Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Understanding omnipotence

  • KENNETH L. PEARCE (a1) and ALEXANDER R. PRUSS (a2)
Abstract
Abstract

An omnipotent being would be a being whose power was unlimited. The power of human beings is limited in two distinct ways: we are limited with respect to our freedom of will, and we are limited in our ability to execute what we have willed. These two distinct sources of limitation suggest a simple definition of omnipotence: an omnipotent being is one that has both perfect freedom of will and perfect efficacy of will. In this article we further explicate this definition and show that it escapes the standard objections to divine omnipotence.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Albritton Rogers (1985) ‘Freedom of will and freedom of action’, Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 59, 239251.
Aquinas St Thomas (1921) The Summa Theologica of St. Thomas Aquinas, Fathers of the English Dominican Province (tr.) (London: Burns Oates & Washbourne).
Austin J. L. (1961) ‘Ifs and cans’, in Austin , Philosophical Papers (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 205232.
Frankfurt Harry (1982) ‘The importance of what we care about’, Synthese, 53, 257272.
Geach P. T. (1973) ‘Omnipotence’, Philosophy, 48, 720.
Kane Robert (1996) The Significance of Free Will (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
La Croix Richard R. (1977) ‘The impossibility of defining “omnipotence”’, Philosophical Studies, 32, 181190.
Lewis David (2003) ‘Finkish dispositions’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 47, 143158.
Mann William E. (1977) ‘Ross on omnipotence’, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 8, 142147.
Martin C. B. (1994) ‘Dispositions and conditionals’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 44, 18.
Merricks Trenton (2003) Objects and Persons (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
Plantinga Alvin (1967) God and Other Minds: A Study of the Rational Justification of Belief in God (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press).
Ross James F. (1969) Philosophical Theology (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill).
Sobel Jordan Howard (2004) Logic and Theism: Arguments for and against Beliefs in God (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Watson Gary (2004) ‘Volitional necessities’, in Agency and Answerability: Selected Essays (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 88122.
Wielenberg Erik J. (2000) ‘Omnipotence again’, Faith and Philosophy, 17, 2647.
Wierenga Edward (1983) ‘Omnipotence defined’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 43, 363375.
Williams Bernard (1993) ‘Moral incapacity’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 93, 5970.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Religious Studies
  • ISSN: 0034-4125
  • EISSN: 1469-901X
  • URL: /core/journals/religious-studies
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 3
Total number of PDF views: 63 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 282 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 16th January 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.