Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

A user's guide to design arguments

  • TRENT DOUGHERTY (a1) and TED POSTON (a2)

Abstract

We argue that there is a tension between two types of design arguments: the fine-tuning argument (FTA) and the biological design argument (BDA). The tension arises because the strength of each argument is inversely proportional to the value of a certain currently unknown probability. Since the value of that probability is currently unknown, we investigate the properties of the FTA and BDA on different hypothetical values of this probability. If our central claim is correct this suggests three results: (1) It is not very plausible that a cumulative case for theism include both the FTA and the BDA (with one possible qualification); (2) Self-organization scenarios do not threaten theism but in fact provide the materials for a good FTA; (3) A plausible design argument of one sort or another (either FTA or BDA) will be available for a wide variety of values of the key probability.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Collins, R. (1999) ‘A scientific argument for the existence of God: the fine-tuning design argument’, in Michael, Murray (ed.) Reason for the Hope Within (Grand Rapids MI: Eerdmans).
Hoffman, J. & Rosenkrantz, G. S. (2002) The Divine Attributes (Malden MA: Blackwell)
Juhl, C. (2006) ‘Fine-tuning is not surprising’, Analysis, 66, 269275.
Leslie, J. (1989) Universes (New York NY: Routledge).
Kauffman, S. (1993) The Origins of Order (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Kauffman, S. (1995) At Home in the Universe (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
McGrew, T., McGrew,, L. & Vestrup, E. (2001) ‘Probabilities and the fine-tuning argument: a sceptical view’, Mind, 110, 10271037.
Monton, B. (2006) ‘God, fine-tuning, and the problem of old evidence’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 57, 405424.
Plantinga, A. (1993) Warrant and Proper Function (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Poston, T. and Dougherty, T. (2007) ‘Divine hiddenness and the nature of belief’, Religious Studies, 43, 183198.
Richards, J. W. (2002) ‘Howard J. Van Till's “robust formational economy principle” as a critique of intelligent design theory’, Philosophia Christi, 4, 101112.
Sobel, J. H. (2004) Logic and Theism: Arguments for and Against the Existence of God (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Swinburne, R. (1991) The Existence of God, revd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Swinburne, R. (1994) The Christian God (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Swinburne, R. (2004) The Existence of God, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Swinburne, R. (2006) ‘Sobel on arguments from design’, Philosophia Christi, 8, 227234.
Van Till, H. J. (2002) ‘Is the creation's formational economy incomplete? A response to Jay Wesley Richards’, Philosophia Christi, 4, 113118.
Wierenga, E. (1989) The Nature of God (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press).

A user's guide to design arguments

  • TRENT DOUGHERTY (a1) and TED POSTON (a2)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed