Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-cf9d5c678-5tm97 Total loading time: 2.767 Render date: 2021-08-04T16:00:58.107Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Cover crop-based reduced tillage system influences Carabidae (Coleoptera) activity, diversity and trophic group during transition to organic production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2017

Ariel Rivers
Affiliation:
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Apdo Postal 6-641, 06600, Mexico, D.F., Mexico.
Christina Mullen
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Penn State University, 501 ASI, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA.
John Wallace
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, Penn State University, 102 Tyson Building, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA.
Mary Barbercheck
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Penn State University, 501 ASI, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA.
Corresponding
E-mail address:

Abstract

Organic grain growers rely on cultural practices and biological control to regulate pests, and the implementation and timing of cultural practices can affect many characteristics of the cropping system as a habitat for natural enemies of arthropod pests. Ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in particular are important insect and weed-seed predators, and are sensitive to crop rotations, tillage and environmental complexity. In a reduced tillage system in transition to organic management, we evaluated the effect of cover crop species and termination date, crop rotation and high residue cultivation on ground and tiger beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) activity-density, community composition and size and trophic groups. The 3-year experiment included a sequence of corn (Zea mays L.), soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) and winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). A mixture of hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth) and triticale (x Triticosecale Wittmack) preceded corn, and cereal rye (Secale cereale L.) preceded soybean, and each crop sequence was present in each year (full-entry). We compared three cover crop termination (and cash crop planting) dates by terminating the overwintered cover crops with a roller-crimper, and immediately or soon after, we no-till planted corn and soybean through the mat created by the rolled cover crops. In the corn and soybean phases of the rotation, we also compared inter-row cultivation as a pest management strategy to a control treatment (no inter-row cultivation in corn, and an alternative row-spacing in soybean). Wheat was planted on a single date in each year into tilled soil. Carabids were sampled using pitfall traps 2 weeks after termination of the two cover crop treatments, and in mid-June in wheat. Carabid activity-density and species richness increased across the experimental site during the 3-year transition, and community evenness across the experimental site increased by the third year. Crop species influenced carabid community composition, and by the third year, the carabid community was comparable between wheat and hairy vetch-triticale cover crop. The late cover crop termination date was positively associated with higher activity-densities of large carabids in rolled hairy vetch-triticale and rolled cereal rye; carnivorous beetles in rolled hairy vetch-triticale; and granivorous beetles in rolled cereal rye. Inter-row cultivation occurring in corn and soybean resulted in a significantly higher proportion of small beetles in the wheat phase of the rotation, with a significantly higher proportion of large beetles in wheat treatments, which had not received inter-row cultivation in corn and soybean. Results have strong implications for management during the transition to organic, including the importance of plant residue, reduced tillage and timing of cover crop termination dates for augmenting carabid populations.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bàrberi, P. 2002. Weed management in organic agriculture: Are we addressing the right issues? Weed Research 42:177193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bengtsson, J., Ahnström, J., and Weibull, A.C. 2005. The effects of organic agriculture on biodiversity and abundance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Ecology 42:261269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birkhofer, K., Wise, D.H., and Scheu, S. 2008. Subsidy from the detrital food web, but not microhabitat complexity, affects the role of generalist predators in an aboveground herbivore food web. Oikos 117:494500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blubaugh, C.K. and Kaplan, I. 2015. Tillage compromises weed seed predator activity across developmental stages. Biological Control 81:7682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohan, D.A., Caron-Lormier, G., Muggleton, S., Raybould, A., and Tamaddoni-Nezhad, A. 2011. Automated discovery of food webs from ecological data using logic-based machine learning. PLoS ONE 6:e29028.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bolker, B.M., Brooks, M.E., Clark, C.J., Geange, S.W., Poulsen, J.R., Stevens, M.H.H., and White, J.S. 2009. Generalized linear mixed models: A practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 24:127135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bond, W. and Grundy, A.C. 2001. Non-chemical weed management in organic farming systems. Weed Research 41:383405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borcard, D., Gillet, F., and Legendre, P. 2011. Numerical Ecology with R. Springer Science+Business Media, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosquet, Y. 2010. Illustrated Identification Guide to Adults and Larvae of Northeastern North America Ground Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Pensoft Publishers, Sofia, Bulgaria.Google Scholar
Carmona, D.M. and Landis, D.A. 1999. Influence of refuge habitats and cover crops on seasonal activity-density of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in field crops. Biological Control 28:11451153.Google Scholar
Clark, S., Szlavecz, K., Cavigelli, M.A., and Purrington, F. 2006. Ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) assemblages in organic, no-till, and chisel-till cropping systems in Maryland. Environmental Entomology 35:13041312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, L.J., McCracken, D.I., Dennis, P., Downie, I.S., Griffin, A.L., Foster, G.N., Murphy, K.J., and Waterhouse, T. 2002. Relationships between agricultural management and ecological groups of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) on Scottish farmland. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 93:323336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowder, D.W. and Jabbour, R. 2014. Relationships between biodiversity and biological control in agroecosystems: current status and future challenges. Biological Control 75:817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, A.S. 2010. Cover-crop roller–crimper contributes to weed management in no-till soybean. Weed Science 58:300309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, A.S., Renner, K.A., and Gross, K.L. 2005. Weed seedbank and community shifts in a long-term cropping systems experiment. Weed Science 53:296306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dearborn, R.G., Nelson, R.E., Donahue, C., Bell, R.T., and Webster, R.P. 2014. The ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) fauna of Maine, USA. Coleopterists Bulletin 68:441599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Cáceres, M. 2013. How to Use the Indicspecies Package (ver. 1.7.1). Centre Tecnològic Forestal de Catalunya, Solsona, Spain.Google Scholar
De Cáceres, M. and Legendre, P. 2009. Associations between species and groups of sites: Indices and statistical inference. Ecology 90:35663574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delate, K. and Cambardella, C.A. 2004. Agroecosystem performance during transition to certified organic grain production. Agronomy Journal 96:12881298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diehl, E., Wolters, V., and Birkhofer, K. 2012. Arable weeds in organically managed wheat fields foster carabid beetles by resource- and structure-mediated effects. Arthropod-Plant Interactions 6:7582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Döring, T.F. and Kromp, B. 2003. Which carabid species benefit from organic agriculture? A review of comparative studies in winter cereals from Germany and Switzerland. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 98:153161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dritschilo, W. and Wanner, D. 1980. Ground beetle abundance in organic and conventional cornfields. Environmental Entomology 9:629631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenhauer, N. and Reich, P.B. 2012. Above- and below-ground plant inputs both fuel soil food webs. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 45:156160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eyre, M.D., Luff, M.L., Atlihan, R., and Leifert, C. 2012. Ground beetle species (Carabidae, Coleoptera) activity and richness in relation to crop type, fertility management and crop protection in a farm management comparison trial. Annals of Applied Biology 161:169179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, S.D., Shrewsbury, P.M., and Denno, R.F. 2011. Plant versus prey resources: Influence on omnivore behavior and herbivore suppression. Biological Control 57:229235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gotelli, N.J. and Colwell, R.K. 2001. Quantifying biodiversity: Procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecology Letters 4:379391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gotelli, N.J. and Ellison, A.M. 2004. A Primer of Ecological Statistics. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar
Guy, A.G., Bohan, D.A., Powers, S.J., and Reynolds, A.M. 2008. Avoidance of conspecific odour by carabid beetles: A mechanism for the emergence of scale-free searching patterns. Animal Behaviour 76:585591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatten, T.D., Bosque-Pérez, N.A., Johnson-Maynard, J., and Eigenbrode, S.D. 2007. Tillage differentially affects the capture rate of pitfall traps for three species of carabid beetles. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 124:177187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heil, M. 2015. Extrafloral nectar at the plant-insect interface: A spotlight on chemical ecology, phenotypic plasticity, and food webs. Annual Review of Entomology 60:213232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holland, J.M. 2004. The environmental consequences of adopting conservation tillage in Europe: Reviewing the evidence. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 103:125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, J.M. and Reynolds, C.J.M. 2003. The impact of soil cultivation on arthropod (Coleoptera and Araneae) emergence on arable land. Pedobiologia 47:181191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ives, A.R. 2015. For testing the significance of regression coefficients, go ahead and log-transform count data. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 6:828835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keene, C.L. 2015. Agronomic performance of a reduced-tillage grain crop rotation during the transition to organic production. Doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park.Google Scholar
Kielty, J.P., Allen-Williams, L.J., Underwood, N., and Eastwood, E.A. 1996. Behavioral responses of three species of ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) to olfactory cues associated with prey and habitat. Journal of Insect Behavior 9:237250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kindt, R. and Coe, R. 2005. Tree Diversity Analysis, in A Manual and Software for Common Statistical Methods for Ecological and Biodiversity Studies. World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
Kutner, M.H., Nachtsheim, C.J., Neter, J., and Li, W. 2005. Applied Linear Stastical Models. 5th ed. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Lang, A.G. 2000. The pitfalls of pitfalls: A comparison of pitfall trap catches and absolute density estimates of epigeal invertebrate predators in arable land. Journal of Pest Science 73:99106.Google Scholar
Larochelle, A. and Larivière, M.C. 2003. A Natural History of the Ground-Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae of America North of Mexico. Pensoft Publishers, Sofia, Bulgaria.Google Scholar
Legendre, P. and Gallagher, E.D. 2001. Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data. Oecologia 129:271280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Letourneau, D.K. and Bothwell, S.G. 2008. Comparisons of organic and conventional farms: challenging ecologists to make biodiversity functional. Frontiers in Ecology and Environment 6:430438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundgren, J.G. 2009. Relationships of Natural Enemies and Non-prey Foods. Springer Science+Business Media, B.V.Google Scholar
Lundgren, J.G. and Fausti, S.W. 2015. Trading biodiversity for pest problems. Science Advances 1:e1500558. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1500558.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lundgren, J.G. and Fergen, J.K. 2011. Enhancing predation of a subterranean insect pest: A conservation benefit of winter vegetation in agroecosystems. Applied Soil Ecology 51:916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundgren, J.G., Shaw, J.T., Zaborski, E.R., and Eastman, C.E. 2006. The influence of organic transition systems on beneficial ground-dwelling arthropods and predation of insects and weed seeds. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 21:227237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathews, C.R., Bottrell, D.G., and Brown, M.W. 2004. Habitat manipulation of the apple orchard floor to increase ground-dwelling predators and predators of Cydia pomonella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Biological Control 30:265273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCune, B. and Grace, J.B. 2002. Analysis of Ecological Communities. 3rd ed. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, OR.Google Scholar
Menalled, F.D., Gross, K.L., and Hammond, M. 2001. Weed above ground and seedbank community responses to agricultural management systems. Ecological Applications 11:15861601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menalled, F.D., Smith, R.G., Dauer, J.T., and Fox, T.B. 2007. Impact of agricultural management on carabid communities and weed seed predation. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 118:4954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirsky, S.B., Curran, W.S., Mortensen, D.A., Ryan, M.R., and Shumway, D.L. 2009. Control of cereal rye with a roller/crimper as influenced by cover crop phenology. Agronomy Journal 101:15891596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirsky, S.B., Curran, W.S., Mortensen, D.A., Ryan, M.R., and Shumway, D.L. 2011. Timing of cover-crop management effects on weed suppression in no-till planted soybean using a roller-crimper. Weed Science 59:380389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirsky, S.B., Ryan, M.R., Curran, W.S., Teasdale, J.R., Maul, J., Spargo, J.T., Moyer, J., Grantham, A.M., Weber, D., Way, T.R., and Camargo, G.G. 2012. Conservation tillage issues: Cover crop-based organic rotational no-till grain production in the mid-Atlantic region, USA. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 27(1):3140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirsky, S.B., Ryan, M.R., Teasdale, J.R., Curran, W.S., Reberg-Horton, C.S., Spargo, J.T., Wells, M.S., Keene, C.L., and Moyer, J.W. 2013. Overcoming weed management challenges in cover crop—based organic rotational no-till soybean production in the eastern United States. Weed Technology 27:193203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mischler, R.A., Curran, W.S., Duiker, S.W., and Hyde, J.A. 2010a. Use of a rolled-rye cover crop for weed suppression in no-till soybeans. Weed Technology 24:253261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mischler, R.A., Duiker, S.W., Curran, W.S., and Wilson, D. 2010b. Hairy vetch management for no-till organic corn production. Agronomy Journal 102:355362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nafziger, E. 2009. Small grains and grain Sorghum. In Illinois Agronomy Handbook. 24th ed. University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Urbana, IL. p. 3747.Google Scholar
NOAA. 2014. 1981–2010 Normals. Retrieved 6 August 2015. Available at Web site http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cdo-web/datatools/normals.Google Scholar
Nord, E.A., Ryan, M.R., Curran, W.S., Mortensen, D.A., and Mirsky, S.B. 2012. Effects of management type and timing on weed suppression in soybean no-till planted into rolled-crimped cereal rye. Weed Science 60:624633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordby, D. 2004. Pocket Guide to Crop Development. University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Urbana, IL.Google Scholar
Oksanen, J., Blanchet, F.G., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., Minchin, P.R., O'Hara, R.B., Simpson, G.L., Solymos, P., Stevens, M.H.H., and Wagner, H. 2015. Vegan: Community Ecology Package. In R package version 2.2-1. Available at Web site http://cran.r-project.org/.Google Scholar
Pfiffner, L. and Niggli, U. 1996. Effects of bio-dynamic, organic and conventional farming on ground beetles (Col. Carabidae) and other epigaeic arthropods in winter wheat. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture: an International Journal for Sustainable Production Systems 12:353364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purtauf, T., Roschewitz, I., Dauber, J., Thies, C., Tscharntke, T., and Wolters, V. 2005. Landscape context of organic and conventional farms: Influences on carabid beetle diversity. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 108:165174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team. 2013. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at Web site http://www.r-project.org.Google ScholarPubMed
Renkema, J.M., Lynch, D.H., Cutler, G.C., Mackenzie, K., and Walde, S.J. 2012. Ground and rove beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae and Staphylinidae) are affected by mulches and weeds in highbush blueberries. Environmental Entomology 41:10971106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russon, H. and Woltz, J.M. 2014. Movement patterns of Carabid beetles between heterogenous crop and noncrop habitats. Great Lakes Entomologist 47:186202.Google Scholar
Ryan, M.R., Mortensen, D.A., Bastiaans, L., Teasdale, J.R.; Mirsky, S.B.; Curran, W.S.; Seidel, R., Wilson, D.O., and Hepperly, P.R. 2010. Elucidating the apparent maize tolerance to weed competition in long-term organically managed systems. Weed Research 50:2536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabais, A.C.W., Scheu, S., and Eisenhauer, N. 2011. Plant species richness drives the density and diversity of Collembola in temperate grassland. Acta Oecologica 37:195202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute. 2014. PROC MIXED, SAS Software. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Shearin, A.F., Chris Reberg-Horton, S., and Gallandt, E.R. 2008. Cover crop effects on the activity-density of the weed seed predator Harpalus rufipes (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Weed Science 56:442450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R.G., Barbercheck, M.E., Mortensen, D.A., Hyde, J., and Hulting, A.G. 2011. Yield and net returns during the transition to organic feed grain production. Agronomy Journal 103:5159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soil Survey Staff. 2014. Web Soil Survey. Retrieved 4 May 2015. Available at Web site http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/.Google Scholar
Szysko, J., Vermeulen, H.J.W., Klimaszewski, K., Abs, M., and Schwerk, A. 2000. Mean individual biomass (MIB) of ground beetles as an indicator of the state of the environment. In Brandmayr, P., Lövei, G.L., Brandmayr, T.Z., Casele, A., and Taglianti, A.V. (eds). Natural History and Applied Ecology of Carabid Beetles. Pensoft Publishers, Sofia, Bulgaria. p. 289294.Google Scholar
Thorbek, P. and Bilde, T. 2004. Reduced numbers of generalist arthropod predators after crop management. Journal of Applied Ecology 41:526538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
USDA, N. O. P. 2015. §205.206 Crop pest, weed, and disease management practice standard. Retrieved 4 May 2015. Available at Web site http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/retrieveECFR?gp=&SID=96caaa0e14f2bf216f65a869c36a872d&mc=true&n=pt7.3.205&r=PART&ty=HTML.Google Scholar
USGS. 2014. The National Map Viewer. Retrieved 6 August 2015. Available at Web site http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/.Google Scholar
van den Brink, P.J. and ter Braak, C.J.F. 1999. Principal response curves: Analysis of time-dependent multivariate responses of biological community to stress. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 18:138148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, M.J., Ryan, M.R., Curran, W.S., Barbercheck, M.E., and Mortensen, D.A. 2011. Cover crops and disturbance influence activity-density of weed seed predators Amara aenea and Harpalus pensylvanicus (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Weed Science 59:7681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weeks, R.D.J. and McIntyre, N.E. 1997. A comparison of live versus kill pitfall trapping techniques using various killing agents. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 82:267273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Rivers supplementary material

Tables S1-S2 and Figures S1-S2

Download Rivers supplementary material(File)
File 201 KB
19
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Cover crop-based reduced tillage system influences Carabidae (Coleoptera) activity, diversity and trophic group during transition to organic production
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Cover crop-based reduced tillage system influences Carabidae (Coleoptera) activity, diversity and trophic group during transition to organic production
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Cover crop-based reduced tillage system influences Carabidae (Coleoptera) activity, diversity and trophic group during transition to organic production
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *