, 81, 235256.
van Inwagen, Peter (1998) ‘Probability and evil’, in The Possibility of Resurrection and Other Essays in Christian Apologetics (Boulder CO: Westview Press), 6988.
Wielenberg, Erik J. (2010) ‘Sceptical theism and divine lies’, Religious Studies, 46, 509523.
Wielenberg, Erik J. (2014) ‘Divine deception’, in Dougherty, Trent & McBrayer, Justin P. (eds) Skeptical Theism: New Essays (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 236259.
Wilks, Ian (2009) ‘Skeptical theism and empirical unfalsifiability’, Faith and Philosophy, 26, 6476.
Williamson, Timothy (2000) Knowledge and its Limits (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Religious Studies
  • ISSN: 0034-4125
  • EISSN: 1469-901X
  • URL: /core/journals/religious-studies
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed