Skip to main content

Understanding omnipotence


An omnipotent being would be a being whose power was unlimited. The power of human beings is limited in two distinct ways: we are limited with respect to our freedom of will, and we are limited in our ability to execute what we have willed. These two distinct sources of limitation suggest a simple definition of omnipotence: an omnipotent being is one that has both perfect freedom of will and perfect efficacy of will. In this article we further explicate this definition and show that it escapes the standard objections to divine omnipotence.

Hide All
Albritton, Rogers (1985) ‘Freedom of will and freedom of action’, Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 59, 239251.
Aquinas, St Thomas (1921) The Summa Theologica of St. Thomas Aquinas, Fathers of the English Dominican Province (tr.) (London: Burns Oates & Washbourne).
Austin, J. L. (1961) ‘Ifs and cans’, in Austin, , Philosophical Papers (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 205232.
Frankfurt, Harry (1982) ‘The importance of what we care about’, Synthese, 53, 257272.
Geach, P. T. (1973) ‘Omnipotence’, Philosophy, 48, 720.
Kane, Robert (1996) The Significance of Free Will (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
La Croix, Richard R. (1977) ‘The impossibility of defining “omnipotence”’, Philosophical Studies, 32, 181190.
Lewis, David (2003) ‘Finkish dispositions’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 47, 143158.
Mann, William E. (1977) ‘Ross on omnipotence’, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 8, 142147.
Martin, C. B. (1994) ‘Dispositions and conditionals’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 44, 18.
Merricks, Trenton (2003) Objects and Persons (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
Plantinga, Alvin (1967) God and Other Minds: A Study of the Rational Justification of Belief in God (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press).
Ross, James F. (1969) Philosophical Theology (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill).
Sobel, Jordan Howard (2004) Logic and Theism: Arguments for and against Beliefs in God (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Watson, Gary (2004) ‘Volitional necessities’, in Agency and Answerability: Selected Essays (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 88122.
Wielenberg, Erik J. (2000) ‘Omnipotence again’, Faith and Philosophy, 17, 2647.
Wierenga, Edward (1983) ‘Omnipotence defined’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 43, 363375.
Williams, Bernard (1993) ‘Moral incapacity’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 93, 5970.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Religious Studies
  • ISSN: 0034-4125
  • EISSN: 1469-901X
  • URL: /core/journals/religious-studies
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed