Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Tough choices still

  • TOMIS KAPITAN (a1)

Abstract

Some argue that an omniprescient being cannot choose between mutually exclusive actions none of which is known to be uniquely reasonable. The view assumes that faced with such a choice one must believe each alternative to be epistemically possible, thereby precluding foreknowledge of what one will do. E. J. Coffman (2011) has challenged this assumption, but I argue that not only does he fail to undermine it, there are independent reasons why choice – and intentional agency generally – entails a presumption of epistemic possibility. The apparent incompatibility between omniprescience and intentional agency continues to pose a tough choice for theists.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Adolph, K. E. & Joh, A. (2009) ‘Multiple learning mechanism in the development of action’, in Woodward, A. & Needham, A. (eds) Learning and the Infant Mind (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 172207.
Adolph, K. E. & Robinson, S. R. (2015) ‘Motor development’, in Liben, L. & Muller, U. (eds) Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science, 7th edn., II (New York: Wiley), 114157.
Bratman, Michael (1987) Intentions, Plans, and Practical Reason (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press).
Brener, J. & Mitchell, S. (1989) ‘Changes in energy expenditure and work during response acquisition in rats’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 15, 166175.
Coffman, E. J. (2011) ‘Omniprescience and tough choices’, Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion, 3, 4154.
Hofsten, von C. (2007) ‘Action in development’, Developmental Science, 10, 5460.
Hofsten, von C. (2012) ‘Action in infancy: a foundation for cognitive development’, in Prinz, W. (ed.) Action Science: The emergence of a new discipline (Cambridge MA: MIT), 255279.
Kapitan, Tomis (1986), ‘Deliberation and the presumption of open alternatives’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 36, 230251.
Kapitan, Tomis (1989) ‘Doxastic freedom: a compatibilist alternative’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 26, 3142.
Kapitan, Tomis (1991) ‘Agency and omniscience’, Religious Studies, 27, 105120.
Kapitan, Tomis (1994) ‘The incompatibility of omniscience and intentional action’, Religious Studies, 30, 5566.
Kapitan, Tomis (1997) ‘Acting and the open future: a brief rejoinder to David Hunt’, Religious Studies, 33, 287292.
Mele, Alfred (2003) Motivation and Agency (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Preston, J. & Wegner, D. (2009) ‘Elbow grease: when action feels like work’, in Morsella, E., Bargh, J. A., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (eds) Oxford Handbook of Human Action (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 569586.
Vohs, K. D. (2010) ‘Free will is costly: precious volitional resources’, in Baumeister, R. F., Mele, A., & Vohs, K. D. (eds) Free Will and Consciousness: How Might They Work? (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 6681.
Ziph, George K. (1949) Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort: An Introduction to Human Ecology (Cambridge MA: Addison-Wesley Press).
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Religious Studies
  • ISSN: 0034-4125
  • EISSN: 1469-901X
  • URL: /core/journals/religious-studies
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed