Skip to main content
×
×
Home

The relevance of Kant's objection to Anselm's ontological argument

  • CHRIS HEATHWOOD (a1)
Abstract

The most famous objection to the ontological argument is given in Kant's dictum that existence is not a real predicate. But it is not obvious how this slogan is supposed to relate to the ontological argument. Some, most notably Alvin Plantinga, have even judged Kant's dictum to be totally irrelevant to Anselm's version of the ontological argument. In this paper I argue, against Plantinga and others, that Kant's claim is indeed relevant to Anselm's argument, in the straightforward sense that if the claim is true, then Anselm's argument is unsound.

Copyright
Corresponding author
e-mail: heathwood@colorado.edu
References
Hide All
Adams, Robert Merrihew (1971) ‘The logical structure of Anselm's argument’, Philosophical Review, 80, 2854.
Anselm, (1903) Proslogium, Sidney Norton Deane (trans.), (Chicago IL: The Open Court Publishing Company).
Barnes, Jonathan (1972) The Ontological Argument (London: Macmillan).
Byrne, Peter (2007) Kant on God (Aldershot: Ashgate).
Davies, Brian (2004) ‘Anselm and the ontological argument’, in Davies, B. & Leftow, B. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Anselm (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 157178.
Everitt, Nicholas (1995) ‘Kant's discussion of the ontological argument’, Kant-Studien, 86, 385405.
Forgie, J. William (2008) ‘How is the question “Is existence a predicate?” relevant to the ontological argument?’, International Journal of the Philosophy of Religion, 64, 117133.
Harris, James Frankin (2002) Analytic Philosophy of Religion (Dordrecht: Kluwer).
Kant, I. (1929) Critique of Pure Reason, Norman Kemp Smith (trans.), (London: Macmillan).
Lewis, David (1970) ‘Anselm and actuality’, NoÛs, 4, 175188.
Lowe, E. J. (2007) ‘The ontological argument’, in Meister, C. & Copan, P. (ed.), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Religion (London: Routledge), 331340.
Lycan, William G. (2008) Philosophy of Language, 2nd edn (New York NY: Routledge).
Matthews, Gareth B. (2004) ‘The ontological argument’, in Mann, W. E. (ed.) Blackwell Guide to Philosophy of Religion (Malden MA: Blackwell), 81–102.
Millican, Peter (2004) ‘The one fatal flaw in Anselm's argument’, Mind, 113, 437476.
Oppenheimer, P. & Zalta, E. (1991) ‘On the logic of the ontological argument’, in Tomberlin, J. (ed.) Philosophical Perspectives 5: The Philosophy of Religion (Atascadero CA: Ridgeview), 509529.
Oppy, Graham (1995) Ontological Arguments and Belief in God (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Oppy, Graham (2009) ‘Ontological arguments’, in Edward, N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter 2009 edn, URL=<http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2009/entries/ontological-arguments/>.
Plantinga, Alvin (1966) ‘Kant's objection to the ontological argument’, The Journal of Philosophy, 63, 537546.
Plantinga, Alvin (1974a) God, Freedom, and Evil (Grand Rapids MI: Eerdmans Publishing Co.).
Plantinga, Alvin (1974b) The Nature of Necessity (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
Sobel, Jordan Howard (2004) Logic and Theism: Arguments For and Against Beliefs in God (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Van Cleve, James (1999) Problems from Kant (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Religious Studies
  • ISSN: 0034-4125
  • EISSN: 1469-901X
  • URL: /core/journals/religious-studies
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 31
Total number of PDF views: 103 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 376 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd May 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.