Skip to main content
×
Home

Stumbling on the threshold: a reply to Gwiazda on threshold obligations

  • JOHN DANAHER (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

Bayne and Nagasawa have argued that the properties traditionally attributed to God provide an insufficient grounding for the obligation to worship God. They do so partly because the same properties, when possessed in lesser quantities by human beings, do not give rise to similar obligations. In a recent paper, Jeremy Gwiazda challenges this line of argument. He does so because it neglects the possible existence of a threshold obligation to worship, i.e. an obligation that only kicks in when the value of a parameter has crossed a certain threshold. This article argues that there is a serious flaw in Gwiazda's proposal. Although thresholds may play an important part in how we think about our obligations, their function is distinct from that envisaged by Gwiazda. To be precise, this article argues that thresholds are only relevant to obligations to the extent that they transform a pre-existing imperfect obligation or act of supererogation into a perfect obligation. Since it is not clear that there is an imperfect obligation to worship any being, and indeed since on a certain conception of moral agency it is highly unlikely that there could be, the search for a rational basis for the obligation to worship must continue.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Aikin S. (2010) ‘The problem of worship’, Think, 25, 101113.
Bayne T. & Nagasawa Y. (2006) ‘The grounds of worship’, Religious Studies, 42, 299313.
Bayne T. & Nagasawa Y. (2007) ‘The grounds of worship again: a reply to Crowe’, Religious Studies, 43, 475480.
Beyleveld D. (1991) The Dialectical Necessity of Morality (Chicago IL: Chicago University Press).
Crowe B. (2007) ‘Reasons for worship: a response to Bayne and Nagasawa’, Religious Studies, 43, 465474.
Gwiazda J. (2010) ‘Worship and threshold obligations’, Religious Studies, Online First, doi:10.1017/S0034412510000508.
Oppy G. (2006) Arguing about Gods (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Rachels J. (1997) ‘God and moral autonomy’, in Rachels, Can Ethics Provide Answers? (Boulder CO: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers), 109123.
Rainbolt G. (2000) ‘Perfect and imperfect obligations’, Philosophical Studies, 98, 233256.
Sobel J. (2002) Logic and Theism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Religious Studies
  • ISSN: 0034-4125
  • EISSN: 1469-901X
  • URL: /core/journals/religious-studies
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 1
Total number of PDF views: 17 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 154 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.